Iran before Jimmy Carter:

It was the terrorist regime that overthrew the shah of Iran, not President Jimmy Carter

I’m at a loss at how Carter is taking all the heat for the Islamic Revolution. Blame your own people.

💯 Trump, the backbone of America. 💪 Getting this country back in shape. ⚡ Shirts that hit like lightning:

The revisionist history on Jimmy Carter’s presidency today is off. He was a decent person but not a good President. We all have flaws but he left the country worse off than when he took power.

before and after

Iran before Carter:

Carter was a puppet like the rest of the presidents have been with the exception of Reagan and Trump.

Here is the reason why Jimmy Carter betrayed The Shah and removed him from power and installed the Satanic Ayatollah in Iran. 1. The Oil Consortium Agreement (1954) •After Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh was overthrown in 1953, the Shah restored Western access to Iranian oil. A consortium of major oil companies—primarily British and American—was established to control Iranian oil production and profits. These companies included British Petroleum (BP), Standard Oil (later Exxon and Mobil), and other Western firms. •Under the agreement, Western companies retained significant control over Iranian oil production and revenues. Iran received only a portion of the profits, a situation that bred resentment over time. 2. Shah’s Push for Greater Control •By the 1970s, the Shah sought to renegotiate terms to give Iran more control over its oil resources and a larger share of the revenues. This aligned with the broader wave of resource nationalism among oil-producing nations, particularly within OPEC (Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries). •In 1973, the Shah negotiated a new agreement that significantly increased Iran’s share of oil revenues and granted the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC) greater control over production and operations. This diminished the direct control of the Western oil consortium. 3. Refusal to Renew Agreements •As the 1979 expiration date of the consortium agreement approached, the Shah made it clear he would not renew the deal under its previous terms. Instead, he aimed to assert full Iranian control over its oil industry, effectively sidelining Western oil companies. •The Shah’s policies coincided with the 1973 oil crisis, when OPEC members used oil as a geopolitical weapon, significantly increasing oil prices. Western nations, particularly the U.S. and U.K., viewed the Shah’s refusal to maintain the status quo as a threat to their energy security and economic stability. 4. Impact on U.S. and U.K. Relations •The Shah’s assertiveness in oil negotiations strained relations with the U.S. and U.K., which had long relied on Iranian oil and favorable terms. These tensions were compounded by Iran’s rapid modernization and military expansion, financed by soaring oil revenues, which created unease about the Shah’s ambitions. •While the U.S. still considered the Shah a key ally, there was growing frustration with his independent stance and his resistance to renewing agreements that prioritized Western interests. 5. Aftermath •The Shah’s policies helped Iran gain greater control of its oil wealth but alienated its Western allies. This strained relationship likely contributed to the lack of strong U.S. support during the Iranian Revolution in 1979, when the Shah was overthrown. •After the revolution, Ayatollah Khomeini fully nationalized Iran’s oil industry, severing the consortium’s influence permanently. In summary, the Shah’s refusal to renew oil agreements under Western-favorable terms symbolized Iran’s growing assertion of sovereignty but also created tensions with the U.S. and U.K., who saw this as a challenge to their strategic and economic interests.

Yeah don’t blame Khomeni - blame a great American right after he dies. Awesome take