Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Iran isn’t collapsing because of protests. It’s collapsing because soldiers can’t feed their families. If you think this can’t happen in America, you’re not paying attention. We either build civic leadership now, or we wait for chaos later. There is no third option. 👉 17 January 2026 #WakeUp #TakeAmericaBack...

26,122 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Bill Maher: “You need to hear that other side. You need to be checked. People need to be checked. Including your little girl.” David Cross: “F*ck that b*tch. F*ck that little b*tch with her black friends and tr*ns friends and not even understanding.” Bill Maher: “Tr*ns? Wait, [your daughter] has tr*ns friends in third grade?” David Cross: “Yeah.” Bill Maher: “They know they’re tr*ns in third grade?” David Cross: “I think just turned 9 [years-old]… Just the coolest kid.” Bill Maher: “[Is the child transitioning from] girl to boy?” David Cross: “Girl to boy. And she has another very close friend who’s not in the school, but who’s boy to girl at 3 years old.” Bill Maher: “A woman said, ‘I was what they called a tomboy. If I was alive now and acted the way I did then, that’s what they would have done to me.’” David Cross: “Well, nobody’s doing this to her.” Bill Maher: “Well, I don’t know.” David Cross: “Literally nobody is doing this to her.” Bill Maher: “How old?” David Cross: “Either 8 or I think 9.” Bill Maher: “Okay, then somebody is doing something because 8 or 9-year-olds can’t do anything on their own.” David Cross: “No, they’re buying them boys' clothes.” Bill Maher: “Well then, they’re doing something.” David Cross: “Sure. Yes, you’re right. They’re buying them boys' clothes.” Bill Maher: “And telling them you’re a boy now.” David Cross: “No, no, they’re not telling them. They’re just agreeing with [the child].” Bill Maher: “Agreeing with an 8-year-old. Because when has their judgment ever been off at 8?” David Cross: “You knew you weren’t g*y, right?… It’s not different.” Bill Maher: “It is different. Good luck with President Vance. Because, as I always say to my woke friends, we voted for the same person. You’re just why [Kamala Harris] lost and this is a case of that.” David Cross: “Wait, what?” Bill Maher: “We voted for the same person. You’re just why she lost. Because America hears this, and they’re going to go, ‘Bill’s right. 8-year-olds can’t really make decisions on their own like this.’ That’s what most people are going to say.” “This is why we’re going to vote for JD Vance... That’s America in a nutshell.”

RedWave Press

1,173,942 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Billionaire drops some very concerning news about America’s ability to arm Ukraine. Once Joe Rogan heard this, he was in full agreement with Palmer Luckey that there’s a serious problem. “That’s crazy,” he said. Luckey revealed: “We can’t even give [Ukraine] what they’re asking for, even if we want to give it to them, because we DON’T HAVE enough to even cover ourselves.” “We can’t just give them all of our Patriot missiles. We can’t give them even purely defensive tools to protect their capital because we don’t make enough of them. We don’t have enough of them. They’re too expensive. That’s crazy to me,” Luckey lamented. He then proposed an idea with a memorable ring to it that might get a lot of American citizens on board: “So I think the best way for the United States to contribute to world stability, again, STOP being the world police, START being the world gun store, and get serious about it. “Instead of saying, ‘Well, it’s okay that we kind of are a crappy gun store because we’re gonna come and save your ass when shit hits the fan,’ we need to say, ‘No, no, no. We’re gonna give everything you need to fight for your own freedom. Look, you’re our friend. You’re our ally. We’ll give you everything you need. We’ll give you support. We’ll give you intelligence. But we’re not gonna fight your wars for you.’ “Because I don’t think the American people have it in us to go do another two decades of adventures in the Middle East or adventures in Europe or adventures in Asia. We don’t have it in us.”

Vigilant Fox 🦊

328,759 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

🚨🇮🇷 PBD INTERVIEW: WILL TRUMP STRIKE IRAN? WILL THE REGIME FALL? Patrick Bet-David’s family fled Iran when he was a child. He’s been an avid supporter of the previous Shah, and a critic of the current regime However he has reservations of opposition leader Reza Pahlavi, and worries any U.S. strikes on the country could destabilize the region He rightly points out that the real challenge comes after the regime falls. Rebuilding Iran will be brutal, messy, and unforgiving, but avoiding it isn’t an option either. We get into: * Why negotiations with Khamenei’s leadership are a dead end * What a post-regime Iran would realistically look like * How the U.S. could influence outcomes without owning another war * And why the hardest part of Iran’s future starts after the fighting stops 03:03 - Regime's delay tactics: drag out negotiations one more day until the world moves on 04:32 - Prince Reza Pahlavi finally playing offense, meeting key US politicians 05:44 - Criticism of Reza sparks cult-like backlash 07:09 - Trump knows leadership: it’s not about doing everything right, it’s about being strong 08:42 - Trump avoids war but won’t let himself be publicly humiliated 10:18 - Iran isn’t just a threat to Israel 11:45 - Trust Trump’s instincts, even if not every move is perfect 13:02 - Don’t waste time taking out Khamenei 14:27 - 47 years of brainwashing won’t vanish overnight 15:59 - The hate for the Pahlavi name runs deep in Iran 17:23 - Reza can’t rely on foreign generals 18:51 - Why the West once felt safe holding a historic summit in Iran 20:17 - Regime’s brutality started day one 21:46 - Iran needs a strong hand and realism 23:12 - Civil war in Iran could happen regardless of U.S. action 24:34 - Sanctions are the regime’s fault because of their failed diplomacy 26:08 - Iranians are suffering not because of sanctions, but because of corrupt leadership 27:33 - Reza Pahlavi burned too many bridges 29:01 - Mossad is absolutely involved in Iran Patrick Bet-David

Mario Nawfal

2,028,627 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

.Naval: You define wealth in a beautiful way. You talk about wealth as a set of physical transformations that we can affect. So as a society it becomes very clear that knowledge leads directly to wealth creation for everybody. A given individual can obviously affect physical transformations proportional to the resources available to them—but much more proportional to the knowledge available to them. Knowledge is a huge force multiplier. You then define resources as the thing that you combine with knowledge to create wealth. New knowledge allows you to use new things as resources and discard old things that maybe we’re running out of. There are lots of examples of how we’ve done that in the past. For example, in energy we’ve gone from wood to coal to oil to nuclear. But then people say, “Now we’re out of ideas. Now we’re caught up. Now we’re done. There aren’t going to be new ideas, and now we have to freeze the frame and conserve what we have.” The counter to that is, “No, we’ll create new knowledge and have new resources. Don’t worry about the old ones.” Well they say, “If you’re going to have new resources, if you can’t think of them now, it’s not real.” This now gets into the realm of people demanding that if you’re going to claim that new knowledge will be created, you have to name that knowledge now. Otherwise it’s not real. But that seems like a Catch-22. David Deutsch: It does, and it’s a bad argument. I don’t want to claim that the knowledge will be created. We’re fallible; we may not create it. We may destroy ourselves. We may miss the solution that’s right under our nose, so that when the snailiens come from another galaxy and look at us, they’ll say, “How can it possibly be that they failed to do so-and-so when it was right in front of them?” That could happen. I can’t prove or argue that it won’t happen. What I always argue, though, is that we have what it takes. We have everything that it takes to achieve that. If we don’t, it’ll be because of bad choices we have made, not because of constraints imposed on us by the planet or the solar system. Naval: It will be by anti-rational memes that restrict the creation of knowledge and the growth of knowledge. David Deutsch: Maybe. Or maybe it’ll be by well-intentioned errors, which nobody could see why they were errors. Again, it doesn’t take malevolence to make mistakes. Mistakes are the normal condition of humans. All we can do is try to find them. Maybe not destroying the means of correcting errors is the heart of morality; because if there is no way of correcting errors, then sooner or later one of those will get us. Naval: Don’t destroy the means of error correction is the base of morality. I love that. I think about places like North Korea where you can’t have elections and a revolution is very difficult because the gang in charge is armed to the teeth and they’ve destroyed the means of political error correction for a long time. That is a case where humanity is trapped in a local minimum, and it’s very hard to climb out of that hole. If too much of the world falls into that mindset, then we as a species may just stagnate because we’ve lost our biggest advantage. We’ve lost our biggest discovery, which was the ability to make new discoveries.

Deutsch Explains

143,913 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce