Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Iran isn’t interested in a ceasefire because Tehran believes any pause without a structural solution guarantees the next attack later. And what does “structural solution” mean from Iran’s point of view? Two things: First, deterrence restored. Not only for Iran, but including Hezbollah in the equation this time, so...

KevorkAlmassian's profile picture

Kevork Almassian

177,968 subscribers

122,127 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

In an interview with Al Mayadeen, Professor Mohammad Marandi described the war on Iran as a major miscalculation by the United States, arguing that Iran sees no benefit in a ceasefire at this stage. According to Marandi, Tehran believes that only sustained pressure will deter future attacks, warning that a ceasefire would give Washington and its allies time to regroup and strike again. Marandi also highlighted the broader consequences of the conflict, including rising energy prices and increasing international pressure on Washington. Seyed Mohammad Marandi #Iran #Tehran #UnitedStates #WarOnIran #Europe #Gulf #AlMayadeen
2:37

In an interview with Al Mayadeen, Professor Mohammad Marandi described the war on Iran as a major miscalculation by the United States, arguing that Iran sees no benefit in a ceasefire at this stage. According to Marandi, Tehran believes that only sustained pressure will deter future attacks, warning that a ceasefire would give Washington and its allies time to regroup and strike again. Marandi also highlighted the broader consequences of the conflict, including rising energy prices and increasing international pressure on Washington. Seyed Mohammad Marandi #Iran #Tehran #UnitedStates #WarOnIran #Europe #Gulf #AlMayadeen

Al Mayadeen English

24,929 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🇮🇷🇮🇱 What just changed tonight? This is the first time Iran has struck Israel in response to an Israeli strike on a 3rd country. Not Iran itself, but Lebanon. The significance is structural. Iran's deterrence used to mean: strike Iran and Iran strikes back. Tonight it expanded to: strike Lebanon and Iran strikes back. That's a fundamentally different equation. One that extends Iranian hard power as a check on Israeli military action across the entire region, not just over Iranian territory. For decades Israel has operated with near-impunity because no regional power had both the capability and willingness to impose real costs on its military actions abroad. If that equation has genuinely shifted, every conflict in the region, including Palestine, has a new variable in it that wasn't there yesterday. If you still thought Israel is calling the shots think again. Source: Trita Parsi on Substack / Writer: Oliver
1:28

🇮🇷🇮🇱 What just changed tonight? This is the first time Iran has struck Israel in response to an Israeli strike on a 3rd country. Not Iran itself, but Lebanon. The significance is structural. Iran's deterrence used to mean: strike Iran and Iran strikes back. Tonight it expanded to: strike Lebanon and Iran strikes back. That's a fundamentally different equation. One that extends Iranian hard power as a check on Israeli military action across the entire region, not just over Iranian territory. For decades Israel has operated with near-impunity because no regional power had both the capability and willingness to impose real costs on its military actions abroad. If that equation has genuinely shifted, every conflict in the region, including Palestine, has a new variable in it that wasn't there yesterday. If you still thought Israel is calling the shots think again. Source: Trita Parsi on Substack / Writer: Oliver

Mario Nawfal

1,132,176 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

“#Iran doesn’t want any kind of ceasefire or pause because it believes that it would be used by the U.S and Israel to rearm, regroup, and attack them again. Therefore, they are seeking some sort of comprehensive solution, which is not possible to achieve in the next few hours. The most likely scenario, unfortunately, is escalation.”- Ali Vaez speaks to Rajdeep Sardesai #WestAsiaWar #NewsToday
2:58

“#Iran doesn’t want any kind of ceasefire or pause because it believes that it would be used by the U.S and Israel to rearm, regroup, and attack them again. Therefore, they are seeking some sort of comprehensive solution, which is not possible to achieve in the next few hours. The most likely scenario, unfortunately, is escalation.”- Ali Vaez speaks to Rajdeep Sardesai #WestAsiaWar #NewsToday

IndiaToday

41,522 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🚨🇷🇺 IRAN’S DEMANDS: SECURITY GUARANTEES Alex Christoforou notes that Iran is now making the same demands as Russia: a definitive end to NATO expansion and regional interference. They are not looking for a temporary ceasefire or a "pause," they want a permanent solution to ensure their security. Without these guarantees, the region remains on the path toward nuclear proliferation. Alex Christoforou
3:44

🚨🇷🇺 IRAN’S DEMANDS: SECURITY GUARANTEES Alex Christoforou notes that Iran is now making the same demands as Russia: a definitive end to NATO expansion and regional interference. They are not looking for a temporary ceasefire or a "pause," they want a permanent solution to ensure their security. Without these guarantees, the region remains on the path toward nuclear proliferation. Alex Christoforou

Mario Nawfal

50,290 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🇮🇷 Iran Has Attacked NO Country in the Region, Baghaei Says Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei stressed that Iran has struck no regional state, while drawing a hard line on those that let the U.S. use their soil against Tehran. "The defensive strikes of the Islamic Republic of Iran are solely against the bases, facilities, and positions that America uses to attack Iran, including their logistical and support capabilities." Iran will DEFEND ITSELF: "Any area, any part of any country that is used for aggression against the Islamic Republic of Iran will naturally be subject to Iran's defensive measures."
1:56

🇮🇷 Iran Has Attacked NO Country in the Region, Baghaei Says Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei stressed that Iran has struck no regional state, while drawing a hard line on those that let the U.S. use their soil against Tehran. "The defensive strikes of the Islamic Republic of Iran are solely against the bases, facilities, and positions that America uses to attack Iran, including their logistical and support capabilities." Iran will DEFEND ITSELF: "Any area, any part of any country that is used for aggression against the Islamic Republic of Iran will naturally be subject to Iran's defensive measures."

Ryan Rozbiani

15,865 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🇺🇸🇮🇷 IRAN DOESN’T SEE NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE U.S. AS A SOLUTION Iranian professor Nima Rostami says Iran is not interested in stopping this war through negotiations or temporary deals. He argues the country sees a ceasefire as useless if it only leads to future attacks, pushing Iran to continue fighting instead of pausing. It would mean Iran is prepared to sustain the war long-term, relying on years of preparation, internal resilience, and the belief it can outlast its opponents. "Iran has been preparing for this war for more than 26 years. Less than 10% of their capabilities have been affected, they can continue this war comfortably.”
7:22

🇺🇸🇮🇷 IRAN DOESN’T SEE NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE U.S. AS A SOLUTION Iranian professor Nima Rostami says Iran is not interested in stopping this war through negotiations or temporary deals. He argues the country sees a ceasefire as useless if it only leads to future attacks, pushing Iran to continue fighting instead of pausing. It would mean Iran is prepared to sustain the war long-term, relying on years of preparation, internal resilience, and the belief it can outlast its opponents. "Iran has been preparing for this war for more than 26 years. Less than 10% of their capabilities have been affected, they can continue this war comfortably.”

Mario Nawfal

100,044 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

🇺🇸🇮🇷 FMR CIA OFFICER: IRAN IS READY FOR THE NEXT WAR Former CIA officer Larry Johnson says the world missed the point of what just happened in Iran. The protests? Just the smoke. The fire? A full-blown CIA-Mossad-MI6 operation to crash the Iranian economy, spark unrest, and prep for war. He says the regime didn’t fall, but the U.S. and Israel are adamant to destroy it militarily. But here’s the twist: Unlike the 12-day war, this time Iran’s not alone. Russia and China are backing Tehran, and if Trump orders a strike, Larry warns it won’t be like Iraq: it’ll be bloodier, bigger, and global.
59:11

🇺🇸🇮🇷 FMR CIA OFFICER: IRAN IS READY FOR THE NEXT WAR Former CIA officer Larry Johnson says the world missed the point of what just happened in Iran. The protests? Just the smoke. The fire? A full-blown CIA-Mossad-MI6 operation to crash the Iranian economy, spark unrest, and prep for war. He says the regime didn’t fall, but the U.S. and Israel are adamant to destroy it militarily. But here’s the twist: Unlike the 12-day war, this time Iran’s not alone. Russia and China are backing Tehran, and if Trump orders a strike, Larry warns it won’t be like Iraq: it’ll be bloodier, bigger, and global.

Mario Nawfal

2,413,772 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

🇮🇷 IRAN: IS SURVIVAL VICTORY? Iran is making demands as if it won the war. From a Western perspective, that sounds delusional. But Tehran is using a different scorecard. For the Iranian regime, survival itself is victory. As long as it remains in power—and can use the Strait of Hormuz as leverage—it believes it can keep making demands. Gedaliah Blum 🇮🇱 explains why the West and Iran are measuring “victory” very differently.
5:27

🇮🇷 IRAN: IS SURVIVAL VICTORY? Iran is making demands as if it won the war. From a Western perspective, that sounds delusional. But Tehran is using a different scorecard. For the Iranian regime, survival itself is victory. As long as it remains in power—and can use the Strait of Hormuz as leverage—it believes it can keep making demands. Gedaliah Blum 🇮🇱 explains why the West and Iran are measuring “victory” very differently.

Mossad Commentary

43,947 görüntüleme • 4 gün önce

China is being dragged into the Iran deal, and it’s not accidental. Here is why Iran wants China to take credit for the ceasefire. Oil crashed. Markets surged. And suddenly China’s name is everywhere in the Iran ceasefire story. But here’s the twist: Beijing hasn’t confirmed anything. So why is Iran pushing the narrative that China helped broker the deal? In this video, I break down what really happened on April 8, how Trump turned this into three strategic wins, and why Iran may be trying to pull China into the negotiation game.
10:10

China is being dragged into the Iran deal, and it’s not accidental. Here is why Iran wants China to take credit for the ceasefire. Oil crashed. Markets surged. And suddenly China’s name is everywhere in the Iran ceasefire story. But here’s the twist: Beijing hasn’t confirmed anything. So why is Iran pushing the narrative that China helped broker the deal? In this video, I break down what really happened on April 8, how Trump turned this into three strategic wins, and why Iran may be trying to pull China into the negotiation game.

Ken Cao-The China Crash Chronicle

28,621 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

💢 Jeremy Scahill says the U.S. and Israel have fundamentally misread Iran and Hezbollah, failing to grasp that they see this as an existential war, “one of the defining moments in a multi-millennia history… on the precipice of history swaying in one direction or another.” He says Tehran believes any capitulation on core demands would destroy deterrence across the region and make the past three years of war for nothing, which is why Iran is insisting any deal apply across all fronts, especially Lebanon, where Israel’s scorched-earth war continues.
7:01

💢 Jeremy Scahill says the U.S. and Israel have fundamentally misread Iran and Hezbollah, failing to grasp that they see this as an existential war, “one of the defining moments in a multi-millennia history… on the precipice of history swaying in one direction or another.” He says Tehran believes any capitulation on core demands would destroy deterrence across the region and make the past three years of war for nothing, which is why Iran is insisting any deal apply across all fronts, especially Lebanon, where Israel’s scorched-earth war continues.

Drop Site

27,812 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Told CNN that there is a sigh of relief in Iran and across the region including here in Doha after the ceasefire. Iran was the underdog in this war but put up a big fight against two super powers and was able to force some of its conditions. Thank you Becky Anderson
7:22

Told CNN that there is a sigh of relief in Iran and across the region including here in Doha after the ceasefire. Iran was the underdog in this war but put up a big fight against two super powers and was able to force some of its conditions. Thank you Becky Anderson

Negar Mortazavi نگار مرتضوی

25,367 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

IRAN THREATENS U.S.: “WE ARE PREPARED FOR WAR” Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf warned the United States that Tehran is prepared to return to war if Washington does not implement what was discussed in recent understandings. Ghalibaf said Iran views violations of the agreement or ceasefire arrangements as a breach that will require a response. He pointed to recent strikes on U.S. bases in Bahrain and Kuwait as part of Iran’s message: “We are in negotiations, but if they do not want to implement what was discussed, we are prepared for war.” He added that Iran is following the situation in Lebanon “day and night” through both military and diplomatic channels, with a focus on ensuring that the terms discussed are implemented. In other words: Iran is negotiating with one hand — and threatening escalation with the other.
2:22

IRAN THREATENS U.S.: “WE ARE PREPARED FOR WAR” Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf warned the United States that Tehran is prepared to return to war if Washington does not implement what was discussed in recent understandings. Ghalibaf said Iran views violations of the agreement or ceasefire arrangements as a breach that will require a response. He pointed to recent strikes on U.S. bases in Bahrain and Kuwait as part of Iran’s message: “We are in negotiations, but if they do not want to implement what was discussed, we are prepared for war.” He added that Iran is following the situation in Lebanon “day and night” through both military and diplomatic channels, with a focus on ensuring that the terms discussed are implemented. In other words: Iran is negotiating with one hand — and threatening escalation with the other.

Mossad Commentary

44,610 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

There may be a ceasefire with Iran for now, but the Trump Admin doesn't seem interested in peace, and its policies in the Middle East are lining up perfectly with one think tank's plan: the Abraham Shield. Sarah noted that the plan is presented as a “response” to Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran, but in reality, it’s a “regional war doctrine in waiting, framed as stability but built for escalation.”
2:37

There may be a ceasefire with Iran for now, but the Trump Admin doesn't seem interested in peace, and its policies in the Middle East are lining up perfectly with one think tank's plan: the Abraham Shield. Sarah noted that the plan is presented as a “response” to Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran, but in reality, it’s a “regional war doctrine in waiting, framed as stability but built for escalation.”

Rachel Blevins

19,643 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨Iran FM Araghchi: Tehran not seeking ceasefire or talks with U.S. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi says Iran is not requesting a ceasefire and sees no reason to negotiate with Washington, noting that the U.S. attacked during the previous two negotiations. ➤ The FM said Iran had no intention to strike the U.S. homeland, noting American forces already have extensive bases in the region. ➤ The Strait of Hormuz remains open, he said, even tanker traffic has dropped sharply; Tehran says closure is not planned but “all scenarios” remain possible if the war continues. ➤ Araghchi also said no backchannel talks with U.S. officials are currently underway.
3:12

🚨Iran FM Araghchi: Tehran not seeking ceasefire or talks with U.S. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi says Iran is not requesting a ceasefire and sees no reason to negotiate with Washington, noting that the U.S. attacked during the previous two negotiations. ➤ The FM said Iran had no intention to strike the U.S. homeland, noting American forces already have extensive bases in the region. ➤ The Strait of Hormuz remains open, he said, even tanker traffic has dropped sharply; Tehran says closure is not planned but “all scenarios” remain possible if the war continues. ➤ Araghchi also said no backchannel talks with U.S. officials are currently underway.

Drop Site

413,431 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Yesterday, I got community noted for saying that I don't remember Lebanon being part of the ceasefire deal. The note stated that “the ceasefire as announced by the Prime Minister of Pakistan does explicitly include Lebanon." So, my team looked into this. What we found was concerning. Yes, Pakistan did say the deal included Lebanon and Israel. But the U.S. and Iran never mentioned either country in their deal announcements, only that the ceasefire would be in Iran, between the U.S. and Iran. Trump also said "everyone knows that" Lebanon wasn't included. Only after that did Iran publicly side with Pakistan about Lebanon. Israel never said it agreed to the deal, only that it "supports President Trump's" version, WITH its own addition that Lebanon wasn't included. That's 3 different versions of the deal. Which version did the U.S. and Iran agree to? Only the negotiators know for sure. So, why is Community Notes taking the word of Pakistan and Iran over America?
9:08

Yesterday, I got community noted for saying that I don't remember Lebanon being part of the ceasefire deal. The note stated that “the ceasefire as announced by the Prime Minister of Pakistan does explicitly include Lebanon." So, my team looked into this. What we found was concerning. Yes, Pakistan did say the deal included Lebanon and Israel. But the U.S. and Iran never mentioned either country in their deal announcements, only that the ceasefire would be in Iran, between the U.S. and Iran. Trump also said "everyone knows that" Lebanon wasn't included. Only after that did Iran publicly side with Pakistan about Lebanon. Israel never said it agreed to the deal, only that it "supports President Trump's" version, WITH its own addition that Lebanon wasn't included. That's 3 different versions of the deal. Which version did the U.S. and Iran agree to? Only the negotiators know for sure. So, why is Community Notes taking the word of Pakistan and Iran over America?

Glenn Beck

593,177 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Tucker Carlson on Iran: “The Iraq war was a catastrophe, and Trump was the first major political figure willing to say so. He’s always known it. So the question is: why would he even contemplate another war, this time with Iran? One answer is that Washington may not fully control whether such a war begins. Israel, under Benjamin Netanyahu, could decide to strike Iran on its own, without coordination. If that happened, Iran would almost certainly retaliate against Israel, and could also hit U.S. assets and energy infrastructure in the Gulf. At that point, America would be pulled in automatically. From that perspective, the U.S. may not be seeking a war with Iran at all, but instead trying to restrain the actions of its closest ally and prevent a wider conflict.”
1:16

Tucker Carlson on Iran: “The Iraq war was a catastrophe, and Trump was the first major political figure willing to say so. He’s always known it. So the question is: why would he even contemplate another war, this time with Iran? One answer is that Washington may not fully control whether such a war begins. Israel, under Benjamin Netanyahu, could decide to strike Iran on its own, without coordination. If that happened, Iran would almost certainly retaliate against Israel, and could also hit U.S. assets and energy infrastructure in the Gulf. At that point, America would be pulled in automatically. From that perspective, the U.S. may not be seeking a war with Iran at all, but instead trying to restrain the actions of its closest ally and prevent a wider conflict.”

Open Source Intel

58,984 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Peter Schiff: Trump didn't win the Iran war; he handed Tehran the cards, then called it a strategy. Most people are asking whether America destroyed enough targets, whether Iran's nuclear programme was set back, or whether the ceasefire will hold. Schiff's question is much simpler: Who needs a deal more? And in his view, the answer isn't Iran, it's Trump. He argues Trump started a war he now has to end before the political cost catches up with him, because oil prices, the economy, and the midterms matter. And Iran knows it. That's why Schiff believes Tehran is negotiating from a position of strength, not weakness, and could actually emerge from this conflict in a better economic position than it was before the first bombs fell. Sanctions could be lifted, oil exports could surge, and a richer Iran eventually becomes a stronger Iran. Then we got onto JD Vance's comments about the MOU. Schiff thinks Vance accidentally revealed far more than he should have. If the MOU is really just about calming energy markets, rebuilding reserves, and buying political breathing room before deciding whether to strike again later, why would Iran trust any of it? And if Tehran believes another round of bombing is simply being delayed until conditions are more favourable for Washington, why would it make life easier for Trump in the meantime? While Washington is trying to convince the world it negotiated from strength, Schiff thinks the opposite happened. He believes the war exposed how dependent America still is on stable energy markets, and how much leverage that gives Iran once the shooting stops. Peter Schiff
36:34

Peter Schiff: Trump didn't win the Iran war; he handed Tehran the cards, then called it a strategy. Most people are asking whether America destroyed enough targets, whether Iran's nuclear programme was set back, or whether the ceasefire will hold. Schiff's question is much simpler: Who needs a deal more? And in his view, the answer isn't Iran, it's Trump. He argues Trump started a war he now has to end before the political cost catches up with him, because oil prices, the economy, and the midterms matter. And Iran knows it. That's why Schiff believes Tehran is negotiating from a position of strength, not weakness, and could actually emerge from this conflict in a better economic position than it was before the first bombs fell. Sanctions could be lifted, oil exports could surge, and a richer Iran eventually becomes a stronger Iran. Then we got onto JD Vance's comments about the MOU. Schiff thinks Vance accidentally revealed far more than he should have. If the MOU is really just about calming energy markets, rebuilding reserves, and buying political breathing room before deciding whether to strike again later, why would Iran trust any of it? And if Tehran believes another round of bombing is simply being delayed until conditions are more favourable for Washington, why would it make life easier for Trump in the meantime? While Washington is trying to convince the world it negotiated from strength, Schiff thinks the opposite happened. He believes the war exposed how dependent America still is on stable energy markets, and how much leverage that gives Iran once the shooting stops. Peter Schiff

Mario Nawfal

320,718 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The biggest mistake Washington may be making is assuming Iran is running out of options. According to Prof. Robert Pape, Tehran believes it has already solved the central military problem of this war. Not because it can defeat America, but because it believes the U.S can't achieve its objective. Trump's goal is simple: reopen the Strait of Hormuz and restore normal shipping. The only problem is that Iran can launch drones capable of striking ships from an area larger than California. Much of it is mountainous, filled with tunnels, valleys and concealed launch sites. It's like trying to find someone in an area equivalent to 11,000 Manhattans. Iran doesn't need thousands of drones to survive; it only needs enough to keep attacking ships. That's why Prof. Pape believes Trump can't simply bomb his way to reopening Hormuz before the midterms, and probably not even before January. And he says Tehran knows it, which changes everything. If Iran believes Washington has no realistic military solution, why would it rush into negotiations? Instead, political scientist Prof. Pape believes Tehran will try to maximise its leverage by keeping pressure on global shipping, energy markets, and the U.S economy. His warning is that Iran is no longer simply trying to survive; it's trying to convince every future American president that attacking them carries an unacceptable economic and political price. Robert A. Pape
45:43

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The biggest mistake Washington may be making is assuming Iran is running out of options. According to Prof. Robert Pape, Tehran believes it has already solved the central military problem of this war. Not because it can defeat America, but because it believes the U.S can't achieve its objective. Trump's goal is simple: reopen the Strait of Hormuz and restore normal shipping. The only problem is that Iran can launch drones capable of striking ships from an area larger than California. Much of it is mountainous, filled with tunnels, valleys and concealed launch sites. It's like trying to find someone in an area equivalent to 11,000 Manhattans. Iran doesn't need thousands of drones to survive; it only needs enough to keep attacking ships. That's why Prof. Pape believes Trump can't simply bomb his way to reopening Hormuz before the midterms, and probably not even before January. And he says Tehran knows it, which changes everything. If Iran believes Washington has no realistic military solution, why would it rush into negotiations? Instead, political scientist Prof. Pape believes Tehran will try to maximise its leverage by keeping pressure on global shipping, energy markets, and the U.S economy. His warning is that Iran is no longer simply trying to survive; it's trying to convince every future American president that attacking them carries an unacceptable economic and political price. Robert A. Pape

Mario Nawfal

306,593 görüntüleme • 17 gün önce

"The likelihood of war is over 90% in the next couple of years." I spoke to Prof. Foad Izadi, of the University of Tehran, to understand how Iran is thinking about what comes next. He reframes the whole Hormuz standoff in one line: this isn't a negotiation, it's a regime change. Not in Tehran, but in the strait itself. Iran and Oman are the ones with territorial waters there. The U.S. is 11,000 km away. On what a second war would look like: Iran has already identified Gulf oil facilities and desalination plants as targets, ones he says could take 2-3 years to rebuild. He believes hitting Qatari gas facilities is what ultimately pushed Trump toward a ceasefire last time. On Israel, he believes without American refueling and Gulf airspace, a serious Israeli strike on Iran simply isn't possible. Great to have فواد ایزدی Foad Izadi back on the show. Enjoy.
27:12

"The likelihood of war is over 90% in the next couple of years." I spoke to Prof. Foad Izadi, of the University of Tehran, to understand how Iran is thinking about what comes next. He reframes the whole Hormuz standoff in one line: this isn't a negotiation, it's a regime change. Not in Tehran, but in the strait itself. Iran and Oman are the ones with territorial waters there. The U.S. is 11,000 km away. On what a second war would look like: Iran has already identified Gulf oil facilities and desalination plants as targets, ones he says could take 2-3 years to rebuild. He believes hitting Qatari gas facilities is what ultimately pushed Trump toward a ceasefire last time. On Israel, he believes without American refueling and Gulf airspace, a serious Israeli strike on Iran simply isn't possible. Great to have فواد ایزدی Foad Izadi back on the show. Enjoy.

Mario Nawfal

323,973 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce