Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Iran Says It Has Achieved Nuclear FUSION Knowledge for Sustainable Energy Atomic Energy Organization chief Mohammad Eslami said researchers have moved beyond proving the technology and into testing and simulation capability, which officials say could ACCELERATE the path toward practical nuclear fusion energy. Iran also UNVEILED domestically built technology...

RyanRozbiani's profile picture

Ryan Rozbiani

204,772 subscribers

196,072 views • 2 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & TechnologyHealth & WellnessNews & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

The U.N.’s nuclear watchdog chief said “any war” with Iran will not destroy Tehran’s nuclear ambitions “unless it was nuclear war, and you go for destruction in an unfathomable way.” International Atomic Energy Agency head Rafael Grossi told Margaret Brennan Iran’s nuclear enrichment knowledge is “very sophisticated” and he called for “an agreed framework” by Iran that will give the IAEA “a clear idea” of the regime’s nuclear program.
2:42

The U.N.’s nuclear watchdog chief said “any war” with Iran will not destroy Tehran’s nuclear ambitions “unless it was nuclear war, and you go for destruction in an unfathomable way.” International Atomic Energy Agency head Rafael Grossi told Margaret Brennan Iran’s nuclear enrichment knowledge is “very sophisticated” and he called for “an agreed framework” by Iran that will give the IAEA “a clear idea” of the regime’s nuclear program.

Face The Nation

24,751 views • 5 months ago

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷🇮🇱 Iran will not give up its nuclear program. Why should it? Israel has nukes, refuses to join the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, and faces zero consequences for either. Dimitri Lascaris says Iran might give up control of the Strait in exchange for permanent sanctions relief, unfrozen assets, and ironclad guarantees of sovereignty but civilian nuclear energy is non-negotiable. "This problem is eminently solvable. The problem is not Iran. The problem is us." Dimitri Lascaris
4:25

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷🇮🇱 Iran will not give up its nuclear program. Why should it? Israel has nukes, refuses to join the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, and faces zero consequences for either. Dimitri Lascaris says Iran might give up control of the Strait in exchange for permanent sanctions relief, unfrozen assets, and ironclad guarantees of sovereignty but civilian nuclear energy is non-negotiable. "This problem is eminently solvable. The problem is not Iran. The problem is us." Dimitri Lascaris

Mario Nawfal

41,419 views • 3 months ago

Iran holds the cards in talks with the US, and it's refusing to let nuclear negotiations turn into Israel's wish list of demands for Iranian surrender. Tehran is also warning that it has adopted an offensive posture and its ballistic missiles are upgraded and ready for war...
1:29

Iran holds the cards in talks with the US, and it's refusing to let nuclear negotiations turn into Israel's wish list of demands for Iranian surrender. Tehran is also warning that it has adopted an offensive posture and its ballistic missiles are upgraded and ready for war...

Rachel Blevins

24,351 views • 6 months ago

Poland is getting ready for a major nuclear build-out. But they aren't just looking for technology — they're looking for a strategic partner. I’m in Warsaw today with Canadian industry to launch a bid for Team Canada CANDU nuclear technology to be the foundation of that partnership. At a time of geopolitical instability, the value of CANDU has never been clearer: energy security, resilient supply chains, and deeper bilateral energy collaboration with a NATO ally.
0:55

Poland is getting ready for a major nuclear build-out. But they aren't just looking for technology — they're looking for a strategic partner. I’m in Warsaw today with Canadian industry to launch a bid for Team Canada CANDU nuclear technology to be the foundation of that partnership. At a time of geopolitical instability, the value of CANDU has never been clearer: energy security, resilient supply chains, and deeper bilateral energy collaboration with a NATO ally.

Tim Hodgson

27,034 views • 6 months ago

After the US and Israel, the UK has taken a more direct stance by deploying a nuclear powered submarine to the Arabian Sea, capable of launching missiles and torpedoes. Despite rising pressure, Iran is showing no signs of backing down. After strikes on its nuclear facilities, Iran retaliated by targeting Dimona, signaling that it can hit sensitive sites and challenge systems like the Iron Dome. The escalation is now moving beyond oil to critical infrastructure. Iran has threatened attacks on desalination plants and energy facilities across the Middle East, raising serious concerns about water, fuel, and regional stability. With oil prices rising and global markets reacting, this conflict is entering a dangerous phase. Unless diplomacy steps in, the situation could escalate further. Jai Hind. Jai Bharat. 🇮🇳
2:58

After the US and Israel, the UK has taken a more direct stance by deploying a nuclear powered submarine to the Arabian Sea, capable of launching missiles and torpedoes. Despite rising pressure, Iran is showing no signs of backing down. After strikes on its nuclear facilities, Iran retaliated by targeting Dimona, signaling that it can hit sensitive sites and challenge systems like the Iron Dome. The escalation is now moving beyond oil to critical infrastructure. Iran has threatened attacks on desalination plants and energy facilities across the Middle East, raising serious concerns about water, fuel, and regional stability. With oil prices rising and global markets reacting, this conflict is entering a dangerous phase. Unless diplomacy steps in, the situation could escalate further. Jai Hind. Jai Bharat. 🇮🇳

Praffulgarg

26,502 views • 5 months ago

President Trump says Gulf and Arab countries didn't want to join the Abraham Accords in the past "because of the problem they had with Iran." "You don't have a great power there anymore," Trump says of Iran. "You have a problem, but the problem is disappearing day by day." The U.S. and Saudi governments have signed a commercial nuclear deal that could allow Saudi Arabia to have a civilian nuclear program on its soil in cooperation with American companies, the U.S. Department of Energy announced.
1:27

President Trump says Gulf and Arab countries didn't want to join the Abraham Accords in the past "because of the problem they had with Iran." "You don't have a great power there anymore," Trump says of Iran. "You have a problem, but the problem is disappearing day by day." The U.S. and Saudi governments have signed a commercial nuclear deal that could allow Saudi Arabia to have a civilian nuclear program on its soil in cooperation with American companies, the U.S. Department of Energy announced.

CBS News

149,336 views • 1 month ago

HABECK: "THERE IS NO DOUBT" GERMAN NUCLEAR COULD HAVE KEPT RUNNING FOR 15 MORE YEARS This week, German Economy Minister Robert Habeck clarified for Germans that the nuclear plants whose closure he enforced could've kept running, and that closing them was a political, not technical, decision. Although consumer power prices have declined, industrial energy remains more expensive than before the closure of nuclear, the cheapest generators of baseload power in Germany. As German industrial companies continue to place new factories outside of the country, several of these nuclear plants sit ready to return to operation. During the worst days of the energy crisis, Habeck and his officials claimed the plants couldn't be continued. International experts, plenty of them here, also incorrectly claimed the plants couldn't keep running. It is helpful to have Habeck's explicit confirmation ahead of the parliamentary committee of inquiry looking into the decision to continue nuclear closures despite the low of Russian pipeline gas, which seriously damaged German industrial competitiveness.
0:48

HABECK: "THERE IS NO DOUBT" GERMAN NUCLEAR COULD HAVE KEPT RUNNING FOR 15 MORE YEARS This week, German Economy Minister Robert Habeck clarified for Germans that the nuclear plants whose closure he enforced could've kept running, and that closing them was a political, not technical, decision. Although consumer power prices have declined, industrial energy remains more expensive than before the closure of nuclear, the cheapest generators of baseload power in Germany. As German industrial companies continue to place new factories outside of the country, several of these nuclear plants sit ready to return to operation. During the worst days of the energy crisis, Habeck and his officials claimed the plants couldn't be continued. International experts, plenty of them here, also incorrectly claimed the plants couldn't keep running. It is helpful to have Habeck's explicit confirmation ahead of the parliamentary committee of inquiry looking into the decision to continue nuclear closures despite the low of Russian pipeline gas, which seriously damaged German industrial competitiveness.

Mark Nelson

126,892 views • 2 years ago

🚨 Compare the Presidents! ➡️ 3 Presidents offered words, 1 took an action ❗️ 🔹 BILL CLINTON (1995) – “All of you know that Iran, a country with more than enough oil to meet its energy needs, wants to buy reactors and other nuclear technology from Russia…. The United States, and I believe all the Western nations, have an overriding interest in containing the threat posed by Iran.” 🔹 BARACK OBAMA (2015) – “I have stated that Iran will never be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon.” 🔹 JOE BIDEN (2022) – “We will not, let me say it again, we will not allow Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon. 🔹 TRUMP (2025) – “Iran’s key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated…”
0:44

🚨 Compare the Presidents! ➡️ 3 Presidents offered words, 1 took an action ❗️ 🔹 BILL CLINTON (1995) – “All of you know that Iran, a country with more than enough oil to meet its energy needs, wants to buy reactors and other nuclear technology from Russia…. The United States, and I believe all the Western nations, have an overriding interest in containing the threat posed by Iran.” 🔹 BARACK OBAMA (2015) – “I have stated that Iran will never be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon.” 🔹 JOE BIDEN (2022) – “We will not, let me say it again, we will not allow Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon. 🔹 TRUMP (2025) – “Iran’s key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated…”

Kayleigh McEnany

95,077 views • 1 year ago

🚨🇷🇺Russia controls over 90% of global nuclear energy market Russia’s domination in the nuclear energy sphere is the result of it possessing “the most advanced technology,” said Sheikh Ibrahim bin Khalifa Al Khalifa, chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions. “We are in active discussion with them to finance some of these [technologies],” he added. The sheikh also noted that nuclear tech offers a cheap and environmentally safe way of power generation.
0:32

🚨🇷🇺Russia controls over 90% of global nuclear energy market Russia’s domination in the nuclear energy sphere is the result of it possessing “the most advanced technology,” said Sheikh Ibrahim bin Khalifa Al Khalifa, chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions. “We are in active discussion with them to finance some of these [technologies],” he added. The sheikh also noted that nuclear tech offers a cheap and environmentally safe way of power generation.

Sputnik

16,152 views • 2 months ago

🚨🚨🚨 IRAN'S FOREIGN MINISTER JUST SAID THE MOST TERRIFYING 15 WORDS OF THIS ENTIRE WAR. READ EVERY SINGLE ONE. 🚨🚨🚨 "They struck our nuclear facilities, but they could not destroy Iran's nuclear program." That's Iran's FM Abbas Araghchi — CONFIRMING the strikes hit nuclear sites. And telling the world it didn't work. Let that sink in. 💀 The US used its most powerful bunker-buster bombs on Natanz 💀 Iran is publicly CONFIRMING the nuclear sites were hit 💀 And in the SAME sentence saying the program SURVIVED 💀 Iran isn't denying, hiding, or deflecting — they're TAUNTING 💀 "You hit us with everything you had. We're STILL here." ⚠️ The US spent $2,000,000,000,000+ developing the most advanced bunker-buster arsenal on Earth — specifically for this moment. Iran says it wasn't enough. ⚠️ Israel destroyed Iraq's Osirak reactor in 1981 with ONE strike and ended Iraq's nuclear program forever. Iran just took the same hit and said "try again." The media is showing you "US strikes Iran's nuclear facilities" like it's mission accomplished. They're NOT showing you that Iran just told the ENTIRE world: our nuclear program is deeper, more dispersed, and more protected than your best weapons can reach. Here's what that means → and what comes NEXT: → Iran built Natanz underground. The US bombed it. Iran says it survived. → Iran built Fordow INSIDE A MOUNTAIN. If Natanz survived, Fordow is untouchable. → Iran has spent 20 years building redundancy — multiple sites, multiple depths, multiple locations → The US just used its BEST shot. If it didn't work, there is no Plan B short of a nuclear weapon. Now here's the part nobody is saying out loud: Iran's nuclear program just went from "peaceful enrichment" to "existential survival." Before today, Iran could negotiate. They had leverage. They could trade their program for sanctions relief. After today? Their nuclear facilities have been BOMBED. The diplomatic path is DEAD. If you're Iran and your "peaceful" nuclear sites were just attacked — what's the argument for NOT building a weapon anymore? The US didn't destroy Iran's nuclear program. They just gave Iran the justification to FINISH it. Every nuclear expert on Earth is thinking the same thing right now: the clock to an Iranian bomb just got shorter, not longer. What happens next: → Iran accelerates enrichment at sites the US CAN'T reach → Iran withdraws from the NPT (Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty) → The IAEA loses ALL access to Iranian nuclear sites → Within 12-18 months, Iran has enough material for a weapon → And the world has ZERO visibility into what's happening underground The most dangerous sentence in geopolitics isn't a threat. It's "you hit us and we're still standing." Iran just said it. To the entire world. Prepare accordingly. 🚨🚨🚨 They don't want you seeing this. Follow + RT to beat the algorithm. 🚨
0:35

🚨🚨🚨 IRAN'S FOREIGN MINISTER JUST SAID THE MOST TERRIFYING 15 WORDS OF THIS ENTIRE WAR. READ EVERY SINGLE ONE. 🚨🚨🚨 "They struck our nuclear facilities, but they could not destroy Iran's nuclear program." That's Iran's FM Abbas Araghchi — CONFIRMING the strikes hit nuclear sites. And telling the world it didn't work. Let that sink in. 💀 The US used its most powerful bunker-buster bombs on Natanz 💀 Iran is publicly CONFIRMING the nuclear sites were hit 💀 And in the SAME sentence saying the program SURVIVED 💀 Iran isn't denying, hiding, or deflecting — they're TAUNTING 💀 "You hit us with everything you had. We're STILL here." ⚠️ The US spent $2,000,000,000,000+ developing the most advanced bunker-buster arsenal on Earth — specifically for this moment. Iran says it wasn't enough. ⚠️ Israel destroyed Iraq's Osirak reactor in 1981 with ONE strike and ended Iraq's nuclear program forever. Iran just took the same hit and said "try again." The media is showing you "US strikes Iran's nuclear facilities" like it's mission accomplished. They're NOT showing you that Iran just told the ENTIRE world: our nuclear program is deeper, more dispersed, and more protected than your best weapons can reach. Here's what that means → and what comes NEXT: → Iran built Natanz underground. The US bombed it. Iran says it survived. → Iran built Fordow INSIDE A MOUNTAIN. If Natanz survived, Fordow is untouchable. → Iran has spent 20 years building redundancy — multiple sites, multiple depths, multiple locations → The US just used its BEST shot. If it didn't work, there is no Plan B short of a nuclear weapon. Now here's the part nobody is saying out loud: Iran's nuclear program just went from "peaceful enrichment" to "existential survival." Before today, Iran could negotiate. They had leverage. They could trade their program for sanctions relief. After today? Their nuclear facilities have been BOMBED. The diplomatic path is DEAD. If you're Iran and your "peaceful" nuclear sites were just attacked — what's the argument for NOT building a weapon anymore? The US didn't destroy Iran's nuclear program. They just gave Iran the justification to FINISH it. Every nuclear expert on Earth is thinking the same thing right now: the clock to an Iranian bomb just got shorter, not longer. What happens next: → Iran accelerates enrichment at sites the US CAN'T reach → Iran withdraws from the NPT (Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty) → The IAEA loses ALL access to Iranian nuclear sites → Within 12-18 months, Iran has enough material for a weapon → And the world has ZERO visibility into what's happening underground The most dangerous sentence in geopolitics isn't a threat. It's "you hit us and we're still standing." Iran just said it. To the entire world. Prepare accordingly. 🚨🚨🚨 They don't want you seeing this. Follow + RT to beat the algorithm. 🚨

🇨🇳 陈杰森 Jason Chen

813,482 views • 5 months ago

IRAN’S NUCLEAR THREAT IS THE NEW WMD 2.0 Trump and the neocons around him keep blowing up peace talks by claiming Iran is racing for a nuclear bomb. The real question is simple: is there an Iranian nuke threat, or is this Iraq WMD all over again? Former UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter says Iran has never had an active nuclear weapons program, and the scare narrative is political, not factual. Israel has pushed this line before, including with its 2018 dossier, which critics say was designed to build a case for war. Israel also sits on an undeclared nuclear arsenal, has never signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty, and still claims the power to decide which countries are “allowed” to have nukes. That double standard is the heart of the issue.
5:17

IRAN’S NUCLEAR THREAT IS THE NEW WMD 2.0 Trump and the neocons around him keep blowing up peace talks by claiming Iran is racing for a nuclear bomb. The real question is simple: is there an Iranian nuke threat, or is this Iraq WMD all over again? Former UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter says Iran has never had an active nuclear weapons program, and the scare narrative is political, not factual. Israel has pushed this line before, including with its 2018 dossier, which critics say was designed to build a case for war. Israel also sits on an undeclared nuclear arsenal, has never signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty, and still claims the power to decide which countries are “allowed” to have nukes. That double standard is the heart of the issue.

Redacted

33,384 views • 1 month ago

Donald Trump was right. Even mainstream media 60 Minutes is reporting it United Nations inspectors were able to verify Iran has 970 pounds of 60% enriched uranium. If enriched further, the stockpile could produce 10 to 11 nuclear bombs Former White House nuclear adviser who works at Harvard's Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs says Iran still have the knowledge to make nuclear bombs An Islamic state with nuclear bombs is the last thing the world needs. They will use them
0:45

Donald Trump was right. Even mainstream media 60 Minutes is reporting it United Nations inspectors were able to verify Iran has 970 pounds of 60% enriched uranium. If enriched further, the stockpile could produce 10 to 11 nuclear bombs Former White House nuclear adviser who works at Harvard's Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs says Iran still have the knowledge to make nuclear bombs An Islamic state with nuclear bombs is the last thing the world needs. They will use them

Wall Street Apes

60,323 views • 4 months ago

⚡️ BREAKING: Iran’s FM Abbas Araghchi rejected Trump’s State of the Union claim that Tehran is developing missiles capable of reaching the U.S., saying the president, who has long railed against fake news, is now “himself the victim of fake news.” Araghchi said Iran has “limited the range of our missiles below 2,000 kilometers” and also has “no intention” of building nuclear weapons. He said decades of hostility between US and Iran stem from Washington being “fed with misinformation campaigns, mostly by Israeli lobbyists,” and stressed the only way forward is “to talk with the Iranian people with the language of respect.” A “fair, balanced and equitable deal is achievable” in Geneva, he said, and stressed Iran will not give up its “right for peaceful use of nuclear technology.”
3:16

⚡️ BREAKING: Iran’s FM Abbas Araghchi rejected Trump’s State of the Union claim that Tehran is developing missiles capable of reaching the U.S., saying the president, who has long railed against fake news, is now “himself the victim of fake news.” Araghchi said Iran has “limited the range of our missiles below 2,000 kilometers” and also has “no intention” of building nuclear weapons. He said decades of hostility between US and Iran stem from Washington being “fed with misinformation campaigns, mostly by Israeli lobbyists,” and stressed the only way forward is “to talk with the Iranian people with the language of respect.” A “fair, balanced and equitable deal is achievable” in Geneva, he said, and stressed Iran will not give up its “right for peaceful use of nuclear technology.”

Drop Site

36,884 views • 6 months ago

When asked why the U.S. should allow Iran to have a small amount of enrichment, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi tells Margaret Brennan that they “have every right to enjoy a peaceful nuclear energy, including enrichment.” “I think as a sovereign country, we have every right to decide for ourselves, by ourselves,” he says. “We have developed this technology by ourselves, by our scientists, and it is very dear to us because we have created – we have paid a huge expense for that. We have been on the sanctions for at least 20 years.”
2:44

When asked why the U.S. should allow Iran to have a small amount of enrichment, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi tells Margaret Brennan that they “have every right to enjoy a peaceful nuclear energy, including enrichment.” “I think as a sovereign country, we have every right to decide for ourselves, by ourselves,” he says. “We have developed this technology by ourselves, by our scientists, and it is very dear to us because we have created – we have paid a huge expense for that. We have been on the sanctions for at least 20 years.”

Face The Nation

40,478 views • 6 months ago

BRITISH DIPLOMAT RIPS INTO JULIA HARTLEY-BREWER “That is a lie.” A heated exchange unfolded between TalkTV host Julia Hartley-Brewer and former British ambassador to Iran Richard Dalton, after Dalton challenged her claims about Iran’s nuclear program. Dalton accused the presenter of “grossly distorting the evidence,” telling her she was “out of [her] depth.” He pointed out that the International Atomic Energy Agency, in one of its recent assessments, said it had not detected evidence of an active Iranian nuclear weapons program. Hartley-Brewer has previously drawn criticism during coverage of the war in Gaza, where detractors say she frequently spoke to guests advocating for Palestinian rights in a confrontational and dismissive manner. The debate also highlights a long-standing regional contradiction. Israel is widely believed to possess nuclear weapons but maintains a policy of ambiguity and has not opened its nuclear facilities to international inspections. Estimates of Israel’s nuclear arsenal remain undisclosed. Meanwhile, Iran has repeatedly stated that its nuclear program is for civilian purposes and denies pursuing nuclear weapons, even as it faces continued accusations and pressure from Israel and its Western allies. Venezuelanalysis VoxUmmah Qiao Collective Progressive International @blkagendareport Orinoco Tribune Kawsachun News
2:25

BRITISH DIPLOMAT RIPS INTO JULIA HARTLEY-BREWER “That is a lie.” A heated exchange unfolded between TalkTV host Julia Hartley-Brewer and former British ambassador to Iran Richard Dalton, after Dalton challenged her claims about Iran’s nuclear program. Dalton accused the presenter of “grossly distorting the evidence,” telling her she was “out of [her] depth.” He pointed out that the International Atomic Energy Agency, in one of its recent assessments, said it had not detected evidence of an active Iranian nuclear weapons program. Hartley-Brewer has previously drawn criticism during coverage of the war in Gaza, where detractors say she frequently spoke to guests advocating for Palestinian rights in a confrontational and dismissive manner. The debate also highlights a long-standing regional contradiction. Israel is widely believed to possess nuclear weapons but maintains a policy of ambiguity and has not opened its nuclear facilities to international inspections. Estimates of Israel’s nuclear arsenal remain undisclosed. Meanwhile, Iran has repeatedly stated that its nuclear program is for civilian purposes and denies pursuing nuclear weapons, even as it faces continued accusations and pressure from Israel and its Western allies. Venezuelanalysis VoxUmmah Qiao Collective Progressive International @blkagendareport Orinoco Tribune Kawsachun News

Sovereign Media

21,763 views • 5 months ago