Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi: The presence of the CENTCOM commander makes no difference to the essence of the matter. We were told that he had arrived there in order to visit one of their own ships. There was a request from the American side for him to be present... show more

Clash Report

702,269 subscribers

49,169 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Iran’s FM, Araghchi: “The US delegation in Muscat had asked if CENTCOM commander could participate in a diplomatic greeting with us. We rejected the request, saying we do not accept the presence of a military person within the negotiation."

Iran’s FM, Araghchi: “The US delegation in Muscat had asked if CENTCOM commander could participate in a diplomatic greeting with us. We rejected the request, saying we do not accept the presence of a military person within the negotiation."

Arya - آریا

68,731 views • 7 months ago

Dr. Araghchi says that from the moment he arrived at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs after the attack, he began issuing statements without interruption... I immediately began contacting the Foreign Ministers of regional countries... I knew the plan had been pre-designed: if Iran were attacked, we would target American military bases in the region... I called all the Foreign Ministers of the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council countries and told all of them that we would target American military bases... I emphasised to them that this action was not against the regional countries, but against American forces stationed on their soil. Dr. Araghchi says they all protested and said such an action should not be taken... In response, Dr. Araghchi told them that "we did not start this war; it was a war imposed on us"... I also reminded them that we had informed them of this in advance... from that afternoon onward, our ambassadors were summoned in some regional countries... Dr. Araghchi reveals that on the 3rd day of the war, early in the morning, one of the region's Foreign Ministers called... (He does not specify who, but the interviewer asks whether it was the UAE or KSA to which Dr. Araghchi refuses to comment) The Foreign Minister said: In response to the attack on our soil, we will strike one of your positions at a specific time; but we do not intend to continue the conflict... He said: You should not target us anymore, and we will not take action against you either... The Americans and Israelis were also sending messages through them, making threats... Dr. Araghchi responded by warning him that if you target us, this time we will target you directly, and a war will begin between Iran and your country... He replied: So what should we do? Dr. Araghchi told him to postpone their attack until around noon... perhaps by then a solution could be reached... Dr. Araghchi: They delayed their attack... and after some negotiations, we reached an understanding that if they did not allow the American bases on their soil to be used for attacking Iran, we would not target them either... But of course, they did not abide by that... and we continued to target US positions on their soil until the end of the war... Dr. Araghchi says the reality is that none of the regional countries believed Iran could target them and they would be unable to respond... This was a major transformation and altered the security structure of the region...

Dr. Araghchi says that from the moment he arrived at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs after the attack, he began issuing statements without interruption... I immediately began contacting the Foreign Ministers of regional countries... I knew the plan had been pre-designed: if Iran were attacked, we would target American military bases in the region... I called all the Foreign Ministers of the Persian Gulf Cooperation Council countries and told all of them that we would target American military bases... I emphasised to them that this action was not against the regional countries, but against American forces stationed on their soil. Dr. Araghchi says they all protested and said such an action should not be taken... In response, Dr. Araghchi told them that "we did not start this war; it was a war imposed on us"... I also reminded them that we had informed them of this in advance... from that afternoon onward, our ambassadors were summoned in some regional countries... Dr. Araghchi reveals that on the 3rd day of the war, early in the morning, one of the region's Foreign Ministers called... (He does not specify who, but the interviewer asks whether it was the UAE or KSA to which Dr. Araghchi refuses to comment) The Foreign Minister said: In response to the attack on our soil, we will strike one of your positions at a specific time; but we do not intend to continue the conflict... He said: You should not target us anymore, and we will not take action against you either... The Americans and Israelis were also sending messages through them, making threats... Dr. Araghchi responded by warning him that if you target us, this time we will target you directly, and a war will begin between Iran and your country... He replied: So what should we do? Dr. Araghchi told him to postpone their attack until around noon... perhaps by then a solution could be reached... Dr. Araghchi: They delayed their attack... and after some negotiations, we reached an understanding that if they did not allow the American bases on their soil to be used for attacking Iran, we would not target them either... But of course, they did not abide by that... and we continued to target US positions on their soil until the end of the war... Dr. Araghchi says the reality is that none of the regional countries believed Iran could target them and they would be unable to respond... This was a major transformation and altered the security structure of the region...

ساسان

18,124 views • 2 months ago

Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi: We entered the negotiations to prove to the whole world that their intention was to attack the Islamic Republic of Iran; their intention was hostile. And they could not claim that we requested negotiations and the Islamic Republic did not accept. We also negotiated so that it would be clear that the truth was with us, so that ultimate proof would be established for the whole world. Our own people would also understand that it wasn't the Islamic Republic that caused the war by refraining from negotiations. Because there was a question: if we hadn't negotiated and a war had broken out, everyone might have thought to themselves that if we had negotiated, the war wouldn't have happened.

Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi: We entered the negotiations to prove to the whole world that their intention was to attack the Islamic Republic of Iran; their intention was hostile. And they could not claim that we requested negotiations and the Islamic Republic did not accept. We also negotiated so that it would be clear that the truth was with us, so that ultimate proof would be established for the whole world. Our own people would also understand that it wasn't the Islamic Republic that caused the war by refraining from negotiations. Because there was a question: if we hadn't negotiated and a war had broken out, everyone might have thought to themselves that if we had negotiated, the war wouldn't have happened.

Clash Report

28,540 views • 6 months ago

“We got a message from the Iranian side that one of the ships, which presumably was closest to our borders at that point of time, wanted to come into our port. On the 1st March, we said you can come in and it took them a few days to sail in and then they docked in Kochi. There were a lot of young cadets and they disembarked. So for us, when this ship wanted to come in and that too in difficulties, I think it was the humane thing to do. We were guided by that principle. In a sense of the other ships, one obviously had a similar situation in Sri Lanka and they took the decision that they did, and one unfortunately didn’t make it.” * ⁠EAM Dr. S. Jaishankar made it clear that there were two Iranian vessels. One docked safely in Kochi, while the other moved towards Sri Lanka. The vessel that remained under India’s watch stayed completely safe and secure.

“We got a message from the Iranian side that one of the ships, which presumably was closest to our borders at that point of time, wanted to come into our port. On the 1st March, we said you can come in and it took them a few days to sail in and then they docked in Kochi. There were a lot of young cadets and they disembarked. So for us, when this ship wanted to come in and that too in difficulties, I think it was the humane thing to do. We were guided by that principle. In a sense of the other ships, one obviously had a similar situation in Sri Lanka and they took the decision that they did, and one unfortunately didn’t make it.” * ⁠EAM Dr. S. Jaishankar made it clear that there were two Iranian vessels. One docked safely in Kochi, while the other moved towards Sri Lanka. The vessel that remained under India’s watch stayed completely safe and secure.

BJP

41,360 views • 6 months ago

"When we were living as refugees, we went to many places telling the international community that Rwanda was our home and that we wanted to return. Some people would come and raise the matter with the government that was in power here. The response they received was that Rwanda was too small and that there was no place for us to go. Imagine being told there is no place for you in the very country you came from. You cannot tell someone to remain where they are, to spend their entire life as a refugee, and for their children to grow up as refugees as well. I used to tell people, even at the beginning of our liberation struggle, that whatever treatment we received in the countries where we lived, they were not the people I had a grievance against. After all, it was my own country that had denied me the right to return because it claimed there was no room for me. The people I had a grievance against were those who had the responsibility to guarantee my rights in my own country, but instead denied them. Those were the people we had to confront. And that is exactly what happened." President Kagame | Indangamirwa 16th Cohort #MeetThePresident

"When we were living as refugees, we went to many places telling the international community that Rwanda was our home and that we wanted to return. Some people would come and raise the matter with the government that was in power here. The response they received was that Rwanda was too small and that there was no place for us to go. Imagine being told there is no place for you in the very country you came from. You cannot tell someone to remain where they are, to spend their entire life as a refugee, and for their children to grow up as refugees as well. I used to tell people, even at the beginning of our liberation struggle, that whatever treatment we received in the countries where we lived, they were not the people I had a grievance against. After all, it was my own country that had denied me the right to return because it claimed there was no room for me. The people I had a grievance against were those who had the responsibility to guarantee my rights in my own country, but instead denied them. Those were the people we had to confront. And that is exactly what happened." President Kagame | Indangamirwa 16th Cohort #MeetThePresident

Presidency | Rwanda

215,712 views • 1 month ago

The content of the negotiations will not be disclosed, but there were a number of things that were unacceptable for the Ukrainian side, Ukrainian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Heorhii Tykhyi said. "President Zelenskyy said openly that he is ready for a direct negotiation with Putin. We understand that if we want to make progress, we need to have this meeting of leaders, including on the ceasefire," he said during the press conference following Russia-Ukraine-Türkiye peace talks.

The content of the negotiations will not be disclosed, but there were a number of things that were unacceptable for the Ukrainian side, Ukrainian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Heorhii Tykhyi said. "President Zelenskyy said openly that he is ready for a direct negotiation with Putin. We understand that if we want to make progress, we need to have this meeting of leaders, including on the ceasefire," he said during the press conference following Russia-Ukraine-Türkiye peace talks.

Anton Gerashchenko

29,549 views • 1 year ago

It’s funny that you think this is about Rohit’s identity. It’s not. Here’s what actually happened: 1. Prz Ibu publicly said there were no military facilities in UTF. He even said he would use “Ebunaa UTF” to give land plots (“goathi”) to people and invited everyone to go and see for themselves. He claimed there was no military presence there and half of the country believed it 2. So we went there. We were stopped, because the site was under MNDF control and a military facility was being developed in UTF. 3. So what was the ‘irrefutable evidence’ about ? Ibu said there was no military establishment. We proved there was. Before we went, MDP supporters and their SM accounts kept saying there were no military structures in UTF and it would be used for giving land. After that day, nobody, including the government, denied the presence of a military facility there anymore. 4. You don’t have to ask me now if UTF is a military establishment because govt’s have since then openly admitted to it. In fact both the Maldivian and Indian governments have since acknowledged this in official documents too. So yes, the evidence was irrefutable because it proved exactly what was being denied, that a military base was indeed being developed at UTF. Had we not done that on that day, half of the nation probably would continue to believe, as ibu said, that there arent no military establishments in UTF

It’s funny that you think this is about Rohit’s identity. It’s not. Here’s what actually happened: 1. Prz Ibu publicly said there were no military facilities in UTF. He even said he would use “Ebunaa UTF” to give land plots (“goathi”) to people and invited everyone to go and see for themselves. He claimed there was no military presence there and half of the country believed it 2. So we went there. We were stopped, because the site was under MNDF control and a military facility was being developed in UTF. 3. So what was the ‘irrefutable evidence’ about ? Ibu said there was no military establishment. We proved there was. Before we went, MDP supporters and their SM accounts kept saying there were no military structures in UTF and it would be used for giving land. After that day, nobody, including the government, denied the presence of a military facility there anymore. 4. You don’t have to ask me now if UTF is a military establishment because govt’s have since then openly admitted to it. In fact both the Maldivian and Indian governments have since acknowledged this in official documents too. So yes, the evidence was irrefutable because it proved exactly what was being denied, that a military base was indeed being developed at UTF. Had we not done that on that day, half of the nation probably would continue to believe, as ibu said, that there arent no military establishments in UTF

Midhuam Saud(米渡）🇲🇻

14,241 views • 11 months ago

Adel Ferdowsipour's initial reaction to Iran's elimination: Clouds and wind and moon and sun and fate and the post and offsides all came together so that we were eliminated from the competition. But was our presence in a 48 team World Cup an accomplishment? We've previously said this - no. We have the history of being present in World Cups that Asia had just half a slot. And we went there and were present. Is that we were not able to be one of the 32 qualifying teams and get out of our group considered a defeat? A failure, a defeat, whatever we want to call it? Yes. It would be considered. That we did not establish a clear vision for the continuation of our country's football, that we do not have a young team, in six months the Asian Cup will be held, in four years the World Cup will be held, and we have not established any clear vision ... we've talked about this multiple times ... but there was no one listening. Our team came to these matches as one of the oldest teams and ultimately was eliminated from the competition. Did we have the necessary boldness to advance from our group? In my view - no. Could we have played better? Certainly yes. That we did not with the 4 points that they had repeatedly promised and said we will get at least 4 points and definitely advance and this will happen and that will happen ... is this considered a failure? Yes. But - Let's look at the other side of the issue too. Did we not have bad luck? We had a lot of bad luck! The events that happened, like the Austria - Algeria game was the pinnacle ... meaning the events of the games and things that happened lined up in a way that we ultimately do not advance. That in the last few games every single thing that shouldn't have happened did so one after another so we get eliminated ... did we have any luck in this angle? No. But couldn't we have had our fate in our own hands? Could we have played bolder? That we have drawn with Belgium, in a situation where many small teams have stopped big teams and gotten good results ... should it be considered an accomplishment? I don't know.

Adel Ferdowsipour's initial reaction to Iran's elimination: Clouds and wind and moon and sun and fate and the post and offsides all came together so that we were eliminated from the competition. But was our presence in a 48 team World Cup an accomplishment? We've previously said this - no. We have the history of being present in World Cups that Asia had just half a slot. And we went there and were present. Is that we were not able to be one of the 32 qualifying teams and get out of our group considered a defeat? A failure, a defeat, whatever we want to call it? Yes. It would be considered. That we did not establish a clear vision for the continuation of our country's football, that we do not have a young team, in six months the Asian Cup will be held, in four years the World Cup will be held, and we have not established any clear vision ... we've talked about this multiple times ... but there was no one listening. Our team came to these matches as one of the oldest teams and ultimately was eliminated from the competition. Did we have the necessary boldness to advance from our group? In my view - no. Could we have played better? Certainly yes. That we did not with the 4 points that they had repeatedly promised and said we will get at least 4 points and definitely advance and this will happen and that will happen ... is this considered a failure? Yes. But - Let's look at the other side of the issue too. Did we not have bad luck? We had a lot of bad luck! The events that happened, like the Austria - Algeria game was the pinnacle ... meaning the events of the games and things that happened lined up in a way that we ultimately do not advance. That in the last few games every single thing that shouldn't have happened did so one after another so we get eliminated ... did we have any luck in this angle? No. But couldn't we have had our fate in our own hands? Could we have played bolder? That we have drawn with Belgium, in a situation where many small teams have stopped big teams and gotten good results ... should it be considered an accomplishment? I don't know.

Alireza Talakoubnejad

48,538 views • 2 months ago

CNN’s Dana Bash: “In May, the president's armored motorcade of SUVs, which can weigh up to 20,000 pounds, drove across that new coating of the Reflecting Pool's floor. Could that have damaged it?” Interior Secretary Doug Burgum: “No. I was with him when we came that night. He didn't take the beast. We were driving in a Cadillac Escalade. It is one of the presidential fleet of cars, but substantially lighter than what you're talking about. And at the time that we were there, they were still putting down — the whole base level of this industrial rubber layer was not yet completed, and so there was no damage that night whatsoever.” “That was one of the questions we asked before we even brought the presidential motorcade there, but not a chance of that [causing damage to the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool].”

CNN’s Dana Bash: “In May, the president's armored motorcade of SUVs, which can weigh up to 20,000 pounds, drove across that new coating of the Reflecting Pool's floor. Could that have damaged it?” Interior Secretary Doug Burgum: “No. I was with him when we came that night. He didn't take the beast. We were driving in a Cadillac Escalade. It is one of the presidential fleet of cars, but substantially lighter than what you're talking about. And at the time that we were there, they were still putting down — the whole base level of this industrial rubber layer was not yet completed, and so there was no damage that night whatsoever.” “That was one of the questions we asked before we even brought the presidential motorcade there, but not a chance of that [causing damage to the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool].”

RedWave Press

386,122 views • 2 months ago

Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi: I believe that if our conclusion is that this seriousness exists on the opposing side, these negotiations will continue. There are signs that this seriousness exists, but there are also signs that this seriousness is faint. The continuation of certain sanctions and some activities in the military sphere, well, create doubt regarding the degree of seriousness and the readiness of the other side for genuine negotiations. We are monitoring all of these; we will evaluate all the signs together and then make a decision regarding the continuation of the negotiations.

Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi: I believe that if our conclusion is that this seriousness exists on the opposing side, these negotiations will continue. There are signs that this seriousness exists, but there are also signs that this seriousness is faint. The continuation of certain sanctions and some activities in the military sphere, well, create doubt regarding the degree of seriousness and the readiness of the other side for genuine negotiations. We are monitoring all of these; we will evaluate all the signs together and then make a decision regarding the continuation of the negotiations.

Clash Report

17,323 views • 7 months ago

Arteta: “We came here to win the game. I think the message was clear from three days before. We prepared to do that, to take the game to the areas that we believed we could win it. We certainly did that, even though we started the game with a goal down and psychologically we had to play with that. We've done it. “So we proved that we are there, but the reality is in the two boxes today was a difference and that's what decided the game. The styles have been different for the profile of players that we have available as well in certain areas, but the difference was 100 per cent, yes.”

Connor Humm

188,860 views • 5 months ago

From Tehran: We were told that the weather in Lebanon is far worse than here, and many of our brothers and sisters among the Lebanese Shia are now in tents, enduring winter and cold. One reason for our presence here, dear people of Lebanon and the resistance, is to show that we are with you and will not abandon you. This footage is being recorded to send to our people there, to show that the Iranian people are here in winter and tell you that we stand by your side.

From Tehran: We were told that the weather in Lebanon is far worse than here, and many of our brothers and sisters among the Lebanese Shia are now in tents, enduring winter and cold. One reason for our presence here, dear people of Lebanon and the resistance, is to show that we are with you and will not abandon you. This footage is being recorded to send to our people there, to show that the Iranian people are here in winter and tell you that we stand by your side.

Pheebs

27,220 views • 6 months ago

Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi: If, God forbid, the United States decides to attack us, then U.S. bases in the region would become legitimate targets. We consider them U.S. bases, not the territory of our neighbors or the countries where they are located. Last time, when we had no choice but to attack the American base in Qatar, I immediately called my dear brother, the Foreign Minister of Qatar, even before the attack. I informed him in advance and told him clearly that this was not an attack against Qatar. It was an attack against U.S. facilities located in Qatar. We wanted them to understand that distinction.

Iranian Foreign Minister Araghchi: If, God forbid, the United States decides to attack us, then U.S. bases in the region would become legitimate targets. We consider them U.S. bases, not the territory of our neighbors or the countries where they are located. Last time, when we had no choice but to attack the American base in Qatar, I immediately called my dear brother, the Foreign Minister of Qatar, even before the attack. I informed him in advance and told him clearly that this was not an attack against Qatar. It was an attack against U.S. facilities located in Qatar. We wanted them to understand that distinction.

Clash Report

56,314 views • 6 months ago

Reporter: Do you envision the U.S. Military having a presence in Venezuela as the U.S. Runs that country? Trump: We are going to have a presence in Venezuela as it pertains to oil. We are going to be taking out a tremendous amount of wealth out of the ground… It goes also to the US in the form of reimbursement for the damages caused us by that country

Reporter: Do you envision the U.S. Military having a presence in Venezuela as the U.S. Runs that country? Trump: We are going to have a presence in Venezuela as it pertains to oil. We are going to be taking out a tremendous amount of wealth out of the ground… It goes also to the US in the form of reimbursement for the damages caused us by that country

Acyn

2,173,526 views • 8 months ago

“We own the Bab al-Mandab Strait, we are present there, and no agreement can take place without our involvement. Somalia has no role in this matter. Our President said that Ethiopia, a country of 150 million people that is landlocked, has the right to access the sea, and that is true,” said Somaliland’s Minister of the Presidency, Khadar Hussein Abdi.

“We own the Bab al-Mandab Strait, we are present there, and no agreement can take place without our involvement. Somalia has no role in this matter. Our President said that Ethiopia, a country of 150 million people that is landlocked, has the right to access the sea, and that is true,” said Somaliland’s Minister of the Presidency, Khadar Hussein Abdi.

Abdilahi Gee-maal 📸

15,534 views • 7 months ago

Prime Minister of the Netherlands Dick Schoof: "In relation to the membership, there is no question that the place to be for Ukraine is the European Union. [...] If we look at the way we are dealing with it now, it will take a couple of years. We have to be honest about that."

Prime Minister of the Netherlands Dick Schoof: "In relation to the membership, there is no question that the place to be for Ukraine is the European Union. [...] If we look at the way we are dealing with it now, it will take a couple of years. We have to be honest about that."

Visegrád 24

32,385 views • 8 months ago

97 out of 100 Senators had their campaigns funded by AIPAC. We knew there was a uniparty but I don’t think most of us knew what that actually entailed. Now that we do, we need to take steps to prevent this foreign influence over the American government.

97 out of 100 Senators had their campaigns funded by AIPAC. We knew there was a uniparty but I don’t think most of us knew what that actually entailed. Now that we do, we need to take steps to prevent this foreign influence over the American government.

Derrick Evans

351,845 views • 3 months ago