Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Iranian National Security Council Secretary Ali Larijani: The most important problem that the Americans have is that they do not understand the intellectual fabric of this region, West Asia, and especially Iran. They think that they did something in Venezuela, for example, and now they can repeat it here,... while a different way of thinking prevails here. You see, they wanted to transform the scene and throw Iran's situation into chaos through the shock they create and by putting people in a state of bewilderment. At first, the Americans intended to disrupt the internal situation of Iran by martyring the leadership of Iran and some of our commanders. So, the first stage was the disruption of the administrative and governmental structure. The Americans thought this would happen very quickly. Their strategy was to end the war with intensity but in a short time. But they did not think that the Iranians would not let go of them.show more

Clash Report

780,024 subscribers

104,365 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

The Anchormen on Israel using a nuclear weapon against Iran: GAETZ: “If Israel believes that this bombing campaign of the United States, that is relentless and effective at destroying infrastructure and military material, but not effective at regime change. If they don’t think that’s enough to send Iran into chaos, they may use the nuclear weapon we all know they have. I shudder to think that. I would like to believe that no country would do that again, and so I’m not of that ilk yet, but the argument was made.” SHARP: “What would the consequences be? Is the U.S. gonna bomb Israel? How is that gonna shake out? Who’s gonna hold them account for that? Not that I think Israel wouldn’t do it. They have their pathological hatred of Iran and they wanna take that region out, and they have the Greater Israel objective. From a philosophical standpoint, they wouldn’t have a problem with it, but God, what would the consequences be?” WATCH NOW:

The Anchormen on Israel using a nuclear weapon against Iran: GAETZ: “If Israel believes that this bombing campaign of the United States, that is relentless and effective at destroying infrastructure and military material, but not effective at regime change. If they don’t think that’s enough to send Iran into chaos, they may use the nuclear weapon we all know they have. I shudder to think that. I would like to believe that no country would do that again, and so I’m not of that ilk yet, but the argument was made.” SHARP: “What would the consequences be? Is the U.S. gonna bomb Israel? How is that gonna shake out? Who’s gonna hold them account for that? Not that I think Israel wouldn’t do it. They have their pathological hatred of Iran and they wanna take that region out, and they have the Greater Israel objective. From a philosophical standpoint, they wouldn’t have a problem with it, but God, what would the consequences be?” WATCH NOW:

Former Congressman Matt Gaetz

122,267 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan on Iran-US talks: I am confident that the Americans and the Iranians are sincere. They want a ceasefire and they want to see the opening of the Strait of Hormuz. But I am not sure about the intentions of Israel. They don't have any intention of seeing stability in the region.

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan on Iran-US talks: I am confident that the Americans and the Iranians are sincere. They want a ceasefire and they want to see the opening of the Strait of Hormuz. But I am not sure about the intentions of Israel. They don't have any intention of seeing stability in the region.

Clash Report

68,234 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨IRAN’S STRATEGY: High-level insurgency, counterpunch escalation ‘The Iranians have been very methodical and actually judicious in the escalation. They have not actually escalated on their own. They have always counterpunched. So the Americans and Israelis, as you noted, we initiated this fight on February 28th against the best judgement of the US military, Joint Chiefs of Staff. The President wanted to do this because he was convinced this would be 72 hours to 96 hours, one and done, and then the people of Iran would overthrow the benighted regime. That did not happen. And now here we are three weeks in with no end in sight. The Iranians have escalated only after we or the Israelis have, you know, notice they didn’t start attacking things like the oil refineries until after they really started getting hit in those target areas in Iran. And so what you’re seeing is a very graduated escalation programme by the Iranian military. Clearly they have gamed this out for a long time. This has clearly been the game plan from the very beginning because the Iranians studied the American and Israeli ways of war and they knew decapitation strikes would be coming in. So they decentralised their regime, they decentralised command and control capabilities. They went underground like Mao did during the Chinese civil war or the North Vietnamese did during the Vietnam War. They very adeptly created an insurgency, a high end insurgency profile for fighting the Americans and the Israelis. And now they’re tethering it to economic attacks, which is brilliant because they know that the Americans and Israelis are far more, and the Arab states are far more exposed to economic disruptions in the aggregate than are the Iranians who have been sanctioned and contained for so long. It doesn’t affect them the same way.’ -Brandon Weichert on the latest episode of Going Underground Watch the full interview in the quoted post, or watch it on Rumble, link below in the replies👇

Going Underground

67,764 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Prof. Hasan Ünal reveals how Türkiye🇹🇷 helped Iran ANNIHILATE US-backed Kurdish mercenaries ‘In December there was a piece of intelligence that Türkiye supplied Iran with. It was about the thirteen Kurdish groups that the Americans brought together to cross the border into Iran. So the Iranian side with Turkish intelligence let them in, let them onto the Iranian side and then they encircled them and presumably annihilated them. But, despite all that, in the 40 days war, the Americans and the Israelis, tried their luck with the so-called Kurdish forces once again against Iran. And this time around, Kurdish forces were very unwilling to do their bidding because they knew what was going to happen. I think it was at that stage that Erdogan, according to all the reports, called Trump and said, don’t do it, because if you do it then you will have to force us to collaborate and cooperate with Iran. And obviously you don’t want us to collaborate with Iran. So it was that point, I think, when the United States gave up the so-called Kurdish forces. And now they are very, you know, the Americans, Trump is basically dropping them off like hot potatoes, as they say in British English.’ —Prof. Dr. Hasan Ünal on the latest episode of Going Underground Watch the full interview in the quoted post below 👇

Prof. Hasan Ünal reveals how Türkiye🇹🇷 helped Iran ANNIHILATE US-backed Kurdish mercenaries ‘In December there was a piece of intelligence that Türkiye supplied Iran with. It was about the thirteen Kurdish groups that the Americans brought together to cross the border into Iran. So the Iranian side with Turkish intelligence let them in, let them onto the Iranian side and then they encircled them and presumably annihilated them. But, despite all that, in the 40 days war, the Americans and the Israelis, tried their luck with the so-called Kurdish forces once again against Iran. And this time around, Kurdish forces were very unwilling to do their bidding because they knew what was going to happen. I think it was at that stage that Erdogan, according to all the reports, called Trump and said, don’t do it, because if you do it then you will have to force us to collaborate and cooperate with Iran. And obviously you don’t want us to collaborate with Iran. So it was that point, I think, when the United States gave up the so-called Kurdish forces. And now they are very, you know, the Americans, Trump is basically dropping them off like hot potatoes, as they say in British English.’ —Prof. Dr. Hasan Ünal on the latest episode of Going Underground Watch the full interview in the quoted post below 👇

Going Underground

74,944 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

🚨ICYMI, Prof. John Mearsheimer: Iran ‘HOLDS ALL THE CARDS’ in war of attrition against US and Israel ‘President Trump believed, and the Israelis believed, that we could win a quick and decisive victory, that we could decapitate the Iranian regime, give them some shock and awe for the first few days, and the Iranians would throw up their hands and surrender. President Trump and his closest advisors all thought that we would not end up in a long war where these massive problems that are now beginning to surface would face us… But the problem is that President Trump did not have a coherent strategy or a viable strategy for winning a quick victory. And once the war turned into a war of attrition, it turns out that it’s the Iranians, not the Americans and the Israelis, who hold almost all of the cards.’ -Prof. John Mearsheimer, one of the world’s most respected realist International Relations scholars, on the first ever episode of New Order

🚨ICYMI, Prof. John Mearsheimer: Iran ‘HOLDS ALL THE CARDS’ in war of attrition against US and Israel ‘President Trump believed, and the Israelis believed, that we could win a quick and decisive victory, that we could decapitate the Iranian regime, give them some shock and awe for the first few days, and the Iranians would throw up their hands and surrender. President Trump and his closest advisors all thought that we would not end up in a long war where these massive problems that are now beginning to surface would face us… But the problem is that President Trump did not have a coherent strategy or a viable strategy for winning a quick victory. And once the war turned into a war of attrition, it turns out that it’s the Iranians, not the Americans and the Israelis, who hold almost all of the cards.’ -Prof. John Mearsheimer, one of the world’s most respected realist International Relations scholars, on the first ever episode of New Order

New Order with Afshin Rattansi

28,840 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 President Trump on Iran: "We ended the war with Iran today, and they agreed that they would never have a nuclear weapon, which is something we insisted on. That was the whole point. That was 95% of it, and they did it in the strongest way possible".

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 President Trump on Iran: "We ended the war with Iran today, and they agreed that they would never have a nuclear weapon, which is something we insisted on. That was the whole point. That was 95% of it, and they did it in the strongest way possible".

Eli Afriat 🇮🇱

42,512 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨 Marco Rubio DROPPED this line then walked away from the Fake News: "The people of Iran deserve better leadership. They slaughter their own people. By the thousands, they shoot them in the head, they slaughter them in the streets. Yeah, we don't like that!" "We don't think that's good for Iran. But our goal and our national interests in Iran is they can never have a nuclear weapon. And that's what they were going to try to do." "If they have been able to hide behind, double the number of missiles, double the number of drones. That's what they would have been in about a year, had they continued on the pace of construction." "Even though their economy was suffering, even though their people were suffering, that's what they were spending their money on." "Even though they had sanctions. The money that was coming in, they were spending it on those things. That tells you everything you need to know about them."

🚨 Marco Rubio DROPPED this line then walked away from the Fake News: "The people of Iran deserve better leadership. They slaughter their own people. By the thousands, they shoot them in the head, they slaughter them in the streets. Yeah, we don't like that!" "We don't think that's good for Iran. But our goal and our national interests in Iran is they can never have a nuclear weapon. And that's what they were going to try to do." "If they have been able to hide behind, double the number of missiles, double the number of drones. That's what they would have been in about a year, had they continued on the pace of construction." "Even though their economy was suffering, even though their people were suffering, that's what they were spending their money on." "Even though they had sanctions. The money that was coming in, they were spending it on those things. That tells you everything you need to know about them."

Eric Daugherty

89,318 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

"The Sunni Muslim Arab Gulf countries will not take kindly to being bombed by Iran, even though they did not join the war to start with. But not least because they bombed them, Iran bombed its neighbours, its Muslim neighbours in the middle of Ramadan. And they somehow expected Muslims to rally behind them. while they were bombing Muslims in the middle of Ramadan. All that's happened is that the Sunni Muslim Arabs surrounding Iran have decided that it's Iran who is their enemy because Israel isn't bombing them. Iran is. I mean, it's quite a no-brainer. It's quite obvious what they're upset about. And this is why Iran stands isolated in the region. And it's why nobody's coming to help the Iranian regime. And there will be no Russians. There will be no Chinese. President Trump, the Americans and the Israelis, have as long as they like bombing Iran until they decide to stop. And this is a horrible thing for the Iranian people. It is a horrible thing for those innocent people inside Iran. But the regime in Iran is going to be at the mercy of of the Americans and the Israelis. Whenever they elect a leader who decides to talk and cut a deal with Trump, this will stop. They will probably need to join the Gaza Peace Board..." Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED (See full livestream below)

"The Sunni Muslim Arab Gulf countries will not take kindly to being bombed by Iran, even though they did not join the war to start with. But not least because they bombed them, Iran bombed its neighbours, its Muslim neighbours in the middle of Ramadan. And they somehow expected Muslims to rally behind them. while they were bombing Muslims in the middle of Ramadan. All that's happened is that the Sunni Muslim Arabs surrounding Iran have decided that it's Iran who is their enemy because Israel isn't bombing them. Iran is. I mean, it's quite a no-brainer. It's quite obvious what they're upset about. And this is why Iran stands isolated in the region. And it's why nobody's coming to help the Iranian regime. And there will be no Russians. There will be no Chinese. President Trump, the Americans and the Israelis, have as long as they like bombing Iran until they decide to stop. And this is a horrible thing for the Iranian people. It is a horrible thing for those innocent people inside Iran. But the regime in Iran is going to be at the mercy of of the Americans and the Israelis. Whenever they elect a leader who decides to talk and cut a deal with Trump, this will stop. They will probably need to join the Gaza Peace Board..." Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED (See full livestream below)

أبو عمّار

40,431 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Former Israeli negotiator Daniel Levy: ‘Iran believes they can sustain the war LONGER than the US…unpopularity of the Iran war is UNPRECEDENTED.’ ‘In absolute terms Iranian losses are greater. But in terms of what the respective systems can absorb. I think they would still look at this and say the Americans can’t sustain this. The Americans can’t sustain petrol prices at the pump above a certain level. The Americans, we can see, they don’t want to put troops on the ground with 20 body bags. One is sure for the people who lost their lives, their families, is a terrible loss for them, but it’s sustainable. But not if that number ticks up and ticks up. What does it do to the midterms? What does it do to the markets? So I think they look at this. It’s a very unpopular war with the American public. Look at the grilling this week that War Secretary Hegseth took in the Senate. That is again unprecedented terrain. Just months into a military effort against a country that has been held up as the ultimate enemy in America for so long. And yet there he is being grilled on what the hell is going on with this war and its costs. So I think the Iranian calculation would be we can sustain this longer than them. And that has been an accurate calculation until now. The short term is that you still have an American system that doesn’t seem to have a joined up strategy, doesn’t seem to know what it wants to get out of this. Thought it was on a cakewalk here, and it’s been anything but.’ —Former Israeli negotiator Daniel Levy on the latest episode of Going Underground Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Former Israeli negotiator Daniel Levy: ‘Iran believes they can sustain the war LONGER than the US…unpopularity of the Iran war is UNPRECEDENTED.’ ‘In absolute terms Iranian losses are greater. But in terms of what the respective systems can absorb. I think they would still look at this and say the Americans can’t sustain this. The Americans can’t sustain petrol prices at the pump above a certain level. The Americans, we can see, they don’t want to put troops on the ground with 20 body bags. One is sure for the people who lost their lives, their families, is a terrible loss for them, but it’s sustainable. But not if that number ticks up and ticks up. What does it do to the midterms? What does it do to the markets? So I think they look at this. It’s a very unpopular war with the American public. Look at the grilling this week that War Secretary Hegseth took in the Senate. That is again unprecedented terrain. Just months into a military effort against a country that has been held up as the ultimate enemy in America for so long. And yet there he is being grilled on what the hell is going on with this war and its costs. So I think the Iranian calculation would be we can sustain this longer than them. And that has been an accurate calculation until now. The short term is that you still have an American system that doesn’t seem to have a joined up strategy, doesn’t seem to know what it wants to get out of this. Thought it was on a cakewalk here, and it’s been anything but.’ —Former Israeli negotiator Daniel Levy on the latest episode of Going Underground Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Going Underground

21,394 Aufrufe • vor 16 Tagen

🇺🇦 Little green corrupt bloody dwarf Zelensky has decided to share his view about the situation in Iran: We went through difficult relations with Iran... We didn't do anything to them. They shot down our plane, killed our passengers, the crew of the plane. People died. They did not admit it. They did not let the experts in. Then the full-scale war started. They handed over the Shahed drones to the Russians and were killing our civilians. I wanted to stop all that. I asked them. They promised that there would be no more than one batch of drones and they carried on lying and giving weapons. That's why I think of them as accomplices of Russia. 🤡 It seems that he doesn’t have enough Russian rockets and drones attacking Ukraine. The Overdue provokes Iran for a strike on Ukraine #News #Ukraine #MiddleEast #Iran

🇺🇦 Little green corrupt bloody dwarf Zelensky has decided to share his view about the situation in Iran: We went through difficult relations with Iran... We didn't do anything to them. They shot down our plane, killed our passengers, the crew of the plane. People died. They did not admit it. They did not let the experts in. Then the full-scale war started. They handed over the Shahed drones to the Russians and were killing our civilians. I wanted to stop all that. I asked them. They promised that there would be no more than one batch of drones and they carried on lying and giving weapons. That's why I think of them as accomplices of Russia. 🤡 It seems that he doesn’t have enough Russian rockets and drones attacking Ukraine. The Overdue provokes Iran for a strike on Ukraine #News #Ukraine #MiddleEast #Iran

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

12,884 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

.President Donald J. Trump: "In order to do it, they have to be a member of the Abraham Accords... it's time now that they do it. They, and others, didn't want to do it because of the problem that they had with Iran. You don't have that problem anymore... they were the bully of the Middle East. They're really not going to be that much of a bully anymore."

.President Donald J. Trump: "In order to do it, they have to be a member of the Abraham Accords... it's time now that they do it. They, and others, didn't want to do it because of the problem that they had with Iran. You don't have that problem anymore... they were the bully of the Middle East. They're really not going to be that much of a bully anymore."

Rapid Response 47

134,106 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

𝐀𝐌𝐄𝐑𝐈𝐂𝐀𝐍𝐒, 𝐘𝐎𝐔 𝐖𝐄𝐑𝐄 𝐋𝐈𝐄𝐃 𝐓𝐎 𝐀𝐁𝐎𝐔𝐓 𝐈𝐑𝐀𝐍 To all Americans: Do you see how much your administration and your president have lied to you? Look at the raw footage. Look at the millions of people flooding the streets for the funeral of Sayyed Ali Khamenei. For years, your government has fed you a narrative that the vast majority of Iranians are against their leadership. They lied when they claimed the Iranian government killed 80,000 of its own people, and they lied when they said their goal was to "liberate" Iran. The truth is simple: The people of Iran, and the people of the entire region, know exactly what the US and Israel are doing, acting as occupying forces trying to subjugate the region and steal its wealth. The next time Washington claims it wants to "liberate" the Iranian people, the American public should give them a reality check: The majority of Iranians stand firmly with their country. Nobody asked for American liberation. The truth is, the region wants the US out. The voices in Iran are not just mourning; they are demanding revenge and pledging allegiance to Sayyed Mojtaba. With their stupidity, the US and Israel wanted to end the regime in Iran, but they have only achieved the exact opposite. They gave a massive new boost to the Iranian state, completely uniting and gathering everyone around it. The West needs to finally understand a fundamental truth: Killing our leaders will never yield the results you want. Assassinations do not break us. On the contrary, they only bring us closer together, rallying the entire country and the whole region against US interference more than ever before.

𝐀𝐌𝐄𝐑𝐈𝐂𝐀𝐍𝐒, 𝐘𝐎𝐔 𝐖𝐄𝐑𝐄 𝐋𝐈𝐄𝐃 𝐓𝐎 𝐀𝐁𝐎𝐔𝐓 𝐈𝐑𝐀𝐍 To all Americans: Do you see how much your administration and your president have lied to you? Look at the raw footage. Look at the millions of people flooding the streets for the funeral of Sayyed Ali Khamenei. For years, your government has fed you a narrative that the vast majority of Iranians are against their leadership. They lied when they claimed the Iranian government killed 80,000 of its own people, and they lied when they said their goal was to "liberate" Iran. The truth is simple: The people of Iran, and the people of the entire region, know exactly what the US and Israel are doing, acting as occupying forces trying to subjugate the region and steal its wealth. The next time Washington claims it wants to "liberate" the Iranian people, the American public should give them a reality check: The majority of Iranians stand firmly with their country. Nobody asked for American liberation. The truth is, the region wants the US out. The voices in Iran are not just mourning; they are demanding revenge and pledging allegiance to Sayyed Mojtaba. With their stupidity, the US and Israel wanted to end the regime in Iran, but they have only achieved the exact opposite. They gave a massive new boost to the Iranian state, completely uniting and gathering everyone around it. The West needs to finally understand a fundamental truth: Killing our leaders will never yield the results you want. Assassinations do not break us. On the contrary, they only bring us closer together, rallying the entire country and the whole region against US interference more than ever before.

Ibrahim Majed

21,306 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Iran’s stance on Pakistan and the meeting of US aligned foreign ministers in Pakistan. “And it is very shameful that the foreign ministers of the region, Egypt, Türkiye, the Saudi and Pakistan issued a statement in which they blamed Iran for a war which they helped start. They assisted the US in bringing this war to the region. They assisted the US in assaulting our country, yet they have the audacity to blame Iran.”

Iran’s stance on Pakistan and the meeting of US aligned foreign ministers in Pakistan. “And it is very shameful that the foreign ministers of the region, Egypt, Türkiye, the Saudi and Pakistan issued a statement in which they blamed Iran for a war which they helped start. They assisted the US in bringing this war to the region. They assisted the US in assaulting our country, yet they have the audacity to blame Iran.”

Dawood Safi

60,177 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Another very important testimony on what happened in the now infamous Russia-Ukraine peace negotiations in Türkiye, 6 weeks into the war. This time by Jean-Daniel Ruch 👇, who was Switzerland's ambassador to Türkiye at the time. He confirms other accounts that it is the West - specifically "the Americans with their British allies" - that "pulled the plug on the negotiations" when they were "on the edge" of succeeding. He says they did so because they thought it was too early and they wanted to "first weaken Russia". As he describes it, he found the decision "deeply immoral" because "it was clear at that time that if the war continued there would be an escalation and the dead would be at least in the tens of thousands, more likely in the hundreds of thousands". He asks, rhetorically: "why did all these people die?" because now "they may have weakened Russia but they weakened the whole West at the same time, maybe not the Americans but certainly Europe." Also, if a peace deal was done today, it would still "pretty much be based on what was negotiated in Istanbul", assuming the Russians are still willing, a tall order given he's "not so sure that the Russians are prepared to compromise today."

Another very important testimony on what happened in the now infamous Russia-Ukraine peace negotiations in Türkiye, 6 weeks into the war. This time by Jean-Daniel Ruch 👇, who was Switzerland's ambassador to Türkiye at the time. He confirms other accounts that it is the West - specifically "the Americans with their British allies" - that "pulled the plug on the negotiations" when they were "on the edge" of succeeding. He says they did so because they thought it was too early and they wanted to "first weaken Russia". As he describes it, he found the decision "deeply immoral" because "it was clear at that time that if the war continued there would be an escalation and the dead would be at least in the tens of thousands, more likely in the hundreds of thousands". He asks, rhetorically: "why did all these people die?" because now "they may have weakened Russia but they weakened the whole West at the same time, maybe not the Americans but certainly Europe." Also, if a peace deal was done today, it would still "pretty much be based on what was negotiated in Istanbul", assuming the Russians are still willing, a tall order given he's "not so sure that the Russians are prepared to compromise today."

Arnaud Bertrand

628,732 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Fox’s Jacqui Heinrich: “Given how the Iranians have been behaving, do you have any regrets about lifting the naval blockade or giving the sanctions waivers?” President Trump: “N, no. I gave them a chance. I wanted to give them a chance at making a deal. You know, we had a deal two days ago. It was done, and then all of a sudden they couldn’t do it. They didn’t like something about the deal, they couldn’t do it, and they shot first, and that was a big mistake that they shot first, because we have been knocking the hell out of them. They’re very difficult people. 47 years we put up with it the USS Cole, you go back all the way. Thousands of people, thousands of Americans were killed. A lot of soldiers were killed. A lot of soldiers are walking around or not walking around. I mean, they’ve been so badly injured. The arms, the legs, the face with the Soleimani, with the bomb. A — they call it the roadside bomb. Most people call it the roadside bomb. It’s a disaster, and I killed him in my first administration. Had I not, it might be a different story today. He was a mad genius. He was a mad — probably a mad man. But he was a general and he had total control over the country, and I actually think the leaders of Iran were afraid of Soleimani. But I killed him. And by the way, with him went a very bad person, also. They happened to be meeting each other at the airport, and a very bad person from Iraq — happened to be a leader of Iraq — happened to be killed in that same incident. So, I don’t know if I did you a favor or not. I’ve never asked you that question. You probably would know better than me. But no, I think — I think that — I think that what we’ve done to Iran is we’ve taken away all of them, almost all of their military capability.”

Fox’s Jacqui Heinrich: “Given how the Iranians have been behaving, do you have any regrets about lifting the naval blockade or giving the sanctions waivers?” President Trump: “N, no. I gave them a chance. I wanted to give them a chance at making a deal. You know, we had a deal two days ago. It was done, and then all of a sudden they couldn’t do it. They didn’t like something about the deal, they couldn’t do it, and they shot first, and that was a big mistake that they shot first, because we have been knocking the hell out of them. They’re very difficult people. 47 years we put up with it the USS Cole, you go back all the way. Thousands of people, thousands of Americans were killed. A lot of soldiers were killed. A lot of soldiers are walking around or not walking around. I mean, they’ve been so badly injured. The arms, the legs, the face with the Soleimani, with the bomb. A — they call it the roadside bomb. Most people call it the roadside bomb. It’s a disaster, and I killed him in my first administration. Had I not, it might be a different story today. He was a mad genius. He was a mad — probably a mad man. But he was a general and he had total control over the country, and I actually think the leaders of Iran were afraid of Soleimani. But I killed him. And by the way, with him went a very bad person, also. They happened to be meeting each other at the airport, and a very bad person from Iraq — happened to be a leader of Iraq — happened to be killed in that same incident. So, I don’t know if I did you a favor or not. I’ve never asked you that question. You probably would know better than me. But no, I think — I think that — I think that what we’ve done to Iran is we’ve taken away all of them, almost all of their military capability.”

Curtis Houck

13,939 Aufrufe • vor 27 Tagen

In an interview for Al Mayadeen, Professor Mohammad Marandi said that he does not think #Iran wants to change mediators, explaining that the problem is with the US, not the mediators. As for Iran's relationship with #Oman, Professor Marandi noted that they have a very good relationship, explaining that Oman did not participate in this war like other #Gulf states. "So obviously, Iran has good relations with Oman, and it will discuss relations with countries in the region, as well as the situation with the United States, with Oman because they have experience with the #UnitedStates and they have longstanding relations with countries in the region," Professor Marandi said. He also noted that Iran and Oman share the Strait of Hormuz, adding that they need to coordinate on a host of different issues. Seyed Mohammad Marandi #IranWar #WarOnIran

In an interview for Al Mayadeen, Professor Mohammad Marandi said that he does not think #Iran wants to change mediators, explaining that the problem is with the US, not the mediators. As for Iran's relationship with #Oman, Professor Marandi noted that they have a very good relationship, explaining that Oman did not participate in this war like other #Gulf states. "So obviously, Iran has good relations with Oman, and it will discuss relations with countries in the region, as well as the situation with the United States, with Oman because they have experience with the #UnitedStates and they have longstanding relations with countries in the region," Professor Marandi said. He also noted that Iran and Oman share the Strait of Hormuz, adding that they need to coordinate on a host of different issues. Seyed Mohammad Marandi #IranWar #WarOnIran

Al Mayadeen English

13,015 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Did they really think that this lawsuit was going to work? Let me tell you something, if it did it would have set a precedent and the courts would be flooded everyday. There is definitely no lack of Thieves out there and they are not the brightest. This is a perfect example of that.

Did they really think that this lawsuit was going to work? Let me tell you something, if it did it would have set a precedent and the courts would be flooded everyday. There is definitely no lack of Thieves out there and they are not the brightest. This is a perfect example of that.

Johnny B. Good

1,422,996 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: "To me, it's [JFK's] most important speech. It's one of the most important speeches in American history; the thing that he did that was so unusual in that speech is he talked to the American people and asked them to put themselves in the shoes of the Russians..." "The zeitgeist of our era was that America had won the war and now we were going to rightfully dominate the peace. And he said something very, very different to Americans that challenged that patriotic assumption: He said, no, it was actually the Russians who won the war. They weakened Hitler and made it possible for us to march into Berlin." "And he talked about the suffering of the Russians during the war and to legitimize their security concerns, which nobody was doing... what he was saying to the Americans is, no, they have legitimate security concerns the same as we do, and we need to understand those things." "And he reminded Americans of the suffering that the Russians had endured, unimaginable suffering. One in seven Russians had been killed during World War II. He asked Americans to imagine that all of the land, all of the cities, all of the towns from the East Coast to Chicago had been leveled to rubble, that the forests and fields had been burned. And he said that's what happened to Russia during the war. That's what they sacrificed for us, and they have legitimate security concerns to make sure that never happens again..." "I'm speaking you today because the world is once again at a very similar crossroads. As in my uncle's time, nuclear tensions are at an extreme and dangerous level. As in his time, we have a unique opportunity not only to diffuse those tensions, but to take a radically different path, a path towards peace."

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: "To me, it's [JFK's] most important speech. It's one of the most important speeches in American history; the thing that he did that was so unusual in that speech is he talked to the American people and asked them to put themselves in the shoes of the Russians..." "The zeitgeist of our era was that America had won the war and now we were going to rightfully dominate the peace. And he said something very, very different to Americans that challenged that patriotic assumption: He said, no, it was actually the Russians who won the war. They weakened Hitler and made it possible for us to march into Berlin." "And he talked about the suffering of the Russians during the war and to legitimize their security concerns, which nobody was doing... what he was saying to the Americans is, no, they have legitimate security concerns the same as we do, and we need to understand those things." "And he reminded Americans of the suffering that the Russians had endured, unimaginable suffering. One in seven Russians had been killed during World War II. He asked Americans to imagine that all of the land, all of the cities, all of the towns from the East Coast to Chicago had been leveled to rubble, that the forests and fields had been burned. And he said that's what happened to Russia during the war. That's what they sacrificed for us, and they have legitimate security concerns to make sure that never happens again..." "I'm speaking you today because the world is once again at a very similar crossroads. As in my uncle's time, nuclear tensions are at an extreme and dangerous level. As in his time, we have a unique opportunity not only to diffuse those tensions, but to take a radically different path, a path towards peace."

COMBATE |🇵🇷

287,322 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

IRANIANS ARE NOT ARABIC ISLAMISTS - THEY ARE IRANIANS and their country has been occupied by regime that is not their own - by a regime that does not speak their language. The Ayatollah came to their country and changed their flag then they wrote on the flag in Arabic (which is not the Persian language) - They took out the symbol of the lion in the sun and replaced it with 'Allahu Akbar'. Then they replaced our ministries - our churches - our synagogues - Before the Ayatollahs occupied Iran - Iran had the biggest Jewish community outside of Israel, but they were wiped out along with the Christians. They forced everyone to convert to Islam and changed the language in their schools. They replaced the National Anthem of Iran. Are we going to allow this in DC or NYC or even TX?

IRANIANS ARE NOT ARABIC ISLAMISTS - THEY ARE IRANIANS and their country has been occupied by regime that is not their own - by a regime that does not speak their language. The Ayatollah came to their country and changed their flag then they wrote on the flag in Arabic (which is not the Persian language) - They took out the symbol of the lion in the sun and replaced it with 'Allahu Akbar'. Then they replaced our ministries - our churches - our synagogues - Before the Ayatollahs occupied Iran - Iran had the biggest Jewish community outside of Israel, but they were wiped out along with the Christians. They forced everyone to convert to Islam and changed the language in their schools. They replaced the National Anthem of Iran. Are we going to allow this in DC or NYC or even TX?

BelannF

118,542 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten