Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🇮🇷 Iran's highest military alert may be less about preparing for war than preparing its response Middle East analyst Nima Rostami says Tehran was expecting a U.S. strike and believes any future attack on Iran's energy infrastructure would likely trigger a response focused on Israel rather than Gulf states.... show more

Mario Nawfal

3,779,231 subscribers

68,663 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🇮🇷 If Iran's energy infrastructure comes under sustained attack, Nima Rostami believes Tehran's response would likely focus on oil, not civilians. The Middle East analyst says Gulf oil facilities would be the most probable targets, arguing Iran would try to maximize economic pressure while avoiding large-scale civilian casualties. Rostami also contends Iran has spent years preparing for attacks on its own power grid, while questioning whether Gulf states have built the same level of resilience. "They've studied every scenario. I'm not sure the Gulf countries have." Dialogue works

🇮🇷 If Iran's energy infrastructure comes under sustained attack, Nima Rostami believes Tehran's response would likely focus on oil, not civilians. The Middle East analyst says Gulf oil facilities would be the most probable targets, arguing Iran would try to maximize economic pressure while avoiding large-scale civilian casualties. Rostami also contends Iran has spent years preparing for attacks on its own power grid, while questioning whether Gulf states have built the same level of resilience. "They've studied every scenario. I'm not sure the Gulf countries have." Dialogue works

Mario Nawfal

74,201 views • 1 month ago

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump may be preparing to make the biggest gamble of his presidency. Iranian analyst Nima Rostami Alkhorshid says reports of U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran's energy infrastructure would mark a major escalation, one that Tehran has spent years preparing for. Start with the targets. The reported plan isn't just to hit missile launchers or military sites. It's to strike the infrastructure that powers Iran's economy, while degrading its ability to retaliate over a campaign that could last days or even weeks. Nima believes Iran's response has already been mapped out. Israel would remain the primary target, but Gulf oil facilities, power infrastructure and American military assets across the region would also come into play. Not because Tehran wants a wider war. Because it wants Washington to understand that attacks on Iran's economy will immediately become attacks on the region's economy. That brings him to the Strait of Hormuz. Nima argues the dispute isn't really about charging ships a transit fee. It's all about security. Iran wants control over what enters the Gulf after watching weapons, missiles and military equipment flow through the region during the conflict. In his view, controlling inbound traffic is now seen in Tehran as essential to preventing another war. He believes it's a struggle over whether the Middle East remains under American dominance or moves toward a new regional balance of power. And if neither side is willing to concede that question, the military campaign may last far longer than anyone currently expects. Dialogue works

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump may be preparing to make the biggest gamble of his presidency. Iranian analyst Nima Rostami Alkhorshid says reports of U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran's energy infrastructure would mark a major escalation, one that Tehran has spent years preparing for. Start with the targets. The reported plan isn't just to hit missile launchers or military sites. It's to strike the infrastructure that powers Iran's economy, while degrading its ability to retaliate over a campaign that could last days or even weeks. Nima believes Iran's response has already been mapped out. Israel would remain the primary target, but Gulf oil facilities, power infrastructure and American military assets across the region would also come into play. Not because Tehran wants a wider war. Because it wants Washington to understand that attacks on Iran's economy will immediately become attacks on the region's economy. That brings him to the Strait of Hormuz. Nima argues the dispute isn't really about charging ships a transit fee. It's all about security. Iran wants control over what enters the Gulf after watching weapons, missiles and military equipment flow through the region during the conflict. In his view, controlling inbound traffic is now seen in Tehran as essential to preventing another war. He believes it's a struggle over whether the Middle East remains under American dominance or moves toward a new regional balance of power. And if neither side is willing to concede that question, the military campaign may last far longer than anyone currently expects. Dialogue works

Mario Nawfal

313,899 views • 1 month ago

🇺🇸🇮🇷 NEW: US Could Target Iran's Oil Refineries, Power Plants & Energy Infrastructure According to CBS, citing two U.S. officials, Iran's power plants, oil refineries, and broader energy infrastructure would likely be among the targets in a potential future U.S. military offensive. If carried out, such strikes would mark a major escalation with potentially significant consequences for the Middle East and global energy markets.

🇺🇸🇮🇷 NEW: US Could Target Iran's Oil Refineries, Power Plants & Energy Infrastructure According to CBS, citing two U.S. officials, Iran's power plants, oil refineries, and broader energy infrastructure would likely be among the targets in a potential future U.S. military offensive. If carried out, such strikes would mark a major escalation with potentially significant consequences for the Middle East and global energy markets.

Defence Index

12,643 views • 1 month ago

🇮🇷 🇺🇸 Iran is signaling that any U.S. economic blockade would trigger a military response rather than force Tehran to back down. Middle East analyst Joshua Landis says recent Iranian strikes were designed to warn Washington that pressure on the Strait of Hormuz would not remain an economic contest. Instead, he argues, Tehran would expand the battlefield by targeting U.S. assets and regional infrastructure, turning sanctions into a wider kinetic conflict. His assessment is that Tehran is trying to convince Washington that economic warfare cannot remain separate from military escalation. Joshua Landis

🇮🇷 🇺🇸 Iran is signaling that any U.S. economic blockade would trigger a military response rather than force Tehran to back down. Middle East analyst Joshua Landis says recent Iranian strikes were designed to warn Washington that pressure on the Strait of Hormuz would not remain an economic contest. Instead, he argues, Tehran would expand the battlefield by targeting U.S. assets and regional infrastructure, turning sanctions into a wider kinetic conflict. His assessment is that Tehran is trying to convince Washington that economic warfare cannot remain separate from military escalation. Joshua Landis

Mario Nawfal

86,521 views • 1 month ago

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 Any hopes for a controlled, localized military strike against Tehran are nothing more than a dangerous fairy tale. Professor David N. Gibbs argues that a symbolic U.S. attack would immediately backfire, forcing Iran to respond with full, disproportionate military force across the region. Prof. Gibbs believes that any escalation on the part of the U.S. will likely drag the entire Gulf into an uncontainable, full-scale regional war. David N. Gibbs

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 Any hopes for a controlled, localized military strike against Tehran are nothing more than a dangerous fairy tale. Professor David N. Gibbs argues that a symbolic U.S. attack would immediately backfire, forcing Iran to respond with full, disproportionate military force across the region. Prof. Gibbs believes that any escalation on the part of the U.S. will likely drag the entire Gulf into an uncontainable, full-scale regional war. David N. Gibbs

Mario Nawfal

94,469 views • 4 months ago

‼️🇮🇷🇺🇸 BIG | Iran's Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters has issued a stark warning that any U.S. strike on Iranian infrastructure would trigger a far broader regional confrontation. According to the statement, Tehran would respond by targeting oil, gas, electricity, and other critical economic infrastructure across the region while moving to halt regional energy exports. Iranian officials warned that attacks on Iran's infrastructure would not remain a bilateral conflict, but would expand well beyond the country's borders. The threat highlights the growing risk that military escalation could quickly evolve into an energy and economic crisis. Any disruption to Gulf oil exports or attacks on regional energy infrastructure would likely send global energy prices sharply higher, threaten maritime trade, and draw additional regional actors deeper into the conflict. While the statement reflects Iran's declared position, it does not by itself confirm that such actions are imminent. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

‼️🇮🇷🇺🇸 BIG | Iran's Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters has issued a stark warning that any U.S. strike on Iranian infrastructure would trigger a far broader regional confrontation. According to the statement, Tehran would respond by targeting oil, gas, electricity, and other critical economic infrastructure across the region while moving to halt regional energy exports. Iranian officials warned that attacks on Iran's infrastructure would not remain a bilateral conflict, but would expand well beyond the country's borders. The threat highlights the growing risk that military escalation could quickly evolve into an energy and economic crisis. Any disruption to Gulf oil exports or attacks on regional energy infrastructure would likely send global energy prices sharply higher, threaten maritime trade, and draw additional regional actors deeper into the conflict. While the statement reflects Iran's declared position, it does not by itself confirm that such actions are imminent. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

28,494 views • 2 months ago

‼️🇺🇸🇮🇷🇮🇱 Over the past few hours, virtually every major US outlet has been reporting that Trump ordered military forces to launch a massive bombing campaign against Iran's energy and critical infrastructure to force Tehran into accepting American terms. At the same time, Israeli media reports that the campaign could start this weekend, with Israel likely participating as well. Iran has already responded to the reports, stating it is prepared for further escalation and knows how to react if the US targets its energy facilities. Tehran signaled that if its energy infrastructure gets hit, the facilities of US allies in the Persian Gulf won't be safe either, warning of a mirror response.

‼️🇺🇸🇮🇷🇮🇱 Over the past few hours, virtually every major US outlet has been reporting that Trump ordered military forces to launch a massive bombing campaign against Iran's energy and critical infrastructure to force Tehran into accepting American terms. At the same time, Israeli media reports that the campaign could start this weekend, with Israel likely participating as well. Iran has already responded to the reports, stating it is prepared for further escalation and knows how to react if the US targets its energy facilities. Tehran signaled that if its energy infrastructure gets hit, the facilities of US allies in the Persian Gulf won't be safe either, warning of a mirror response.

NSTRIKE

171,468 views • 1 month ago

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The headlines are focused on negotiations. Philip Pilkington is looking somewhere else: the U.S. weapons inventory. He argues Iran's latest warning to Gulf states changed the calculation. A future round of strikes could trigger a much wider economic shock by targeting regional energy infrastructure. Meanwhile, Pilkington says Washington faces a shrinking menu of options. More attacks would mean higher risks for aircraft, fewer available weapons, and a conflict that becomes harder to control. Can America afford the consequences of another big strike on Iran? Philip Pilkington

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The headlines are focused on negotiations. Philip Pilkington is looking somewhere else: the U.S. weapons inventory. He argues Iran's latest warning to Gulf states changed the calculation. A future round of strikes could trigger a much wider economic shock by targeting regional energy infrastructure. Meanwhile, Pilkington says Washington faces a shrinking menu of options. More attacks would mean higher risks for aircraft, fewer available weapons, and a conflict that becomes harder to control. Can America afford the consequences of another big strike on Iran? Philip Pilkington

Mario Nawfal

55,321 views • 1 month ago

NEW: 🇮🇷🇮🇱🇺🇸 Iran's Minister of Energy says Iran generates electricity through a decentralized system and operate more than 150 power plants that they built entirely on their own. In contrast, the countries bordering the Persian Gulf and Israel generate electricity through a centralized system, which makes them extremely vulnerable

NEW: 🇮🇷🇮🇱🇺🇸 Iran's Minister of Energy says Iran generates electricity through a decentralized system and operate more than 150 power plants that they built entirely on their own. In contrast, the countries bordering the Persian Gulf and Israel generate electricity through a centralized system, which makes them extremely vulnerable

Megatron

98,006 views • 6 months ago

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Before any missile flies, the Iran war plan already has a logistics problem. Geopolitical analyst Alex Krainer says Washington may no longer be able to count on Gulf bases or Gulf airspace, especially as those countries improve ties with Tehran and know their own energy infrastructure would be on the line. "Without the access to the American bases in the region, it's going to become a lot harder, if not impossible, for the Americans to conduct a new operation against Iran." Alex (Sasha) Krainer

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Before any missile flies, the Iran war plan already has a logistics problem. Geopolitical analyst Alex Krainer says Washington may no longer be able to count on Gulf bases or Gulf airspace, especially as those countries improve ties with Tehran and know their own energy infrastructure would be on the line. "Without the access to the American bases in the region, it's going to become a lot harder, if not impossible, for the Americans to conduct a new operation against Iran." Alex (Sasha) Krainer

Mario Nawfal

56,504 views • 2 months ago

🚨🇮🇷 Geopolitical Analyst Nima Rostami Alkhorshid says Iran is doubling down on its historic role as the primary defender of the Persian Gulf. Tehran is signaling a transition toward "new management" of the Strait of Hormuz intended to end decades of foreign military domination. Regional leaders increasingly view the U.S. military presence as a primary cause of insecurity rather than a stabilizing force. "America's presence the most important cause of insecurity in the Gulf". The era of Western control over the world’s most critical maritime chokepoint is being directly challenged.

🚨🇮🇷 Geopolitical Analyst Nima Rostami Alkhorshid says Iran is doubling down on its historic role as the primary defender of the Persian Gulf. Tehran is signaling a transition toward "new management" of the Strait of Hormuz intended to end decades of foreign military domination. Regional leaders increasingly view the U.S. military presence as a primary cause of insecurity rather than a stabilizing force. "America's presence the most important cause of insecurity in the Gulf". The era of Western control over the world’s most critical maritime chokepoint is being directly challenged.

Mario Nawfal

35,892 views • 4 months ago

🇺🇸💥Pentagon Prepares for Potential Ground Invasion of Iran: U.S. forces struck dozens of military sites on Iran's Kharg Island overnight. The targets included bunkers, ammunition storage facilities, a radar station, and other military infrastructure such as naval mine and missile storage sites. Landing docks and oil infrastructure were reportedly not intentionally targeted. Kharg Island is Iran's primary oil export hub in the Persian Gulf, responsible for handling approximately 90% of the country's crude oil exports through its terminals, pipelines, and storage facilities. By focusing strikes exclusively on military assets, the U.S. appears to be applying pressure on Iran while deliberately avoiding direct damage to the island’s critical economic infrastructure, which could trigger a sharp rise in global oil prices. The key question now is whether these strikes are preparation for a potential invasion or seizure of the island. In such a scenario, the most likely approach would be for U.S. forces to insert troops via air assault.

🇺🇸💥Pentagon Prepares for Potential Ground Invasion of Iran: U.S. forces struck dozens of military sites on Iran's Kharg Island overnight. The targets included bunkers, ammunition storage facilities, a radar station, and other military infrastructure such as naval mine and missile storage sites. Landing docks and oil infrastructure were reportedly not intentionally targeted. Kharg Island is Iran's primary oil export hub in the Persian Gulf, responsible for handling approximately 90% of the country's crude oil exports through its terminals, pipelines, and storage facilities. By focusing strikes exclusively on military assets, the U.S. appears to be applying pressure on Iran while deliberately avoiding direct damage to the island’s critical economic infrastructure, which could trigger a sharp rise in global oil prices. The key question now is whether these strikes are preparation for a potential invasion or seizure of the island. In such a scenario, the most likely approach would be for U.S. forces to insert troops via air assault.

WORLD AT WAR

20,131 views • 5 months ago

🚨 WATER WARS: WHY DESALINATION PLANTS ARE THE GULF’S LIFELINE When missiles fly in the Middle East, people usually think of oil fields, pipelines, or military bases, but in the Gulf, there is another target that may be even more critical, water. The Iranian drone strike on a Bahraini desalination plant, and Iran’s claim that the U.S. targeted a similar facility on Qeshm Island, signals a dangerous new phase in the war. Because in the Gulf, desalination plants are essential for survival. Unlike most regions of the world, the Gulf has almost no natural freshwater. Rainfall is scarce, rivers are nonexistent, and groundwater reserves are limited and rapidly depleting. So Gulf states turned to the sea. Today, massive desalination plants pull salt from seawater and convert it into drinkable water for cities, industries, and agriculture. Without them, daily life across the region would collapse almost overnight. The Gulf Cooperation Council countries control roughly 60% of the world’s desalination capacity and produce about 40% of all desalinated water globally. More than 400 desalination plants operate across the region, quietly supplying the water that keeps cities running. In Kuwait, about 90% of drinking water comes from desalination. In Oman, it’s 86%. Even the United Arab Emirates, with one of the most advanced infrastructure systems on the planet, gets about 42% of its drinking water from the sea. That’s what makes attacks on these facilities so alarming. Unlike oil infrastructure, which affects markets and government revenue, desalination plants affect people immediately. Take out a refinery and the economy suffers. Take out a desalination plant and millions could lose access to drinking water. Energy infrastructure has always been part of regional conflict, but targeting water infrastructure raises the stakes dramatically.

🚨 WATER WARS: WHY DESALINATION PLANTS ARE THE GULF’S LIFELINE When missiles fly in the Middle East, people usually think of oil fields, pipelines, or military bases, but in the Gulf, there is another target that may be even more critical, water. The Iranian drone strike on a Bahraini desalination plant, and Iran’s claim that the U.S. targeted a similar facility on Qeshm Island, signals a dangerous new phase in the war. Because in the Gulf, desalination plants are essential for survival. Unlike most regions of the world, the Gulf has almost no natural freshwater. Rainfall is scarce, rivers are nonexistent, and groundwater reserves are limited and rapidly depleting. So Gulf states turned to the sea. Today, massive desalination plants pull salt from seawater and convert it into drinkable water for cities, industries, and agriculture. Without them, daily life across the region would collapse almost overnight. The Gulf Cooperation Council countries control roughly 60% of the world’s desalination capacity and produce about 40% of all desalinated water globally. More than 400 desalination plants operate across the region, quietly supplying the water that keeps cities running. In Kuwait, about 90% of drinking water comes from desalination. In Oman, it’s 86%. Even the United Arab Emirates, with one of the most advanced infrastructure systems on the planet, gets about 42% of its drinking water from the sea. That’s what makes attacks on these facilities so alarming. Unlike oil infrastructure, which affects markets and government revenue, desalination plants affect people immediately. Take out a refinery and the economy suffers. Take out a desalination plant and millions could lose access to drinking water. Energy infrastructure has always been part of regional conflict, but targeting water infrastructure raises the stakes dramatically.

Mario Nawfal

271,019 views • 6 months ago

🇸🇦🇺🇸 The petrodollar system was built on a simple loop: Gulf states sell oil for dollars, then recycle part of those surpluses into U.S. assets. Philip Pilkington argues the Iran and Yemen wars are disrupting that loop at its source. “𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘭𝘰𝘸 𝘪𝘯 𝘪𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘰𝘧𝘧 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘢𝘳.” The Gulf still holds an enormous stock of dollar assets. But if oil revenues remain impaired, Pilkington says those countries could eventually have to start liquidating some of those assets to support their economies and currency pegs. That would be a remarkable reversal. Instead of Gulf oil revenues creating demand for US assets, a prolonged energy crisis could turn the Gulf into a seller of them. Philip Pilkington

🇸🇦🇺🇸 The petrodollar system was built on a simple loop: Gulf states sell oil for dollars, then recycle part of those surpluses into U.S. assets. Philip Pilkington argues the Iran and Yemen wars are disrupting that loop at its source. “𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘧𝘭𝘰𝘸 𝘪𝘯 𝘪𝘴 𝘯𝘰𝘸 𝘰𝘧𝘧 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘵𝘳𝘰𝘥𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘢𝘳.” The Gulf still holds an enormous stock of dollar assets. But if oil revenues remain impaired, Pilkington says those countries could eventually have to start liquidating some of those assets to support their economies and currency pegs. That would be a remarkable reversal. Instead of Gulf oil revenues creating demand for US assets, a prolonged energy crisis could turn the Gulf into a seller of them. Philip Pilkington

Mario Nawfal

83,067 views • 10 days ago

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Iran has issued a direct warning that any U.S. attack on civilian infrastructure inside the country could trigger retaliatory strikes across the wider region. An Iranian military official, quoted by the Tasnim News Agency, said that if American forces target bridges, power plants, or other critical facilities in Iran, Tehran will respond by attacking regional infrastructure connected to U.S. interests. The official specifically mentioned bridges and energy facilities as potential targets. The warning signals that Iran may no longer limit its response to military installations alone. Any attack on energy or transport infrastructure could rapidly widen the conflict, threaten regional economies, and disrupt global energy supplies. It also places U.S. allies and partners in the region under greater pressure, as facilities linked to Washington could become part of Iran’s retaliation strategy. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Iran has issued a direct warning that any U.S. attack on civilian infrastructure inside the country could trigger retaliatory strikes across the wider region. An Iranian military official, quoted by the Tasnim News Agency, said that if American forces target bridges, power plants, or other critical facilities in Iran, Tehran will respond by attacking regional infrastructure connected to U.S. interests. The official specifically mentioned bridges and energy facilities as potential targets. The warning signals that Iran may no longer limit its response to military installations alone. Any attack on energy or transport infrastructure could rapidly widen the conflict, threaten regional economies, and disrupt global energy supplies. It also places U.S. allies and partners in the region under greater pressure, as facilities linked to Washington could become part of Iran’s retaliation strategy. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

21,146 views • 2 months ago

🇺🇸 🇮🇷 Joshua Landis says the fight over the Strait of Hormuz is ultimately about American power and prestige, not whether Iran would permanently choke off global oil supplies. The Middle East analyst argues U.S. dominance in the Gulf has long underpinned its role as the world's leading superpower, giving Washington strategic leverage over global energy flows. But he contends Iran has every incentive to keep oil moving, since its own economy depends on exports. Losing exclusive dominance in the Gulf would damage U.S. credibility, but not necessarily trigger a collapse of the global energy system. Joshua Landis

🇺🇸 🇮🇷 Joshua Landis says the fight over the Strait of Hormuz is ultimately about American power and prestige, not whether Iran would permanently choke off global oil supplies. The Middle East analyst argues U.S. dominance in the Gulf has long underpinned its role as the world's leading superpower, giving Washington strategic leverage over global energy flows. But he contends Iran has every incentive to keep oil moving, since its own economy depends on exports. Losing exclusive dominance in the Gulf would damage U.S. credibility, but not necessarily trigger a collapse of the global energy system. Joshua Landis

Mario Nawfal

32,313 views • 1 month ago

🚨🇸🇦 REGIME COLLAPSE RISK? GULF STATES ARE EXPOSED Scott Ritter argues Saudi Arabia and the UAE lack the military capacity to change the war’s trajectory, warning any direct strike on Iran would be repaid “tenfold.” He says Gulf economies are built on secure energy exports, and sustained attacks on oil and gas infrastructure could trigger internal instability, especially in Bahrain and eastern Saudi Arabia. Scott dismisses talk of U.S. “boots on the ground,” saying America lacks the troops, logistics, and time for a major invasion, leaving Washington with limited leverage. Scott Ritter

🚨🇸🇦 REGIME COLLAPSE RISK? GULF STATES ARE EXPOSED Scott Ritter argues Saudi Arabia and the UAE lack the military capacity to change the war’s trajectory, warning any direct strike on Iran would be repaid “tenfold.” He says Gulf economies are built on secure energy exports, and sustained attacks on oil and gas infrastructure could trigger internal instability, especially in Bahrain and eastern Saudi Arabia. Scott dismisses talk of U.S. “boots on the ground,” saying America lacks the troops, logistics, and time for a major invasion, leaving Washington with limited leverage. Scott Ritter

Mario Nawfal

210,369 views • 6 months ago

🚨🇮🇱🇮🇷 THE OIL MESSAGE: A TASTE OF THEIR OWN MEDICINE The strike on the Tehran oil depot wasn't just about fuel; it was a strategic message to the regime that their own energy sector is vulnerable. Jonathan Conricus explains that since the IRGC uses this oil for its military efforts and air defenses, it remains a legitimate target. This serves as a signal to the Gulf nations that Israel and the U.S. can retaliate against Iranian aggression in kind. If the regime continues to strike regional infrastructure, they must realize the consequences for their own economy will be total disintegration. Jonathan Conricus

🚨🇮🇱🇮🇷 THE OIL MESSAGE: A TASTE OF THEIR OWN MEDICINE The strike on the Tehran oil depot wasn't just about fuel; it was a strategic message to the regime that their own energy sector is vulnerable. Jonathan Conricus explains that since the IRGC uses this oil for its military efforts and air defenses, it remains a legitimate target. This serves as a signal to the Gulf nations that Israel and the U.S. can retaliate against Iranian aggression in kind. If the regime continues to strike regional infrastructure, they must realize the consequences for their own economy will be total disintegration. Jonathan Conricus

Mario Nawfal

70,068 views • 6 months ago

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Philip Pilkington believes the biggest mistake Washington could make is targeting Iran's energy infrastructure. Not because it would fail to inflict damage. But because it could lock the global economy into a crisis that lasts far longer than the war itself. According to Philip, oil markets have remained surprisingly calm because investors still assume escalation can be contained. He argues that assumption disappears the moment energy infrastructure becomes a battlefield. His point is that repairing pipelines, export terminals and refineries takes months, sometimes more than a year. Every strike extends the disruption. Even if the fighting ends quickly, the economic consequences don't. Philip also believes Washington has relied on the ability to repeatedly de-escalate whenever oil prices threatened to spike. If that option disappears, he argues, markets will be forced to confront risks they have largely ignored. His warning goes beyond oil. He believes a prolonged energy shock would hit major importers like Japan first, expose deeper cracks in the global financial system, and eventually put pressure on the U.S. dollar itself. In his view, striking Iran's energy infrastructure wouldn't end the crisis. It would simply make it much harder to stop. Philip Pilkington

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Philip Pilkington believes the biggest mistake Washington could make is targeting Iran's energy infrastructure. Not because it would fail to inflict damage. But because it could lock the global economy into a crisis that lasts far longer than the war itself. According to Philip, oil markets have remained surprisingly calm because investors still assume escalation can be contained. He argues that assumption disappears the moment energy infrastructure becomes a battlefield. His point is that repairing pipelines, export terminals and refineries takes months, sometimes more than a year. Every strike extends the disruption. Even if the fighting ends quickly, the economic consequences don't. Philip also believes Washington has relied on the ability to repeatedly de-escalate whenever oil prices threatened to spike. If that option disappears, he argues, markets will be forced to confront risks they have largely ignored. His warning goes beyond oil. He believes a prolonged energy shock would hit major importers like Japan first, expose deeper cracks in the global financial system, and eventually put pressure on the U.S. dollar itself. In his view, striking Iran's energy infrastructure wouldn't end the crisis. It would simply make it much harder to stop. Philip Pilkington

Mario Nawfal

271,093 views • 1 month ago

🇮🇷 Strike Iran's power grid, and every Gulf state goes dark in 50-degree heat. Military and political analyst Elijah Magnier spells out the retaliation scenario everyone keeps ignoring. If Israel or the US hits Iranian energy infrastructure, the response wouldn't stay inside Iran's borders: "If the Americans hit the energy and electricity power plants, you can be sure that all of the energy and electricity power plants in all the GCC countries will be completely destroyed." Picture the Gulf's glass towers with no air conditioning at the peak of summer. The Middle East becomes, in Magnier's words, the biggest free sauna on earth. Elijah J. Magnier 🇪🇺

🇮🇷 Strike Iran's power grid, and every Gulf state goes dark in 50-degree heat. Military and political analyst Elijah Magnier spells out the retaliation scenario everyone keeps ignoring. If Israel or the US hits Iranian energy infrastructure, the response wouldn't stay inside Iran's borders: "If the Americans hit the energy and electricity power plants, you can be sure that all of the energy and electricity power plants in all the GCC countries will be completely destroyed." Picture the Gulf's glass towers with no air conditioning at the peak of summer. The Middle East becomes, in Magnier's words, the biggest free sauna on earth. Elijah J. Magnier 🇪🇺

Mario Nawfal

136,926 views • 2 months ago