Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

IRAN’S RAIN RETURNS, AFTER A STRIKE ON A UAE CLOUD-SEEDING BASE For decades, large parts of Iran have suffered through severe drought, parched farmland, and dwindling water supplies. Now, areas that have struggled for generations are seeing rain and snowfall at levels not recorded in more than 60 years....

298,646 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

I joined this Texas Clear Sky Movement because I need to learn a lot more facts about what is going on and what effects whatever is going on is having on Texas. I post this hearing of Texas House State Representative Wes Virdell, TX State Rep 's on his HB 1382 which started out as a bill to eliminate weather modification and changed into one to stop geoengineering spraying in Texas. In this hearing, I, and I think the Texas House members on the panel learned a lot about the issue. My summary of the hearing is that we learned that there are two different programs/activities going on. One is rain enhancement and to a slight extent, hail size reduction activities going on in Texas that is regulated by the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation (TDLR). The rain enhancement activities carried out by the state spray silver iodide into developing thunderclouds in the troposphere (between 5000 and 10,000 feet) in the air with the objective of increasing the rain produced in the clouds. There are 5 or 6 companies/entities licensed to do this in Texas. One representative in the hearing said that his brother living in Oklahoma is noted that rain enhancement into a developing cell in Texas eventually developed into a tornadic system that hit his house with a tornado. He saw the correlation and presumed that the Texas cloud seeding created the tornado that hit his house. The science expert for TDLR did not agree that cloud seeding causes tornadoes. He said it is designed to create more rain. The other activity going on is the stratospheric (several miles high) spaying of aluminum compounds (and maybe barium and strontium based compounds) in the grid patterns. This is called geoengineering. A representative of one of the rain enhancement companies said that this was being done with the objective of reducing global warming by creating a haze that reflects sunlight away from the earth. I am still unclear who is doing the geoengineering spraying. Is it the federal government as the rain enhancement rep said? Or is it privately funded? I have seen a video elsewhere of a former CIA director admitting it is being done. But if it is the feds, what federal entity is doing it? How much fed money is going to do it? When was it authorized, and for what purpose? After TDLR and the entities doing the cloud seeding in Texas (some of whom testified) visited Rep Virdell to tell him about the difference between weather mod/rain enhancement and geoengineering, claiming positive and benign effects of weather modification, Virdell changed his bill to target geoengineering being done instead of any regulated or funded by the state of Texas. The bill by Virdell had the votes to get out of committee and to the House floor, but Chair Dade Phelan (the former speaker of the Texas House and the chair of the committee in the video) refused to hold a vote, so the bill died. BTW, Kerrville is in Wes Virdell's district, and he has been out doing what he can to help in the response to the devastation of the flooding in his district. Note also that the testimony from citizens was primarily targeted at the health and environmental risks associated with spaying heavy metals and silver iodide over Texas. One of the rain production proponents claimed he has never seen a study that says that silver iodide for rain seeding is not safe. But I think I heard one of the witnesses saying that there are studies that are. But, boy, I still have a lot of questions. 1) How do we know that the Texas regulated rain enhancement program is not causing these freak rainstorms? I want to see a lot more science on this. I even think that the question about the enhancement of tornadic activity by cloud seeding that was asked has not been answered to my satisfaction. And I would VERY MUCH like to know if there was any cloud seeding activity that correlates with this most recent flooding episode. 2) Who is doing the geoengineering over Texas? How was it authorized? What chemicals are they using? What health and environmental studies have been done on whatever they are spaying? 3) What studies have been done on the impacts on weather (and rain production and tornadic impact) from the geoengineering going on that takes into account the combination of BOTH Texas weather mod activity AND geoengineering spraying? (This is kind of like asking whether there have ever been any safety studies on the combination of all the vaccines being recommended for children, nowadays. It is possible that one activity by itself does not do any harm, but a combination of multiple factors does.) I argued in the hearing that we need a stop to all of this until the people of Texas have had time to have input into what is being sprayed on them and what the health, environmental, and weather impacts are on them using unbiased, special-interest free studies. I still believe that. I hope that by reading info provided in this group, I will get a lot more answers to these questions. Thanks for letting me join.

Tom Glass

114,959 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

THERE IT IS 🚨 Mainstream media finally reporting our skies are being sprayed to cloud seed and change the weather New cloud seeding drones are also being introduced into America We need a nationwide ban over populated areas before this expands “Well, much of the country is plagued by drought, and while cloud seeding with silver iodide powder like this is nothing new, it's been around for decades Doing it by drone, that could be a huge game changer. Leading the charge on this front is Rainmaker, a startup company here in Southern California that's already adding a bit to overall precipitation levels in California, Oregon, Idaho, and Utah. CEO Augustus Derico, especially proud of ongoing efforts to save the Great Salt Lake, which is currently just half of what it was back in the 1980s. Working with state governments in Utah and Idaho, Rainmaker has had its drones seeding clouds to enhance snowpack and runoff into Salt Lake — Drought is hardly limited to the West. In fact, much of the Southeast is currently plagued with conditions categorized as extreme or exceptional — But cloud seeding is controversial and actually banned in Florida, Tennessee, and Louisiana. Rainmaker argues there's been human intervention throughout history in handling water resources. Now, cloud seeding with drones also offers new hope with firefighting, and more moisture in the ground overall would also help with fire prevention” It’s actually been around much longer has been practiced for over 80 years and is actively used in multiple states. Cloud seeding began with experiments in the 1940s. As of 2024–2025, at least nine states have active programs: California, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Texas, Utah, and Wyoming Silver Iodide Dry Ice (Solid Carbon Dioxide) Sodium Chloride (Table Salt) Calcium Chloride Potassium Iodide Liquid Propane And a few more chemicals are used in cloud seeding We don’t want to be breathing this stuff in. Ban it over populated areas. Don’t forget the chemicals come down as rain and get absorbed by our crops

Wall Street Apes

62,360 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨 IDAHO WAS THE WEATHER WARFARE TEST RUN — AND PEOPLE ARE STARTING TO PANIC Something isn't adding up. The world is burning. Record heat. Historic wildfires. Floods that seem to come out of nowhere. Entire regions running out of water. Weather patterns that many people swear aren't behaving naturally anymore. And right in the middle of it all, scientists, governments, and powerful institutions are suddenly talking openly about modifying the weather. For years, anyone who brought up weather modification was laughed out of the room. Now the conversation isn't happening in the shadows. It's happening in public. Not whether it can be done. Whether it should be done. Then Idaho happened. The footage spread everywhere. And for a lot of people, it felt less like a weather event and more like a glimpse behind the curtain. Because once humanity gains the ability to influence the atmosphere, everything changes. Who decides where the rain falls? Who decides which regions get relief? Who decides which regions suffer drought? Who decides when a storm is a disaster... and when it's a tool? Some people believe the public is being slowly conditioned to accept something that would have sounded insane just a few years ago. The industrialization of the sky. The ability to engineer the environment itself. Food can be controlled. Energy can be controlled. Water can be controlled. And if the weather can be controlled too... what exactly is left beyond their reach? That's why some people don't believe Idaho was the story. They believe Idaho was the demonstration. The moment the public accidentally saw something they weren't supposed to see. The moment a "conspiracy theory" stopped sounding so crazy. Was Idaho a freak weather event... or the first public glimpse of a future where the weather is no longer controlled by nature?

HustleBitch

20,299 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat