Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

✍️ Iran-US Conflict: Global Cost Tracker (Live Update) 🗺️ Where do you live? Do you know how much you’re personally paying for this conflict every day? I built this interactive world map to track the real-time global cost since Feb 28. The total has already hit $64.4 billion, with...

TATrader_Alan's profile picture

Trader Tardigrade 🧬

77,106 subscribers

16,215 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

A couple that makes $20k/mo will live a comfortable life in Toronto, Canada. Let me walk you through it $20k per month is $240k a year. Let’s say each person makes $120,000 per year In Ontario: Federal tax: $18,812.49 Provincial tax: $10,128.16 CPP contributions: $4,055.50 EI premiums $1,049.12 Net pay: $85,954.73 per person per year or $7,162.89 per person per month. Who are we talking about? A couple. No kids. For a couple: Net pay: $171,909.46 per year or $14,325.79 per month. What does “comfortable” mean? Let us say you are: - not living pay check to pay check - filling retirement accounts - paying for food, clothing, shelter, transportation Let us start: TFSA (equivalent to U.S. Roth IRA): $7,000 per adult per year, or $14k per couple per year total. But each person contributed $21,600 to their RRSP, paid $30,000 in tax, and had a refund of $8,900 which they used for their TFSA with $1,900 per person to spare. RRSP (equivalent to U.S. 401k/403b): $21,600 per adult, or $43,200 total per couple. For retirement (TFSA & RRSP): $43,200 per year or $3,600 per month. Let’s move to shelter: A 1b1b condo in Toronto costs $720,000. This should be affordable for a gross household income of $240,000 per year based on the 20/30/3 rule for buying a home: 1. 20% down 2. Shelter costs less than 30% gross household income 3. Shelter price less than 3x gross household income If no downpayment the couple needs to find $144,000 for downpayment, $13,275 land transfer tax (assuming first time home buyer otherwise $21,750) and legal. $162k+ Minimum. Monthly mortgage is $3,400 per month (20% down, 5.1% interest, 25 year amortization) Plus: Utilities Insurance Property tax Landscaping Maintenance Capital expenditures You get the picture. If non-recoverable shelter cost is 2% this is $14,400 per year or $1,200 per month. Let’s keep it simple and say that shelter equivalent is $4,600 per month Next add the following: Groceries: $1,000/mo Car: $1,000/mo (includes monthly payment, maintenance, insurance, gas) We are at $10,200 per month. ($3,600 retirement + $4,600 shelter + $1,000 food + $1,000 transportation) Now add: $200/mo Emergency fund $200/mo. Phone & Internet $400/mo Eating out $200/mo Entertainment $500/mo Clothes, Fitness, Grooming, Travel Total of $1,500 We are at $11,700 per month. This couple has $2,700 per month to spare and can consider having a child and/or a second car. Statistics Canada calculated that raising a child from birth until the age of 18 years of age will cost $1,400 per month. This excludes saving for the child’s post-secondary education in an RESP. In short to live a comfortable life in Toronto with adaquate contributions to retirement, money for shelter, food, clothing, transportation, entertainment, and a future that may include having a child, a couple needs to make $20k/mo. Otherwise we just decide to sacrifice, and live without something listed above. Get financially literate. You got this! 🙌
0:36

A couple that makes $20k/mo will live a comfortable life in Toronto, Canada. Let me walk you through it $20k per month is $240k a year. Let’s say each person makes $120,000 per year In Ontario: Federal tax: $18,812.49 Provincial tax: $10,128.16 CPP contributions: $4,055.50 EI premiums $1,049.12 Net pay: $85,954.73 per person per year or $7,162.89 per person per month. Who are we talking about? A couple. No kids. For a couple: Net pay: $171,909.46 per year or $14,325.79 per month. What does “comfortable” mean? Let us say you are: - not living pay check to pay check - filling retirement accounts - paying for food, clothing, shelter, transportation Let us start: TFSA (equivalent to U.S. Roth IRA): $7,000 per adult per year, or $14k per couple per year total. But each person contributed $21,600 to their RRSP, paid $30,000 in tax, and had a refund of $8,900 which they used for their TFSA with $1,900 per person to spare. RRSP (equivalent to U.S. 401k/403b): $21,600 per adult, or $43,200 total per couple. For retirement (TFSA & RRSP): $43,200 per year or $3,600 per month. Let’s move to shelter: A 1b1b condo in Toronto costs $720,000. This should be affordable for a gross household income of $240,000 per year based on the 20/30/3 rule for buying a home: 1. 20% down 2. Shelter costs less than 30% gross household income 3. Shelter price less than 3x gross household income If no downpayment the couple needs to find $144,000 for downpayment, $13,275 land transfer tax (assuming first time home buyer otherwise $21,750) and legal. $162k+ Minimum. Monthly mortgage is $3,400 per month (20% down, 5.1% interest, 25 year amortization) Plus: Utilities Insurance Property tax Landscaping Maintenance Capital expenditures You get the picture. If non-recoverable shelter cost is 2% this is $14,400 per year or $1,200 per month. Let’s keep it simple and say that shelter equivalent is $4,600 per month Next add the following: Groceries: $1,000/mo Car: $1,000/mo (includes monthly payment, maintenance, insurance, gas) We are at $10,200 per month. ($3,600 retirement + $4,600 shelter + $1,000 food + $1,000 transportation) Now add: $200/mo Emergency fund $200/mo. Phone & Internet $400/mo Eating out $200/mo Entertainment $500/mo Clothes, Fitness, Grooming, Travel Total of $1,500 We are at $11,700 per month. This couple has $2,700 per month to spare and can consider having a child and/or a second car. Statistics Canada calculated that raising a child from birth until the age of 18 years of age will cost $1,400 per month. This excludes saving for the child’s post-secondary education in an RESP. In short to live a comfortable life in Toronto with adaquate contributions to retirement, money for shelter, food, clothing, transportation, entertainment, and a future that may include having a child, a couple needs to make $20k/mo. Otherwise we just decide to sacrifice, and live without something listed above. Get financially literate. You got this! 🙌

Lazy Canadian Entrepreneur

1,654,478 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Meetings suck. AI makes them suck more. But not for the reasons you think. Nate B Jones talks about how you are destroying company value with meetings. Everybody is looking at AI as a way to cut team sizes, but this is also wrong: - Look back at your week, you probably spent 1/3 of your time in meetings. - Team sizes max at 5, every person after that has a cost in productivity (both personal and in communication co-ordination). - Up till now, we've been willing to pay the price of each additional person in a meeting (and each meeting) because we needed to get large orgs to co-ordinate or it's chaos. - The cost of lost productivity was worth it, because each person generates maybe 200-300k in company value. - But in the age of AI, each person using AI can be maybe 5-10x more productive. This means the cost of each person in a meeting is taking away not 200k in value, but 1M per person. - Every person you add to a meeting above 5 (and I would argue per meeting), is costing you 1 - 2 million dollars. It's not worth it, not by a little, by an order of magnitude. - The naive approach is to think this means you need less people and should fire everyone. This is the wrong framing. - The correct pattern is smaller team sizes, optimal at 5, where adding an additional person does not cost you 1-2M dollars. And then doing MORE with everyone else, also in smaller strike teams of 5. - You now have excess capacity, a fleet of aircraft carriers instead of fishing boats. - Your org need to reach for MORE, instead of trying to do the same job for less. You can reach more markets, higher complexity projects and generate more revenue. Think BIGGER, not "same company, less people." He's right, and game teams should think the same way.
4:04

Meetings suck. AI makes them suck more. But not for the reasons you think. Nate B Jones talks about how you are destroying company value with meetings. Everybody is looking at AI as a way to cut team sizes, but this is also wrong: - Look back at your week, you probably spent 1/3 of your time in meetings. - Team sizes max at 5, every person after that has a cost in productivity (both personal and in communication co-ordination). - Up till now, we've been willing to pay the price of each additional person in a meeting (and each meeting) because we needed to get large orgs to co-ordinate or it's chaos. - The cost of lost productivity was worth it, because each person generates maybe 200-300k in company value. - But in the age of AI, each person using AI can be maybe 5-10x more productive. This means the cost of each person in a meeting is taking away not 200k in value, but 1M per person. - Every person you add to a meeting above 5 (and I would argue per meeting), is costing you 1 - 2 million dollars. It's not worth it, not by a little, by an order of magnitude. - The naive approach is to think this means you need less people and should fire everyone. This is the wrong framing. - The correct pattern is smaller team sizes, optimal at 5, where adding an additional person does not cost you 1-2M dollars. And then doing MORE with everyone else, also in smaller strike teams of 5. - You now have excess capacity, a fleet of aircraft carriers instead of fishing boats. - Your org need to reach for MORE, instead of trying to do the same job for less. You can reach more markets, higher complexity projects and generate more revenue. Think BIGGER, not "same company, less people." He's right, and game teams should think the same way.

Grummz

16,157 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Priority Fees tracking is live at Priority fees are HYPE burned to move faster on Hyperliquid. Two separate burns: write priority, where you pay for a taker order to be filled sooner, and read priority, an auction for faster market-data reads. Both fully tracked. What you can track: - Priority fees as a share of all Hyperliquid revenue, and how that share is growing over time - Which markets pay the most priority, and where it rivals or beats the trading fee itself - Daily HYPE burned for priority since launch, in dollars and HYPE, split write vs read - An annualized run-rate you can model yourself, with sliders for priority growth and HYPE price - The wallets paying the most, 24h and all-time, and how concentrated the spend is - The live read auction in real time, and who is winning it right now - Cost per fill, total fills, and the user base growing over time Hyperliquid.
0:31

Priority Fees tracking is live at Priority fees are HYPE burned to move faster on Hyperliquid. Two separate burns: write priority, where you pay for a taker order to be filled sooner, and read priority, an auction for faster market-data reads. Both fully tracked. What you can track: - Priority fees as a share of all Hyperliquid revenue, and how that share is growing over time - Which markets pay the most priority, and where it rivals or beats the trading fee itself - Daily HYPE burned for priority since launch, in dollars and HYPE, split write vs read - An annualized run-rate you can model yourself, with sliders for priority growth and HYPE price - The wallets paying the most, 24h and all-time, and how concentrated the spend is - The live read auction in real time, and who is winning it right now - Cost per fill, total fills, and the user base growing over time Hyperliquid.

HL Eco

19,154 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Training Volume / Intensity / Rep Range / Progressive Overload — Everything You Need To Know: (This is what will grow MOST people best) 𝗧𝗢𝗧𝗔𝗟 𝗦𝗘𝗧𝗦 𝗣𝗘𝗥 𝗪𝗘𝗘𝗞 45ish-60ish total working sets per week - If training 3x per week, this will mean 16, 17, 18ish sets per session - If training 4x per week, this will mean 13, 14, 15ish sets per session - If training 5x per week, this will mean 10, 11, 12ish sets per session 𝗧𝗢𝗧𝗔𝗟 𝗦𝗘𝗧𝗦 𝗣𝗘𝗥 𝗕𝗢𝗗𝗬 𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗧 𝗣𝗘𝗥 𝗪𝗘𝗘𝗞 - For balanced development, you’re going to want to perform 5, 6, 7, 8ish sets per body part per week - If prioritizing a muscle group, you’re going to want to perform 8, 9, 10, MAYBE 10+ sets for that body part each week - If deprioritizing a muscle group, you only need 2, 3, 4ish sets for that body part each week to maintain existing development 𝗙𝗥𝗘𝗤𝗨𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗬 In all likelihood, you will get MORE (in the way of stimulus) by splitting the work you do for a given muscle group across 2 sessions per week Splitting the work you do for a given muscle group across 3 sessions per week can work as well but the potential benefit is probably NOT that large and it diminishes the margin of safety Performing all the work you do for a given muscle group on ONE day (Bro Split Style) can work but it like has an opportunity cost associated with it 𝗧𝗢𝗧𝗔𝗟 𝗦𝗘𝗧𝗦 𝗣𝗘𝗥 𝗘𝗫𝗘𝗥𝗖𝗜𝗦𝗘 The sweet spot is generally 2-3 sets for a given exercise in a given session 1 set is fine depending on the context of the programming as a whole but you likely didn’t squeeze all the juice out of the lemon If you preform 4+ sets of a given exercise in a given session, what the fuck were you doing the first couple of sets? 𝗜𝗡𝗧𝗘𝗡𝗦𝗜𝗧𝗬 The intensity you take sets to can GREATLY IMPACT how many total sets you can perform while still allowing for adequate recovery from session to session Generally speaking, it is a good idea to leave about 1 RIR on most exercises to ensure stimulus is robust but fatigue is kept at bay There is one HUGE caveat to that however: If you do not trust your ability to accurately gauge RIR, it is better to just take your sets to 0 RIR/Failure than it is to risk sandbagging sets by leaving an incidental 2, 3, 4+ reps in the tank…just know you will not be able to generate as high a net stimulus throughout the week if you live in this intensity range 𝗥𝗲𝗽 𝗥𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲/𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗴𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗢𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗹𝗼𝗮𝗱 Pick a weight you can do for 5-6ish reps with GOOD-GREAT technique @ the prescribed RIR (should be 0-2 RIR) Once you can hit 7, 8, 9, 10ish reps with the same GOOD-GREAT technique @ the prescribed RIR, increase the load You can weight select on a SET BY SET BASIS — this means in theory some of your sets could be heavier/lighter than others (assuming you’re doing multiple sets of a given exercise on a given day)
0:22

Training Volume / Intensity / Rep Range / Progressive Overload — Everything You Need To Know: (This is what will grow MOST people best) 𝗧𝗢𝗧𝗔𝗟 𝗦𝗘𝗧𝗦 𝗣𝗘𝗥 𝗪𝗘𝗘𝗞 45ish-60ish total working sets per week - If training 3x per week, this will mean 16, 17, 18ish sets per session - If training 4x per week, this will mean 13, 14, 15ish sets per session - If training 5x per week, this will mean 10, 11, 12ish sets per session 𝗧𝗢𝗧𝗔𝗟 𝗦𝗘𝗧𝗦 𝗣𝗘𝗥 𝗕𝗢𝗗𝗬 𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗧 𝗣𝗘𝗥 𝗪𝗘𝗘𝗞 - For balanced development, you’re going to want to perform 5, 6, 7, 8ish sets per body part per week - If prioritizing a muscle group, you’re going to want to perform 8, 9, 10, MAYBE 10+ sets for that body part each week - If deprioritizing a muscle group, you only need 2, 3, 4ish sets for that body part each week to maintain existing development 𝗙𝗥𝗘𝗤𝗨𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗬 In all likelihood, you will get MORE (in the way of stimulus) by splitting the work you do for a given muscle group across 2 sessions per week Splitting the work you do for a given muscle group across 3 sessions per week can work as well but the potential benefit is probably NOT that large and it diminishes the margin of safety Performing all the work you do for a given muscle group on ONE day (Bro Split Style) can work but it like has an opportunity cost associated with it 𝗧𝗢𝗧𝗔𝗟 𝗦𝗘𝗧𝗦 𝗣𝗘𝗥 𝗘𝗫𝗘𝗥𝗖𝗜𝗦𝗘 The sweet spot is generally 2-3 sets for a given exercise in a given session 1 set is fine depending on the context of the programming as a whole but you likely didn’t squeeze all the juice out of the lemon If you preform 4+ sets of a given exercise in a given session, what the fuck were you doing the first couple of sets? 𝗜𝗡𝗧𝗘𝗡𝗦𝗜𝗧𝗬 The intensity you take sets to can GREATLY IMPACT how many total sets you can perform while still allowing for adequate recovery from session to session Generally speaking, it is a good idea to leave about 1 RIR on most exercises to ensure stimulus is robust but fatigue is kept at bay There is one HUGE caveat to that however: If you do not trust your ability to accurately gauge RIR, it is better to just take your sets to 0 RIR/Failure than it is to risk sandbagging sets by leaving an incidental 2, 3, 4+ reps in the tank…just know you will not be able to generate as high a net stimulus throughout the week if you live in this intensity range 𝗥𝗲𝗽 𝗥𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲/𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗴𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗢𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗹𝗼𝗮𝗱 Pick a weight you can do for 5-6ish reps with GOOD-GREAT technique @ the prescribed RIR (should be 0-2 RIR) Once you can hit 7, 8, 9, 10ish reps with the same GOOD-GREAT technique @ the prescribed RIR, increase the load You can weight select on a SET BY SET BASIS — this means in theory some of your sets could be heavier/lighter than others (assuming you’re doing multiple sets of a given exercise on a given day)

Dean Turner

18,116 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Training Volume — Everything You Need To Know: (This can provide you with a great STARTING POINT…from there, use trial & error to refine your programming over time) 𝗧𝗢𝗧𝗔𝗟 𝗦𝗘𝗧𝗦 𝗣𝗘𝗥 𝗪𝗘𝗘𝗞 45ish-60ish total working sets per week - If training 3x per week, this will mean 16, 17, 18ish sets per session - If training 4x per week, this will mean 13, 14, 15ish sets per session - If training 5x per week, this will mean 10, 11, 12ish sets per session 𝗧𝗢𝗧𝗔𝗟 𝗦𝗘𝗧𝗦 𝗣𝗘𝗥 𝗕𝗢𝗗𝗬 𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗧 𝗣𝗘𝗥 𝗪𝗘𝗘𝗞 - For balanced development, you’re going to want to perform 5, 6, 7, 8ish sets per body part per week - If prioritizing a muscle group, you’re going to want to perform 8, 9, 10, MAYBE 10+ sets for that body part each week - If deprioritizing a muscle group, you only need 2, 3, 4ish sets for that body part each week to maintain existing development 𝗙𝗥𝗘𝗤𝗨𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗬 In all likelihood, you will get MORE (in the way of stimulus) by splitting the work you do for a given muscle group across 2 sessions per week Splitting the work you do for a given muscle group across 3 sessions per week can work as well but the potential benefit is probably NOT that large and it diminishes the margin of safety Performing all the work you do for a given muscle group on ONE day (Bro Split Style) can work but it like has an opportunity cost associated with it 𝗧𝗢𝗧𝗔𝗟 𝗦𝗘𝗧𝗦 𝗣𝗘𝗥 𝗘𝗫𝗘𝗥𝗖𝗜𝗦𝗘 The sweet spot is generally 2-3 sets for a given exercise in a given session 1 set is fine depending on the context of the programming as a whole but you likely didn’t squeeze all the juice out of the lemon If you preform 4+ sets of a given exercise in a given session, what were you doing the first couple of sets? 𝗜𝗡𝗧𝗘𝗡𝗦𝗜𝗧𝗬 The intensity you take sets to can GREATLY IMPACT how many total sets you can perform while still allowing for adequate recovery from session to session Generally speaking, it is a good idea to leave about 1 RIR on most exercises to ensure stimulus is robust but fatigue is kept at bay There is one HUGE caveat to that however: If you do not trust your ability to accurately gauge RIR, it is better to just take your sets to 0 RIR/Failure than it is to risk sandbagging sets by leaving an incidental 2, 3, 4+ reps in the tank…just know you will not be able to generate as high a net stimulus throughout the week if you live in this intensity range 𝗥𝗲𝗽 𝗥𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲/𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗴𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗢𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗹𝗼𝗮𝗱 Pick a weight you can do for 5-6ish reps with GOOD-GREAT technique @ the prescribed RIR (should be 0-2 RIR) Once you can hit 7, 8, 9, 10ish reps with the same GOOD-GREAT technique @ the prescribed RIR, increase the load You can weight select on a SET BY SET BASIS — this means in theory some of your sets could be heavier/lighter than others (assuming you’re doing multiple sets of a given exercise on a given day) 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗠𝗮𝗷𝗼𝗿 𝗠𝘂𝘀𝗰𝗹𝗲 𝗚𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗽𝘀 Chest Mid/upper back Lats Delts Bis Tris Quads Hams Calves Glutes Abs/Traps (maybe)
0:23

Training Volume — Everything You Need To Know: (This can provide you with a great STARTING POINT…from there, use trial & error to refine your programming over time) 𝗧𝗢𝗧𝗔𝗟 𝗦𝗘𝗧𝗦 𝗣𝗘𝗥 𝗪𝗘𝗘𝗞 45ish-60ish total working sets per week - If training 3x per week, this will mean 16, 17, 18ish sets per session - If training 4x per week, this will mean 13, 14, 15ish sets per session - If training 5x per week, this will mean 10, 11, 12ish sets per session 𝗧𝗢𝗧𝗔𝗟 𝗦𝗘𝗧𝗦 𝗣𝗘𝗥 𝗕𝗢𝗗𝗬 𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗧 𝗣𝗘𝗥 𝗪𝗘𝗘𝗞 - For balanced development, you’re going to want to perform 5, 6, 7, 8ish sets per body part per week - If prioritizing a muscle group, you’re going to want to perform 8, 9, 10, MAYBE 10+ sets for that body part each week - If deprioritizing a muscle group, you only need 2, 3, 4ish sets for that body part each week to maintain existing development 𝗙𝗥𝗘𝗤𝗨𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗬 In all likelihood, you will get MORE (in the way of stimulus) by splitting the work you do for a given muscle group across 2 sessions per week Splitting the work you do for a given muscle group across 3 sessions per week can work as well but the potential benefit is probably NOT that large and it diminishes the margin of safety Performing all the work you do for a given muscle group on ONE day (Bro Split Style) can work but it like has an opportunity cost associated with it 𝗧𝗢𝗧𝗔𝗟 𝗦𝗘𝗧𝗦 𝗣𝗘𝗥 𝗘𝗫𝗘𝗥𝗖𝗜𝗦𝗘 The sweet spot is generally 2-3 sets for a given exercise in a given session 1 set is fine depending on the context of the programming as a whole but you likely didn’t squeeze all the juice out of the lemon If you preform 4+ sets of a given exercise in a given session, what were you doing the first couple of sets? 𝗜𝗡𝗧𝗘𝗡𝗦𝗜𝗧𝗬 The intensity you take sets to can GREATLY IMPACT how many total sets you can perform while still allowing for adequate recovery from session to session Generally speaking, it is a good idea to leave about 1 RIR on most exercises to ensure stimulus is robust but fatigue is kept at bay There is one HUGE caveat to that however: If you do not trust your ability to accurately gauge RIR, it is better to just take your sets to 0 RIR/Failure than it is to risk sandbagging sets by leaving an incidental 2, 3, 4+ reps in the tank…just know you will not be able to generate as high a net stimulus throughout the week if you live in this intensity range 𝗥𝗲𝗽 𝗥𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲/𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗴𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗢𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗹𝗼𝗮𝗱 Pick a weight you can do for 5-6ish reps with GOOD-GREAT technique @ the prescribed RIR (should be 0-2 RIR) Once you can hit 7, 8, 9, 10ish reps with the same GOOD-GREAT technique @ the prescribed RIR, increase the load You can weight select on a SET BY SET BASIS — this means in theory some of your sets could be heavier/lighter than others (assuming you’re doing multiple sets of a given exercise on a given day) 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗠𝗮𝗷𝗼𝗿 𝗠𝘂𝘀𝗰𝗹𝗲 𝗚𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗽𝘀 Chest Mid/upper back Lats Delts Bis Tris Quads Hams Calves Glutes Abs/Traps (maybe)

Dean Turner

36,903 просмотров • 25 дней назад

My Jaw Dropped & Hit The Floor While Listening To This. California Corruption IS OUT OF CONTROL California is ordering tiny homes for the homeless however they are paying $834,000 MORE PER tiny home than what you can order THE SAME TINY HOME on Amazon for READ THAT AGAIN “I’m pretty sure I just found the most wasteful spending in the history of California. And look I know that a high bar but I feel pretty confident in what I just said. So do y'all know those tiny homes that you get off, like, Amazon or Lowe's or Home Depot for, like, $2,500? ‌ You know, they're basically like little barns, but you can actually live in them. Well, the California government is buying a lot of them, and they're buying a lot of them in an effort to house the homeless, which I gotta say is fu**ing awesome. I fully support that. However, instead of paying about $2,500 per house or even less because they're buying a ton of them in bulk, the California tax payer is paying more than $837,000 per tiny home. They are paying $834,000 more than you can order them off Amazon per home. ‌ For that much money, you should be able to buy 335 tiny homes. Even if you weren't buying them in bulk, if you just went to the website and ordered 1 at a time, you could get 335 of these tiny homes for the same price that the California government is paying for 1. Think about it this way, California. It is estimated that you have about a 160,000 homeless people. And over the last 4 years, your government claims you have spent $17 billion trying to house them. ‌ Do understand that if you had bought every single one of those 160,000 people a tiny home, not just once, but you bought them 1 every year for the last 5 years, like, they got a brand new tiny home every every single year, you still would have only spent about $2.5 billion You would have spent nearly $15 billion less by just buying them a new tiny home every year. But, no, you're spending $837,000 for something I can go to Amazon and get for $2,500. You are spending 330 times what the average American can get that tiny home for. How are you allowing this level of government corruption and thievery to just keep going on? ‌ How are you not demanding to know where that extra $834,000 per home is going? This is why your state 4 years ago had a surplus, one of the biggest surpluses in California history as of this year. You have a $73,000,000,000 deficit. California, please stop worrying about the presidential race. Please stop worrying about who's president. ‌ That shouldn't matter to you. You. Pay attention to your local government that is very obviously fucking you, and go ask your governor why you're paying $837,000 for a tiny home that you can buy online for $2,500 or don't. I legitimately don't give a sh*t because I would never f**king live in your state. It's sad because California is f**king beautiful, but your government sucks.”
3:13

My Jaw Dropped & Hit The Floor While Listening To This. California Corruption IS OUT OF CONTROL California is ordering tiny homes for the homeless however they are paying $834,000 MORE PER tiny home than what you can order THE SAME TINY HOME on Amazon for READ THAT AGAIN “I’m pretty sure I just found the most wasteful spending in the history of California. And look I know that a high bar but I feel pretty confident in what I just said. So do y'all know those tiny homes that you get off, like, Amazon or Lowe's or Home Depot for, like, $2,500? ‌ You know, they're basically like little barns, but you can actually live in them. Well, the California government is buying a lot of them, and they're buying a lot of them in an effort to house the homeless, which I gotta say is fu**ing awesome. I fully support that. However, instead of paying about $2,500 per house or even less because they're buying a ton of them in bulk, the California tax payer is paying more than $837,000 per tiny home. They are paying $834,000 more than you can order them off Amazon per home. ‌ For that much money, you should be able to buy 335 tiny homes. Even if you weren't buying them in bulk, if you just went to the website and ordered 1 at a time, you could get 335 of these tiny homes for the same price that the California government is paying for 1. Think about it this way, California. It is estimated that you have about a 160,000 homeless people. And over the last 4 years, your government claims you have spent $17 billion trying to house them. ‌ Do understand that if you had bought every single one of those 160,000 people a tiny home, not just once, but you bought them 1 every year for the last 5 years, like, they got a brand new tiny home every every single year, you still would have only spent about $2.5 billion You would have spent nearly $15 billion less by just buying them a new tiny home every year. But, no, you're spending $837,000 for something I can go to Amazon and get for $2,500. You are spending 330 times what the average American can get that tiny home for. How are you allowing this level of government corruption and thievery to just keep going on? ‌ How are you not demanding to know where that extra $834,000 per home is going? This is why your state 4 years ago had a surplus, one of the biggest surpluses in California history as of this year. You have a $73,000,000,000 deficit. California, please stop worrying about the presidential race. Please stop worrying about who's president. ‌ That shouldn't matter to you. You. Pay attention to your local government that is very obviously fucking you, and go ask your governor why you're paying $837,000 for a tiny home that you can buy online for $2,500 or don't. I legitimately don't give a sh*t because I would never f**king live in your state. It's sad because California is f**king beautiful, but your government sucks.”

Wall Street Apes

1,131,197 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Every song release is a big deal. This song has waited a long time to have its moment. I remember when Sara, Sam and I wrote Fragile (the same day we wrote another song called Madness), it held a special place in my soul as a human. So much so, that it kept disappearing from different projects as if to wait for the right moment to be introduced to the world. Being on Evergreen, song release number 3… it’s crazy how things work themselves out for the best when you trust the process. I always wanted to change the lyrics of the first line because I was afraid it wouldn’t make sense. But the more I worked with it, the more personal it became, and the more truth it carried. I would tell you what it means to me, but I want to hear how all of you connect with it first, so I’ll just say this… This one is for anyone in a season of life where the structure of you that you’ve built for the world needs to take a break and make space to care for the human inside. Whether you have those people, or that person in your life that loves and supports that human, or you’re looking forward to meeting that person someday, this is for you. You deserve to be the human you are, and you deserve to be loved and seen for that human. And if you haven’t felt it yet, I can’t wait for you to feel what it’s like to find someone who makes you feel safe enough to be Fragile.
0:23

Every song release is a big deal. This song has waited a long time to have its moment. I remember when Sara, Sam and I wrote Fragile (the same day we wrote another song called Madness), it held a special place in my soul as a human. So much so, that it kept disappearing from different projects as if to wait for the right moment to be introduced to the world. Being on Evergreen, song release number 3… it’s crazy how things work themselves out for the best when you trust the process. I always wanted to change the lyrics of the first line because I was afraid it wouldn’t make sense. But the more I worked with it, the more personal it became, and the more truth it carried. I would tell you what it means to me, but I want to hear how all of you connect with it first, so I’ll just say this… This one is for anyone in a season of life where the structure of you that you’ve built for the world needs to take a break and make space to care for the human inside. Whether you have those people, or that person in your life that loves and supports that human, or you’re looking forward to meeting that person someday, this is for you. You deserve to be the human you are, and you deserve to be loved and seen for that human. And if you haven’t felt it yet, I can’t wait for you to feel what it’s like to find someone who makes you feel safe enough to be Fragile.

Hunter Hayes

24,668 просмотров • 1 год назад

Before you trade futures, you MUST the contracts you are trading. Every contract, comes with two key numbers: 1) Tick size 2) Tick value Tick size is the smallest price movement the contract can make Tick value is how much money you make or lose per tick Here's how to calculate what one point is worth: For example, let’s look at the NASDAQ 100 E-mini (NQ): • Tick size: 0.25 • Tick value: $5 per tick • One point = 4 ticks × $5 = $20 per point • Margin required: ~$17,600 Or the NASDAQ 100 Micro (MNQ): • Tick size: 0.25 • Tick value: $0.50 per tick • One point = 4 ticks × $0.50 = $2 per point • Margin required: ~$1,760 See the difference? The micro contract is 1/10th the size—perfect for beginners. S&P 500 E-mini (ES): • Tick value: $12.50 per tick • One point = $50 • Margin: ~$15,400 S&P 500 Micro (MES): • Tick value: $1.25 per tick • One point = $5 • Margin: ~$1,540 Why this matters: If your stop loss is 10 points away on MES, you're risking $50. On ES? You're risking $500. It’s the same setup, but different exposure. This is why most beginners blow up—they don't understand contract specs and trade position sizes way too large for their account. Pro tip: Stick to micro contracts (MES, MNQ) until you're consistently profitable. Lower margin means mistakes cost less while you learn. — This is just scratching the surface. In the full 2-hour futures trading masterclass, I break down: • How to calculate exact position sizes so you never blow your account • The 3 beginner mistakes that cost traders thousands (and how to avoid them) • Live chart examples walking through actual entries and exits step-by-step Just comment "FUTURES" and I'll send you the complete masterclass in the next few minutes.
3:12

Before you trade futures, you MUST the contracts you are trading. Every contract, comes with two key numbers: 1) Tick size 2) Tick value Tick size is the smallest price movement the contract can make Tick value is how much money you make or lose per tick Here's how to calculate what one point is worth: For example, let’s look at the NASDAQ 100 E-mini (NQ): • Tick size: 0.25 • Tick value: $5 per tick • One point = 4 ticks × $5 = $20 per point • Margin required: ~$17,600 Or the NASDAQ 100 Micro (MNQ): • Tick size: 0.25 • Tick value: $0.50 per tick • One point = 4 ticks × $0.50 = $2 per point • Margin required: ~$1,760 See the difference? The micro contract is 1/10th the size—perfect for beginners. S&P 500 E-mini (ES): • Tick value: $12.50 per tick • One point = $50 • Margin: ~$15,400 S&P 500 Micro (MES): • Tick value: $1.25 per tick • One point = $5 • Margin: ~$1,540 Why this matters: If your stop loss is 10 points away on MES, you're risking $50. On ES? You're risking $500. It’s the same setup, but different exposure. This is why most beginners blow up—they don't understand contract specs and trade position sizes way too large for their account. Pro tip: Stick to micro contracts (MES, MNQ) until you're consistently profitable. Lower margin means mistakes cost less while you learn. — This is just scratching the surface. In the full 2-hour futures trading masterclass, I break down: • How to calculate exact position sizes so you never blow your account • The 3 beginner mistakes that cost traders thousands (and how to avoid them) • Live chart examples walking through actual entries and exits step-by-step Just comment "FUTURES" and I'll send you the complete masterclass in the next few minutes.

The Trading Geek (Brad Goh)

11,122 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🚨 FORMER FLOCK SAFETY EMPLOYEE JUST BROKE HIS SILENCE… 🚨 And what He Revealed Should Terrify Every Single One of Us. This isn’t “public safety.” This is a private company building a permanent, nationwide tracking grid of every car, every movement, every person… with almost zero oversight. Watch the video. Then answer these questions honestly: If a private corporation can track every vehicle in your city 24/7 and sell that data to police (and who knows who else)… do you still live in a free country? When did we collectively agree that “safety” means surrendering the right to move without being recorded? What happens the day this system gets used against political enemies, journalists, or regular people who just disagreed with the wrong person? If these cameras can already identify your car, your patterns, and your life… how long until facial recognition and AI complete the total surveillance package? And the most uncomfortable one: Would you still support this technology if the next administration (whichever side you hate) controlled the data? This man worked on the inside. He just told the truth. The silence ends now. Watch. Share. Force the conversation. The Future of Privacy is being decided in Real Time… and Most People Are Still Asleep. Let me know what You think, and SHARE THIS so that others may too! And if You're not already following Noah B. Price... What the heck are You doing!?
5:49

🚨 FORMER FLOCK SAFETY EMPLOYEE JUST BROKE HIS SILENCE… 🚨 And what He Revealed Should Terrify Every Single One of Us. This isn’t “public safety.” This is a private company building a permanent, nationwide tracking grid of every car, every movement, every person… with almost zero oversight. Watch the video. Then answer these questions honestly: If a private corporation can track every vehicle in your city 24/7 and sell that data to police (and who knows who else)… do you still live in a free country? When did we collectively agree that “safety” means surrendering the right to move without being recorded? What happens the day this system gets used against political enemies, journalists, or regular people who just disagreed with the wrong person? If these cameras can already identify your car, your patterns, and your life… how long until facial recognition and AI complete the total surveillance package? And the most uncomfortable one: Would you still support this technology if the next administration (whichever side you hate) controlled the data? This man worked on the inside. He just told the truth. The silence ends now. Watch. Share. Force the conversation. The Future of Privacy is being decided in Real Time… and Most People Are Still Asleep. Let me know what You think, and SHARE THIS so that others may too! And if You're not already following Noah B. Price... What the heck are You doing!?

Noah B. Price

41,297 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Pickering’s SECRET Asylum Hotel EXPOSED: You will pay $7M/Year starting in 2027 - YAY - No choice! ** Let’s put this into perspective using your tax payers dollars. On top of the purchase price, room costs per day are $140/day and food costs are $84/day, based on 2024, I repeat 2024 rates, for stays of up to 90 days = ( $20,160 ). That’s per person. Break it down even more, it’s almost $7,000.00 a month. That’s like making 2 or 3 mortgage payments per month! 📷Do you as a Canadian Citizen bring home that much per month. Pickering was NOT consulted — Durham Region quietly turned the former Comfort Inn at 533 Kingston Road (right off the 401) into a secret federal asylum reception centre for up to 250 claimants. All 8 Durham mayors knew since December 2025 and approved it in a closed-door confidential meeting. No public input. No notice to residents. Now, taxpayers get stuck with the full $7.075 million a year for housing, food, and services starting April 2027 — while our seniors and veterans wait and you can barely pay your bills, or programs for your children. This multi-level government secrecy is disgusting. We are NOT the UN’s dumping ground. Tag your councillors, Your Mayors, All Durham MPPs, & MPs Demand a public meeting NOW. * Let me ask you.....IF THIS WAS SUCH A GREAT IDEA, WHY WAS IT KEPT A SECRET? Share before it happens in YOUR neighbourhood next
3:01

Pickering’s SECRET Asylum Hotel EXPOSED: You will pay $7M/Year starting in 2027 - YAY - No choice! ** Let’s put this into perspective using your tax payers dollars. On top of the purchase price, room costs per day are $140/day and food costs are $84/day, based on 2024, I repeat 2024 rates, for stays of up to 90 days = ( $20,160 ). That’s per person. Break it down even more, it’s almost $7,000.00 a month. That’s like making 2 or 3 mortgage payments per month! 📷Do you as a Canadian Citizen bring home that much per month. Pickering was NOT consulted — Durham Region quietly turned the former Comfort Inn at 533 Kingston Road (right off the 401) into a secret federal asylum reception centre for up to 250 claimants. All 8 Durham mayors knew since December 2025 and approved it in a closed-door confidential meeting. No public input. No notice to residents. Now, taxpayers get stuck with the full $7.075 million a year for housing, food, and services starting April 2027 — while our seniors and veterans wait and you can barely pay your bills, or programs for your children. This multi-level government secrecy is disgusting. We are NOT the UN’s dumping ground. Tag your councillors, Your Mayors, All Durham MPPs, & MPs Demand a public meeting NOW. * Let me ask you.....IF THIS WAS SUCH A GREAT IDEA, WHY WAS IT KEPT A SECRET? Share before it happens in YOUR neighbourhood next

Lisa Robinson

60,792 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

If this canal gets built, every supply chain on Earth gets rewritten. And the price you pay for everything gets recalculated. Here's what the Ben Gurion Canal actually means for you: Right now, 12% of global trade flows through the Suez Canal. Every pair of sneakers. Every phone. Every car part. Every piece of furniture shipped from Asia to Europe passes through one 193 km Egyptian chokepoint. And that chokepoint keeps breaking. → March 2021: One ship got stuck. Six days. $9,600,000,000 in trade per day halted. → Late 2023: Houthi missiles started targeting Red Sea shipping. Hundreds of vessels rerouted around Africa. → Result: Your shipping costs spiked. Your delivery times stretched. Your inflation went up. Israel's answer? Carve a brand-new 250+ km canal straight through the Negev desert. Red Sea to the Mediterranean. Under Israeli control. No Egypt. No Houthi threat. No Ever Given repeat. The idea has been on the table since 1963. A declassified U.S. memo from that year explored nuclear excavation to build it. Estimated cost today: $55,000,000,000+. Insane? Yes. But here's why it matters to you personally: → If this canal opens, Egypt loses its leverage over global trade overnight → Shipping companies get a second route — competition drives your costs down → Israel becomes one of the most strategically important nations on Earth → The countries that own stakes in this route own a piece of every shipment between Asia and Europe The Suez Canal made Egypt a geopolitical power for 70 years. The Ben Gurion Canal would do the same for Israel. And every time a container ship passes through it — you pay less. Or you pay more if it never gets built and the current chokepoints keep breaking. Either way, this affects your wallet. Most people have no idea what's coming… I'll keep you updated. Turn on notifications. 🚨
4:52

If this canal gets built, every supply chain on Earth gets rewritten. And the price you pay for everything gets recalculated. Here's what the Ben Gurion Canal actually means for you: Right now, 12% of global trade flows through the Suez Canal. Every pair of sneakers. Every phone. Every car part. Every piece of furniture shipped from Asia to Europe passes through one 193 km Egyptian chokepoint. And that chokepoint keeps breaking. → March 2021: One ship got stuck. Six days. $9,600,000,000 in trade per day halted. → Late 2023: Houthi missiles started targeting Red Sea shipping. Hundreds of vessels rerouted around Africa. → Result: Your shipping costs spiked. Your delivery times stretched. Your inflation went up. Israel's answer? Carve a brand-new 250+ km canal straight through the Negev desert. Red Sea to the Mediterranean. Under Israeli control. No Egypt. No Houthi threat. No Ever Given repeat. The idea has been on the table since 1963. A declassified U.S. memo from that year explored nuclear excavation to build it. Estimated cost today: $55,000,000,000+. Insane? Yes. But here's why it matters to you personally: → If this canal opens, Egypt loses its leverage over global trade overnight → Shipping companies get a second route — competition drives your costs down → Israel becomes one of the most strategically important nations on Earth → The countries that own stakes in this route own a piece of every shipment between Asia and Europe The Suez Canal made Egypt a geopolitical power for 70 years. The Ben Gurion Canal would do the same for Israel. And every time a container ship passes through it — you pay less. Or you pay more if it never gets built and the current chokepoints keep breaking. Either way, this affects your wallet. Most people have no idea what's coming… I'll keep you updated. Turn on notifications. 🚨

🇨🇳 Liu Feng 刘锋

36,366 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨BREAKING: Iran is striking major ports and oil tankers in the Middle East and this could trigger a crash in stock markets. The Strait of Hormuz is effectively blocked. Around 20 million barrels of oil per day pass through this route. Nearly 20% of global LNG exports, mainly from Qatar, also move through here. If this route stays disrupted, the impact spreads fast. 1. It could push oil toward $100–$120 per barrel. If that happens, petrol and diesel prices rise globally. Electricity costs also increase in countries that rely on gas. Airlines, logistics companies, and manufacturers all face higher fuel costs. 2. Qatar is one of the world’s largest LNG exporters. If LNG shipments are delayed or blocked, Europe and Asia face tighter gas supply. Power generation costs go up. Governments may need to use emergency reserves again. That’s why some analysts are comparing this to the 2022 energy crisis. 3. Shipping routes are being rerouted around Africa. That adds: 10–14 extra days to deliveries, higher fuel costs, and higher freight rates. Car manufacturers depend on just-in-time parts. If parts are delayed for weeks, production lines slow or temporarily stop. 4. The Gulf region exports key petrochemicals used to make fertilizer. If fertilizer supply tightens, farming costs rise and food prices increase in the coming months. This doesn’t hit instantly, but it builds over time. 5. War-risk insurance costs have reportedly jumped around 50%. For large vessels, that means hundreds of thousands of dollars in extra cost per trip. That reduces trade flow and pushes freight costs higher globally. The UAE has already shut its stock market for two days. Global markets are reacting. This is not just about oil prices moving up. It impacts energy supply, trade routes, inflation pressure, and global growth. If the disruption lasts more than a few weeks, the economic effects will compound quickly.
3:17

🚨BREAKING: Iran is striking major ports and oil tankers in the Middle East and this could trigger a crash in stock markets. The Strait of Hormuz is effectively blocked. Around 20 million barrels of oil per day pass through this route. Nearly 20% of global LNG exports, mainly from Qatar, also move through here. If this route stays disrupted, the impact spreads fast. 1. It could push oil toward $100–$120 per barrel. If that happens, petrol and diesel prices rise globally. Electricity costs also increase in countries that rely on gas. Airlines, logistics companies, and manufacturers all face higher fuel costs. 2. Qatar is one of the world’s largest LNG exporters. If LNG shipments are delayed or blocked, Europe and Asia face tighter gas supply. Power generation costs go up. Governments may need to use emergency reserves again. That’s why some analysts are comparing this to the 2022 energy crisis. 3. Shipping routes are being rerouted around Africa. That adds: 10–14 extra days to deliveries, higher fuel costs, and higher freight rates. Car manufacturers depend on just-in-time parts. If parts are delayed for weeks, production lines slow or temporarily stop. 4. The Gulf region exports key petrochemicals used to make fertilizer. If fertilizer supply tightens, farming costs rise and food prices increase in the coming months. This doesn’t hit instantly, but it builds over time. 5. War-risk insurance costs have reportedly jumped around 50%. For large vessels, that means hundreds of thousands of dollars in extra cost per trip. That reduces trade flow and pushes freight costs higher globally. The UAE has already shut its stock market for two days. Global markets are reacting. This is not just about oil prices moving up. It impacts energy supply, trade routes, inflation pressure, and global growth. If the disruption lasts more than a few weeks, the economic effects will compound quickly.

Bull Theory

1,417,400 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Wake Up NJ Speech from Trenton today in the Assembly Appropriations Committee on Bill A5267 How are you doing members of the committee, My name is Michael from Wake Up New Jersey, Bill A5267 means to procure and incentivize transmission-scale energy storage for "renewables" such as solar and wind How is this being funded? Well through your NJ electric bills! Starting July 1st 2027, a "minimum" of $60M will be collected via the societal benefits charges or SBC Might be asking yourself, what's an SBC? When first digging into why our bills were so high in February this year I had no idea, but They are hidden charges in your electric bills to pay for mostly pet projects The Board of Public Utilities or BPU, recommends the SBC funding level for 2025 to be?......anyone here know? It's over $344M per year in our NJ electric bills Why don't we go over a few these programs, Ever Heard of Charge Up New Jersey? It's a program that gives folks up to $4,250 dollars for buying Electric Vehicles and chargers. This is costing NJ residents over $30 million dollars a year in their electric bills How about 'It Pay$ to Plug In', this program has spent $100M since 2012 on EV chargers in your electric Bill! This program cost ratepayers $27M this year alone as an SBC Per year Electric Vehicle Programs total $82.5M, Clean Energy Equity costs us $16.6M, NJ Wind total $22M and Energy Storage is currently costing the rate payers $29.5M per year, just to stress again this bill your voting on today will jump it up to $60M a year at a minimum! More than double it's current total Why is all this in our New Jersey Electric Bills? Want to know the real problem NJ? Democrats here have been pillaging your pockets, nickel and diming you year after year for pet projects in your electric bills. Now with the rake hikes happening, they are frantically trying to steamroll multiple bills in committees in an effort to deflect from the main issue Since 2017 - 6 power plants have closed totaling over half our power here in NJ, Democrats championed coal and nuclear plants being shut down, betting on Windfarms that never happened, this is a huge reason our electric bills are so high here, we need sensible solutions, not a green agenda storage push that caused this mess New Jersey residents pay over $8,100 more per year than the average American Household on their bills and pay around $700 more per month in overall bills compared to the national average My handle receives so many messages, comments, concerns from citizens that are struggling daily, some working 2 to 3 jobs, this state is becoming more unaffordable each and every day, and bills coming out of this Legislature that add to that burden, are not good for the hardworking people of New Jersey We are already hurting with the worst property and corporate taxes, one of the worst income and gas tax rates, and the absolute worst overall tax burden at over 54% of your lifetime earnings being syphoned from our NJ residents How much more do you want to take from us? How do you justify so much money hidden in our electric bills yearly? This endless spending path is unsustainable, we need more money in our pockets, not less Voting yes for this literally raises our electric bills yet again, is that really what you want to do to the people of NJ? Thank you Any questions? Or comments?
5:50

Wake Up NJ Speech from Trenton today in the Assembly Appropriations Committee on Bill A5267 How are you doing members of the committee, My name is Michael from Wake Up New Jersey, Bill A5267 means to procure and incentivize transmission-scale energy storage for "renewables" such as solar and wind How is this being funded? Well through your NJ electric bills! Starting July 1st 2027, a "minimum" of $60M will be collected via the societal benefits charges or SBC Might be asking yourself, what's an SBC? When first digging into why our bills were so high in February this year I had no idea, but They are hidden charges in your electric bills to pay for mostly pet projects The Board of Public Utilities or BPU, recommends the SBC funding level for 2025 to be?......anyone here know? It's over $344M per year in our NJ electric bills Why don't we go over a few these programs, Ever Heard of Charge Up New Jersey? It's a program that gives folks up to $4,250 dollars for buying Electric Vehicles and chargers. This is costing NJ residents over $30 million dollars a year in their electric bills How about 'It Pay$ to Plug In', this program has spent $100M since 2012 on EV chargers in your electric Bill! This program cost ratepayers $27M this year alone as an SBC Per year Electric Vehicle Programs total $82.5M, Clean Energy Equity costs us $16.6M, NJ Wind total $22M and Energy Storage is currently costing the rate payers $29.5M per year, just to stress again this bill your voting on today will jump it up to $60M a year at a minimum! More than double it's current total Why is all this in our New Jersey Electric Bills? Want to know the real problem NJ? Democrats here have been pillaging your pockets, nickel and diming you year after year for pet projects in your electric bills. Now with the rake hikes happening, they are frantically trying to steamroll multiple bills in committees in an effort to deflect from the main issue Since 2017 - 6 power plants have closed totaling over half our power here in NJ, Democrats championed coal and nuclear plants being shut down, betting on Windfarms that never happened, this is a huge reason our electric bills are so high here, we need sensible solutions, not a green agenda storage push that caused this mess New Jersey residents pay over $8,100 more per year than the average American Household on their bills and pay around $700 more per month in overall bills compared to the national average My handle receives so many messages, comments, concerns from citizens that are struggling daily, some working 2 to 3 jobs, this state is becoming more unaffordable each and every day, and bills coming out of this Legislature that add to that burden, are not good for the hardworking people of New Jersey We are already hurting with the worst property and corporate taxes, one of the worst income and gas tax rates, and the absolute worst overall tax burden at over 54% of your lifetime earnings being syphoned from our NJ residents How much more do you want to take from us? How do you justify so much money hidden in our electric bills yearly? This endless spending path is unsustainable, we need more money in our pockets, not less Voting yes for this literally raises our electric bills yet again, is that really what you want to do to the people of NJ? Thank you Any questions? Or comments?

Wake Up NJ 🇺🇸 New Jersey

145,050 просмотров • 1 год назад

I’m thinking about remaking a free step-by-step series on how to set up accounts and find content to avoid getting 0 views. I’ve noticed that many people are getting very low views, whether they use a VPN or not. Meanwhile, on the 3 phones below, I only started posting less than 2 months ago. There are 6 accounts in total, and none of them are shadow banned. The average is around 10K views per post, with quite a few posts getting over 100K views. All phones are using VPNs. This has helped me get an average of 700 new users per app every day. So I think if your views are flopping, it’s likely because you set up something wrong, your content has visuals that violate TikTok’s policies, your IP is blacklisted, or simply your content isn’t good enough for TikTok to keep pushing it viral.
0:26

I’m thinking about remaking a free step-by-step series on how to set up accounts and find content to avoid getting 0 views. I’ve noticed that many people are getting very low views, whether they use a VPN or not. Meanwhile, on the 3 phones below, I only started posting less than 2 months ago. There are 6 accounts in total, and none of them are shadow banned. The average is around 10K views per post, with quite a few posts getting over 100K views. All phones are using VPNs. This has helped me get an average of 700 new users per app every day. So I think if your views are flopping, it’s likely because you set up something wrong, your content has visuals that violate TikTok’s policies, your IP is blacklisted, or simply your content isn’t good enough for TikTok to keep pushing it viral.

Alex Nguyen

36,519 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Hong Kong is SO back. The city this morning celebrated its 29th birthday free of being a British colony--with a host of stunning statistics. At the ceremony, Chief Executive John Lee shared, in a video and a speech, some remarkable achievements of the urban center on the south coast of China. I’ll just share a few highlights: - First quarter Hong Kong GDP growth figures for 2026 show 5.9 per cent expansion, which is extremely good for a mature developed society. (For comparison, the US is at 2 per cent and UK is 1.3 per cent.) - We had 49 million people coming to Hong Kong in 2025, making us one of the world’s top international destinations. - Hong Kong regained its crown as the number one share-market launch capital in the world, beating London and New York. - If you look at a list of top ten universities across the whole of Asia, you find that five of the ten are in a single city – yes, Hong Kong. - Hong Kong has become Muslim-friendly (there are 2 billion Muslims in the world) with halal food options and Qurans in hotel guestrooms. It has just been rated one of the top two Islam-friendly tourist destinations. - And more companies are coming here, too – the number of foreign companies registered here in Hong Kong has hit a record high. - An innovative scheme using “light public housing” means that Hong Kong is finally solving its decades-old struggle with shabby, subdivided flats. Public housing waiting lists fell by one and a half years. - A global survey of technology clusters revealed that the highest performing one IN THE WORLD is the Shenzhen- Hong Kong-Guangzhou cluster. There’s more data in the video, but you get the picture. Perhaps most amazing of all, the always sour Economist magazine actually printed a grudgingly positive report about Hong Kong this week. Miracles do happen.
4:41

Hong Kong is SO back. The city this morning celebrated its 29th birthday free of being a British colony--with a host of stunning statistics. At the ceremony, Chief Executive John Lee shared, in a video and a speech, some remarkable achievements of the urban center on the south coast of China. I’ll just share a few highlights: - First quarter Hong Kong GDP growth figures for 2026 show 5.9 per cent expansion, which is extremely good for a mature developed society. (For comparison, the US is at 2 per cent and UK is 1.3 per cent.) - We had 49 million people coming to Hong Kong in 2025, making us one of the world’s top international destinations. - Hong Kong regained its crown as the number one share-market launch capital in the world, beating London and New York. - If you look at a list of top ten universities across the whole of Asia, you find that five of the ten are in a single city – yes, Hong Kong. - Hong Kong has become Muslim-friendly (there are 2 billion Muslims in the world) with halal food options and Qurans in hotel guestrooms. It has just been rated one of the top two Islam-friendly tourist destinations. - And more companies are coming here, too – the number of foreign companies registered here in Hong Kong has hit a record high. - An innovative scheme using “light public housing” means that Hong Kong is finally solving its decades-old struggle with shabby, subdivided flats. Public housing waiting lists fell by one and a half years. - A global survey of technology clusters revealed that the highest performing one IN THE WORLD is the Shenzhen- Hong Kong-Guangzhou cluster. There’s more data in the video, but you get the picture. Perhaps most amazing of all, the always sour Economist magazine actually printed a grudgingly positive report about Hong Kong this week. Miracles do happen.

Nury Vittachi

19,889 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

the first living cell on earth immediately killed another living cell. four billion years later you're here, on your phone, watching a video about badgers. evolution is not linear. EVERYTHING IS PVP. ALWAYS HAS BEEN. we just built the casino that admits it. waitlist live at no KYC, no house edge, no "we're holding your withdrawal for verification" bullshit. connect a wallet. refer your idiot friends with real followers (we'll check). earn lifetime rake every time they play. forever. we buried badgers in this episode. yes on purpose. yes there's a specific number. no we won't tell you how many, that's literally the game, pay attention. watch → find every badger → screenshot → reply to this tweet + tag 2 people whose financial decisions you've lost faith in. closest count + most screenshots = $100 SOL. 5 winners. 48h. we're doing this across all 10 episodes. $5,000 total. $500 per episode. LOSERS CAN FUCK OFF QUIETLY AND TRY AGAIN NEXT WEEK.
1:30

the first living cell on earth immediately killed another living cell. four billion years later you're here, on your phone, watching a video about badgers. evolution is not linear. EVERYTHING IS PVP. ALWAYS HAS BEEN. we just built the casino that admits it. waitlist live at no KYC, no house edge, no "we're holding your withdrawal for verification" bullshit. connect a wallet. refer your idiot friends with real followers (we'll check). earn lifetime rake every time they play. forever. we buried badgers in this episode. yes on purpose. yes there's a specific number. no we won't tell you how many, that's literally the game, pay attention. watch → find every badger → screenshot → reply to this tweet + tag 2 people whose financial decisions you've lost faith in. closest count + most screenshots = $100 SOL. 5 winners. 48h. we're doing this across all 10 episodes. $5,000 total. $500 per episode. LOSERS CAN FUCK OFF QUIETLY AND TRY AGAIN NEXT WEEK.

TAUNT.

76,869 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

This guy made $8,000 net profit in two days selling something out of a $1,000 cart he gutted in his garage. The cart was a Home Depot tool chest he modified himself. Total startup cost under $1,000 for everything. His product cost is less than $3 per unit. He sells it for $8.50. He can serve a customer in 30 seconds flat while everyone else is messing around with $30,000 machines that take 5 minutes per order. This is a $250 billion event industry that nobody talks about. Weddings, corporate picnics, air shows, night markets, car washes, gas stations. He's already helped divorced moms, military spouses, and immigrants set up the exact same system. What is it? Iced coffee from a modified tool cart. That's it. Guys, you DON’T have to reinvent the wheel. I keep telling you this. The guy I talked to is Marc. He's a 66 year old lawyer who spent years helping people buy businesses on visas. He saw the coffee keg system, knew the guy was doing it wrong, and built something better. In this episode Marc breaks down: - How to make $100-400 per hour in profit at the right locations - Why car washes might be the best untapped venue in America - Tells me the exact Home Depot cart he uses and how to convert it - The exact unit economics on every cup Whether you love coffee or have never even tasted it like me, as long as you love business, you're going to love this episode.
1:00

This guy made $8,000 net profit in two days selling something out of a $1,000 cart he gutted in his garage. The cart was a Home Depot tool chest he modified himself. Total startup cost under $1,000 for everything. His product cost is less than $3 per unit. He sells it for $8.50. He can serve a customer in 30 seconds flat while everyone else is messing around with $30,000 machines that take 5 minutes per order. This is a $250 billion event industry that nobody talks about. Weddings, corporate picnics, air shows, night markets, car washes, gas stations. He's already helped divorced moms, military spouses, and immigrants set up the exact same system. What is it? Iced coffee from a modified tool cart. That's it. Guys, you DON’T have to reinvent the wheel. I keep telling you this. The guy I talked to is Marc. He's a 66 year old lawyer who spent years helping people buy businesses on visas. He saw the coffee keg system, knew the guy was doing it wrong, and built something better. In this episode Marc breaks down: - How to make $100-400 per hour in profit at the right locations - Why car washes might be the best untapped venue in America - Tells me the exact Home Depot cart he uses and how to convert it - The exact unit economics on every cup Whether you love coffee or have never even tasted it like me, as long as you love business, you're going to love this episode.

Chris Koerner

67,507 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

The Trump administration underestimated Iran’s willingness to close the Strait of Hormuz, note many in the media. CNN reported that while the Departments of Energy and the Treasury participated in pre-war planning meetings, “the agency analysis and forecasts that would be integral elements of the decision-making process in past administrations were secondary considerations.” But the Strait of Hormuz was a catastrophe waiting to happen. A few years from now, people will look back on this moment and find it incredible that the world allowed the global economy to be dependent on moving so much oil and natural gas through such a dangerous bottleneck. Part of the solution is for the world to reduce its dependence on Persian Gulf oil and gas. That will require expanding production outside the Persian Gulf. Another part is to help Persian Gulf nations move more of their oil and gas through new or expanded pipelines to the Red Sea and perhaps even the Mediterranean. The faster the world builds those alternatives, the less leverage Iran retains. Many believe that the United States must not allow Iran to control the Strait under any circumstances, and the instinct to fight for Hormuz is understandable. It has been a central artery of global energy for over half a century. But instead of fighting to reopen the Strait, the world should build around it. The infrastructure to do so already exists in embryonic form. Saudi Arabia’s East-West pipeline, built during the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s, carries crude 750 miles across the kingdom from the Gulf coast to the Red Sea port of Yanbu, with a design capacity of 7 million barrels per day. The UAE’s Abu Dhabi Crude Oil Pipeline runs to Fujairah on the Gulf of Oman, bypassing the Strait entirely. And Iraq’s Kirkuk-Ceyhan pipeline connects to the Mediterranean coast of Turkey. Gulf states are already exploring a broader network of pipelines, railways, and roads, including the U.S.-backed India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC), that would create multiple export routes to the Red Sea and the Mediterranean. Kuwait, Bahrain, and Qatar, which have no bypass pipelines at all, should build routes through Saudi Arabia or Iraq, argued The National, a UAE newspaper. And Japan, South Korea, and India should, the paper argued, invest alongside Gulf sovereign wealth funds. Iran will almost certainly impose tolls on vessels transiting the Strait, as its parliament has already passed a bill to formalize fee collection. A toll of $2 to $5 per barrel, the range analysts expect Iran to charge, would add roughly $40 to $100 billion per year to global energy costs. But more war will cause far more harm than simply building alternatives because every escalation destroys infrastructure that the world needs to produce and export energy. While “all roads” may lead to “structurally higher oil prices,” as one analysis of future scenarios concluded, one of those roads leads to far less damage to people and energy infrastructure. Iran’s strikes on Ras Laffan, Qatar’s LNG hub, will take three to five years to repair. The strikes on South Pars threaten the world’s largest natural gas reserve. Iran’s attacks on Gulf neighbors have damaged refineries, desalination plants, and port facilities across Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Bahrain, and Kuwait. And consider how much more damage is possible. After the US struck Kharg Island, Iran’s main oil export hub, and Israel hit Iran’s largest petrochemical complex at South Pars, the world’s largest natural gas reserve, Iran’s military threatened to “deprive the U.S. and its allies of the region’s oil and gas for years.” As such, the $40 to $100 billion is a fraction of the $2 trillion or more that Goldman Sachs has estimated the war has already cost the global economy in lost output, destroyed infrastructure, and elevated energy prices. And continued war could lead Iran to cut off the flows of existing Saudi oil flows through its East-West pipeline. Iranian adviser Aliakbar Velayati warned that Iran views the Bab al-Mandab Strait off Yemen “with the same intensity as Hormuz” and that “the flow of energy and global trade can be disrupted with a single signal.” Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative journalism, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video.
3:56

The Trump administration underestimated Iran’s willingness to close the Strait of Hormuz, note many in the media. CNN reported that while the Departments of Energy and the Treasury participated in pre-war planning meetings, “the agency analysis and forecasts that would be integral elements of the decision-making process in past administrations were secondary considerations.” But the Strait of Hormuz was a catastrophe waiting to happen. A few years from now, people will look back on this moment and find it incredible that the world allowed the global economy to be dependent on moving so much oil and natural gas through such a dangerous bottleneck. Part of the solution is for the world to reduce its dependence on Persian Gulf oil and gas. That will require expanding production outside the Persian Gulf. Another part is to help Persian Gulf nations move more of their oil and gas through new or expanded pipelines to the Red Sea and perhaps even the Mediterranean. The faster the world builds those alternatives, the less leverage Iran retains. Many believe that the United States must not allow Iran to control the Strait under any circumstances, and the instinct to fight for Hormuz is understandable. It has been a central artery of global energy for over half a century. But instead of fighting to reopen the Strait, the world should build around it. The infrastructure to do so already exists in embryonic form. Saudi Arabia’s East-West pipeline, built during the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s, carries crude 750 miles across the kingdom from the Gulf coast to the Red Sea port of Yanbu, with a design capacity of 7 million barrels per day. The UAE’s Abu Dhabi Crude Oil Pipeline runs to Fujairah on the Gulf of Oman, bypassing the Strait entirely. And Iraq’s Kirkuk-Ceyhan pipeline connects to the Mediterranean coast of Turkey. Gulf states are already exploring a broader network of pipelines, railways, and roads, including the U.S.-backed India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC), that would create multiple export routes to the Red Sea and the Mediterranean. Kuwait, Bahrain, and Qatar, which have no bypass pipelines at all, should build routes through Saudi Arabia or Iraq, argued The National, a UAE newspaper. And Japan, South Korea, and India should, the paper argued, invest alongside Gulf sovereign wealth funds. Iran will almost certainly impose tolls on vessels transiting the Strait, as its parliament has already passed a bill to formalize fee collection. A toll of $2 to $5 per barrel, the range analysts expect Iran to charge, would add roughly $40 to $100 billion per year to global energy costs. But more war will cause far more harm than simply building alternatives because every escalation destroys infrastructure that the world needs to produce and export energy. While “all roads” may lead to “structurally higher oil prices,” as one analysis of future scenarios concluded, one of those roads leads to far less damage to people and energy infrastructure. Iran’s strikes on Ras Laffan, Qatar’s LNG hub, will take three to five years to repair. The strikes on South Pars threaten the world’s largest natural gas reserve. Iran’s attacks on Gulf neighbors have damaged refineries, desalination plants, and port facilities across Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Bahrain, and Kuwait. And consider how much more damage is possible. After the US struck Kharg Island, Iran’s main oil export hub, and Israel hit Iran’s largest petrochemical complex at South Pars, the world’s largest natural gas reserve, Iran’s military threatened to “deprive the U.S. and its allies of the region’s oil and gas for years.” As such, the $40 to $100 billion is a fraction of the $2 trillion or more that Goldman Sachs has estimated the war has already cost the global economy in lost output, destroyed infrastructure, and elevated energy prices. And continued war could lead Iran to cut off the flows of existing Saudi oil flows through its East-West pipeline. Iranian adviser Aliakbar Velayati warned that Iran views the Bab al-Mandab Strait off Yemen “with the same intensity as Hormuz” and that “the flow of energy and global trade can be disrupted with a single signal.” Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative journalism, read the rest of the article, and watch the full video.

Michael Shellenberger

61,948 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Since I’m a carnivore, many of you ask me where I buy my steaks and how much it costs me to live in Mexico. - I live in a 220 sqm hotel penthouse in Playa del Carmen and pay $1,500 USD, including utilities and cleaning. They also change my sheets and towels. In the same hotel, there are 1-bedroom units available for $500 per month, fully furnished, and all-inclusive. - I bought a brand-new scooter for $1,500, costing me $5 a week in gas⛽️ - I buy my meat from Carnes Finas de Monterrey. I pay $32 USD per 1 kg of grass-fed top sirloin, and I eat 1kg a day. Adding eggs, fruit, and other necessities, so $1,100 a month. You can find it elsewhere for half the price, but I care about meat quality, and theirs is top-tier. My expenses are $2,600 while living a high-end lifestyle that most people can only dream of. Only after leaving Canada did I realize how badly I was being fucked by the Canadian government, paying x3 times more for the cost of living just to fucking breathe💰 If you’re single, you can live comfortably on under $1,000/month. If you’ve got a family, you can enjoy a 3-bedroom apartment just 10 minutes walking from the beach for under $2,000/month for house, utilities, and groceries included❤️ Moving to Mexico takes courage, resilience, and determination. I did it alone. No safety nets. No handouts. No guarantees. I took full control of my destiny. I chose a place that aligns with my values and built my dream life from the ground up! The only difference between you and me is my trust in myself to figure shit out. No matter how tough life gets, no matter how chaotic things become, I know I’ll find a way. That unshakeable belief in my abilities is exactly why I became the man you see today Mexico is ranked as the world's top place to live as an expat, the second most visited, and the seventh most affordable country. We've affordable healthcare, free schools and universities. You can work, launch a business, open offshore bank accounts, and purchase real estate 🇲🇽 To learn more, click ‘Escape to Mexico” in my bio To secure your Mexican residency or passport in 10 days: Text me+1-844-699-1844
0:53

Since I’m a carnivore, many of you ask me where I buy my steaks and how much it costs me to live in Mexico. - I live in a 220 sqm hotel penthouse in Playa del Carmen and pay $1,500 USD, including utilities and cleaning. They also change my sheets and towels. In the same hotel, there are 1-bedroom units available for $500 per month, fully furnished, and all-inclusive. - I bought a brand-new scooter for $1,500, costing me $5 a week in gas⛽️ - I buy my meat from Carnes Finas de Monterrey. I pay $32 USD per 1 kg of grass-fed top sirloin, and I eat 1kg a day. Adding eggs, fruit, and other necessities, so $1,100 a month. You can find it elsewhere for half the price, but I care about meat quality, and theirs is top-tier. My expenses are $2,600 while living a high-end lifestyle that most people can only dream of. Only after leaving Canada did I realize how badly I was being fucked by the Canadian government, paying x3 times more for the cost of living just to fucking breathe💰 If you’re single, you can live comfortably on under $1,000/month. If you’ve got a family, you can enjoy a 3-bedroom apartment just 10 minutes walking from the beach for under $2,000/month for house, utilities, and groceries included❤️ Moving to Mexico takes courage, resilience, and determination. I did it alone. No safety nets. No handouts. No guarantees. I took full control of my destiny. I chose a place that aligns with my values and built my dream life from the ground up! The only difference between you and me is my trust in myself to figure shit out. No matter how tough life gets, no matter how chaotic things become, I know I’ll find a way. That unshakeable belief in my abilities is exactly why I became the man you see today Mexico is ranked as the world's top place to live as an expat, the second most visited, and the seventh most affordable country. We've affordable healthcare, free schools and universities. You can work, launch a business, open offshore bank accounts, and purchase real estate 🇲🇽 To learn more, click ‘Escape to Mexico” in my bio To secure your Mexican residency or passport in 10 days: Text me+1-844-699-1844

Jeckov Kanani

570,330 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад