Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Is calling yourself a 10 "confidence" or EGO?!

19,180 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

8 Kommentare

Profilbild von SpaceRocker
SpaceRockervor 1 Jahr

Y'all should do a show with the women taking all the makeup off after the first hour.

Profilbild von S4Veau
S4Veauvor 1 Jahr

More than anything, it's delusion. Confidence and ego can contribute but not to the same extent.

Profilbild von Feminism is not about equality
Feminism is not about equalityvor 1 Jahr

Of course it's ego. Just like when women call themselves intelligent, funny, witty, etc. Those are things other people say about you, not you about yourself. It's a sign of ego and women like that are everywhere.

Profilbild von DKS1313
DKS1313vor 1 Jahr

Ego. What you rate yourself has no bearing on your dating rating by men. Think yourself a 10 all day everyday. If guys rate you a 4, you a 4.

Profilbild von Nick
Nickvor 1 Jahr

Neither, it’s pure delusion 🤷‍♂️

Profilbild von ☆ Dark_star ☆
☆ Dark_star ☆vor 1 Jahr

Any woman who says she's above an eight is full of s*** and is not worth your time.

Profilbild von Dan
Danvor 1 Jahr

Delusion

Profilbild von Steckroth
Steckrothvor 1 Jahr

Are they a ten if not it's EGO

Ähnliche Videos

Adult age gap relationships: are they little girls or ADULTS?! Referring to an 18- or 19-year-old as a "little girl" in the context of an age gap debate is a form of narrative framing and rhetorical spin to morally tilt the debate. It's a deliberate choice of language that shapes perception rather than neutrally describes reality. Denotatively, "little girl" refers to a child, generally prepubescent or very young. Connotatively, it invokes innocence, vulnerability, and immaturity—often intentionally. Using it to describe an 18- or 19-year-old, who is legally an adult, overlays childlike imagery onto someone who may be legally autonomous but young. This type of language is often used to: Emotionally charge the argument, by insinuating predation or manipulation. Frame the older partner (often a man) as morally suspect or exploitative. Reinforce power imbalance narratives, sometimes regardless of the specific dynamics of the relationship. It's a persuasive technique aimed at shifting the moral framing of the situation from a discussion of legal adults to one of exploitation or grooming—whether or not that interpretation is warranted. This linguistic and rhetorical sleight of hand is not accidental. It is the tactic of those who cannot win the argument on facts or principle, and so resort to emotive manipulation. By calling a young woman a “little girl,” one hopes to smuggle in associations of innocence, helplessness, and violation. The implication? That any older partner is, by default, a predator. It's an accusation by insinuation—a coward’s libel.
1:01

Sensitive content

Adult age gap relationships: are they little girls or ADULTS?! Referring to an 18- or 19-year-old as a "little girl" in the context of an age gap debate is a form of narrative framing and rhetorical spin to morally tilt the debate. It's a deliberate choice of language that shapes perception rather than neutrally describes reality. Denotatively, "little girl" refers to a child, generally prepubescent or very young. Connotatively, it invokes innocence, vulnerability, and immaturity—often intentionally. Using it to describe an 18- or 19-year-old, who is legally an adult, overlays childlike imagery onto someone who may be legally autonomous but young. This type of language is often used to: Emotionally charge the argument, by insinuating predation or manipulation. Frame the older partner (often a man) as morally suspect or exploitative. Reinforce power imbalance narratives, sometimes regardless of the specific dynamics of the relationship. It's a persuasive technique aimed at shifting the moral framing of the situation from a discussion of legal adults to one of exploitation or grooming—whether or not that interpretation is warranted. This linguistic and rhetorical sleight of hand is not accidental. It is the tactic of those who cannot win the argument on facts or principle, and so resort to emotive manipulation. By calling a young woman a “little girl,” one hopes to smuggle in associations of innocence, helplessness, and violation. The implication? That any older partner is, by default, a predator. It's an accusation by insinuation—a coward’s libel.

whatever

50,038 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr