Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Is calling yourself a 10 "confidence" or EGO?!

19,180 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

8 Comments

SpaceRocker's profile picture
SpaceRocker1 year ago

Y'all should do a show with the women taking all the makeup off after the first hour.

S4Veau's profile picture
S4Veau1 year ago

More than anything, it's delusion. Confidence and ego can contribute but not to the same extent.

Feminism is not about equality's profile picture
Feminism is not about equality1 year ago

Of course it's ego. Just like when women call themselves intelligent, funny, witty, etc. Those are things other people say about you, not you about yourself. It's a sign of ego and women like that are everywhere.

DKS1313's profile picture
DKS13131 year ago

Ego. What you rate yourself has no bearing on your dating rating by men. Think yourself a 10 all day everyday. If guys rate you a 4, you a 4.

Nick's profile picture
Nick1 year ago

Neither, it’s pure delusion 🤷‍♂️

☆ Dark_star ☆'s profile picture
☆ Dark_star ☆1 year ago

Any woman who says she's above an eight is full of s*** and is not worth your time.

Dan's profile picture
Dan1 year ago

Delusion

Steckroth's profile picture
Steckroth1 year ago

Are they a ten if not it's EGO

Related Videos

Adult age gap relationships: are they little girls or ADULTS?! Referring to an 18- or 19-year-old as a "little girl" in the context of an age gap debate is a form of narrative framing and rhetorical spin to morally tilt the debate. It's a deliberate choice of language that shapes perception rather than neutrally describes reality. Denotatively, "little girl" refers to a child, generally prepubescent or very young. Connotatively, it invokes innocence, vulnerability, and immaturity—often intentionally. Using it to describe an 18- or 19-year-old, who is legally an adult, overlays childlike imagery onto someone who may be legally autonomous but young. This type of language is often used to: Emotionally charge the argument, by insinuating predation or manipulation. Frame the older partner (often a man) as morally suspect or exploitative. Reinforce power imbalance narratives, sometimes regardless of the specific dynamics of the relationship. It's a persuasive technique aimed at shifting the moral framing of the situation from a discussion of legal adults to one of exploitation or grooming—whether or not that interpretation is warranted. This linguistic and rhetorical sleight of hand is not accidental. It is the tactic of those who cannot win the argument on facts or principle, and so resort to emotive manipulation. By calling a young woman a “little girl,” one hopes to smuggle in associations of innocence, helplessness, and violation. The implication? That any older partner is, by default, a predator. It's an accusation by insinuation—a coward’s libel.
1:01

Sensitive content

Adult age gap relationships: are they little girls or ADULTS?! Referring to an 18- or 19-year-old as a "little girl" in the context of an age gap debate is a form of narrative framing and rhetorical spin to morally tilt the debate. It's a deliberate choice of language that shapes perception rather than neutrally describes reality. Denotatively, "little girl" refers to a child, generally prepubescent or very young. Connotatively, it invokes innocence, vulnerability, and immaturity—often intentionally. Using it to describe an 18- or 19-year-old, who is legally an adult, overlays childlike imagery onto someone who may be legally autonomous but young. This type of language is often used to: Emotionally charge the argument, by insinuating predation or manipulation. Frame the older partner (often a man) as morally suspect or exploitative. Reinforce power imbalance narratives, sometimes regardless of the specific dynamics of the relationship. It's a persuasive technique aimed at shifting the moral framing of the situation from a discussion of legal adults to one of exploitation or grooming—whether or not that interpretation is warranted. This linguistic and rhetorical sleight of hand is not accidental. It is the tactic of those who cannot win the argument on facts or principle, and so resort to emotive manipulation. By calling a young woman a “little girl,” one hopes to smuggle in associations of innocence, helplessness, and violation. The implication? That any older partner is, by default, a predator. It's an accusation by insinuation—a coward’s libel.

whatever

50,038 views • 1 year ago