Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Is crypto VC going extinct? "No, I think it's evolving." "If you rewind the clock back to 2021–2022, there were a lot more VCs who raised money on the idea that they were going to deploy into a crypto venture." "And the idea was that, well, anybody can do...

27,067 просмотров • 5 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля Russfranky
Russfranky4 дней назад

In a perfect world crypto replaces VCs.

Фото профиля Dragonfly >|<
Dragonfly >|<5 дней назад

Full interview via Bloomberg:

Фото профиля Sim
Sim5 дней назад

How does dragonfly add value that others don't? I've seen a lot of asking for money back from projects

Фото профиля defibagholder
defibagholder4 дней назад

wydm ur not giving me 20M for my NFT ?

Фото профиля Tuấn Kèo
Tuấn Kèo5 дней назад

dễ tiền vẫn còn, chỉ là chuyển sang mấy kèo meme và degen mới mà VC không với tới. họ mất nhịp với phần tiền thực đang chảy ở đó.

Фото профиля vøv △
vøv △5 дней назад

@hosseeb crypto vc died in 22, the survivors are actually doing the work

Фото профиля Theerat Nitaya
Theerat Nitaya4 дней назад

It's definitely getting more competitive and only the institutional players with real value add are left standing.

Фото профиля Dash🔶
Dash🔶5 дней назад

We BDs and founders need to evolve with the times we are in.

Фото профиля Leon
Leon5 дней назад

The tourist phase is over. Evolution is just a polite way of saying the filter is finally working. Only real operators left standing now.

Фото профиля sophia l.
sophia l.4 дней назад

Love this take

Фото профиля Soph n. ❀
Soph n. ❀4 дней назад

Well said!

Похожие видео

Martin Masser from ChangeNOW says banks are running software from the 70s, and crypto is how they get out "I think there was a point where we did think we would replace the banks, but that was probably 12 years ago. I think now, working parallel." "I worked in a lot of these banking systems, and do you know what, now that you've doxxed your age, a lot of the software in the banks is older than you." "They've got these legacy systems in from the '70s, and they just can't get that out because so much of that is ingrained. So you're in banking and you've got software from the '80s, '90s, '70s in there. It's just not going to be as efficient." "I think what's really interesting for the stage that we're at is there's going to be so many more things that we can do with crypto within banking." "The amount of people that are on the banking floor trying to approve settlements is crazy. We can do that in crypto really easily." "So I'm actually finding a lot more banks now are open to integrating, and they are now integrating a lot of the software, a lot of the ideas." "And I think the key thing people maybe don't realize, banks have been involved in this space for a very long time. A lot of the times they've been doing pilots, proofs of concept, little trials." "But now we're starting to see the banks integrating a lot of these systems, because they just see so many efficiencies that are there now with this."

The Wolf Of All Streets

27,235 просмотров • 24 дней назад

Martin Masser from ChangeNOW says the institutions that left crypto for AI are planning to come back "Are we going to have another alt season? Are alts going to be what they are? I don't know. I think there's a lot of confidence that's been taken out." "When was the last token launch you saw? Honestly, can you remember the last time we had a token launch?" "Even then, if we exclude meme coins, I think altcoins are definitely not what they were going to be." "I definitely think there is a lot more, I don't want to say adoption, but a lot more openness to these discussions. 3-4 years ago you'd just have the door slammed in your face." "Now it's X bank, Z bank, they're all wanting to integrate this software. And they're opening it up. All of these little integrations, like accepting stablecoins, that then makes the whole ecosystem stronger." "I'm not doing predictions, but a lot of the liquidity will flow back in to where we were. Speaking to a lot of these institutions, they've gone out of crypto into AI." "And they do feel that when AI sort of cools down, where's that money going to be coming back into? Is it going to be gold? Is it silver? Is it going to be crypto?" "A lot of them are like, we're just putting it out there for the IPOs and we're coming back. A lot of people have been saying that. So that gives me a lot of confidence." "And look, the biggest marketing you can have is a big green candle."

The Wolf Of All Streets

29,107 просмотров • 24 дней назад

Awesome to sit down with Inversion founder Santiago R Santos at TOKEN2049 last week. This one meant a lot. Santi was my first ever guest on Risk Takers, and I was SO nervous for that first interview. Seeing how much I've grown since then nicely closed the circle on my first year interviewing some of the biggest names in crypto and finance. "It was almost irresponsible not to think about, wow, there's vastly more opportunity here relative to crypto." What we spoke about: - is the four-year crypto cycle still a thing - which crypto protocols actually make money - can OpenAI and Anthropic fund the AI build-out - why big tech is happy to borrow at 9-10% to build AI - where to invest in AI without picking the winning model - why Inversion swapped crypto for AI - the businesses AI agents put under pressure first THE CYCLE: "I think this idea of like a four-year cycle or thinking about in cycles is largely irrelevant... every year of the last couple of years has started off feeling like it's going to end. Like p(doom) has been high at the beginning of the year. And then somehow the market's up like 15, 20% and we're hitting all time high." WHERE CRYPTO MAKES MONEY: "There's only a handful of crypto companies that have really outperformed, you know, Hyperliquid, some of the other Hyperliquid type like perpetual exchanges... And then there's a whole segment that is just not interesting... Yes, I invested early on, so I'm talking my book a little bit." AI DEBT: "If someone is willing to raise and borrow money at 9%, 10%, they're doing the math on the back and saying, there's a great return to that investment. And that just, in my opinion, tells you the spread that these guys are capturing with these products." POWER AND MEMORY: "In the stack of AI that I want to be invested in, feel more comfortable, it's in power and it's in memory... Most of the memory guys are totally sold out for the next couple of years... It's almost like a drug trade. It's like I know a guy that knows a guy that can get me the chips." THE BIG WAVE: "There's a trillion dollars of AI CapEx that is going to be deployed in the next couple years. Every year... Do you want to be riding a small wave or do you want to be riding a big wave?" BANKS AND INSURERS: "Businesses that you definitely don't want to be investing behind, which is businesses that have made money on basically banking on less intelligence. And a lot of that is just banks, for instance, financial institutions, insurance companies... If your flight gets delayed, you're owed $600 by regulation... Now it's worth your time because you can deploy an agent for very little cost." Timestamps: 0:00 Coming up 1:05 Where crypto markets go next 3:21 Where crypto makes real money 6:38 What investors pay for crypto revenue 9:54 Is Nvidia still cheap? 12:31 Can OpenAI and Anthropic fund AI? 17:07 Borrowing billions to build AI 18:53 AI's need for power and memory 23:08 Can AI get cheap like Ethereum? 27:38 Is AI being sold below cost? 32:02 Can any AI lab stay ahead? 36:15 Why Inversion swapped crypto for AI 40:11 Crypto returns against stocks and bonds 42:47 Businesses built on customer confusion

Alessandro

13,143 просмотров • 2 дней назад

I have a friend who doesn't read anything published in the past 50 years, and the more I think about it, the more I think he's onto something. The reason is that time is the best filter we have for quality. People are bad at judging quality in the moment but very good at getting rid of junk over time. — — "History is not very good at capturing all that is great in art. It is not good at that. There are many great symphonies that have been lost permanently, there are many great painters that died unknown and their paintings are gone, there's novels that have been written that no one will ever read. So history is not good at capturing all this great art. But history is very good at discarding all that is mediocre. And the amount of time that that takes, it's something like 50 years. So over the course of 50 years, what will happen is a lot of stuff that was prominent will be re-filtered and re-filtered and re-filtered, and you'll end up with a smaller group of things which have survived that test of time. So if you think about it right now, if you go back and look at the bestseller lists for 1974, 1973, there's a lot of that that would have been highly regarded at the time, which people do not read anymore for a variety of reasons, and there's some that has survived, and that's a very telling distinction. So in a world where I'm turning 60 this year, you have a limited amount of time, all four of us have active lives, we want to make sure that if we're going to sit down, we're going to read carefully, we're going to meet and we're going to discuss it in detail, we want to make sure that the work is rewarding. And the best way to ensure that is by drawing from the past." amor towles

David Perell

86,765 просмотров • 1 год назад