Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Is it glory or propaganda?!

34,518 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

8 Kommentare

Profilbild von Feuerdrache
Feuerdrachevor 11 Monaten

German here, we did this a whole year in history. The propaganda of the Kaiserreich was extremely good and well organised...

Profilbild von Stpbdn * Clim Stan Account
Stpbdn * Clim Stan Accountvor 11 Monaten

WWI was hell. Slaugterhouse. No honor on that. Europe died then.

Profilbild von Brad
Bradvor 11 Monaten

I met a man that served in WWI it was about 10 years ago and he was about 95-99. He served in the Air Corps (before the Air Force). It was a honor to meet him and he was the only WWI vet I’ve ever talked to. War is hell the propaganda machine was alive and well then.

Profilbild von Simp Hunter
Simp Huntervor 11 Monaten

"Oh no, I know ... I know ..." No, you don't know, lady. Shut the fuck up and learn something.

Profilbild von Mark (Wizard/Engineer)
Mark (Wizard/Engineer)vor 11 Monaten

It's amazing the way how some people that don't know the first thing about warfare romanticise it. Saying things like people felt proud to do their bit..... The reality is much different. My grandfather was a POW & survived the deathmarches then managed to escape - I have his diary from the time. What they endured was awful. He never forgave the Germans. I have been in multiple wars now & nothing I endured was as bad as what my grandfather had in WW2. As humans, we can be so cruel to each other.

Profilbild von ZeroInc™
ZeroInc™vor 11 Monaten

World War 1 was a nightmare for men as it was a dark war given the mental and physical toll the soldiers endured day and night in the trench warfare.

Profilbild von Michael McCutcheon
Michael McCutcheonvor 11 Monaten

Brian speaks the truth. That war was unbelievably brutal. Women don’t want equality when it comes time to die for your country.

Profilbild von Aureus130
Aureus130vor 11 Monaten

Propaganda 💯

Ähnliche Videos

Is it WRONG for men to want VlRGlN or low body count women?!
1:01

Sensitive content

Is it WRONG for men to want VlRGlN or low body count women?!

whatever

20,561 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Adult age gap relationships: are they little girls or ADULTS?! Referring to an 18- or 19-year-old as a "little girl" in the context of an age gap debate is a form of narrative framing and rhetorical spin to morally tilt the debate. It's a deliberate choice of language that shapes perception rather than neutrally describes reality. Denotatively, "little girl" refers to a child, generally prepubescent or very young. Connotatively, it invokes innocence, vulnerability, and immaturity—often intentionally. Using it to describe an 18- or 19-year-old, who is legally an adult, overlays childlike imagery onto someone who may be legally autonomous but young. This type of language is often used to: Emotionally charge the argument, by insinuating predation or manipulation. Frame the older partner (often a man) as morally suspect or exploitative. Reinforce power imbalance narratives, sometimes regardless of the specific dynamics of the relationship. It's a persuasive technique aimed at shifting the moral framing of the situation from a discussion of legal adults to one of exploitation or grooming—whether or not that interpretation is warranted. This linguistic and rhetorical sleight of hand is not accidental. It is the tactic of those who cannot win the argument on facts or principle, and so resort to emotive manipulation. By calling a young woman a “little girl,” one hopes to smuggle in associations of innocence, helplessness, and violation. The implication? That any older partner is, by default, a predator. It's an accusation by insinuation—a coward’s libel.
1:01

Sensitive content

Adult age gap relationships: are they little girls or ADULTS?! Referring to an 18- or 19-year-old as a "little girl" in the context of an age gap debate is a form of narrative framing and rhetorical spin to morally tilt the debate. It's a deliberate choice of language that shapes perception rather than neutrally describes reality. Denotatively, "little girl" refers to a child, generally prepubescent or very young. Connotatively, it invokes innocence, vulnerability, and immaturity—often intentionally. Using it to describe an 18- or 19-year-old, who is legally an adult, overlays childlike imagery onto someone who may be legally autonomous but young. This type of language is often used to: Emotionally charge the argument, by insinuating predation or manipulation. Frame the older partner (often a man) as morally suspect or exploitative. Reinforce power imbalance narratives, sometimes regardless of the specific dynamics of the relationship. It's a persuasive technique aimed at shifting the moral framing of the situation from a discussion of legal adults to one of exploitation or grooming—whether or not that interpretation is warranted. This linguistic and rhetorical sleight of hand is not accidental. It is the tactic of those who cannot win the argument on facts or principle, and so resort to emotive manipulation. By calling a young woman a “little girl,” one hopes to smuggle in associations of innocence, helplessness, and violation. The implication? That any older partner is, by default, a predator. It's an accusation by insinuation—a coward’s libel.

whatever

50,038 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

If BDE or SDE is okay, can we use Cavernous Vaj Energy?!
0:49

Sensitive content

If BDE or SDE is okay, can we use Cavernous Vaj Energy?!

whatever

107,726 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten