Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Is it glory or propaganda?!

34,518 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 8

Фото профиля Feuerdrache
Feuerdrache11 месяцев назад

German here, we did this a whole year in history. The propaganda of the Kaiserreich was extremely good and well organised...

Фото профиля Stpbdn * Clim Stan Account
Stpbdn * Clim Stan Account11 месяцев назад

WWI was hell. Slaugterhouse. No honor on that. Europe died then.

Фото профиля Brad
Brad11 месяцев назад

I met a man that served in WWI it was about 10 years ago and he was about 95-99. He served in the Air Corps (before the Air Force). It was a honor to meet him and he was the only WWI vet I’ve ever talked to. War is hell the propaganda machine was alive and well then.

Фото профиля Simp Hunter
Simp Hunter11 месяцев назад

"Oh no, I know ... I know ..." No, you don't know, lady. Shut the fuck up and learn something.

Фото профиля Mark (Wizard/Engineer)
Mark (Wizard/Engineer)11 месяцев назад

It's amazing the way how some people that don't know the first thing about warfare romanticise it. Saying things like people felt proud to do their bit..... The reality is much different. My grandfather was a POW & survived the deathmarches then managed to escape - I have his diary from the time. What they endured was awful. He never forgave the Germans. I have been in multiple wars now & nothing I endured was as bad as what my grandfather had in WW2. As humans, we can be so cruel to each other.

Фото профиля ZeroInc™
ZeroInc™11 месяцев назад

World War 1 was a nightmare for men as it was a dark war given the mental and physical toll the soldiers endured day and night in the trench warfare.

Фото профиля Michael McCutcheon
Michael McCutcheon11 месяцев назад

Brian speaks the truth. That war was unbelievably brutal. Women don’t want equality when it comes time to die for your country.

Фото профиля Aureus130
Aureus13011 месяцев назад

Propaganda 💯

Похожие видео

Adult age gap relationships: are they little girls or ADULTS?! Referring to an 18- or 19-year-old as a "little girl" in the context of an age gap debate is a form of narrative framing and rhetorical spin to morally tilt the debate. It's a deliberate choice of language that shapes perception rather than neutrally describes reality. Denotatively, "little girl" refers to a child, generally prepubescent or very young. Connotatively, it invokes innocence, vulnerability, and immaturity—often intentionally. Using it to describe an 18- or 19-year-old, who is legally an adult, overlays childlike imagery onto someone who may be legally autonomous but young. This type of language is often used to: Emotionally charge the argument, by insinuating predation or manipulation. Frame the older partner (often a man) as morally suspect or exploitative. Reinforce power imbalance narratives, sometimes regardless of the specific dynamics of the relationship. It's a persuasive technique aimed at shifting the moral framing of the situation from a discussion of legal adults to one of exploitation or grooming—whether or not that interpretation is warranted. This linguistic and rhetorical sleight of hand is not accidental. It is the tactic of those who cannot win the argument on facts or principle, and so resort to emotive manipulation. By calling a young woman a “little girl,” one hopes to smuggle in associations of innocence, helplessness, and violation. The implication? That any older partner is, by default, a predator. It's an accusation by insinuation—a coward’s libel.
1:01

Sensitive content

Adult age gap relationships: are they little girls or ADULTS?! Referring to an 18- or 19-year-old as a "little girl" in the context of an age gap debate is a form of narrative framing and rhetorical spin to morally tilt the debate. It's a deliberate choice of language that shapes perception rather than neutrally describes reality. Denotatively, "little girl" refers to a child, generally prepubescent or very young. Connotatively, it invokes innocence, vulnerability, and immaturity—often intentionally. Using it to describe an 18- or 19-year-old, who is legally an adult, overlays childlike imagery onto someone who may be legally autonomous but young. This type of language is often used to: Emotionally charge the argument, by insinuating predation or manipulation. Frame the older partner (often a man) as morally suspect or exploitative. Reinforce power imbalance narratives, sometimes regardless of the specific dynamics of the relationship. It's a persuasive technique aimed at shifting the moral framing of the situation from a discussion of legal adults to one of exploitation or grooming—whether or not that interpretation is warranted. This linguistic and rhetorical sleight of hand is not accidental. It is the tactic of those who cannot win the argument on facts or principle, and so resort to emotive manipulation. By calling a young woman a “little girl,” one hopes to smuggle in associations of innocence, helplessness, and violation. The implication? That any older partner is, by default, a predator. It's an accusation by insinuation—a coward’s libel.

whatever

50,038 просмотров • 1 год назад