Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Is it making sense yet? While exposing the Supreme Court, this “decision” actually CODIFIED the President’s powers… President Trump: "In actuality, while I am sure that they did not mean to do so, the Supreme Court's decision today made a president's ability to both regulate trade and impose tariffs...

PaulGoldEagle's profile picture

Paul White Gold Eagle

208,901 subscribers

50,992 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Trump: While I am sure that they did not mean to do so, the Supreme Court's decision today made a President's ability to both regulate trade and impose tariffs more powerful and more crystal clear, rather than less.
0:21

Trump: While I am sure that they did not mean to do so, the Supreme Court's decision today made a President's ability to both regulate trade and impose tariffs more powerful and more crystal clear, rather than less.

Open Source Intel

68,688 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

President Trump said the Supreme Court’s ruling that invalidated most of his tariffs actually “made a president’s ability to both regulate trade and impose tariffs more powerful and more crystal clear.” “I can charge much more than I was charging.”
2:06

President Trump said the Supreme Court’s ruling that invalidated most of his tariffs actually “made a president’s ability to both regulate trade and impose tariffs more powerful and more crystal clear.” “I can charge much more than I was charging.”

ABC News

118,510 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨 HOLY SMOKES. President Trump announces the Supreme Court has actually STRENGTHENED the president's ability to enact tariffs, HUGE BACKFIRE "SCOTUS made a president's ability to regulate trade and impose tariffs MORE POWERFUL and MORE CRYSTAL CLEAR, rather than less." "There's no longer ANY DOUBT, the income coming in and protection will ACTUALLY INCREASE because of the decision. I don't think SCOTUS meant that!" "Based on longstanding law and victories...the Supreme Court did NOT overrule tariffs. They merely overruled one use of IEEPA tariffs." "The ability to block, embargo, restrict, license or impose any other condition on a foreign country's ability to conduct trade with the US under IEEPA has been FULLY CONFIRMED by this decision." "Now, there's no doubt."
2:04

🚨 HOLY SMOKES. President Trump announces the Supreme Court has actually STRENGTHENED the president's ability to enact tariffs, HUGE BACKFIRE "SCOTUS made a president's ability to regulate trade and impose tariffs MORE POWERFUL and MORE CRYSTAL CLEAR, rather than less." "There's no longer ANY DOUBT, the income coming in and protection will ACTUALLY INCREASE because of the decision. I don't think SCOTUS meant that!" "Based on longstanding law and victories...the Supreme Court did NOT overrule tariffs. They merely overruled one use of IEEPA tariffs." "The ability to block, embargo, restrict, license or impose any other condition on a foreign country's ability to conduct trade with the US under IEEPA has been FULLY CONFIRMED by this decision." "Now, there's no doubt."

Eric Daugherty

923,839 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

BREAKING: Trump announces that the Supreme Court's decision on tariffs has actually made the President's ability to impose tariffs "MORE POWERFUL" rather than less. "I don't think the court meant that... The ability to block, embargo, restrict, license, or impose any other condition on a foreign country's ability to conduct trade with the United States under IEEPA has been fully confirmed by this decision."
1:15

BREAKING: Trump announces that the Supreme Court's decision on tariffs has actually made the President's ability to impose tariffs "MORE POWERFUL" rather than less. "I don't think the court meant that... The ability to block, embargo, restrict, license, or impose any other condition on a foreign country's ability to conduct trade with the United States under IEEPA has been fully confirmed by this decision."

Libs of TikTok

241,397 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

On today’s episode of Verdict, we do a deep dive into the Supreme Court decision concerning the President’s tariffs. That decision hasn’t come down yet, but I’m making a clear prediction about what the Supreme Court will do. Don’t miss it:
1:54

On today’s episode of Verdict, we do a deep dive into the Supreme Court decision concerning the President’s tariffs. That decision hasn’t come down yet, but I’m making a clear prediction about what the Supreme Court will do. Don’t miss it:

Ted Cruz

25,602 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Trump announced that the Supreme Court’s decision on tariffs has actually made the President’s authority to impose them more powerful, not weaker. “I don’t think the court meant that… The ability to block, embargo, restrict, license, or impose any other condition on a foreign country’s ability to conduct trade with the United States under IEEPA has been fully confirmed by this decision.”
1:15

Trump announced that the Supreme Court’s decision on tariffs has actually made the President’s authority to impose them more powerful, not weaker. “I don’t think the court meant that… The ability to block, embargo, restrict, license, or impose any other condition on a foreign country’s ability to conduct trade with the United States under IEEPA has been fully confirmed by this decision.”

Jammles

59,520 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

NEW: President Trump signals that despite disagreeing with the court's holding, he is not backing down on future tariffs: "Although I firmly disagree with the court's holding today, the decision might not substantially constrain a president's ability to order tariffs going forward." "That's because numerous other federal statutes, which is so true, authorize the president to impose tariffs and might justify most, if not all, of the tariffs issued in this case. Even more tariffs."
0:26

NEW: President Trump signals that despite disagreeing with the court's holding, he is not backing down on future tariffs: "Although I firmly disagree with the court's holding today, the decision might not substantially constrain a president's ability to order tariffs going forward." "That's because numerous other federal statutes, which is so true, authorize the president to impose tariffs and might justify most, if not all, of the tariffs issued in this case. Even more tariffs."

Fox News

179,977 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

In a 6-3 decision written by Chief Justice John Roberts, the Supreme Court deemed that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not give President Trump the power to unilaterally impose tariffs. ABC News' Jon Karl has more on what this means.
1:56

In a 6-3 decision written by Chief Justice John Roberts, the Supreme Court deemed that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not give President Trump the power to unilaterally impose tariffs. ABC News' Jon Karl has more on what this means.

ABC News

55,186 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

MacCallum: What do you think The White House should do in this situation? Gowdy: I think what they ought to do is probably follow the judge’s order and the supreme court decision which used the word facilitate. Also on that opinion, the words accidental, mistake and illegal. Those are not three good words you want in a supreme court decision.. the president may not agree with that but bring him back and remove him to another country but what we can't have is any executive disobeying or not following a judge's decision
1:24

MacCallum: What do you think The White House should do in this situation? Gowdy: I think what they ought to do is probably follow the judge’s order and the supreme court decision which used the word facilitate. Also on that opinion, the words accidental, mistake and illegal. Those are not three good words you want in a supreme court decision.. the president may not agree with that but bring him back and remove him to another country but what we can't have is any executive disobeying or not following a judge's decision

Acyn

1,112,434 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

President Trump and President Bukele both made clear in the Oval Office today that they do not intend to return Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia to the U.S. following the Supreme Court's ruling. "How can I smuggle a terrorist into the United States? Of course I'm not going to do it. The question is preposterous," Bukele said.
3:55

President Trump and President Bukele both made clear in the Oval Office today that they do not intend to return Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia to the U.S. following the Supreme Court's ruling. "How can I smuggle a terrorist into the United States? Of course I'm not going to do it. The question is preposterous," Bukele said.

Kaitlan Collins

4,141,093 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

NEW: VP Vance praises the "definitive end to the tyranny of judicial rule" with the Supreme Court's landmark Dobbs decision: "We cannot forget [President Trump] delivered and his Supreme Court justices delivered the most important Supreme Court decision of my lifetime." "Because with the Dobbs decision, what we did, what the president did, what the Supreme Court did was put a definitive end to the tyranny of judicial rule on the question of human life." "He shattered a 50-year culture of disposability, one that treated human life as expendable, the moment that it became inconvenient and he empowered our nation and our movement to build a culture of life from the grassroots up."
1:00

NEW: VP Vance praises the "definitive end to the tyranny of judicial rule" with the Supreme Court's landmark Dobbs decision: "We cannot forget [President Trump] delivered and his Supreme Court justices delivered the most important Supreme Court decision of my lifetime." "Because with the Dobbs decision, what we did, what the president did, what the Supreme Court did was put a definitive end to the tyranny of judicial rule on the question of human life." "He shattered a 50-year culture of disposability, one that treated human life as expendable, the moment that it became inconvenient and he empowered our nation and our movement to build a culture of life from the grassroots up."

Fox News

161,259 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

What I Posted 11/12/25…. 👇 “Trump already has the power to tariff. It was codified in 1962 & again in 1974 by Congress.” 👉 The Trade Expansion Act of 1962 👉 The Trade Act of 1974 What two laws did Trump just highlight today? 👉 The Trade Expansion Act of 1962 👉 The Trade Act of 1974 Not a lucky guess. It’s just reading. He exposed the SCOTUS, while simultaneous codifying his Powers. 5GW H/T: Derek Johnson
0:46

What I Posted 11/12/25…. 👇 “Trump already has the power to tariff. It was codified in 1962 & again in 1974 by Congress.” 👉 The Trade Expansion Act of 1962 👉 The Trade Act of 1974 What two laws did Trump just highlight today? 👉 The Trade Expansion Act of 1962 👉 The Trade Act of 1974 Not a lucky guess. It’s just reading. He exposed the SCOTUS, while simultaneous codifying his Powers. 5GW H/T: Derek Johnson

NewsTreason Channel 17

19,479 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

The U.S. Supreme Court rules 6–3 that President Trump cannot impose tariffs under emergency powers, saying tariff authority belongs to Congress, raising questions about trade deals and billions in revenue. Watch OAN on Spectrum and YouTube TV today for more updates.
2:09

The U.S. Supreme Court rules 6–3 that President Trump cannot impose tariffs under emergency powers, saying tariff authority belongs to Congress, raising questions about trade deals and billions in revenue. Watch OAN on Spectrum and YouTube TV today for more updates.

One America News

42,856 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

#WATCH | On Waqf Amendment Act, National Conference president Dr. Farooq Abdullah says," This Bill is against the Constitution. The Speaker (of J&K Assembly) made a good decision of not allowing discussion on this as the matter is in the Supreme Court. We can talk about this after the Supreme Court's decision. The Opposition here is only meant to do opposition; it is not a healthy criticism."
1:31

#WATCH | On Waqf Amendment Act, National Conference president Dr. Farooq Abdullah says," This Bill is against the Constitution. The Speaker (of J&K Assembly) made a good decision of not allowing discussion on this as the matter is in the Supreme Court. We can talk about this after the Supreme Court's decision. The Opposition here is only meant to do opposition; it is not a healthy criticism."

ANI

14,318 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

JUST IN: President Biden refuses to condemn the Colorado Supreme Court's decision to ban Trump from the ballot under the 14th Amendment and says Trump "absolutely" supported an insurrection. The U.S. looks more and more like Communist China by the day. The comment from Biden came after a reporter asked about the Colorado Supreme Court's decision. Biden said there is "no question" Trump supported an insurrection and said he was fine with letting "the court make that decision" on if the 14th Amendment applies. Video: RNC Research
0:22

JUST IN: President Biden refuses to condemn the Colorado Supreme Court's decision to ban Trump from the ballot under the 14th Amendment and says Trump "absolutely" supported an insurrection. The U.S. looks more and more like Communist China by the day. The comment from Biden came after a reporter asked about the Colorado Supreme Court's decision. Biden said there is "no question" Trump supported an insurrection and said he was fine with letting "the court make that decision" on if the 14th Amendment applies. Video: RNC Research

Collin Rugg

952,500 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🚨JUST NOW: Sen. Rand Paul says the Constitution doesn't have meaning since President Trump is using Tariffs. Q: "I know you're not a fan of tariffs. Do you want to see them struck down by the Supreme Court?" PAUL: "Tariffs are a tax, and anybody who tries to say tariffs are not a tax is just not serious. A president cannot levy taxes without the approval of Congress. I think the Supreme Court's going to strike this down."
0:48

🚨JUST NOW: Sen. Rand Paul says the Constitution doesn't have meaning since President Trump is using Tariffs. Q: "I know you're not a fan of tariffs. Do you want to see them struck down by the Supreme Court?" PAUL: "Tariffs are a tax, and anybody who tries to say tariffs are not a tax is just not serious. A president cannot levy taxes without the approval of Congress. I think the Supreme Court's going to strike this down."

The Patriot Oasis™

949,708 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Terrible ruling today out of SCOTUS. After President Trump put his finger on the scales, Bayer has won in court what it could not get through Congress: a powerful new shield from accountability. If the Supreme Court is going to put even more weight on EPA’s pesticide review and labeling process, then Congress and the President have a responsibility to fix the dangerous gap this decision exposes. EPA must be transparent, science-based, independent, and accountable to the public—not the industries it is supposed to regulate. We have won this fight before and we must again.
1:21

Terrible ruling today out of SCOTUS. After President Trump put his finger on the scales, Bayer has won in court what it could not get through Congress: a powerful new shield from accountability. If the Supreme Court is going to put even more weight on EPA’s pesticide review and labeling process, then Congress and the President have a responsibility to fix the dangerous gap this decision exposes. EPA must be transparent, science-based, independent, and accountable to the public—not the industries it is supposed to regulate. We have won this fight before and we must again.

Congresswoman Chellie Pingree

12,347 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen

President Trump welcomed both Democratic and Republican governors to the White House on Friday. As that gathering was underway, the Supreme Court handed down a major ruling against tariffs. The decision could affect a number of states, including Wyoming, where trade and energy production play an important role in the state’s economy. Geoff Bennett speaks to Wyoming Gov. Mark Gordon for more.
4:47

President Trump welcomed both Democratic and Republican governors to the White House on Friday. As that gathering was underway, the Supreme Court handed down a major ruling against tariffs. The decision could affect a number of states, including Wyoming, where trade and energy production play an important role in the state’s economy. Geoff Bennett speaks to Wyoming Gov. Mark Gordon for more.

PBS News

16,283 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

President Trump tells the media he’s now going to have to go in a different direction on tariffs — “the direction that I should have gone the first time.” He then read aloud Justice Kavanaugh’s dissent for all of the press to hear. TRUMP: “But now I’m going to go in a different direction, probably the direction that I should have gone the first time.” “But I read the language. I’m very good at reading language, and it read our way 100%.” “But now I’ll go the way I could have gone originally, which is even stronger than our original choice, as Justice Kavanaugh — whose stock has gone so up…you have to see…I’m so proud of him — wrote in his dissent:” “Although I firmly disagree with the court’s holding today, the decision might not substantially constrain a president’s ability to order tariffs going forward.” “So think of that — the decision might not substantially constrain. And it doesn’t. He’s right. In fact, I can charge much more than I was charging.” “Although I firmly disagree with the court’s holding today, the decision might not substantially constrain a president’s ability to order tariffs going forward.” “That’s because numerous other federal statutes, which is so true, authorize the president to impose tariffs and might justify most, if not all, of the tariffs issued in this case — even more tariffs.” “Those statutes include, for example, the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, section 232.” “The Trade Act of 1974, sections 122, 201, 301, and the Tariff Act of 1930, section 338.” “All clear, but it’s a little bit longer process.”
2:03

President Trump tells the media he’s now going to have to go in a different direction on tariffs — “the direction that I should have gone the first time.” He then read aloud Justice Kavanaugh’s dissent for all of the press to hear. TRUMP: “But now I’m going to go in a different direction, probably the direction that I should have gone the first time.” “But I read the language. I’m very good at reading language, and it read our way 100%.” “But now I’ll go the way I could have gone originally, which is even stronger than our original choice, as Justice Kavanaugh — whose stock has gone so up…you have to see…I’m so proud of him — wrote in his dissent:” “Although I firmly disagree with the court’s holding today, the decision might not substantially constrain a president’s ability to order tariffs going forward.” “So think of that — the decision might not substantially constrain. And it doesn’t. He’s right. In fact, I can charge much more than I was charging.” “Although I firmly disagree with the court’s holding today, the decision might not substantially constrain a president’s ability to order tariffs going forward.” “That’s because numerous other federal statutes, which is so true, authorize the president to impose tariffs and might justify most, if not all, of the tariffs issued in this case — even more tariffs.” “Those statutes include, for example, the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, section 232.” “The Trade Act of 1974, sections 122, 201, 301, and the Tariff Act of 1930, section 338.” “All clear, but it’s a little bit longer process.”

Overton

278,996 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten