Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Is #SCOTUS getting more partisan? Neil Gorsuch tells reason that he'd stack today's court, with abt 40 percent unanimous decisions, against FDR's 1945 model.

Nick Gillespie

118,477 subscribers

102,994 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Bildung #SCOTUS

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

UNANIMOUS. The Supreme Court just sent a shockwave through the freight industry. 9-0 decision: Broker liability is back on the table. Even with the US Chamber and FMCSA arguing otherwise, SCOTUS ruled that negligence claims against brokers can survive. This changes the game for freight litigation. It’s no longer a question of "if" but "how" brokers vet their carriers. Watch the full breakdown:

UNANIMOUS. The Supreme Court just sent a shockwave through the freight industry. 9-0 decision: Broker liability is back on the table. Even with the US Chamber and FMCSA arguing otherwise, SCOTUS ruled that negligence claims against brokers can survive. This changes the game for freight litigation. It’s no longer a question of "if" but "how" brokers vet their carriers. Watch the full breakdown:

FreightWaves

74,455 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Don't be hypocrites! I hope that those celebrating and praising the Supreme Court for today's Section 3 Colorado Trump ruling will not be hypocrites when the Supreme Court likely rules against Trump in the Presidential Immunity case: Trey Gowdy: "There are other decisions coming that he may not agree with. I don't think he is going to win the presidential immunity case before the court, so it's confusing when you say 'I love you' on one day and 'I hate you' the next."

Don't be hypocrites! I hope that those celebrating and praising the Supreme Court for today's Section 3 Colorado Trump ruling will not be hypocrites when the Supreme Court likely rules against Trump in the Presidential Immunity case: Trey Gowdy: "There are other decisions coming that he may not agree with. I don't think he is going to win the presidential immunity case before the court, so it's confusing when you say 'I love you' on one day and 'I hate you' the next."

Brian Krassenstein

586,471 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

🔥 The fight over the Supreme Court is far from over—and the stakes have never been higher. Are attacks on conservative justices actually making the Court more committed to originalism? Has the push to pack the Supreme Court fundamentally changed the judicial landscape? I sat down with Carrie Severino for a must-listen conversation on the future of SCOTUS, the growing pressure campaign against the justices, Justice Amy Coney Barrett and Justice Brett Kavanaugh's evolving jurisprudence, religious liberty, presidential power, the Second Amendment, and why the Court's biggest decisions are still ahead. If you want to understand where the Supreme Court—and the country—is headed next, you won't want to miss this episode of The Truth with Lisa Boothe 🎧 Listen here:

🔥 The fight over the Supreme Court is far from over—and the stakes have never been higher. Are attacks on conservative justices actually making the Court more committed to originalism? Has the push to pack the Supreme Court fundamentally changed the judicial landscape? I sat down with Carrie Severino for a must-listen conversation on the future of SCOTUS, the growing pressure campaign against the justices, Justice Amy Coney Barrett and Justice Brett Kavanaugh's evolving jurisprudence, religious liberty, presidential power, the Second Amendment, and why the Court's biggest decisions are still ahead. If you want to understand where the Supreme Court—and the country—is headed next, you won't want to miss this episode of The Truth with Lisa Boothe 🎧 Listen here:

Lisa Boothe

29,056 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

Promises Made. Promises Kept. 🇺🇸 With UNANIMOUS, veto-proof passage of SB88 — “The Bossly Bill” — the South Dakota Legislature has officially killed the egregious “Landowner Bill of Rights.” SB88 eliminates HB1185 and aligns South Dakota law with the unanimous South Dakota Supreme Court ruling that invasive surveying is unconstitutional. That means no private company can enter your land against your wishes to conduct invasive surveys. The court made clear what happened to Jared and Tara Bossly should never happen in our state — when a foreign-backed carbon pipeline company invaded their property with armed security, entered their home and shop, drove over trees and crops, and bore a 90-foot hole into their land. In the 2026 legislative session, we righted that wrong. This victory belongs to the farmers, ranchers, landowners, and citizens who spoke up, made calls, and refused to back down. Your land is worth fighting for. Your legacy is worth protecting. And we’re just getting started. Join the fight at #SouthDakota #EminentDomain #PropertyRights

Promises Made. Promises Kept. 🇺🇸 With UNANIMOUS, veto-proof passage of SB88 — “The Bossly Bill” — the South Dakota Legislature has officially killed the egregious “Landowner Bill of Rights.” SB88 eliminates HB1185 and aligns South Dakota law with the unanimous South Dakota Supreme Court ruling that invasive surveying is unconstitutional. That means no private company can enter your land against your wishes to conduct invasive surveys. The court made clear what happened to Jared and Tara Bossly should never happen in our state — when a foreign-backed carbon pipeline company invaded their property with armed security, entered their home and shop, drove over trees and crops, and bore a 90-foot hole into their land. In the 2026 legislative session, we righted that wrong. This victory belongs to the farmers, ranchers, landowners, and citizens who spoke up, made calls, and refused to back down. Your land is worth fighting for. Your legacy is worth protecting. And we’re just getting started. Join the fight at #SouthDakota #EminentDomain #PropertyRights

Amanda Radke

45,310 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Does the democratic legitimacy of institutions depend on the public understanding what they do? How can judges ensure they are doing their jobs in a nonpartisan way? And how do the Supreme Court justices make their decisions? These questions are at the heart of American democracy and the inaugural SCOTUSblog Summit brought together the nation’s top attorneys and judges—including Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett—to weigh in. “This is our purpose [at Johns Hopkins University],” said Johns Hopkins University President Ron Daniels. “To seek and discover truth and to share that truth with the world.” Read more from the #HopkinsBloombergCenter and The Dispatch event: #SCOTUS #SupremeCourt #SCOTUSblog

Does the democratic legitimacy of institutions depend on the public understanding what they do? How can judges ensure they are doing their jobs in a nonpartisan way? And how do the Supreme Court justices make their decisions? These questions are at the heart of American democracy and the inaugural SCOTUSblog Summit brought together the nation’s top attorneys and judges—including Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett—to weigh in. “This is our purpose [at Johns Hopkins University],” said Johns Hopkins University President Ron Daniels. “To seek and discover truth and to share that truth with the world.” Read more from the #HopkinsBloombergCenter and The Dispatch event: #SCOTUS #SupremeCourt #SCOTUSblog

Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg Center

21,187 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

WATCH: Mollie on how liberal Supreme Court justices are turning to *shocking* tactics all because they are not getting what they want from the Court: “I have a new book out today, 'Alito,' which tells the behind-the-scenes story of what happened with the Dobbs leak. You are correct that we have seen this increase in bad relationships between the justices or problems with leaks. And the court really does need to operate without leaks so that they can get their work done. Justices throughout the history of the court have said how important it is that they can work without fear of this type of public discussion of the topics. It is an attempt to go after the court and to achieve results that people are not able to achieve through normal court procedures. That’s what we saw with the Dobbs leak, where in my book I showed the liberal justices actually delayed their dissent in the Dobbs decision after the leak intentionally, even though their colleagues were facing death threats, and we even had an assassination threat at Kavanaugh, and it’s what you see with the most recent leak from the New York Times — the liberal justices are not happy with what they are getting, they are not winning on the strength of their arguments, so you are seeing more and more of these politicized leaks.”

WATCH: Mollie on how liberal Supreme Court justices are turning to shocking tactics all because they are not getting what they want from the Court: “I have a new book out today, 'Alito,' which tells the behind-the-scenes story of what happened with the Dobbs leak. You are correct that we have seen this increase in bad relationships between the justices or problems with leaks. And the court really does need to operate without leaks so that they can get their work done. Justices throughout the history of the court have said how important it is that they can work without fear of this type of public discussion of the topics. It is an attempt to go after the court and to achieve results that people are not able to achieve through normal court procedures. That’s what we saw with the Dobbs leak, where in my book I showed the liberal justices actually delayed their dissent in the Dobbs decision after the leak intentionally, even though their colleagues were facing death threats, and we even had an assassination threat at Kavanaugh, and it’s what you see with the most recent leak from the New York Times — the liberal justices are not happy with what they are getting, they are not winning on the strength of their arguments, so you are seeing more and more of these politicized leaks.”

Conservative War Machine

677,709 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Rui Hachimura on the energy in today's practice, with the Lakers aware of the challenge they have being down 0-3 to the Thunder: "It's tough. They are championship [team] for a reason. We focus on a lot on Shai but I think we talk about more...we should have talked about more other guys. They're killing us. Especially when Shai is off the court, we're really losing those minutes. We talked about that today, how we're gonna guard them as a team. We feel good about it tomorrow."

Rui Hachimura on the energy in today's practice, with the Lakers aware of the challenge they have being down 0-3 to the Thunder: "It's tough. They are championship [team] for a reason. We focus on a lot on Shai but I think we talk about more...we should have talked about more other guys. They're killing us. Especially when Shai is off the court, we're really losing those minutes. We talked about that today, how we're gonna guard them as a team. We feel good about it tomorrow."

Khobi Price

308,410 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Judge Calls Wife’s Beating “Blessing”? Gender Reverse Karke Dekho A husband tells the court that his wife beats him. In a viral clip from Gwalior Bench proceedings, the judge is heard saying: “Husband who gets beaten up by his wife is a lucky man. That beating is a blessing. She's a goddess. Why are you complaining that wife is beating you” Now reverse the gender. If a wife said her husband beats her, and anyone called it a “blessing”, the whole country would scream abuse, cruelty and patriarchy. But when a husband is the victim, his pain becomes comedy, his dignity becomes irrelevant, and violence against him is treated like some divine gift. This is not justice. This is the mindset that tells men to suffer, adjust and shut up. Abuse is abuse. A beaten husband is not lucky. He is a victim. For more similar content and legal guides click on the link:👇 🌐 Disclaimer: This video is for Educational and News Awareness purposes only. The copyright of this court proceeding lies with the respective Hon'ble High Court / Supreme Court of India. This is NOT an official record of the court and cannot be used as legal evidence. We respect the dignity of the judiciary and aim to spread legal literacy among citizens.

Judge Calls Wife’s Beating “Blessing”? Gender Reverse Karke Dekho A husband tells the court that his wife beats him. In a viral clip from Gwalior Bench proceedings, the judge is heard saying: “Husband who gets beaten up by his wife is a lucky man. That beating is a blessing. She's a goddess. Why are you complaining that wife is beating you” Now reverse the gender. If a wife said her husband beats her, and anyone called it a “blessing”, the whole country would scream abuse, cruelty and patriarchy. But when a husband is the victim, his pain becomes comedy, his dignity becomes irrelevant, and violence against him is treated like some divine gift. This is not justice. This is the mindset that tells men to suffer, adjust and shut up. Abuse is abuse. A beaten husband is not lucky. He is a victim. For more similar content and legal guides click on the link:👇 🌐 Disclaimer: This video is for Educational and News Awareness purposes only. The copyright of this court proceeding lies with the respective Hon'ble High Court / Supreme Court of India. This is NOT an official record of the court and cannot be used as legal evidence. We respect the dignity of the judiciary and aim to spread legal literacy among citizens.

ShoneeKapoor

10,655 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

BREAKING: Judge Engoron in Trump’s NY case just admonished Trump for potentially violating his gag order yet again. As you can see below, Trump, to me, seems to have violated his gag order, saying: “This was a trial that should have never been brought but if we had a jury it would have been fair, at least. Even if it was a negative jury because no negative jury would vote against me. "But this judge will because this judge is a very partisan judge with a person who’s very partisan sitting alongside of him. Perhaps even much more partisan than he is." The Judge admonished him, saying: "I am very protective of my staff, as i should be…I don’t want anybody killed… I stated the last time that any future violations would be severely punished. Why should there not be severe sanctions for this blatant, dangerous disobeyal of a court order?" Trump’s attorney claimed Trump was referring to Michael Cohen.

BREAKING: Judge Engoron in Trump’s NY case just admonished Trump for potentially violating his gag order yet again. As you can see below, Trump, to me, seems to have violated his gag order, saying: “This was a trial that should have never been brought but if we had a jury it would have been fair, at least. Even if it was a negative jury because no negative jury would vote against me. "But this judge will because this judge is a very partisan judge with a person who’s very partisan sitting alongside of him. Perhaps even much more partisan than he is." The Judge admonished him, saying: "I am very protective of my staff, as i should be…I don’t want anybody killed… I stated the last time that any future violations would be severely punished. Why should there not be severe sanctions for this blatant, dangerous disobeyal of a court order?" Trump’s attorney claimed Trump was referring to Michael Cohen.

Ed Krassenstein

1,059,580 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

This is why Ridges AI | SN62 is an absolute monster 🔥 🔵 "If you were to take the top coding systems from these major companies with billions of dollars in funding at multi hundred billion dollar valuations and take their primary product which is coding agents and you stack it up against ours.. Ours is better" 🔵 "It solves more problems faster, for orders of magnitude cheaper, like 70x cheaper to use us than the flagship #Anthropic model to solve these problems.. and we're beating them now" ⚪️ "For way less capital, we've created a system that is way more efficient and actually better at solving problems for multiples cheaper, with a system that is now profitable to run" ⚪️ "With probably less capital than it costs our competitors to pay their engineers to do research in this time" Shakeel $TAO

This is why Ridges AI | SN62 is an absolute monster 🔥 🔵 "If you were to take the top coding systems from these major companies with billions of dollars in funding at multi hundred billion dollar valuations and take their primary product which is coding agents and you stack it up against ours.. Ours is better" 🔵 "It solves more problems faster, for orders of magnitude cheaper, like 70x cheaper to use us than the flagship #Anthropic model to solve these problems.. and we're beating them now" ⚪️ "For way less capital, we've created a system that is way more efficient and actually better at solving problems for multiples cheaper, with a system that is now profitable to run" ⚪️ "With probably less capital than it costs our competitors to pay their engineers to do research in this time" Shakeel $TAO

ＤＲＥＡＤＢＯＮＧＯ

18,356 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Drago tells K. Shami about how looksmaxxing’s real danger comes from DR*GS and how dr*gs have heavily effected his streaming career and mental state negatively 💔😕 “The moment you start with one of them it’s a very slippery slope…” “Streaming really does take a toll on you, because of the fact that you’re getting paid for the amount of time you’re streaming something inside of me has been like every hour that I’m awake is useful and I can be paid for… You’re redosing more and more blue for no reason, and the effects from that have been that my dopamine got so destroyed…”

Drago tells K. Shami about how looksmaxxing’s real danger comes from DRGS and how drgs have heavily effected his streaming career and mental state negatively 💔😕 “The moment you start with one of them it’s a very slippery slope…” “Streaming really does take a toll on you, because of the fact that you’re getting paid for the amount of time you’re streaming something inside of me has been like every hour that I’m awake is useful and I can be paid for… You’re redosing more and more blue for no reason, and the effects from that have been that my dopamine got so destroyed…”

Clavicular Updates

11,385 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

Howard Lutnick has some explaining to do… 🚨 It appears Howard Lutnick’s Family greatly benefited from the SCOTUS Ruling against President Trump Today The Supreme Court just ruled against President Trump’s tariff powers, which we know could trigger refunds of up to $175 billion (or more). Well… Howard Lutnick was the Chairman and CEO of Cantor Fitzgerald, a global financial services firm. Howard Lutnick stepped down from Cantor Fitzgerald when he became President Trump’s Commerce Secretary — then transferred control and ownership of Cantor Fitzgerald (and related entities like BGC Group and Newmark Group) to trusts benefiting his adult children, with his two eldest sons—Brandon Lutnick (Chairman & CEO) and Kyle Lutnick (Executive Vice Chairman)—taking primary leadership and control. In mid-2025, Cantor Fitzgerald marketed and reportedly executed deals to purchase importers' rights to potential FUTURE TARIFF REFUNDS at steep discounts of 20-30 cents on the dollar— essentially betting on a court ruling that the tariffs would be deemed illegal and refunds issued. With the SCOTUS decision now ruling against President Trump — any such acquired refund claims held by Cantor Fitzgerald stand to pay out at full value (100 cents on the dollar, minus what they paid upfront), delivering MILLIONS of dollars in profits to the family-controlled firm. To be clear… the SCOTUS’ ruling just means they are leaving mechanics of what gets paid back to the lower courts/Treasury, but the Lutnick Family betted against President Trump… and won. This is extremely concerning to me because Lutnick has publicly expressed strong confidence in a SCOTUS win for the tariffs for months saying he believes SCOTUS will rule in Trump’s favor… meanwhile, his children did the exact opposite and betted against it. This screams ethics violations…

Howard Lutnick has some explaining to do… 🚨 It appears Howard Lutnick’s Family greatly benefited from the SCOTUS Ruling against President Trump Today The Supreme Court just ruled against President Trump’s tariff powers, which we know could trigger refunds of up to $175 billion (or more). Well… Howard Lutnick was the Chairman and CEO of Cantor Fitzgerald, a global financial services firm. Howard Lutnick stepped down from Cantor Fitzgerald when he became President Trump’s Commerce Secretary — then transferred control and ownership of Cantor Fitzgerald (and related entities like BGC Group and Newmark Group) to trusts benefiting his adult children, with his two eldest sons—Brandon Lutnick (Chairman & CEO) and Kyle Lutnick (Executive Vice Chairman)—taking primary leadership and control. In mid-2025, Cantor Fitzgerald marketed and reportedly executed deals to purchase importers' rights to potential FUTURE TARIFF REFUNDS at steep discounts of 20-30 cents on the dollar— essentially betting on a court ruling that the tariffs would be deemed illegal and refunds issued. With the SCOTUS decision now ruling against President Trump — any such acquired refund claims held by Cantor Fitzgerald stand to pay out at full value (100 cents on the dollar, minus what they paid upfront), delivering MILLIONS of dollars in profits to the family-controlled firm. To be clear… the SCOTUS’ ruling just means they are leaving mechanics of what gets paid back to the lower courts/Treasury, but the Lutnick Family betted against President Trump… and won. This is extremely concerning to me because Lutnick has publicly expressed strong confidence in a SCOTUS win for the tariffs for months saying he believes SCOTUS will rule in Trump’s favor… meanwhile, his children did the exact opposite and betted against it. This screams ethics violations…

MJTruthUltra

109,059 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

One of the greatest possible boomerangs we have seen yet.... Folks freaked out when SCOTUS "Rejected" Trump's bid to send the National Guard to Chicago, but as usual, the devil is in the details... They just opened the door to the Insurrection Act.... Supreme Court Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch both referenced the Insurrection Act in their dissents of a decision blocking President Donald Trump’s administration from deploying National Guard troops in Illinois to support its immigration agenda. The key order in question is 10 U.S.C. §12406(3), a statute that states the president may call into federal service members and units of the National Guard in cases when the U.S. is being invaded, there is a rebellion against the authority of the U.S. government or the president is unable to execute the law "with the regular forces." Key word: "REGULAR FORCES" "At this preliminary stage, the Government has failed to identify a source of authority that would allow the military to execute the laws in Illinois," the court's majority opinion said. The U.S. Supreme Court's Tuesday decision against Donald Trump's deployment of the National Guard in Illinois had the "unintended consequence" of potentially pushing the president to deploy active-duty military units instead, legal scholar John Yoo, who previously clerked for conservative Justice Clarence Thomas, said Wednesday. Active Duty Military = MARINES What was that 17th letter thing that reminded us "the only way is the Military"? It looks like we may soon find out.

One of the greatest possible boomerangs we have seen yet.... Folks freaked out when SCOTUS "Rejected" Trump's bid to send the National Guard to Chicago, but as usual, the devil is in the details... They just opened the door to the Insurrection Act.... Supreme Court Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch both referenced the Insurrection Act in their dissents of a decision blocking President Donald Trump’s administration from deploying National Guard troops in Illinois to support its immigration agenda. The key order in question is 10 U.S.C. §12406(3), a statute that states the president may call into federal service members and units of the National Guard in cases when the U.S. is being invaded, there is a rebellion against the authority of the U.S. government or the president is unable to execute the law "with the regular forces." Key word: "REGULAR FORCES" "At this preliminary stage, the Government has failed to identify a source of authority that would allow the military to execute the laws in Illinois," the court's majority opinion said. The U.S. Supreme Court's Tuesday decision against Donald Trump's deployment of the National Guard in Illinois had the "unintended consequence" of potentially pushing the president to deploy active-duty military units instead, legal scholar John Yoo, who previously clerked for conservative Justice Clarence Thomas, said Wednesday. Active Duty Military = MARINES What was that 17th letter thing that reminded us "the only way is the Military"? It looks like we may soon find out.

NewsTreason Channel 17

20,020 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Oh my gosh! It happens… my personal prediction is getting real! This is the beginning of the deterioration of Neil deGrasse Tyson BRAVO TO Garry P. Nolan 👏🏻 He speaks out from the bottom of my heart! Jeremy Corbell: "When you got scientists with that level of hubris it’s really hard to back track from there." And from there now comes the cut to Neil and Garry said the following: "Neil deGrasse Tyson needs to grow up. I think Neil deGrasse Tyson is jealous. You can publish that. He is acting more as an astrologer than an astronomer. He is acting more like a priest. Look at the people who are the most against it. They are actually not practicing scientists. They are OPINION scientists. Where is the last time any of these people have been anywhere near a laboratory or near a measurement device? These people should be forced to give back their PHD‘s if you’re not going to honor your oath of how you’re gonna address and approach data and openness to ideas and you‘re gonna use ridicule… you‘ve lost." Ouch! 🔥 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 Source: TMZ The UFO Revolution Part 2 #ufotwitter #ufoX

Oh my gosh! It happens… my personal prediction is getting real! This is the beginning of the deterioration of Neil deGrasse Tyson BRAVO TO Garry P. Nolan 👏🏻 He speaks out from the bottom of my heart! Jeremy Corbell: "When you got scientists with that level of hubris it’s really hard to back track from there." And from there now comes the cut to Neil and Garry said the following: "Neil deGrasse Tyson needs to grow up. I think Neil deGrasse Tyson is jealous. You can publish that. He is acting more as an astrologer than an astronomer. He is acting more like a priest. Look at the people who are the most against it. They are actually not practicing scientists. They are OPINION scientists. Where is the last time any of these people have been anywhere near a laboratory or near a measurement device? These people should be forced to give back their PHD‘s if you’re not going to honor your oath of how you’re gonna address and approach data and openness to ideas and you‘re gonna use ridicule… you‘ve lost." Ouch! 🔥 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 Source: TMZ The UFO Revolution Part 2 #ufotwitter #ufoX

The Pillars Of Creation 🚫

144,052 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

A Federal court blocked Trump’s tariffs. Judicial coup is trending again and of course the GOP does absolutely nothing America has been SO RIGGED by Democrats “There are nearly 700 federal district court judges across the country. Barack Obama and Joe Biden held the White House for 12 of the last 16 years. They appointed 72% of the federal district court judges. Those are left wing federal district court judges. — Those left wing robed radicals are routinely using nationwide restraining orders against the Executive Office of the United States. - The President, for example, Barack Obama only faced 12 nationwide injunctions during his eight years in office - Joe Biden had 14 injunctions in 4 years - But Donald Trump in his first 60 days, actually, the first Trump term saw 64 judicial injunctions against his agenda And the left's lawfare against Trump's second term is off to a blistering start with more than 120 lawsuits that have been filed against the administration and 15 nationwide injunctions against his orders just in the last 30 days. So the obvious tactic of the left is to cripple the Trump administration. They can't do it with legislation, can't do it in other ways. So they're going to try to prevent you from getting what you voted for by using activist judges. The Supreme Court alone can rein this in. The Supreme Court alone. I worried about Justice Roberts. I'm worried about Amy. I'm worried if we have Supreme Court judges that aren't under pressure in Washington to move to the left, let's be aware that the only tactic they've got now is judicial activism.“

A Federal court blocked Trump’s tariffs. Judicial coup is trending again and of course the GOP does absolutely nothing America has been SO RIGGED by Democrats “There are nearly 700 federal district court judges across the country. Barack Obama and Joe Biden held the White House for 12 of the last 16 years. They appointed 72% of the federal district court judges. Those are left wing federal district court judges. — Those left wing robed radicals are routinely using nationwide restraining orders against the Executive Office of the United States. - The President, for example, Barack Obama only faced 12 nationwide injunctions during his eight years in office - Joe Biden had 14 injunctions in 4 years - But Donald Trump in his first 60 days, actually, the first Trump term saw 64 judicial injunctions against his agenda And the left's lawfare against Trump's second term is off to a blistering start with more than 120 lawsuits that have been filed against the administration and 15 nationwide injunctions against his orders just in the last 30 days. So the obvious tactic of the left is to cripple the Trump administration. They can't do it with legislation, can't do it in other ways. So they're going to try to prevent you from getting what you voted for by using activist judges. The Supreme Court alone can rein this in. The Supreme Court alone. I worried about Justice Roberts. I'm worried about Amy. I'm worried if we have Supreme Court judges that aren't under pressure in Washington to move to the left, let's be aware that the only tactic they've got now is judicial activism.“

Wall Street Apes

29,661 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

.Amjad Masad suggests SaaS founders to go against Silicon Valley's dogma w/ "focus" and build Chinese style tech companies - go broad, build platforms not point solutions. The SaaS market is getting brutally reshaped by AI. Every day Amjad sees people using Replit to replace $15k-100k software products. Vertical SaaS companies are on death watch. If your product solves one specific problem, it's already possible to clone it with today's AI. Tomorrow's tools will make it even easier. Horizontal platforms with strong ecosystems - think Rippling as your "system of record" or Salesforce with its massive developer network are more likely to survive. These aren't getting replaced by a weekend project. He predicts that generative capabilities and larger pieces of software will become more important.

.Amjad Masad suggests SaaS founders to go against Silicon Valley's dogma w/ "focus" and build Chinese style tech companies - go broad, build platforms not point solutions. The SaaS market is getting brutally reshaped by AI. Every day Amjad sees people using Replit to replace $15k-100k software products. Vertical SaaS companies are on death watch. If your product solves one specific problem, it's already possible to clone it with today's AI. Tomorrow's tools will make it even easier. Horizontal platforms with strong ecosystems - think Rippling as your "system of record" or Salesforce with its massive developer network are more likely to survive. These aren't getting replaced by a weekend project. He predicts that generative capabilities and larger pieces of software will become more important.

Aish

116,612 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 LMAO! President Trump has thrown the left into a frenzy over his use of the term “Dumacrat” “You just change the E to a U, and get rid of the B, and you have Dumacrat, and I have had more calls on that. I've been good at names over the years!” 🔥 “The reason is I was talking about Hakeem Jeffries, a low IQ person, and the hatred he has for the country, and he says, hey, I was unhappy with decisions in the Supreme Court, but you can't call it illegitimate.” Rapid Response 47

🚨 LMAO! President Trump has thrown the left into a frenzy over his use of the term “Dumacrat” “You just change the E to a U, and get rid of the B, and you have Dumacrat, and I have had more calls on that. I've been good at names over the years!” 🔥 “The reason is I was talking about Hakeem Jeffries, a low IQ person, and the hatred he has for the country, and he says, hey, I was unhappy with decisions in the Supreme Court, but you can't call it illegitimate.” Rapid Response 47

Eric Daugherty

34,134 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

lando on the reason why he’s collaborated with race against dementia ❤️‍🩹 “because one of my good friends, a guy i've gotten to know a lot more over the last few years, sir jack stewart, he's the biggest advocate for it in terms of his partner has it, and he tells great stories, but some of the more sad stories about how the difficulties of what he goes through nowadays on a day-to-day life is living with someone who has dementia and how it can affect his life. i have an incredible following and incredible fan base, and it's nice to do something that gives back and raises awareness. this is the perfect way to do that”

lando on the reason why he’s collaborated with race against dementia ❤️‍🩹 “because one of my good friends, a guy i've gotten to know a lot more over the last few years, sir jack stewart, he's the biggest advocate for it in terms of his partner has it, and he tells great stories, but some of the more sad stories about how the difficulties of what he goes through nowadays on a day-to-day life is living with someone who has dementia and how it can affect his life. i have an incredible following and incredible fan base, and it's nice to do something that gives back and raises awareness. this is the perfect way to do that”

ray

25,622 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨 BREAKING: Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent listened to the oral arguments and believes the Supreme Court WILL uphold President Trump's tariffs - meaning the US will NOT have to pay back trillions "Traditionally, the Supreme Court does not interfere with a president's signature policy." "I don't think this ruling is gonna go against us. If it does - what's THEIR plan for refunds?! Are we just handing these importers big windfalls? What if exporters gave big discounts already? Then you give a refund? They'd be making on both sides." "I don't think the Supreme Court wants to wade into a mess like that." "Numerous peace deals - he threatened tariffs! That got us to the peace deal." "Fentanyl - we had FENTANYL tariffs., What's more of an emergency than hundreds of thousands of Americans dying every year?! Nobody got China to the table [except Trump]." DO THE RIGHT THING, SCOTUS!

🚨 BREAKING: Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent listened to the oral arguments and believes the Supreme Court WILL uphold President Trump's tariffs - meaning the US will NOT have to pay back trillions "Traditionally, the Supreme Court does not interfere with a president's signature policy." "I don't think this ruling is gonna go against us. If it does - what's THEIR plan for refunds?! Are we just handing these importers big windfalls? What if exporters gave big discounts already? Then you give a refund? They'd be making on both sides." "I don't think the Supreme Court wants to wade into a mess like that." "Numerous peace deals - he threatened tariffs! That got us to the peace deal." "Fentanyl - we had FENTANYL tariffs., What's more of an emergency than hundreds of thousands of Americans dying every year?! Nobody got China to the table [except Trump]." DO THE RIGHT THING, SCOTUS!

Eric Daugherty

163,380 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🚨 BOOM! SUPREME COURT DROPS A MASSIVE 6-3 BOMB ON RACIAL GERRYMANDERING IN LOUISIANA! The U.S. Supreme Court just ruled — non-minority voters WIN. Louisiana drew up a second majority-minority congressional district to boost Black voters. Non-Black plaintiffs sued, saying it was straight-up racial gerrymandering that violated the 14th and 15th Amendments. The Court agreed. In a 6-3 decision, the majority said: “Because the Voting Rights Act did NOT require Louisiana to create an additional majority/minority district, no compelling interest justified the state’s use of race in drawing these two new districts. That map is an unconstitutional gerrymander.” Exactly as expected: Conservatives (6) vs. the liberal bloc (Kagan, Sotomayor, and Jackson dissenting). Thomas and Gorsuch even dropped a concurrence. This isn’t just about Louisiana. Shannon Bream noted this could open the door to challenges against 20+ other districts across the country — mostly in the South — that were drawn primarily on the basis of race. Huge potential implications for the midterms. The left’s fear of the Voting Rights Act getting gutted? Not fully there yet… but this is a major shot across the bow against race-based map drawing. No more treating the Constitution like a suggestion just to engineer racial outcomes. The Supreme Court just reminded everyone: race cannot be the dominant factor in drawing districts. Big win for colorblind justice.

🚨 BOOM! SUPREME COURT DROPS A MASSIVE 6-3 BOMB ON RACIAL GERRYMANDERING IN LOUISIANA! The U.S. Supreme Court just ruled — non-minority voters WIN. Louisiana drew up a second majority-minority congressional district to boost Black voters. Non-Black plaintiffs sued, saying it was straight-up racial gerrymandering that violated the 14th and 15th Amendments. The Court agreed. In a 6-3 decision, the majority said: “Because the Voting Rights Act did NOT require Louisiana to create an additional majority/minority district, no compelling interest justified the state’s use of race in drawing these two new districts. That map is an unconstitutional gerrymander.” Exactly as expected: Conservatives (6) vs. the liberal bloc (Kagan, Sotomayor, and Jackson dissenting). Thomas and Gorsuch even dropped a concurrence. This isn’t just about Louisiana. Shannon Bream noted this could open the door to challenges against 20+ other districts across the country — mostly in the South — that were drawn primarily on the basis of race. Huge potential implications for the midterms. The left’s fear of the Voting Rights Act getting gutted? Not fully there yet… but this is a major shot across the bow against race-based map drawing. No more treating the Constitution like a suggestion just to engineer racial outcomes. The Supreme Court just reminded everyone: race cannot be the dominant factor in drawing districts. Big win for colorblind justice.

Gunther Eagleman™

74,797 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten