Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Is that a HIT Wicket? A controversial decision made by the third umpire when Mark Waugh hit the stumps with his bat after playing a delivery from Shaun Pollock.

254,990 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

35 Comments

Andrew Parker's profile picture
Andrew Parker9 months ago

From Law 35.2 Not Out Hit Wicket The striker is not out under this Law should his/her wicket be put down in any of the ways referred to in 35.1 if any of the following applies - it occurs after the striker has completed any action in receiving the delivery So, it's not out.

Simon Davis's profile picture
Simon Davis9 months ago

Correctly Not Out. The action that broke the stumps was not taken in the course of receiving the delivery. As an aside, Cronje was really not a good person: "...Hansie Cronje, who is said to have later speared a stump through the door of the umpires' room."

David Ludlow's profile picture
David Ludlow9 months ago

Australians same old cheats,he had not grounded his bat therefore the ball is not dead, when he collected his stumps,both Waugh's were not known for their sportsmanship,he should have walked.

Si's profile picture
Si9 months ago

Strop 3rd Umpire? Bairstow was out but Waugh isnt. We see you😉

Darren Timms's profile picture
Darren Timms9 months ago

He’s out. He’s hit his wicket. If he doesn’t, there’s no arguments!

John Birch's profile picture
John Birch9 months ago

That is not an easy one - had he completed his stroke? He was backing away and arguably reacting, and the ball is live, so there is a case for hit wicket - and/or maybe obstruction of the field?

Satya - the Truth!'s profile picture
Satya - the Truth!9 months ago

I'm disagreeing with Richie Benaugh in like 40 years for the first time. I think that's out. It was part of the ball. 30 seconds later is a whole different scenario which can't be speculated on till we see it.

Ramachandran S's profile picture
Ramachandran S9 months ago

He was not in control of his bat - effectively the bat was swinging still. It is out.

Brad Henderson's profile picture
Brad Henderson9 months ago

Never realised how useless the replays were in those days. Like just play one replay that actually shows what happened ffs 😄

DJG's profile picture
DJG9 months ago

This is out if Johnny Bairstow was out. Same situation!!!

Dr. Nellai's profile picture
Dr. Nellai9 months ago

The ball is still in play. So he is out.

Mark Sheldon's profile picture
Mark Sheldon9 months ago

Edited down rule: The striker is out if, while the ball is in play, his wicket is broken by his bat IN THE COURSE OF any action taken by him in receiving a delivery. The striker is not out if it occurs AFTER the striker has COMPLETED any action in receiving the delivery.

Peter Dadswell's profile picture
Peter Dadswell9 months ago

I'm not sure how that could NOT be

Paul Hawkins's profile picture
Paul Hawkins9 months ago

Difficult but I would say not out 35.2 Not out Hit wicket The striker is not out under this Law should his/her wicket be put down in any of the ways referred to in 35.1 if any of the following applies: - it occurs after the striker has completed any action in receiving the

K's profile picture
K9 months ago

That's out every day of the week.

Sir M.B.Anshaw §'s profile picture
Sir M.B.Anshaw §9 months ago

Was Hansie Cronje happy with the decision?

S M Chishty's profile picture
S M Chishty9 months ago

It was given not out and I think it was right call.

Shawls 🏏📚🎬's profile picture
Shawls 🏏📚🎬9 months ago

Ball is live, don’t hit your stumps. Out.

Chris Ferguson 💙's profile picture
Chris Ferguson 💙9 months ago

That’s a ridiculous decision

James Morgan's profile picture
James Morgan9 months ago

If Simon Awful’s the 3rd umpire, Australia’s opponents have no chance.

Worcestershire ACO's profile picture
Worcestershire ACO9 months ago

Not out. He wasn’t in the act of receiving the ball or setting off for the first run.

Rahul SA 🇿🇦's profile picture
Rahul SA 🇿🇦9 months ago

He was out. Not given.

Adam's profile picture
Adam9 months ago

it's just out , end of

Putin the nonce's profile picture
Putin the nonce9 months ago

@grok what was the correct decision here? Explain by referencing the relevant part of the laws of cricket.

Grey Lion's profile picture
Grey Lion9 months ago

He was in the follow through of his shot/ leave. So seems out

Don G's profile picture
Don G9 months ago

Yeah he is out but would that really be given in Australia??

Odie D's profile picture
Odie D9 months ago

Not sure if Richie was too impressed with Bill going strongly against him there

Armchaircritech's profile picture
Armchaircritech9 months ago

This is out!! This was discussed in a Golf Tournament too

Mark Press's profile picture
Mark Press9 months ago

It's the third umpire's discretion here. If the umpire thinks the batter is in control of his actions after fending off the ball, I can see why it was given not out. If he was 'forced into' hitting the stumps by his defensive movements, I could see him being given out.

Mr Meh's profile picture
Mr Meh9 months ago

A big decision - Australia then managed to hold on for a draw which gave them a 1-0 series win. SAF were desperate for a victory to level the series. Cronje smashed a stump thru the umpire's room door.

Curt Haycock's profile picture
Curt Haycock9 months ago

Out

Bhavesh's profile picture
Bhavesh9 months ago

Nothing controversial. That's a clear hit wicket

Jaco's profile picture
Jaco9 months ago

It's obvious Mr. Waugh did it on purpose, to avoid facing more bouncers from Pollock (and Donald if he was also playing).

Mango Jenkins's profile picture
Mango Jenkins9 months ago

If Waugh's off-balance when he does that, he's out. But because he's casually striding off when he hits the stumps it's hard to argue that he's still in the action of receiving the delivery. Personally I think if you knock over your own wicket while the ball's live you should go.

The Winning Factor's profile picture
The Winning Factor9 months ago

Bill Lawry, one of the greatest ever commentating!

Related Videos