正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Is that a HIT Wicket? A controversial decision made by the third umpire when Mark Waugh hit the stumps with his bat after playing a delivery from Shaun Pollock.

254,990 次观看 • 9 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

35 条评论

Andrew Parker 的头像
Andrew Parker9 个月前

From Law 35.2 Not Out Hit Wicket The striker is not out under this Law should his/her wicket be put down in any of the ways referred to in 35.1 if any of the following applies - it occurs after the striker has completed any action in receiving the delivery So, it's not out.

Simon Davis 的头像
Simon Davis9 个月前

Correctly Not Out. The action that broke the stumps was not taken in the course of receiving the delivery. As an aside, Cronje was really not a good person: "...Hansie Cronje, who is said to have later speared a stump through the door of the umpires' room."

David Ludlow 的头像
David Ludlow9 个月前

Australians same old cheats,he had not grounded his bat therefore the ball is not dead, when he collected his stumps,both Waugh's were not known for their sportsmanship,he should have walked.

Si 的头像
Si9 个月前

Strop 3rd Umpire? Bairstow was out but Waugh isnt. We see you😉

Darren Timms 的头像
Darren Timms9 个月前

He’s out. He’s hit his wicket. If he doesn’t, there’s no arguments!

John Birch 的头像
John Birch9 个月前

That is not an easy one - had he completed his stroke? He was backing away and arguably reacting, and the ball is live, so there is a case for hit wicket - and/or maybe obstruction of the field?

Satya - the Truth! 的头像
Satya - the Truth!9 个月前

I'm disagreeing with Richie Benaugh in like 40 years for the first time. I think that's out. It was part of the ball. 30 seconds later is a whole different scenario which can't be speculated on till we see it.

Ramachandran S 的头像
Ramachandran S9 个月前

He was not in control of his bat - effectively the bat was swinging still. It is out.

Brad Henderson 的头像
Brad Henderson9 个月前

Never realised how useless the replays were in those days. Like just play one replay that actually shows what happened ffs 😄

DJG 的头像
DJG9 个月前

This is out if Johnny Bairstow was out. Same situation!!!

Dr. Nellai 的头像
Dr. Nellai9 个月前

The ball is still in play. So he is out.

Mark Sheldon 的头像
Mark Sheldon9 个月前

Edited down rule: The striker is out if, while the ball is in play, his wicket is broken by his bat IN THE COURSE OF any action taken by him in receiving a delivery. The striker is not out if it occurs AFTER the striker has COMPLETED any action in receiving the delivery.

Peter Dadswell 的头像
Peter Dadswell9 个月前

I'm not sure how that could NOT be

Paul Hawkins 的头像
Paul Hawkins9 个月前

Difficult but I would say not out 35.2 Not out Hit wicket The striker is not out under this Law should his/her wicket be put down in any of the ways referred to in 35.1 if any of the following applies: - it occurs after the striker has completed any action in receiving the

K 的头像
K9 个月前

That's out every day of the week.

Sir M.B.Anshaw § 的头像
Sir M.B.Anshaw §9 个月前

Was Hansie Cronje happy with the decision?

S M Chishty 的头像
S M Chishty9 个月前

It was given not out and I think it was right call.

Shawls 🏏📚🎬 的头像
Shawls 🏏📚🎬9 个月前

Ball is live, don’t hit your stumps. Out.

Chris Ferguson 💙 的头像
Chris Ferguson 💙9 个月前

That’s a ridiculous decision

James Morgan 的头像
James Morgan9 个月前

If Simon Awful’s the 3rd umpire, Australia’s opponents have no chance.

Worcestershire ACO 的头像
Worcestershire ACO9 个月前

Not out. He wasn’t in the act of receiving the ball or setting off for the first run.

Rahul SA 🇿🇦 的头像
Rahul SA 🇿🇦9 个月前

He was out. Not given.

Adam 的头像
Adam9 个月前

it's just out , end of

Putin the nonce 的头像
Putin the nonce9 个月前

@grok what was the correct decision here? Explain by referencing the relevant part of the laws of cricket.

Grey Lion 的头像
Grey Lion9 个月前

He was in the follow through of his shot/ leave. So seems out

Don G 的头像
Don G9 个月前

Yeah he is out but would that really be given in Australia??

Odie D 的头像
Odie D9 个月前

Not sure if Richie was too impressed with Bill going strongly against him there

Armchaircritech 的头像
Armchaircritech9 个月前

This is out!! This was discussed in a Golf Tournament too

Mark Press 的头像
Mark Press9 个月前

It's the third umpire's discretion here. If the umpire thinks the batter is in control of his actions after fending off the ball, I can see why it was given not out. If he was 'forced into' hitting the stumps by his defensive movements, I could see him being given out.

Mr Meh 的头像
Mr Meh9 个月前

A big decision - Australia then managed to hold on for a draw which gave them a 1-0 series win. SAF were desperate for a victory to level the series. Cronje smashed a stump thru the umpire's room door.

Curt Haycock 的头像
Curt Haycock9 个月前

Out

Bhavesh 的头像
Bhavesh9 个月前

Nothing controversial. That's a clear hit wicket

Jaco 的头像
Jaco9 个月前

It's obvious Mr. Waugh did it on purpose, to avoid facing more bouncers from Pollock (and Donald if he was also playing).

Mango Jenkins 的头像
Mango Jenkins9 个月前

If Waugh's off-balance when he does that, he's out. But because he's casually striding off when he hits the stumps it's hard to argue that he's still in the action of receiving the delivery. Personally I think if you knock over your own wicket while the ball's live you should go.

The Winning Factor 的头像
The Winning Factor9 个月前

Bill Lawry, one of the greatest ever commentating!

相关视频