Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Is the Cybersecurity crash a permanent shift or just a "Ghost Trade"? Technology and AI stocks are taking a hit, but Steven Cress says the data tells a different story. It's time to separate sentiment from reality. The 2026 Breakdown: - Market Rotation: Fear is driving investors out of...

11,794 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 WARNING: TOMORROW WILL BE THE WORST DAY OF 2026!! JPMorgan will dump $165 BILLION in U.S. stocks right after the market opens. If you think this is a "drop in the ocean" and it won’t affect the markets... YOU ARE COMPLETELY WRONG. Every time JP Morgan sells stocks, the S&P 500 drops 10–20%. And this isn't just about the stock market. It's about liquidity. It's about investor sentiment. And it's about a market that isn't prepared for what's coming. Let me explain: JPMorgan isn't some retail trader taking profits. It's one of the largest and most influential financial institutions on the planet. When they move capital at scale, markets pay attention. And history shows that large institutional selling rarely happens in a vacuum. It usually signals something bigger. A shift in risk appetite. A change in liquidity conditions. Or growing concerns beneath the surface that most investors haven't recognized yet. Now here's the part almost nobody talks about. The direct impact isn't limited to the stocks being sold. Because when a major institution dumps billions of dollars worth of equities, it affects sentiment across the entire market. Selling creates more selling. Liquidity gets thinner. Volatility increases. And risk assets everywhere start to feel the pressure. That's why this isn't just an S&P 500 story. The S&P 500 is the first domino. But the effects will spread into AI stocks. International equities. Commodities. Credit markets. And even digital assets. Today, people are positioned for stability. They're positioned for higher prices. They're positioned for the rally to continue. Which means they're vulnerable if liquidity suddenly moves in the opposite direction. THIS IS THE WARNING. Not because one institution is selling. But because markets often underestimate what large-scale institutional selling can trigger. The risk isn't the transaction itself. The risk is how everyone else reacts to it. Markets aren't pricing that possibility today. But eventually, they will. I've spent more than a decade studying macro and market cycles. I've called some of the biggest market tops and bottoms of the past 10+ years. And I'll call the next market crash in 2026 before the crowd sees it coming. Follow and turn notifications on. I'll post my next market call here first.

0xNobler

375,722 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 WARNING: THE WORST DAY OF 2026 IS TOMORROW. JPMorgan is preparing to dump $165,000,000,000 into the market right at open. Thinking this won’t move the market? You’re in for the rudest awakening of your life. Every time JP Morgan sells stocks, the S&P 500 drops 10–20%. And this isn't just about the stock market. It's about liquidity. It's about investor sentiment. And it's about a market that isn't prepared for what's coming. Let me explain: JPMorgan isn't some retail trader taking profits. It's one of the largest and most influential financial institutions on the planet. When they move capital at scale, markets pay attention. And history shows that large institutional selling rarely happens in a vacuum. It usually signals something bigger. A shift in risk appetite. A change in liquidity conditions. Or growing concerns beneath the surface that most investors haven't recognized yet. Now here's the part almost nobody talks about. The direct impact isn't limited to the stocks being sold. Because when a major institution dumps billions of dollars worth of equities, it affects sentiment across the entire market. Selling creates more selling. Liquidity gets thinner. Volatility increases. And risk assets everywhere start to feel the pressure. That's why this isn't just an S&P 500 story. The S&P 500 is the first domino. But the effects will spread into AI stocks. International equities. Commodities. Credit markets. And even digital assets. Today, people are positioned for stability. They're positioned for higher prices. They're positioned for the rally to continue. Which means they're vulnerable if liquidity suddenly moves in the opposite direction. THIS IS THE WARNING. Not because one institution is selling. But because markets often underestimate what large-scale institutional selling can trigger. The risk isn't the transaction itself. The risk is how everyone else reacts to it. Markets aren't pricing that possibility today. But eventually, they will. I've spent more than a decade studying macro and market cycles. I've called some of the biggest market tops and bottoms of the past 10+ years. And I'll call the next market crash in 2026 before the crowd sees it coming. Follow and turn notifications on. I'll post my next market call here first.

WhaleTwits

340,786 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Friedberg: 3 Reasons Why College Students Are Booing AI 1) AI creates too much power for the 1% in the short-term, and the 99% aren’t seeing the long-term benefits yet 2) Astroturfing by state actors and foreign adversaries, who want to slow American progress 3) AI is anti-humanist, and it messes with our ego, which fuels the blowback @jason: “When you hear young people booing AI, why are they doing that?” david friedberg: “I think that there's an underlying view that technology creates leverage for a small group of people, which creates power imbalances, and nothing represents that more than AI, that a small number of people that control, and profit from, and benefit from AI are going to end up getting outsized returns relative to the broader population. That the time to diffusion of the technology, because ultimately all technologies commoditize and diffuse, but the time to diffusion here is such that it's going to be extremely asymmetric for society. And because those questions about, 'When does this benefit me, how does it benefit me?' can't be answered today, the economic benefit that's accruing to the few today becomes the narrative. It becomes the story, and it becomes this power system that a few people take from the many. And so there's something deeply disturbing for the average person about that. They don't understand how it works, why it works, what it'll do for them, when it will do it, and all that they're being told is that some people are making trillions of dollars. So I think that it's pretty obvious why this has got such a backlash. Secondly, I think that there's a deep amount of external energy that's fueling this anti-technology sentiment in the United States and has been for decades. I don't think it's just China with NGOs today. I think that there's a long history of state actors intervening in media activities in foreign nations to try and create the sentiment and fuel a sentiment that reduces progress in that competitive state. This third piece is, when the Copernican revolution happened, it was a mind f**k. Heliocentricity was a totally new way of thinking for humans, and it was deeply disruptive to the church, and it was deeply disruptive to the power centers, which were the centers that could tell people, 'Earth is at the center of the universe, we're in control, we're the direct channel to God.' And the idea that the sun is at the center of the solar system, and we spin around it, and we're a tiny speck in the universe was very hard for people to grasp. There's something about AI that's very not human-centric, and it kind of shifts and f**ks with the ego of the human. It's almost anti-humanist, and I think that that's like a deep psychological current. A lot of people and their disdain for this technology, it fuels it. It's not the cause, but I think it fuels it.”

The All-In Podcast

33,112 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

David Friedberg: “AI is the new lightning rod for fear and divisiveness that ultimately breeds compliance and control.” “Peter Thiel said this best. He's like, ‘Look at all the money that's going into AI, there's really only one company that's making any money, and that's Nvidia.’” “Like at this point, the jury's still out. We don't even know what AI is.” “It's sort of like when the internet was happening, everyone thought these fiber optic switch companies were going to make all the money.” “Turns out that was wrong. It was the end applications that made all the money.” “And they competed in many different markets. from Google, to Amazon, to Uber.” “You can go down the list of all the beneficiaries of the core infrastructure technology of the internet that was built out.” “So what is really going on?” Well, AI is the new lightning rod for fear and for divisiveness that ultimately breeds compliance and control.” “Which is where these politicians are trying to drive the populace and the voting conditions in the United States.” “And that's what's going on right now.” “There's a lot of fear about, ‘Putting this data center in my town is gonna do X or Y or Z,’ with no real conversation about the truth of that matter.” “There's a lot of fear about wealth creation being aggregated in the hands of a few when as we saw with the internet, it benefited the many.” “And that fear mongering is a very similar tactic that we've seen in the prior generations where policies were misstated, fear was used, and then voting control allowed folks to come to power that were looking for power.” “So I think it's just the lightning rod at the moment.”

The All-In Podcast

241,146 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten