正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Is this correct? No other countries can replicate the Chinook?

90,211 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

40 条评论

Chaos Warehouse 的头像
Chaos Warehouse3 个月前

Russia had the YAK-24, but it could only carry about 4,400 lbs compared to the Chinook's beastly 26,000 lbs.

GX5000 🇨🇦 🐾🍁❄️🇨🇦🤝🇺🇸 的头像
GX5000 🇨🇦 🐾🍁❄️🇨🇦🤝🇺🇸3 个月前

They were great fun as are the Labradors (modded Voyagers) --------------------- Allies such as Japan (via Kawasaki) and Italy have license-produced Chinook variants, while Russia and China rely on different heavy-lift designs like the Mi-26, underscoring US mastery of this specific configuration.

Trucker Dan 的头像
Trucker Dan3 个月前

Very cool!

GX5000 🇨🇦 🐾🍁❄️🇨🇦🤝🇺🇸 的头像
GX5000 🇨🇦 🐾🍁❄️🇨🇦🤝🇺🇸3 个月前

Love Helis 😇

Don Juan Quixote 的头像
Don Juan Quixote3 个月前

Ok but,

NorfChris 的头像
NorfChris3 个月前

We did have the The Bristol Type 192 Belvedere that ended service in 1968 but haven't had a tandem rotor helicopter domestically produced since in the UK.

Eric Carr 的头像
Eric Carr3 个月前

Boy, if you ever wanted to make sure a couple was talking to each other, it is those rotors.

Kevin S. 的头像
Kevin S.3 个月前

Chinooks fly over my house frequently. They make a distinctive sound. Sometimes when I took a walk to lunch from work I would see formations of three Chinooks.

Hart America 的头像
Hart America3 个月前

America winning 👍🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

Trucker Dan 的头像
Trucker Dan3 个月前

Always bet on America!

Blizzard Arms 的头像
Blizzard Arms3 个月前

They fly over my house pretty often. Them and Blackhawks

Lets Go Oilers 的头像
Lets Go Oilers3 个月前

Huge load capabilities. An engineering masterpiece.

One Plus 的头像
One Plus3 个月前

Here's a HALO lifting up a damaged Chinook.

iron chef 的头像
iron chef3 个月前

Soviet Yakovlev Yak-24 Lest you forget

Trucker Dan 的头像
Trucker Dan3 个月前

Cool, thank you!

iron chef 的头像
iron chef3 个月前

History needs to be remember while we still have our minds

Wild Bill Cody 的头像
Wild Bill Cody3 个月前

For a bit of clarity, the XCH-62 never really got very far. The empty shell airframe's only flight was Mobile to the Army Aviation Museum under a CH-47. I was there at the delivery. It was cool but nobody was calling the 62 a helicopter at the time and there really was no reason for it to be at Ft. Rucker. It was just another cancelled project. The US Army could have had a larger helicopter. The Army and Congress decided it was unnecessary.

daoc15 的头像
daoc153 个月前

Boeing builds the vast majority of the Chinook helicopters in Pennsylvania. They've licensed a Japanese and Italian company to make them as well.

The Metal Redneck 的头像
The Metal Redneck3 个月前

Yep. The Chinook is as bad ass as the A10.

Mike Perry 的头像
Mike Perry3 个月前

They don't actually fly. Like many helicopters they're so ugly that the earth repels them.

Ray387994 的头像
Ray3879943 个月前

Nothing else sounds like them

Trucker Dan 的头像
Trucker Dan3 个月前

Nope.

Undeesclosed1 的头像
Undeesclosed13 个月前

How do the droopy blades not hit each other at start up?

Jmb&f56 的头像
Jmb&f563 个月前

I should think that it is false.

LAFARMS 的头像
LAFARMS3 个月前

They'll be flying over the house in a little bit.

Dave Roth 的头像
Dave Roth3 个月前

Russian Mil MI-26. Does the same job as the chinook.

The Finger of Fact 🇺🇸 的头像
The Finger of Fact 🇺🇸3 个月前

Not really. If someone wanted to, they could. The tech is not unobtainable. Japan has built Chinooks via Kawasaki under license since the 1980s (CH-47J/JA models) and Italy has assembled CH-47C variants through Agusta. But, both remain tied to Boeing designs and US supply chains.

Dangerous America 的头像
Dangerous America3 个月前

Yes it is CH 47 is a beast She can handle any mission Airborne ops or sling load, moving troops or light vehicles and supplies An absolute workhorse Oh and has two door gunners and a tail gunner 50 cals and mark 19s

pontiacfanG8GT 的头像
pontiacfanG8GT3 个月前

The Brits worked out the bugs on the Harrier Jump jet.

Nasi Bule ⚔️ 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 🇲🇨 🇺🇲 的头像
Nasi Bule ⚔️ 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 🇲🇨 🇺🇲3 个月前

There have been multiple small ones. Here are the big ones. Bristol Type 173 - just a few built Bristol Type 192 Belvedere - used in the 1960s; could carry 19 troops. Yakovlev Yak-24 - Soviet Air Force and Aeroflot. Depending on the model, it could carry 19 or 40 troops.

Dan. 的头像
Dan.3 个月前

Fastest there is. Talked to one of their pilots and they give the attack choppers shit for being slower.

mjacks 🇺🇸 的头像
mjacks 🇺🇸3 个月前

Badass, and best, chopper.

Anna Mazzuchelli 的头像
Anna Mazzuchelli3 个月前

Very cool dudes. Tax dollars well spent.

DeltaZuluIK 的头像
DeltaZuluIK3 个月前

So bad ass 👍🏻🇱🇷

Glen Bradley 的头像
Glen Bradley3 个月前

I was in a US Marine Corps squadron of CH-46 Sea Knights (Phrogs), tandem-rotor helicopters but not Chinooks. Like the Chinooks, they were also Boeing Vertol. However, some tandem-rotor aircraft were not made by Boeing, such as the Piasecki H-21, Yakovlev Yak-24, Bristol Belvedere, and Bell HSL. The video’s claim is not precisely accurate, but the Boeing Vertol aircraft (Chinook and Sea Knight) were by far the most badass versions of such helicopters.

Victor Vail 的头像
Victor Vail3 个月前

I was a Flight Engineer (FE) in those. Bosnia/Kosovo/Iraq, stinger position. (M60 On the Ramp.) Life goes quick, but it goes faster in a ‘47. 🇨🇱🇺🇸🦅

@Elf432 的头像
@Elf4323 个月前

Yep. 🇺🇸

Attack Lab 的头像
Attack Lab3 个月前

After seeing these birds bringing in supplies to WNC after hurricane Helene I have nothing but respect.

WHS🇺🇸 的头像
WHS🇺🇸3 个月前

Outstanding! Loved taking flight in them.

Seven 7 的头像
Seven 73 个月前

@SDSLLC_USA chin up USA 🇺🇸 deliberately fragmented like C i Americas 🌀 Amazing sync drive MK spinning machine you 🦇 Batman now ?

相关视频