正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Isabelle Adjani on why working with Andrzej Żuławski in 'Possession' (1981) was very tough: "'Possession' (1981) is only the type of film you can do when you are young. He is a director that makes you sink into his world of darkness and his demons. It is okay when...

DannyDrinksWine's profile picture

DepressedBergman

239,291 subscribers

41,639 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

喜剧艺术健康养生
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Lucio Fulci on why people misunderstood 'The Beyond' (1981) & the movies he thinks even idiots can understand: "I like 'The Beyond' (1981) very much because I think it was an interesting attempt. People who blame 'The Beyond' for its lack of story have not understood that it's a film of images, which must be received without any reflection. They say it is very difficult to interpret such a film, but it is very easy to interpret a film with threads: any idiot can understand Molinaro's 'La Cage aux Folles' (1978), or even Carpenter's 'Escape from New York' (1981), while 'The Beyond' or Argento's 'Inferno' (1980) are absolute films." (Lucio Fulci's interview to Starbust Magazine, 1982) P.S: On this day, 45 years ago, "The Beyond" (1981) was released in Italy.
1:40

Lucio Fulci on why people misunderstood 'The Beyond' (1981) & the movies he thinks even idiots can understand: "I like 'The Beyond' (1981) very much because I think it was an interesting attempt. People who blame 'The Beyond' for its lack of story have not understood that it's a film of images, which must be received without any reflection. They say it is very difficult to interpret such a film, but it is very easy to interpret a film with threads: any idiot can understand Molinaro's 'La Cage aux Folles' (1978), or even Carpenter's 'Escape from New York' (1981), while 'The Beyond' or Argento's 'Inferno' (1980) are absolute films." (Lucio Fulci's interview to Starbust Magazine, 1982) P.S: On this day, 45 years ago, "The Beyond" (1981) was released in Italy.

DepressedBergman

63,442 次观看 • 4 个月前

Abel Ferrara on "Ms. 45" (1981): "'Ms. 45' (1981) was one of those films where we were still kids, you know. We were still trying to make it in the world, and just going at it with a lot of wide-eyed wonder. We were very pre-jaded. I mean, we had to convince ourselves that we were making a film that was even gonna be seen in theaters. But we kinda knew it. I think 'Ms. 45' was the first film where we went, “Jesus Christ, people are actually gonna make money from this — we’d better f-cking concentrate here. People are actually gonna buy tickets, so it might be a good idea to kinda focus,” you know what I mean. It’s a tough thing, with Zoë, you know. The movie is her, and embodies her. The beautiful thing about a film is that it captures one moment in time; and that film captures her as a 17-year-old Columbia student, you know– not on hard drugs, not drinking, with a different kind of take on life. She was a beautiful kid, you know, with the whole world in front of her." (Abel Ferrara's interview with Luke Goodsell, Rotten Tomatoes, 2013) P.S: On this day, 45 years ago, "Ms. 45" (1981) was released in the USA.
1:04

Abel Ferrara on "Ms. 45" (1981): "'Ms. 45' (1981) was one of those films where we were still kids, you know. We were still trying to make it in the world, and just going at it with a lot of wide-eyed wonder. We were very pre-jaded. I mean, we had to convince ourselves that we were making a film that was even gonna be seen in theaters. But we kinda knew it. I think 'Ms. 45' was the first film where we went, “Jesus Christ, people are actually gonna make money from this — we’d better f-cking concentrate here. People are actually gonna buy tickets, so it might be a good idea to kinda focus,” you know what I mean. It’s a tough thing, with Zoë, you know. The movie is her, and embodies her. The beautiful thing about a film is that it captures one moment in time; and that film captures her as a 17-year-old Columbia student, you know– not on hard drugs, not drinking, with a different kind of take on life. She was a beautiful kid, you know, with the whole world in front of her." (Abel Ferrara's interview with Luke Goodsell, Rotten Tomatoes, 2013) P.S: On this day, 45 years ago, "Ms. 45" (1981) was released in the USA.

DepressedBergman

43,379 次观看 • 4 个月前

Kinzinger: To me, it was very personal, very, very difficult for my family and me. And so you see some of that in the film. But most importantly, what this is, is a warning to America. You’ll see this in the film again — we lay out a very compelling case against Trump. But it shows, again, that what I did wasn’t courageous — it was just my job. There is, though, an intense cost to that. You see that cost laid out in this film, and it shows why, when people say, “Why don’t other Republicans speak out?” — this brings home that there is a cost to doing so. And we need to, frankly, elect and hire people who are willing to do tough things
2:38

Kinzinger: To me, it was very personal, very, very difficult for my family and me. And so you see some of that in the film. But most importantly, what this is, is a warning to America. You’ll see this in the film again — we lay out a very compelling case against Trump. But it shows, again, that what I did wasn’t courageous — it was just my job. There is, though, an intense cost to that. You see that cost laid out in this film, and it shows why, when people say, “Why don’t other Republicans speak out?” — this brings home that there is a cost to doing so. And we need to, frankly, elect and hire people who are willing to do tough things

Acyn

151,606 次观看 • 10 个月前

WATCH: Very newsy exchange at the White House Tuesday afternoon between President Trump and CBS’s Ed O'Keefe about Iran, revealing the U.S. was gifted “a present” from whatever remains of the new/old Iranian regime that is “oil and gas related”.... President Trump: “Do you have another question? You haven’t been here in a while.” O’Keefe: “Well, on Iran, can you give us any more sense of who exactly in Iran it is, either Witkoff or Kushner you’re speaking with?” Trump: “Yeah. We had — I hate to say this in front of these young people — they’re not children. I spoke to most of them. They sound like adults to me. Even though they are sort of children, right? They’ll always be your children. But I hate to say it, but we killed all their leadership. And then they met to choose new leaders, and we killed all of them. And now, we have a new group and we can easily do that. But let’s see how they turn out. It’s — we have, really, regime change. You know, this is a change in the regime because the leaders are all very different than the ones that we started off with that created all those problems. So this was — I think we can say, Jason, this is regime change, right?” O’Keefe: “What makes you trust them?” Trump: “I don’t trust anybody. I don’t trust you. I mean, that’s only because I know you, but if I didn’t know you, I’d probably have more trust. But I don’t trust anyone.” O’Keefe: “Why bother talking to them?” Trump: “Why do you — why do you say that? Why do you say what makes you — do you think I trust them? I don’t trust them.” O’Keefe: “Then why bother talking to them?” Trump: “Because they’re going to make a deal. They’re going to make a deal. They did something yesterday that was amazing. Actually. They gave us a present. And the president arrived today and it was a very big present worth a tremendous amount of money. And I’m not going to tell you what that present is, but it was a very significant prize. And they gave it to us, and they said they were going to give it, so that meant one thing to me. We’re dealing with the right people —” O’Keefe: “Was it nuclear related.” Trump: “No, it wasn’t nuclear related. It was oil and gas related. And it was a very nice thing they did. But what it showed me is that we’re dealing with the right people because, you know, you don’t know because the leadership was killed, all gone. Khamenei, all gone. As the expression goes, the past Supreme Leader and then the new Supreme Leader was racked up at a minimum, racked up pretty good, and everyone else was gone. And then many of the people in the third tier are gone. But we’re dealing with a group of people that I think turn out and the — the present, the gift they made to us was very significant. And they said they were going to do it and it happened. And they’re the only ones that could have done it.”
2:36

WATCH: Very newsy exchange at the White House Tuesday afternoon between President Trump and CBS’s Ed O'Keefe about Iran, revealing the U.S. was gifted “a present” from whatever remains of the new/old Iranian regime that is “oil and gas related”.... President Trump: “Do you have another question? You haven’t been here in a while.” O’Keefe: “Well, on Iran, can you give us any more sense of who exactly in Iran it is, either Witkoff or Kushner you’re speaking with?” Trump: “Yeah. We had — I hate to say this in front of these young people — they’re not children. I spoke to most of them. They sound like adults to me. Even though they are sort of children, right? They’ll always be your children. But I hate to say it, but we killed all their leadership. And then they met to choose new leaders, and we killed all of them. And now, we have a new group and we can easily do that. But let’s see how they turn out. It’s — we have, really, regime change. You know, this is a change in the regime because the leaders are all very different than the ones that we started off with that created all those problems. So this was — I think we can say, Jason, this is regime change, right?” O’Keefe: “What makes you trust them?” Trump: “I don’t trust anybody. I don’t trust you. I mean, that’s only because I know you, but if I didn’t know you, I’d probably have more trust. But I don’t trust anyone.” O’Keefe: “Why bother talking to them?” Trump: “Why do you — why do you say that? Why do you say what makes you — do you think I trust them? I don’t trust them.” O’Keefe: “Then why bother talking to them?” Trump: “Because they’re going to make a deal. They’re going to make a deal. They did something yesterday that was amazing. Actually. They gave us a present. And the president arrived today and it was a very big present worth a tremendous amount of money. And I’m not going to tell you what that present is, but it was a very significant prize. And they gave it to us, and they said they were going to give it, so that meant one thing to me. We’re dealing with the right people —” O’Keefe: “Was it nuclear related.” Trump: “No, it wasn’t nuclear related. It was oil and gas related. And it was a very nice thing they did. But what it showed me is that we’re dealing with the right people because, you know, you don’t know because the leadership was killed, all gone. Khamenei, all gone. As the expression goes, the past Supreme Leader and then the new Supreme Leader was racked up at a minimum, racked up pretty good, and everyone else was gone. And then many of the people in the third tier are gone. But we’re dealing with a group of people that I think turn out and the — the present, the gift they made to us was very significant. And they said they were going to do it and it happened. And they’re the only ones that could have done it.”

Curtis Houck

108,556 次观看 • 5 个月前

Reporter: The FIFA decision. Millions of American soccer fans are obviously very happy, but what do you say to the critics who say this sets a precedent that other powerful leaders— Trump: Well, I don’t know. I mean, I can only say this: I had nothing to do with the decision. What I did do is say, “I think that should be reviewed,” because I watched the play, and he didn’t do anything wrong. You’ve got to look at it. By the way, if he did, I’d probably feel differently. If he punched him in the face or did something wrong… I thought your young, wonderful basketball player, Caitlin—I thought she was treated rather rough, if you want to know the truth. That was a much different kind of an event. That was a pretty bad event. But in this case, he didn’t do anything wrong. Two people ran into each other. And by the way, if you look at that game, there were 10 instances that were much rougher than that. So I think it starts with the fact that it shouldn’t have been a foul. Then you have to look at the person who raised the card, and that’s up to you people. You look at it. But I didn’t think it was very good because it was not good.
1:56

Reporter: The FIFA decision. Millions of American soccer fans are obviously very happy, but what do you say to the critics who say this sets a precedent that other powerful leaders— Trump: Well, I don’t know. I mean, I can only say this: I had nothing to do with the decision. What I did do is say, “I think that should be reviewed,” because I watched the play, and he didn’t do anything wrong. You’ve got to look at it. By the way, if he did, I’d probably feel differently. If he punched him in the face or did something wrong… I thought your young, wonderful basketball player, Caitlin—I thought she was treated rather rough, if you want to know the truth. That was a much different kind of an event. That was a pretty bad event. But in this case, he didn’t do anything wrong. Two people ran into each other. And by the way, if you look at that game, there were 10 instances that were much rougher than that. So I think it starts with the fact that it shouldn’t have been a foul. Then you have to look at the person who raised the card, and that’s up to you people. You look at it. But I didn’t think it was very good because it was not good.

Acyn

109,598 次观看 • 1 个月前

Interview about the March 31: "It was really fast. No one was ready for it. Beck has a reflex instinct. I didn't mean to do anything to them, but just like, "Who should not be here?" or something like that. Very shocked, I was very shocked because I felt that it was wrong. You shouldn't do this and you shouldn't do this to any artist. It's something like that. The people who are afraid are afraid. It's not okay. We live like a lovely fan club, we love each other very much and trust each other very much. We are like a family. I don't want anyone to do this to us" BECKY IS WORTH IT #LOrealParisTHxBecky #beckysangels
0:51

Interview about the March 31: "It was really fast. No one was ready for it. Beck has a reflex instinct. I didn't mean to do anything to them, but just like, "Who should not be here?" or something like that. Very shocked, I was very shocked because I felt that it was wrong. You shouldn't do this and you shouldn't do this to any artist. It's something like that. The people who are afraid are afraid. It's not okay. We live like a lovely fan club, we love each other very much and trust each other very much. We are like a family. I don't want anyone to do this to us" BECKY IS WORTH IT #LOrealParisTHxBecky #beckysangels

D_ 🐰🦦

43,805 次观看 • 1 年前

Sylvester Stallone admits one risky career move set him back eight years "I had a real down period, say around '95, when I did Cop Land, '95, '96, and I said, oh, let me do something really off, out of my comfort zone. And I did it. And I was very happy with the project, but actually it set me way back" "The studios are going, why would you do that man, you did that for nothing, why wouldn't you just do an action film. I said, because I was gonna do it, I was going to do an action film next, I was just trying to prove a point to myself and whoever cared" "He goes, well that doesn't make us look good because you're doing this for free, and why would we pay you anyway. It began a very bad spiral for about eight years"
0:47

Sylvester Stallone admits one risky career move set him back eight years "I had a real down period, say around '95, when I did Cop Land, '95, '96, and I said, oh, let me do something really off, out of my comfort zone. And I did it. And I was very happy with the project, but actually it set me way back" "The studios are going, why would you do that man, you did that for nothing, why wouldn't you just do an action film. I said, because I was gonna do it, I was going to do an action film next, I was just trying to prove a point to myself and whoever cared" "He goes, well that doesn't make us look good because you're doing this for free, and why would we pay you anyway. It began a very bad spiral for about eight years"

Casper

3,071,441 次观看 • 1 个月前

Sam Neill about slapping Isabelle Adjani in ‘Possession’: ‘The Most Distressing Thing’ I’ve Ever Done’ “I said: ‘Look, Andrzej, I have to say no. I can’t do that. You can’t ask me to do that. I have never raised a hand to another human being and I have to say no. Please don’t ask me to. I’m not going to do it,'” Neill said. “Then Adjani came up to me. She said, ‘Sam, you have to do this. You must.’ I said, ‘Please, Isabelle, do not ask me.’ She said, ‘You must do it.’ So I had to do it. I have to say it was the most distressing thing I’ve ever had to do on film.”
1:07

Sam Neill about slapping Isabelle Adjani in ‘Possession’: ‘The Most Distressing Thing’ I’ve Ever Done’ “I said: ‘Look, Andrzej, I have to say no. I can’t do that. You can’t ask me to do that. I have never raised a hand to another human being and I have to say no. Please don’t ask me to. I’m not going to do it,'” Neill said. “Then Adjani came up to me. She said, ‘Sam, you have to do this. You must.’ I said, ‘Please, Isabelle, do not ask me.’ She said, ‘You must do it.’ So I had to do it. I have to say it was the most distressing thing I’ve ever had to do on film.”

Remnants of the Past

1,049,944 次观看 • 1 个月前

Andrzej Zulawski explains why 'Possession' (1981) was a personal film & how it was inspired by Ingmar Bergman's 'Scenes from a Marriage' (1973): "Interviewer: 'Possession' (1981) has been singled out lately on the repertory circuit in the U.S. after a very successful run at Film Forum. You’ve called it a “personal” film. What do you think of its recent success? Zulawski: Please, how can I answer that? 'Possession' (1981) was born of a totally private experience. After making 'That Most Important Thing: Love' (1975) in France, I went back to Poland to get my family (which at the time was my wife and my kid) and bring them to France. I had two or three interesting proposals to make really big European films. But when I returned to Poland I saw exactly what the guy in Possession sees when he opens the door to his flat, which is an abandoned child in an empty flat and a woman who is doing something somewhere else. It’s so basically private. Now I can go back to it many years later, but even the dialogue in certain kitchen scenes and certain private scenes is like I just wrote it down after some harrowing day. So it’s amazing how such a private thing became a kind of icon. You know Isabelle Adjani got the prize at Cannes for this film, she got the Cesar which is the French Oscar and 14 other prizes in many festivals. Please believe me, it’s mentally very disturbing to see that your very private little film became something in which so many people recognize something of themselves. Thirty years later I’m still thinking about it. Interviewer: There’s obviously a personal truth to it but it’s also one of your most fantastic films. It jumps effortlessly between different genres of filmmaking, with a surprising turn toward horrific science fiction. It’s an interesting way to tell such a personal story. Zulawski: It stems again from the simple fact that I was living in Paris and I went to see Ingmar Bergman’s 'Scenes from a Marriage' (1973). It’s an extremely well acted and brilliant film, but I left the cinema feeling empty. I went out and I said, All right, the analysis is perfect. It’s cold, it’s brilliant, like always. But so what? I was walking the streets I remember, it was raining and I said look, the beauty of the stories that we are telling our children is the moral at the end. That is to say that there is always something fantastic by the end of the story. So they walk along the pavement and they go into the house… this is the first floor, this is the kitchen, blah blah, but what’s in the attic? And I was thinking, okay, in my little story what attic does it really have? If I go up the stairs out of the realistic realm and into the fantasy, the science fiction, what is the fairy tale? What is the bad fairy tale at the end? So I went to the attic and I found a monster." (Andrzej Zulawski's interview with Margaret Barton-Fumo, Film Comment, 2012)
0:57

Andrzej Zulawski explains why 'Possession' (1981) was a personal film & how it was inspired by Ingmar Bergman's 'Scenes from a Marriage' (1973): "Interviewer: 'Possession' (1981) has been singled out lately on the repertory circuit in the U.S. after a very successful run at Film Forum. You’ve called it a “personal” film. What do you think of its recent success? Zulawski: Please, how can I answer that? 'Possession' (1981) was born of a totally private experience. After making 'That Most Important Thing: Love' (1975) in France, I went back to Poland to get my family (which at the time was my wife and my kid) and bring them to France. I had two or three interesting proposals to make really big European films. But when I returned to Poland I saw exactly what the guy in Possession sees when he opens the door to his flat, which is an abandoned child in an empty flat and a woman who is doing something somewhere else. It’s so basically private. Now I can go back to it many years later, but even the dialogue in certain kitchen scenes and certain private scenes is like I just wrote it down after some harrowing day. So it’s amazing how such a private thing became a kind of icon. You know Isabelle Adjani got the prize at Cannes for this film, she got the Cesar which is the French Oscar and 14 other prizes in many festivals. Please believe me, it’s mentally very disturbing to see that your very private little film became something in which so many people recognize something of themselves. Thirty years later I’m still thinking about it. Interviewer: There’s obviously a personal truth to it but it’s also one of your most fantastic films. It jumps effortlessly between different genres of filmmaking, with a surprising turn toward horrific science fiction. It’s an interesting way to tell such a personal story. Zulawski: It stems again from the simple fact that I was living in Paris and I went to see Ingmar Bergman’s 'Scenes from a Marriage' (1973). It’s an extremely well acted and brilliant film, but I left the cinema feeling empty. I went out and I said, All right, the analysis is perfect. It’s cold, it’s brilliant, like always. But so what? I was walking the streets I remember, it was raining and I said look, the beauty of the stories that we are telling our children is the moral at the end. That is to say that there is always something fantastic by the end of the story. So they walk along the pavement and they go into the house… this is the first floor, this is the kitchen, blah blah, but what’s in the attic? And I was thinking, okay, in my little story what attic does it really have? If I go up the stairs out of the realistic realm and into the fantasy, the science fiction, what is the fairy tale? What is the bad fairy tale at the end? So I went to the attic and I found a monster." (Andrzej Zulawski's interview with Margaret Barton-Fumo, Film Comment, 2012)

DepressedBergman

21,497 次观看 • 8 个月前

Robert Altman on his Gambling addiction & his attitude towards Gambling: "The reason I was so keen to do 'California Split' (1974) was that for years I wanted to do a gambling film that had nothing but the ambience of gambling, and then point out it had nothing to do with money." Full Excerpt: "I think gambling is just action, and why not? What is there to hoard? I don’t think I have ever jeopardized anybody’s existence by my gambling. Actually, for the last fifteen years or so I’ve been kind of bored with it, because it doesn’t mean anything — what’s the most I could win? Buying lottery tickets, that isn’t gambling. That’s just throwing your hat in the ring. I don’t think gamblers want to lose. But there are people who are addicted to it. At one time I could stand at a crap table for two days — the feeling is like sex. Compulsive gamblers lie to themselves, to everybody. I think I became embarrassed that maybe I was becoming a compulsive gambler. When I was making Tanner ’88, I bet on every game on every day of the baseball season. There’s a moral blanket over gambling. It’s considered immoral, it’s not what you’re supposed to do. I think the greatest theatrical opening scene ever was in "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead," when the guys are tossing coins, and one of them wins every time. The odds are against that, yet they’re not. Every time you throw a coin, the odds are fifty—-fifty. When you say I’ve thrown heads six hundred times in a row, what are the odds of that happening? Well, mathematically they’re tremendous, but to say that now you’re going to bet on tails because the odds are way in your favour — the odds are not in your favour. So you try this guessing game, ‘I’ve got a hunch, I feel it...’ That was the whole point of California Split, when at the end George Segal turned to Elliott Gould and said, “There was no special feeling.’ He never felt it, because he has nothing to feel! The reason I was so keen to do 'California Split' was that for years I wanted to do a gambling film that had nothing but the ambience of gambling, and then point out it had nothing to do with money." ('Altman on Altman', Edited by David Thompson, 2006)
2:08

Sensitive content

Robert Altman on his Gambling addiction & his attitude towards Gambling: "The reason I was so keen to do 'California Split' (1974) was that for years I wanted to do a gambling film that had nothing but the ambience of gambling, and then point out it had nothing to do with money." Full Excerpt: "I think gambling is just action, and why not? What is there to hoard? I don’t think I have ever jeopardized anybody’s existence by my gambling. Actually, for the last fifteen years or so I’ve been kind of bored with it, because it doesn’t mean anything — what’s the most I could win? Buying lottery tickets, that isn’t gambling. That’s just throwing your hat in the ring. I don’t think gamblers want to lose. But there are people who are addicted to it. At one time I could stand at a crap table for two days — the feeling is like sex. Compulsive gamblers lie to themselves, to everybody. I think I became embarrassed that maybe I was becoming a compulsive gambler. When I was making Tanner ’88, I bet on every game on every day of the baseball season. There’s a moral blanket over gambling. It’s considered immoral, it’s not what you’re supposed to do. I think the greatest theatrical opening scene ever was in "Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead," when the guys are tossing coins, and one of them wins every time. The odds are against that, yet they’re not. Every time you throw a coin, the odds are fifty—-fifty. When you say I’ve thrown heads six hundred times in a row, what are the odds of that happening? Well, mathematically they’re tremendous, but to say that now you’re going to bet on tails because the odds are way in your favour — the odds are not in your favour. So you try this guessing game, ‘I’ve got a hunch, I feel it...’ That was the whole point of California Split, when at the end George Segal turned to Elliott Gould and said, “There was no special feeling.’ He never felt it, because he has nothing to feel! The reason I was so keen to do 'California Split' was that for years I wanted to do a gambling film that had nothing but the ambience of gambling, and then point out it had nothing to do with money." ('Altman on Altman', Edited by David Thompson, 2006)

DepressedBergman

119,994 次观看 • 6 个月前

Elon Musk: I found school to be quite painful and very boring. In South Africa, it was very violent. Peter Diamandis: “My son Dax wanted to know, what was it like for you in middle school and high school?” Elon: “Well, I found school to be quite painful, and it was very boring. And in South Africa, it was very violent. It was like that book Ender's Game, but in survival IRL. In this game IRL, it was like, but not as fun.” Peter Diamandis: “Do you think most successful people have had a lot of hardship early in life? Do you need to have that level of hardship?” Elon Musk: “Probably need a little bit of hardship, I suppose. And then it is always tricky. Like, what are you supposed to do with your kids? It is not easy to create artificial adversity, because if you love your kids, you don't want to do that. I had a lot of adversity. Probably it was good, probably, you know, helped someone, I suppose. What doesn't kill you makes you stronger type of thing. At least I didn't lose a limb.” Source: Moonshots with Peter Diamandis, January 6, 2026.
1:23

Elon Musk: I found school to be quite painful and very boring. In South Africa, it was very violent. Peter Diamandis: “My son Dax wanted to know, what was it like for you in middle school and high school?” Elon: “Well, I found school to be quite painful, and it was very boring. And in South Africa, it was very violent. It was like that book Ender's Game, but in survival IRL. In this game IRL, it was like, but not as fun.” Peter Diamandis: “Do you think most successful people have had a lot of hardship early in life? Do you need to have that level of hardship?” Elon Musk: “Probably need a little bit of hardship, I suppose. And then it is always tricky. Like, what are you supposed to do with your kids? It is not easy to create artificial adversity, because if you love your kids, you don't want to do that. I had a lot of adversity. Probably it was good, probably, you know, helped someone, I suppose. What doesn't kill you makes you stronger type of thing. At least I didn't lose a limb.” Source: Moonshots with Peter Diamandis, January 6, 2026.

ELON CLIPS

35,849 次观看 • 1 个月前

stefan van de graaff (director of “one of us”) talks about kit connor in “romeo + juliet”: host: “[kit] played romeo on broadway, but i believe that was after you’d cast it. so you really got him exactly...the shakespearean language in time.” second host: “after doing it, he was like, ‘you know what? i kind of want to do theater now.’” stefan: “i don’t know. well, it was funny because at one point he did message me and he was like, ‘hey, can i show a screener of the film to somebody?’ and he didn’t tell me who he was sharing it with. but then it was a few months later that he was cast in the romeo project. i was like, i wonder if the director was, you know, ‘hey, can you do something in this world?’ and he was like, ‘yeah, i can definitely do something in this world.’ and i don’t know that, so maybe that’s not a fair assessment—” host: “i mean, two plus two is four.” stefan: “yeah, but two plus two is four, a little bit. and he was great. i went and saw him on broadway in new york with rachel zegler, and they were fantastic. the two of them were really, really remarkable on stage, as you might imagine.” 🎥:
0:53

stefan van de graaff (director of “one of us”) talks about kit connor in “romeo + juliet”: host: “[kit] played romeo on broadway, but i believe that was after you’d cast it. so you really got him exactly...the shakespearean language in time.” second host: “after doing it, he was like, ‘you know what? i kind of want to do theater now.’” stefan: “i don’t know. well, it was funny because at one point he did message me and he was like, ‘hey, can i show a screener of the film to somebody?’ and he didn’t tell me who he was sharing it with. but then it was a few months later that he was cast in the romeo project. i was like, i wonder if the director was, you know, ‘hey, can you do something in this world?’ and he was like, ‘yeah, i can definitely do something in this world.’ and i don’t know that, so maybe that’s not a fair assessment—” host: “i mean, two plus two is four.” stefan: “yeah, but two plus two is four, a little bit. and he was great. i went and saw him on broadway in new york with rachel zegler, and they were fantastic. the two of them were really, really remarkable on stage, as you might imagine.” 🎥:

kit connor updates

10,225 次观看 • 5 个月前

👤 is it okay for the members to come in when anxin is showering? 🐱 it doesn’t matter to me 🐶 he came in when i was showering! how this happened was that when i was showering he suddenly came in. so i was like what? but he just did his stuff and left. so after i was done showering i asked him why he came in and he was like “i can’t come in??” and after that he said “you can come in too i don’t mind~” 🐱 it’s because we’re so close to each other 🐱 are we still only that close…? 🐶 no but it was the first time and you just walked in to the bathroom 🐱 you also just took my snack without asking!!
0:48

Sensitive content

👤 is it okay for the members to come in when anxin is showering? 🐱 it doesn’t matter to me 🐶 he came in when i was showering! how this happened was that when i was showering he suddenly came in. so i was like what? but he just did his stuff and left. so after i was done showering i asked him why he came in and he was like “i can’t come in??” and after that he said “you can come in too i don’t mind~” 🐱 it’s because we’re so close to each other 🐱 are we still only that close…? 🐶 no but it was the first time and you just walked in to the bathroom 🐱 you also just took my snack without asking!!

🥟

113,711 次观看 • 5 天前

Joe Rogan on why he goes to church. “When I was younger, I was very cynical about religion, and then I've gotten older…” “One of the things that I always say is, if there was a pill that could make you as nice as the people that I go to church with, everybody would be on it.” “They are the nicest f*cking people you will ever encounter. When we leave church, they're kind…” “If you get just to the teachings of Christ, I can't find any faults in it.”
1:40

Joe Rogan on why he goes to church. “When I was younger, I was very cynical about religion, and then I've gotten older…” “One of the things that I always say is, if there was a pill that could make you as nice as the people that I go to church with, everybody would be on it.” “They are the nicest f*cking people you will ever encounter. When we leave church, they're kind…” “If you get just to the teachings of Christ, I can't find any faults in it.”

Collin Rugg

2,570,809 次观看 • 7 个月前

Barbara Crampton on why she doesn't shy away from nudity in movies: "Anything I did was always part of the film and part of the story. I don’t think that anything I ever did felt like, “I should be doing this” or “I’m scared to do it,” or that it would hurt my career if I do it. There are a lot of people who are movie viewers who have very varying degrees on what they think and how they feel about sexuality and nudity. There’s a lot of social and moral issues involved in people’s minds and their upbringing. But, for me, as an actor, if it’s part of the story, I’ll do it and I’ll probably continue to do it. I don’t know if anybody’s going to see a ‘wrinkled-old grandmother’ Barbara Crampton, but if it’s part of the story, I’ll do it. (laughs)" (Barbara Crampton's interview with Jason Howard, Cinedump, 2014) Clip from: From Beyond (1986) Director: Stuart Gordon
2:24

Sensitive content

Barbara Crampton on why she doesn't shy away from nudity in movies: "Anything I did was always part of the film and part of the story. I don’t think that anything I ever did felt like, “I should be doing this” or “I’m scared to do it,” or that it would hurt my career if I do it. There are a lot of people who are movie viewers who have very varying degrees on what they think and how they feel about sexuality and nudity. There’s a lot of social and moral issues involved in people’s minds and their upbringing. But, for me, as an actor, if it’s part of the story, I’ll do it and I’ll probably continue to do it. I don’t know if anybody’s going to see a ‘wrinkled-old grandmother’ Barbara Crampton, but if it’s part of the story, I’ll do it. (laughs)" (Barbara Crampton's interview with Jason Howard, Cinedump, 2014) Clip from: From Beyond (1986) Director: Stuart Gordon

DepressedBergman

54,150 次观看 • 6 个月前

Trump: "It's very sad when you do the right thing....They said because of the fact that Vladimir Putin came to American soil, this was a tremendous defeat. No, it was really wonderful that he did it. It was hard thing for him to do, to be honest with you."
1:47

Trump: "It's very sad when you do the right thing....They said because of the fact that Vladimir Putin came to American soil, this was a tremendous defeat. No, it was really wonderful that he did it. It was hard thing for him to do, to be honest with you."

The Bulwark

804,247 次观看 • 1 年前

Nicky Butt: “I never played against Messi.” Paul Scholes: “Well, you were lucky.” Nicky Butt: “I was very lucky, yes. I would not go anywhere near him. How good was he?” Paul Scholes: “Well, look, it wasn’t just him. You think of the three in the midfield. They must have played both times in that Champions League: Iniesta, Xavi and Busquets, and then you’ve got Messi with that. When you are up against a midfield player and they are coming at you one-on-one, you hope you don’t get in that situation. With some players, you would be able to read them. You know where they are going and sometimes you can take it off them. But with Messi, I did not have a clue. I had absolutely no idea what he was going to do. I didn’t know if he was going to the left, to the right, or if he was going to go through my legs. He could have done absolutely anything. You just had to guess. If you missed the ball, you had to try and get him. I actually did it here once at Old Trafford. It should have been a penalty. If VAR had been around, it would have been a different story because it was the night when we won 1-0. But that team, as a whole, was incredible. I would say after those first 10 minutes in Rome, they just totally outplayed us.”
0:59

Nicky Butt: “I never played against Messi.” Paul Scholes: “Well, you were lucky.” Nicky Butt: “I was very lucky, yes. I would not go anywhere near him. How good was he?” Paul Scholes: “Well, look, it wasn’t just him. You think of the three in the midfield. They must have played both times in that Champions League: Iniesta, Xavi and Busquets, and then you’ve got Messi with that. When you are up against a midfield player and they are coming at you one-on-one, you hope you don’t get in that situation. With some players, you would be able to read them. You know where they are going and sometimes you can take it off them. But with Messi, I did not have a clue. I had absolutely no idea what he was going to do. I didn’t know if he was going to the left, to the right, or if he was going to go through my legs. He could have done absolutely anything. You just had to guess. If you missed the ball, you had to try and get him. I actually did it here once at Old Trafford. It should have been a penalty. If VAR had been around, it would have been a different story because it was the night when we won 1-0. But that team, as a whole, was incredible. I would say after those first 10 minutes in Rome, they just totally outplayed us.”

M 🇦🇷

96,241 次观看 • 17 天前

Baier: I just got off the phone with the president…. I asked, “what you are saying is you know there is somebody on the ground in Iran that is going to rise up?” He said, “yeah, I feel there is. I feel that and some of them are no longer with us to be honest because it was 49 leaders that were taken out. That was going to take four weeks we thought to get rid of the Iranian leadership and it is always, you know, if they hide, it is a lot longer than four weeks. They would have been hiding. We were shocked when we heard what was going on. We knew exactly what was happening… they are talking about using people now that nobody ever heard of—even they don't know. They are using people, studying people to be the leader that even they don't know who they are. Can you believe that?” I said it's a tough succession plan in Iran. He said, “49 leaders is deep. It's very deep. When they met, they met for breakfast. They assumed it was good for a lot of reasons. Number one they didn't think we knew. You never attack in the morning having to do with wind and sun and a lot of things. It was amazing that we knew everything we knew.”
1:48

Baier: I just got off the phone with the president…. I asked, “what you are saying is you know there is somebody on the ground in Iran that is going to rise up?” He said, “yeah, I feel there is. I feel that and some of them are no longer with us to be honest because it was 49 leaders that were taken out. That was going to take four weeks we thought to get rid of the Iranian leadership and it is always, you know, if they hide, it is a lot longer than four weeks. They would have been hiding. We were shocked when we heard what was going on. We knew exactly what was happening… they are talking about using people now that nobody ever heard of—even they don't know. They are using people, studying people to be the leader that even they don't know who they are. Can you believe that?” I said it's a tough succession plan in Iran. He said, “49 leaders is deep. It's very deep. When they met, they met for breakfast. They assumed it was good for a lot of reasons. Number one they didn't think we knew. You never attack in the morning having to do with wind and sun and a lot of things. It was amazing that we knew everything we knew.”

Acyn

1,065,464 次观看 • 6 个月前