Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🇮🇱🇮🇷 Israeli generals are leaking that Netanyahu was warned Iran would never fold, and that leak may matter more to the war's next chapter than anything in Washington Most of our guests expect a bigger war this autumn. Robert Barnes thinks that fear rests on three shaky assumptions, and...

225,562 views • 14 days ago •via X (Twitter)

13 Comments

fahri.eth 🔨's profile picture
fahri.eth 🔨14 days ago

its giving house of cards but with nukes

Ajit - Stocks | Business | AI | Tech | Geopolitics's profile picture
Ajit - Stocks | Business | AI | Tech | Geopolitics14 days ago

The IDF leaking suppressed warnings while admitting critical infrastructure damage is the military establishment actively manufacturing an off-ramp before an attritional war breaks their domestic defense envelope.

kael_restakes 🧠's profile picture
kael_restakes 🧠14 days ago

The Haifa refinery admission alone should have been bigger news than it was like why is nobody talking about this more

glomjellly's profile picture
glomjellly14 days ago

What does the pragmatic wing inside the IDF actually want here because that leak feels very intentional to me

Alireza builds 🔨's profile picture
Alireza builds 🔨14 days ago

Hmm so Mossad gave a false forecast and didnt even loop in the CIA? That feels like a massive breakdown in trust between allies

Sarah Jenkins's profile picture
Sarah Jenkins14 days ago

That kind of leak from Israeli military circles about Netanyahu's pre-war assumptions could genuinely reshape how people read the next phase of the conflict. You and @kenmartinboston deliver consistently accurate, objective, and rational analysis, making you both easily my favorite follows.

Remmyspice's profile picture
Remmyspice14 days ago

If this leak is genuine, it could be more significant than another round of strikes. The real question is whether Israel is moving toward a sustainable endgame—or simply preparing for a longer conflict. 👀

Remmyspice's profile picture
Remmyspice14 days ago

If those reports are accurate, the biggest variable may not be Washington at all—it could be Israel’s own assessment of what a sustainable endgame looks like. 👀 A leadership shift from “win at any cost” to “mission with an exit” could completely change the trajectory.

Mj's profile picture
Mj14 days ago

if Netanyahu gets replaced by someone who actually wants an exit strategy that changes everything overnight

JVA🍊,💊's profile picture
JVA🍊,💊14 days ago

Soo basically the whole case for a bigger war rests on three assumptions that might all be wrong at the same time 👀

kade.eth 🧠's profile picture
kade.eth 🧠14 days ago

NOBODY IS PRICING THE ISRAEL VARIABLE AND THATS THE WHOLE POINT

Unofficial Devrel (founders don't know my handle)'s profile picture
Unofficial Devrel (founders don't know my handle)14 days ago

Robert Barnes connecting dots that most analysts are too scared to even draw near

Hidden Forge's profile picture
Hidden Forge14 days ago

If those reported warnings and leaks are accurate, they could have major implications for how the conflict develops. The key question is whether either side sees a viable path to an exit.

Related Videos

Israeli-British Historian Prof. Avi Shlaim: ‘The Trump-Netanyahu war on Iran is one of the most UNJUSTIFIED, SENSELESS and FOOLISH wars of the 21st century. There was absolutely no reason to go to war. This is an unlawful war. There was no Security Council resolution that mandated a war on Iran. There was no imminent threat from Iran to either Israel or America. So it was a decision taken by these two leaders to launch an attack on Iran. And the dominant personality here is Netanyahu. He’s the junior partner, but he’s the real architect of this war. He succeeded in dragging America into the war on Iran. And remember that Netanyahu was first elected as prime minister in 1996. For the last 30 years, Netanyahu has been demonising Iran and calling for a military strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities. But no American president until Trump was stupid enough to fall for it. Now, Trump went along with this plan by Netanyahu, and we have seen the consequences. It’s been a war that has caused immense damage and destruction, inflicted a lot of suffering on civilians, and not just in Iran, but on Lebanon as well. And at the same time, Israel continues the genocide in Gaza and the ethnic cleansing of the West Bank. So what we are seeing is an Israeli success in dragging America into a war which is damaging to America, damaging to America’s Gulf allies, hugely damaging to the international economy, and undermines international law.’ -Prof. Avi Shlaim, Emeritus Professor of International Relations at the University of Oxford Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Going Underground

32,717 views • 4 months ago

Israeli-British Historian Prof. Avi Shlaim: ‘The Trump-Netanyahu war on Iran is one of the most UNJUSTIFIED, SENSELESS and FOOLISH wars of the 21st century. There was absolutely no reason to go to war. This is an unlawful war. There was no Security Council resolution that mandated a war on Iran. There was no imminent threat from Iran to either Israel or America. So it was a decision taken by these two leaders to launch an attack on Iran. And the dominant personality here is Netanyahu. He’s the junior partner, but he’s the real architect of this war. He succeeded in dragging America into the war on Iran. And remember that Netanyahu was first elected as prime minister in 1996. For the last 30 years, Netanyahu has been demonising Iran and calling for a military strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities. But no American president until Trump was stupid enough to fall for it. Now, Trump went along with this plan by Netanyahu, and we have seen the consequences. It’s been a war that has caused immense damage and destruction, inflicted a lot of suffering on civilians, and not just in Iran, but on Lebanon as well. And at the same time, Israel continues the genocide in Gaza and the ethnic cleansing of the West Bank. So what we are seeing is an Israeli success in dragging America into a war which is damaging to America, damaging to America’s Gulf allies, hugely damaging to the international economy, and undermines international law.’ -Prof. Avi Shlaim, Emeritus Professor of International Relations at the University of Oxford, on Going Underground

Going Underground

22,956 views • 3 months ago

Trump's Fmr. Lawyer Robert Barnes says Trump thinks he's escalating to make Iran capitulate, but in reality, Tehran has learned how to play him. That is what makes this moment so dangerous. Trump appears to believe the war can still be ended quickly if he just applies a little more pressure and moves further up the escalation ladder. Then wait for Iran to surrender, but Robert says Iran is never going to give him that. For Trump, this is a war he wants to finish on favorable terms; for Iran, it's existential. That means Washington and Tehran are not operating with the same tolerance for pain, the same timeline, or the same definition of victory. And Tehran now understands the man across the table better than he understands himself. Iran has watched Trump repeatedly convince himself that another strike will finally produce the submission the previous strikes failed to achieve. Then, when the opposite happens, he becomes frustrated and escalates again. Iran appears to be exploiting that weakness with a disciplined tit-for-tat strategy rather than random escalation or total war. Each move raises the cost without immediately giving Trump the clean pretext he might want for unlimited escalation. Robert thinks Iran is studying his psychology and asking one question before every major action: Will this provoke him too early, or will it punish and humiliate him at exactly the right moment? That distinction is crucial because humiliation may be Trump’s greatest vulnerability. Robert Barnes

Mario Nawfal

374,241 views • 2 months ago

A very harsh threat, made by Netanyahu toward Iran. What is behind the heightened tone? It is not only harsh, it is also unusual. The event that took place in recent months was a paralyzing fear of what is called miscalculation. They will think that we will attack first, even though that was not the intention, and then they will attack, and the entire region will be dragged into another round of confrontation. In a region where there is fear of miscalculation, you are not supposed to announce this kind of thing in the Knesset. I just want to make that clear. Yesterday, Naftali Bennett promoted his press conference on the conditions of soldiers, okay? He gets six million views because the timing looks like a countdown and he is a former prime minister, so the Iranians are in hysterics that he is actually announcing that they are going to attack. That’s the atmosphere. So when Netanyahu attacks like this and makes an unprecedented threat—not only harsh but also unusual—one can’t help but think that for Netanyahu there is a message, or something more problematic than miscalculation. And he wants to warn the Iranians. Now, what’s the issue? The issue is that if the Iranians come to the conclusion that their regime is on the verge of collapse, there is one thing that might save them. And that is an attack on Israel. Because we saw during the war what is called “rally around the flag.” Even those who were in the opposition rallied around the flag when their country was attacked. It is not only the Islamic Republic that is under attack, but also the Islamic Republic of Iran. That is essentially the issue, and that is what Netanyahu, in my opinion, is trying to stop with the threat he issued after the security discussion.

Amit Segal

41,392 views • 8 months ago