'It is better than the system we have at present' On #BBCBreakfast Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds defended the Government's welfare reforms after official figures revealed they will put 150,000 people in to poverty

Ask him what PIP is for. It exists to cover the extra costs disabled people face because of their disability — it has nothing to do with work. By cutting or removing it, Labour is effectively saying our needs — and our value to society — don’t matter. #TakingThePIP

@BBCPolitics Jonathan Reynolds thinks pushing 150,000 people into poverty is “better than the current system.” If that's Labour’s idea of progress, the Tories might as well sit back — the red ties are doing their job for them. This isn’t reform. It’s sanctioned cruelty.

BBC Breakfast It is better than the system we have at present' NOT On #BBCBreakfast King Charles’ the royal Family train – scrapped for two new helicopters #Train #TRAINTV

IF THE LABOUR PARTY WANT ANY CREDIBILITY... STOP MINISTERS APPEARING.. AND USE CARD BOARD CUTOUTS!

This is what happens when you run government purely as a bean counter and not actually taking into account the finer details of why things exist and what they cover

MR LIER LIER!

I see the @UKLabour liars brought out one of their best liars, the bloke who started every answer with ‘well look’ @jreynoldsMP to lie to us all again this morning!

LABOUR PARTY IS IN A SHIT HOLE OF ITS OWN DIGGING! IT ALL STARTED WITH FREEBIES BEFORE GOVERNANCE! THE PROBLEM IS... STARMERS CIRCUS DOESN'T GIVE A SHIT ABOUT THE COUNTRY OR PEOPLE OR TAX PAYING PUBLIC ONLY ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS & COMMUNICATES IT VERY !

On #BBCBreakfast Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds defended the Government's welfare reforms after official figures revealed they will put 150,000 people in to poverty Re Royal Family buys two new helicopters for £8m each in major transport refresh The helicopters

'It is better than the system we have at present'.. what the fuck.. A LABOUR GOVERNMENT throwing 100s of thousands of disabled people & their carers into poverty is better for who? Oh that would be handful of £millionaires who won't have to pay a tiny bit more in tax..