Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

It is ironic that those who are debating the Constitution do not know the basics of it . A Member alluded to the fact that the 9 th Schedule was inserted into the Constitution to provide protection to dodgy laws. Had to set the record straight that the 9... show more

Manish Tewari

476,339 subscribers

24,992 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

Eğitim Haberler & Politika Sağlık & İyilik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

9 Yorum

AJIT DESAI profil fotoğrafı

AJIT DESAI1 yıl önce

Sir, I wonder why knowledgeable & richly experienced person like you who has risen from NSUI to M.P. (3rd Term) is not fully utilised in Congress? @kharge @RahulGandhi @priyankagandhi @SoniaGandhi_FC

Bhupinder Kanwal profil fotoğrafı

Bhupinder Kanwal1 yıl önce

Forgive them, they are brought up on WhatsApp university degree on Entire Political Science.

BhartiyNiveshak (BN Ka Parivar) profil fotoğrafı

BhartiyNiveshak (BN Ka Parivar)1 yıl önce

Basically it was brought in to make the laws being struck down by Supreme Court legit? That’s the bottom of it.

Zia Haq 🍉 🎗️ profil fotoğrafı

Zia Haq 🍉 🎗️1 yıl önce

Imp intervention. Shame on the treasury bench member if he/she didn’t know why the Constitution was amended for the very first time. Article 31B, and, correspondingly, the Ninth Schedule, was inserted by the Constitution (First Amendment) Act, 1951 to protect land reform laws from challenges on the touchstone of Fundamental Rights (to property). At the time, unlike today, the most stark form of economic inequality was not income inequality but inequality of land, and thereby wealth stock. Zamindari was not just pastoral feudalism, it was a structural basis of our poverty and caste system.

Ranaji Ganguly, PhD profil fotoğrafı

Ranaji Ganguly, PhD1 yıl önce

#modi only knows Entire Jumla Science & the rest of his circus dare not show more knowledge than him!

Himalayan Odyssey profil fotoğrafı

Himalayan Odyssey1 yıl önce

Why are your always in the background of congress and not at the forefront ...either you dont have the appetite & zeal to fight ...or your views are NEVER appreciated in the congress .....your place is in AAP Sir ....! @BhagwantMann , @ArvindKejriwal ..please get him to your side

Raula88 profil fotoğrafı

Raula881 yıl önce

Thank you for making it clear.

Rama @ Blunt profil fotoğrafı

Rama @ Blunt1 yıl önce

Well said

Sarvesh Sharma profil fotoğrafı

Sarvesh Sharma1 yıl önce

The very purpose of the Constitutional Amendment inserting 9th Schedule has been lost once the SC ruled that the Amendment putting laws beyond judicial scrutiny was unconstitutional.

Benzer Videolar

I note Prime Minister Andrew Holness’s remarks in a TV interview this morning. Neither he nor his Party has made those proposals as part of the process of constitutional reform. His proposals are therefore not in the report of the Constitutional Reform Committee, and will not be in the new Constitution coming out of that process. Furthermore, Mr. Holness’s proposals are not in the existing Constitution, and would violate the existing Constitution. This is in keeping with his and his Government’s unfortunate history of past violations of the Constitution of Jamaica. It seems that the Prime Minister wants to make up a rule which is not part of the Constitution or laws of Jamaica, to suit his Party’s political fortune at a time when it is waning. He has no power and no authority to do that. He needs to tell the country why his statutory declarations to the Integrity Commission cannot be certified. I am compliant with the Constitution and laws of Jamaica, and I undertake to the People of Jamaica that I will continue to be so.

I note Prime Minister Andrew Holness’s remarks in a TV interview this morning. Neither he nor his Party has made those proposals as part of the process of constitutional reform. His proposals are therefore not in the report of the Constitutional Reform Committee, and will not be in the new Constitution coming out of that process. Furthermore, Mr. Holness’s proposals are not in the existing Constitution, and would violate the existing Constitution. This is in keeping with his and his Government’s unfortunate history of past violations of the Constitution of Jamaica. It seems that the Prime Minister wants to make up a rule which is not part of the Constitution or laws of Jamaica, to suit his Party’s political fortune at a time when it is waning. He has no power and no authority to do that. He needs to tell the country why his statutory declarations to the Integrity Commission cannot be certified. I am compliant with the Constitution and laws of Jamaica, and I undertake to the People of Jamaica that I will continue to be so.

Mark J. Golding

32,129 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

The RSS believes that India is one idea and we believe that India is a multiplicity of ideas. We believe that everybody should be allowed to participate, allowed to dream, and given space regardless of their caste, language, religion, tradition or history. This is the fight, and the fight was crystallised in the election when millions of people in India clearly understood that the Prime Minister of India was attacking the Constitution of India. Every single word that I have said to you is in the Constitution. The foundation of modern India is the Constitution. What people understood in the election clearly, and I saw it happening when I used to raise the Constitution, people understood what I was saying. They were saying that the BJP is attacking our tradition, attacking our language, attacking our states, attacking our histories. Most importantly, what they understood was that anybody who is attacking the Constitution of India is also attacking our religious tradition. That is why in my first speech in Parliament you must have noticed when I describe Abhayamudra, the fact that this is a symbol of fearlessness and it is present in every single Indian religion. When I was saying this, the BJP could not stand it. They don't understand, and we are going to make them understand. The other thing that happened was that the fear of the BJP vanished. We saw that immediately, within minutes of the election result, nobody in India was scared of the BJP or the Prime Minister of India. So these are huge achievements, not of Rahul Gandhi or the Congress party. We are peripheral. These are huge achievements of the people of India who realised democracy, of the people of India who realised that we are not going to accept an attack on our Constitution. We are not going to accept an attack on our religion, on our state. : Shri Rahul Gandhi 📍Dallas, USA

The RSS believes that India is one idea and we believe that India is a multiplicity of ideas. We believe that everybody should be allowed to participate, allowed to dream, and given space regardless of their caste, language, religion, tradition or history. This is the fight, and the fight was crystallised in the election when millions of people in India clearly understood that the Prime Minister of India was attacking the Constitution of India. Every single word that I have said to you is in the Constitution. The foundation of modern India is the Constitution. What people understood in the election clearly, and I saw it happening when I used to raise the Constitution, people understood what I was saying. They were saying that the BJP is attacking our tradition, attacking our language, attacking our states, attacking our histories. Most importantly, what they understood was that anybody who is attacking the Constitution of India is also attacking our religious tradition. That is why in my first speech in Parliament you must have noticed when I describe Abhayamudra, the fact that this is a symbol of fearlessness and it is present in every single Indian religion. When I was saying this, the BJP could not stand it. They don't understand, and we are going to make them understand. The other thing that happened was that the fear of the BJP vanished. We saw that immediately, within minutes of the election result, nobody in India was scared of the BJP or the Prime Minister of India. So these are huge achievements, not of Rahul Gandhi or the Congress party. We are peripheral. These are huge achievements of the people of India who realised democracy, of the people of India who realised that we are not going to accept an attack on our Constitution. We are not going to accept an attack on our religion, on our state. : Shri Rahul Gandhi 📍Dallas, USA

Congress

68,142 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

☝️“In one of the US laws that explicitly mentions Russia, the stated goal is to "democratize" the Russian Federation. Can you imagine us setting a goal in our own domestic legislation to "democratize" the United States? You know, that is at least impolite. But in principle, we could do it, and there are reasons for that. Everyone is well aware that twice in US history, a president has come to power who was elected by a majority of electors but had a minority of voters behind him. Is that democratic? No. Democracy is the power of the people, the power of the majority. How is it possible that a person is elected to the highest office in the state by a minority of voters? There is such a problem in the US Constitution. But we are not demanding that you change your Constitution, are we?” - President Putin.

☝️“In one of the US laws that explicitly mentions Russia, the stated goal is to "democratize" the Russian Federation. Can you imagine us setting a goal in our own domestic legislation to "democratize" the United States? You know, that is at least impolite. But in principle, we could do it, and there are reasons for that. Everyone is well aware that twice in US history, a president has come to power who was elected by a majority of electors but had a minority of voters behind him. Is that democratic? No. Democracy is the power of the people, the power of the majority. How is it possible that a person is elected to the highest office in the state by a minority of voters? There is such a problem in the US Constitution. But we are not demanding that you change your Constitution, are we?” - President Putin.

🇷🇺Russia is not Enemy

249,356 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

🚨 Caravan-Gate Update. On 29 January this year we were told a caravan had been found on the outskirts of Sydney that contain explosives plus notes about planning for an anti-semitic terrorist attack. It was alarming news. It was reported internationally. Premier Minns wanted to be seen to be 'doing something' so he got the balling rolling on new laws to restrict what you can say and even think in NSW (terrorists of course will cease terrorising if we restrict free speech). A couple of weeks later, however, the Australian Federal Police announce the 'caravan incident' was a 'criminal con-job.' It is now clear a fugitive had orchestrated the caravan incident ... in order to then tip off the cops so he could negotiate a reduced sentence if he handed himself in. But Premier Minns (with Opposition support) had his anti-free speech laws passed by then any way. So the NSW Legislative Council then set up an inquiry to look into this matter. I was selected to be part of that inquiry and we had our first hearing yesterday with the three top cops in NSW. It came out that not only was the caravan incident a 'criminal con job' but that there were 13 other anti-semitic attacks in the weeks prior that were also part of the same 'criminal con job.' This is welcome relief. Over the summer, Sydneysiders and especially our Jewish community were acutely alarmed by what appeared to be the beginning of a medieval pogrom ... but we now know the 'facts' that lead us to that conclusion were baseless. What is not so welcome is the cops knew well in advance of those anti-free speech laws passing that the hysteria that gave birth to those laws was BS. Commissioner Karen Webb is the top cop in NSW. Yesterday I asked Webb at the inquiry: JR: 'The elephant in the room is that this parliament has recently passed laws which restrict freedom of the people of NSW to speak and think freely. Do you think you should have said to the Premier, 'hey before you go ahead with these anti free speech laws because of this current hysteria that we're in, it may not be what it appears to be.' Did you have any type of discussion with the Premier about the recent curbs on free speech in this state?' WEBB: 'I leave the politics to the politicians. We provide comment when we're asked to but we don't provide comment without being asked.' JR: 'Well I would say it was a dereliction of duty. Politicians and the press and prone to hysterias but you were the adults in the room. You are not an island. While you are apolitical in your senior role you knew laws were being rushed to curb free speech. The Premier was saying almost every second day, 'We need new laws to curb free speech. By the time the Premier was saying this, it sounds like you and your team were very well aware that the caravan incident was a manipulation of the criminal justice system. Why didn't you tell the Premier, 'hey look we should not rush into restricting speech because it is a murky situation and it's not what it appears to be?' WEBB: 'Well I reject that. If we are asked, we will provide comment when asked.' ME: 'Well Mr Chair, I would like it recorded in Hansard that the NSW Police sat back and did nothing while these bad laws were being passed.'

🚨 Caravan-Gate Update. On 29 January this year we were told a caravan had been found on the outskirts of Sydney that contain explosives plus notes about planning for an anti-semitic terrorist attack. It was alarming news. It was reported internationally. Premier Minns wanted to be seen to be 'doing something' so he got the balling rolling on new laws to restrict what you can say and even think in NSW (terrorists of course will cease terrorising if we restrict free speech). A couple of weeks later, however, the Australian Federal Police announce the 'caravan incident' was a 'criminal con-job.' It is now clear a fugitive had orchestrated the caravan incident ... in order to then tip off the cops so he could negotiate a reduced sentence if he handed himself in. But Premier Minns (with Opposition support) had his anti-free speech laws passed by then any way. So the NSW Legislative Council then set up an inquiry to look into this matter. I was selected to be part of that inquiry and we had our first hearing yesterday with the three top cops in NSW. It came out that not only was the caravan incident a 'criminal con job' but that there were 13 other anti-semitic attacks in the weeks prior that were also part of the same 'criminal con job.' This is welcome relief. Over the summer, Sydneysiders and especially our Jewish community were acutely alarmed by what appeared to be the beginning of a medieval pogrom ... but we now know the 'facts' that lead us to that conclusion were baseless. What is not so welcome is the cops knew well in advance of those anti-free speech laws passing that the hysteria that gave birth to those laws was BS. Commissioner Karen Webb is the top cop in NSW. Yesterday I asked Webb at the inquiry: JR: 'The elephant in the room is that this parliament has recently passed laws which restrict freedom of the people of NSW to speak and think freely. Do you think you should have said to the Premier, 'hey before you go ahead with these anti free speech laws because of this current hysteria that we're in, it may not be what it appears to be.' Did you have any type of discussion with the Premier about the recent curbs on free speech in this state?' WEBB: 'I leave the politics to the politicians. We provide comment when we're asked to but we don't provide comment without being asked.' JR: 'Well I would say it was a dereliction of duty. Politicians and the press and prone to hysterias but you were the adults in the room. You are not an island. While you are apolitical in your senior role you knew laws were being rushed to curb free speech. The Premier was saying almost every second day, 'We need new laws to curb free speech. By the time the Premier was saying this, it sounds like you and your team were very well aware that the caravan incident was a manipulation of the criminal justice system. Why didn't you tell the Premier, 'hey look we should not rush into restricting speech because it is a murky situation and it's not what it appears to be?' WEBB: 'Well I reject that. If we are asked, we will provide comment when asked.' ME: 'Well Mr Chair, I would like it recorded in Hansard that the NSW Police sat back and did nothing while these bad laws were being passed.'

John Ruddick MLC - Libertarian

16,405 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

The supreme court has gone against the wishes of Kenyans who enacted a constitution that they were convinced was not going to introduce homosexuality, LGBTQ+ into our laws - Charles Kanjama #WADR James Smart

The supreme court has gone against the wishes of Kenyans who enacted a constitution that they were convinced was not going to introduce homosexuality, LGBTQ+ into our laws - Charles Kanjama #WADR James Smart

NTV Kenya

17,911 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

The wokerati want you to believe that the British were most at fault for slavery. In actual fact, all empires had slaves, but it was the British who put a stop to it. And who gave the seminal judgement that was the first step to abolition? It was William Murray, 1st Earl of Mansfield. Find out more by subscribing today:

The wokerati want you to believe that the British were most at fault for slavery. In actual fact, all empires had slaves, but it was the British who put a stop to it. And who gave the seminal judgement that was the first step to abolition? It was William Murray, 1st Earl of Mansfield. Find out more by subscribing today:

Jacob Rees-Mogg

103,264 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

RFK Jr: "It used to be that everybody got measles. And the measles gave you lifetime protection against measles infection. The vaccine doesn't do that ... it used to be that very young kids were protected by breast milk. Women who get vaccinated do not provide that level of immunity."

RFK Jr: "It used to be that everybody got measles. And the measles gave you lifetime protection against measles infection. The vaccine doesn't do that ... it used to be that very young kids were protected by breast milk. Women who get vaccinated do not provide that level of immunity."

Aaron Rupar

4,980,717 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Overseas Pakistanis are the next target. Lawyer network has been set up to provide protection to Overseas Pakistanis that are victims of the fascist regime

Overseas Pakistanis are the next target. Lawyer network has been set up to provide protection to Overseas Pakistanis that are victims of the fascist regime

Shayan Ali

137,985 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

.Liz Cheney on Republicans who accuse her of abandoning her conservative values by endorsing Allred and Harris: “The most conservative value of all is being faithful to the Constitution and doing your duty to uphold the Constitution. And that has to come above party.

.Liz Cheney on Republicans who accuse her of abandoning her conservative values by endorsing Allred and Harris: “The most conservative value of all is being faithful to the Constitution and doing your duty to uphold the Constitution. And that has to come above party.

Republican Accountability

526,364 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Chris Christie on Donald Trump: "He said that it was ok to suspend the Constitution if you think the election was stolen from you...Anybody, in my opinion, who says that it's okay to suspend the Constitution is disqualified from being President of the United States."

Chris Christie on Donald Trump: "He said that it was ok to suspend the Constitution if you think the election was stolen from you...Anybody, in my opinion, who says that it's okay to suspend the Constitution is disqualified from being President of the United States."

Republican Accountability

701,325 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce

“On the day of swearing in of Obasanjo we didn’t have a copy of the constitution. I didn’t know who was printing it, and my ministry was supposed to pay for the printing. Obasanjo was sworn in on a constitution that has not been read by anybody. Abdulsalami Gave Us 1999 Constitution Overnight – No Debate, No Draft.”

“On the day of swearing in of Obasanjo we didn’t have a copy of the constitution. I didn’t know who was printing it, and my ministry was supposed to pay for the printing. Obasanjo was sworn in on a constitution that has not been read by anybody. Abdulsalami Gave Us 1999 Constitution Overnight – No Debate, No Draft.”

Ozor Ndi Ozor

59,987 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Raskin: "Someone should've told Donald Trump that the president's job under Article 2 of the Constitution is to take care that the laws are faithfully executed, not that the vice president is executed ... JD Vance, do you understand why there was a sudden job opening?"

Raskin: "Someone should've told Donald Trump that the president's job under Article 2 of the Constitution is to take care that the laws are faithfully executed, not that the vice president is executed ... JD Vance, do you understand why there was a sudden job opening?"

Aaron Rupar

89,537 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

I need people to know that, under Principle 26 of the same Constitution that all of you have read,these are things that are already in your Constitution. But for you, Karuhanga, and your friends, you think that the Constitution is not something people should read. But when I entered Cabinet, the first thing I was given…

I need people to know that, under Principle 26 of the same Constitution that all of you have read,these are things that are already in your Constitution. But for you, Karuhanga, and your friends, you think that the Constitution is not something people should read. But when I entered Cabinet, the first thing I was given…

Barugahara Balaam Ateenyi.

106,154 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Why is Trump able to begin the elimination of the Department of Education by Executive Order? Because at the heart of this military operation is the restoration of The Constitution. The 10th Amendment is all that people need to know: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people” Was the Federal Government granted the power to regulate Education in the original Constitution? The answer is No. Therefore, the Department, like most of them is by definition, Unconstitutional. It’s a state issue. Period. End of story. This clip from Fox is interesting, because it’s highlighting how Democrats in The House “stopped Reagan” from eliminating the DOE. That’s an important narrative to show the normies how the Dems have perpetrated waste and fraud. But I would argue it was that bullet to Reagan’s neck that stopped this and many other plans he had to move back towards the Constitution. This time is different. This time Trump has the backing of a Military Operation that’s being used to eliminate fraud, sedition, and treason and restore our rightful Constitution.

Why is Trump able to begin the elimination of the Department of Education by Executive Order? Because at the heart of this military operation is the restoration of The Constitution. The 10th Amendment is all that people need to know: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people” Was the Federal Government granted the power to regulate Education in the original Constitution? The answer is No. Therefore, the Department, like most of them is by definition, Unconstitutional. It’s a state issue. Period. End of story. This clip from Fox is interesting, because it’s highlighting how Democrats in The House “stopped Reagan” from eliminating the DOE. That’s an important narrative to show the normies how the Dems have perpetrated waste and fraud. But I would argue it was that bullet to Reagan’s neck that stopped this and many other plans he had to move back towards the Constitution. This time is different. This time Trump has the backing of a Military Operation that’s being used to eliminate fraud, sedition, and treason and restore our rightful Constitution.

NewsTreason Channel 17

28,243 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Haseeb says the real protection against a future administration isn't a law, it's adoption "For those who were following along, Clarity wasn't too much of a surprise that it didn't make it through. Prediction markets were putting it at fifteen, twenty percent max by the time we were getting to the end zone." "It was already kind of assumed by most people in the industry that we weren't going to get a lot this year, that it was really going to be primarily around rulemaking from the agencies that was going to get us most of the things we wanted. Even within Clarity, if Clarity had passed, there was a bunch of stuff in there about the SEC and the CFTC needing to do a bunch of work to decide how all this stuff is going to get regulated. So Clarity was already putting a bunch of the onus on the agencies to figure out the gory details." "A bill would have been nice. It wasn't really that necessary. The main thing that's going to be a bulwark against a future administration is not a law. We've seen with this administration and others that the laws are flexible. If you're the executive, you can find all sorts of ways to get your agencies to go do havoc, despite what the laws might say on paper." "The real bulwark is ultimately adoption. If you just get people using this stuff, if you actually solve problems, that is going to be the thing that makes it politically unpopular to go and mess with applications that are just disseminating through the economy. So that's the mandate for the next few years, not trying to do some kind of regulatory game."

Haseeb says the real protection against a future administration isn't a law, it's adoption "For those who were following along, Clarity wasn't too much of a surprise that it didn't make it through. Prediction markets were putting it at fifteen, twenty percent max by the time we were getting to the end zone." "It was already kind of assumed by most people in the industry that we weren't going to get a lot this year, that it was really going to be primarily around rulemaking from the agencies that was going to get us most of the things we wanted. Even within Clarity, if Clarity had passed, there was a bunch of stuff in there about the SEC and the CFTC needing to do a bunch of work to decide how all this stuff is going to get regulated. So Clarity was already putting a bunch of the onus on the agencies to figure out the gory details." "A bill would have been nice. It wasn't really that necessary. The main thing that's going to be a bulwark against a future administration is not a law. We've seen with this administration and others that the laws are flexible. If you're the executive, you can find all sorts of ways to get your agencies to go do havoc, despite what the laws might say on paper." "The real bulwark is ultimately adoption. If you just get people using this stuff, if you actually solve problems, that is going to be the thing that makes it politically unpopular to go and mess with applications that are just disseminating through the economy. So that's the mandate for the next few years, not trying to do some kind of regulatory game."

The Wolf Of All Streets

30,274 görüntüleme • 10 gün önce

#WATCH | Delhi: BJP MP Deepak Prakash says, "Those who today swear by the Constitution, carry the book of the Constitution and do politics in the name of the Constitution, the very same Congress people, the very same government was the one that murdered the Constitution in 1975. At that time, citizens were deprived of their rights, democratic institutions were murdered, and during that period, many political parties and people fought against the Emergency to save the Constitution. The Congress government imprisoned and tortured lakhs of people inside jails, therefore Congress should not talk about democracy or the Constitution... Whenever Congress comes to power, it murders democracy and eliminates constitutional institutions."

#WATCH | Delhi: BJP MP Deepak Prakash says, "Those who today swear by the Constitution, carry the book of the Constitution and do politics in the name of the Constitution, the very same Congress people, the very same government was the one that murdered the Constitution in 1975. At that time, citizens were deprived of their rights, democratic institutions were murdered, and during that period, many political parties and people fought against the Emergency to save the Constitution. The Congress government imprisoned and tortured lakhs of people inside jails, therefore Congress should not talk about democracy or the Constitution... Whenever Congress comes to power, it murders democracy and eliminates constitutional institutions."

ANI

32,994 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce