Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

It is that same GREED, that lack of CONTENTMENT that is worrying our politicians that is worrying the likes of SEYILAW. If not, why would a very talented young man like Seyi put himself in this kind of embarrassing situation? Why ridicule yourself like this? At Delloite, Tinubu’s monthly...

SamuelOmogor's profile picture

Samuel Omogor

6,984 subscribers

13,558 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

How Jeffrey Epstein rose from maths nerd, to a financial fixer for elites, to the boss of blackmail: ‘If you look at Epstein’s operation, what it looks like to me is that it’s a criminal operation on a number of different levels. Epstein is an interesting case because where does he come from? Well, he doesn’t come from a wealthy family. He doesn’t come from an influential family. He was a Long Island kid who was good at mathematics…he was a kind of smart, nerdy kid who made friends by doing their math homework. You’re not popular because you’re a jock. You’re not popular necessarily because you’re that good-looking or you dance well. You’re popular because you can do other people’s math homework and get them to pass. His whole career is ingratiating himself to wealthy, powerful people. What did he do as a financial advisor? Look at it. Just stand back and look at what he did. And what he did was that he helped them dodge taxes. He also helped them hide money. He could help people discover money that had been hidden abroad. He could help them hide money. If you do one, you can do the other. And that’s how he moved as a kind of fixer and arranger into the realm of the rich and powerful. And in that process, either he or other people who were working with him found out that these people can be compromised in a number of ways. And so then you start installing cameras in your residences, in the bedrooms and the bathrooms. There’s only one reason you do that. It’s fairly simple. The only reason why you collect all of this video information on your rich and powerful friends is to potentially use it as leverage against them. You don’t have to actually use it. You simply have to make them aware that you have it and could use it.’ -Prof. Richard Spence on the latest episode of Going Underground FULL INTERVIEW:
3:19

How Jeffrey Epstein rose from maths nerd, to a financial fixer for elites, to the boss of blackmail: ‘If you look at Epstein’s operation, what it looks like to me is that it’s a criminal operation on a number of different levels. Epstein is an interesting case because where does he come from? Well, he doesn’t come from a wealthy family. He doesn’t come from an influential family. He was a Long Island kid who was good at mathematics…he was a kind of smart, nerdy kid who made friends by doing their math homework. You’re not popular because you’re a jock. You’re not popular necessarily because you’re that good-looking or you dance well. You’re popular because you can do other people’s math homework and get them to pass. His whole career is ingratiating himself to wealthy, powerful people. What did he do as a financial advisor? Look at it. Just stand back and look at what he did. And what he did was that he helped them dodge taxes. He also helped them hide money. He could help people discover money that had been hidden abroad. He could help them hide money. If you do one, you can do the other. And that’s how he moved as a kind of fixer and arranger into the realm of the rich and powerful. And in that process, either he or other people who were working with him found out that these people can be compromised in a number of ways. And so then you start installing cameras in your residences, in the bedrooms and the bathrooms. There’s only one reason you do that. It’s fairly simple. The only reason why you collect all of this video information on your rich and powerful friends is to potentially use it as leverage against them. You don’t have to actually use it. You simply have to make them aware that you have it and could use it.’ -Prof. Richard Spence on the latest episode of Going Underground FULL INTERVIEW:

Going Underground

68,766 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

“We got a message from the Iranian side that one of the ships, which presumably was closest to our borders at that point of time, wanted to come into our port. On the 1st March, we said you can come in and it took them a few days to sail in and then they docked in Kochi. There were a lot of young cadets and they disembarked. So for us, when this ship wanted to come in and that too in difficulties, I think it was the humane thing to do. We were guided by that principle. In a sense of the other ships, one obviously had a similar situation in Sri Lanka and they took the decision that they did, and one unfortunately didn’t make it.” * ⁠EAM Dr. S. Jaishankar made it clear that there were two Iranian vessels. One docked safely in Kochi, while the other moved towards Sri Lanka. The vessel that remained under India’s watch stayed completely safe and secure.
1:59

“We got a message from the Iranian side that one of the ships, which presumably was closest to our borders at that point of time, wanted to come into our port. On the 1st March, we said you can come in and it took them a few days to sail in and then they docked in Kochi. There were a lot of young cadets and they disembarked. So for us, when this ship wanted to come in and that too in difficulties, I think it was the humane thing to do. We were guided by that principle. In a sense of the other ships, one obviously had a similar situation in Sri Lanka and they took the decision that they did, and one unfortunately didn’t make it.” * ⁠EAM Dr. S. Jaishankar made it clear that there were two Iranian vessels. One docked safely in Kochi, while the other moved towards Sri Lanka. The vessel that remained under India’s watch stayed completely safe and secure.

BJP

40,930 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

NOW..........Who was it that HE interviewed out on the scene again? Who was it that he was Searching with today and Interviewed? Let's ask one of the one's SEEN in this video on his take? Jamie My point is.......NOT Every BIG Name, and YES I FOLLOW HIM and Like his content, and even put out a PROMOTION OF HIM last night, is out DOING what they tell you they are!!! They have a TEAM to put together their content!!! (The Skip in th middle of video is of his own personal ad for a Product)
4:37

NOW..........Who was it that HE interviewed out on the scene again? Who was it that he was Searching with today and Interviewed? Let's ask one of the one's SEEN in this video on his take? Jamie My point is.......NOT Every BIG Name, and YES I FOLLOW HIM and Like his content, and even put out a PROMOTION OF HIM last night, is out DOING what they tell you they are!!! They have a TEAM to put together their content!!! (The Skip in th middle of video is of his own personal ad for a Product)

Capt KEVman!!!

15,934 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

A 15 year old boy was hired to shovel part of a driveway for a local business. He spent hours doing it with a shovel. When it was time to pay up, the worker just offered him a plate of food instead of the $100 that they originally agreed upon. It wasn’t until the video was posted on social media and the owner received massive backlash from the community that he spoke out and claimed it was an employee that did it and offered to pay the boy. If this is true, should the person who did it be fired, or is he just saving face at this point?
0:46

A 15 year old boy was hired to shovel part of a driveway for a local business. He spent hours doing it with a shovel. When it was time to pay up, the worker just offered him a plate of food instead of the $100 that they originally agreed upon. It wasn’t until the video was posted on social media and the owner received massive backlash from the community that he spoke out and claimed it was an employee that did it and offered to pay the boy. If this is true, should the person who did it be fired, or is he just saving face at this point?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

10,948,277 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

This is what a $40,000 heist looks like in broad daylight. ​Scammers are tricking victims into withdrawing their life savings to "protect" it from fraud. They direct them to these machines, claiming they are depositing money into a safety account. ​The reality: He is buying Bitcoin for a stranger. The moment that cash hits the machine, the money is gone forever. ​This was one of the top financial threats last year for a reason. Educate your parents and grandparents before they pick up that phone call.
2:20

This is what a $40,000 heist looks like in broad daylight. ​Scammers are tricking victims into withdrawing their life savings to "protect" it from fraud. They direct them to these machines, claiming they are depositing money into a safety account. ​The reality: He is buying Bitcoin for a stranger. The moment that cash hits the machine, the money is gone forever. ​This was one of the top financial threats last year for a reason. Educate your parents and grandparents before they pick up that phone call.

Desiree

231,733 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Regarding Neil Ferguson “And so my conclusion from that is not that he was stupid or that he was doing bad science. He wasn't doing bad science. He was doing exactly what he needed to do and he was paid to do it and he did it knowingly and intentionally. So I think it's a mistake to go too deep into showing how these papers are scientifically wrong and he didn't consider this and he didn't consider that and the model is this and the model is that. From the beginning, the entire thing is just a piece of propaganda. So his job is to be a propagandist. And so anything that he puts out cannot be analyzed or considered as a scientific production. It is not a production of anything that has to do with science. It is a production of propaganda and public relations.” Debbie Lerman Episode 445 NEVER FORGET WHAT THEY DID TO US
0:52

Regarding Neil Ferguson “And so my conclusion from that is not that he was stupid or that he was doing bad science. He wasn't doing bad science. He was doing exactly what he needed to do and he was paid to do it and he did it knowingly and intentionally. So I think it's a mistake to go too deep into showing how these papers are scientifically wrong and he didn't consider this and he didn't consider that and the model is this and the model is that. From the beginning, the entire thing is just a piece of propaganda. So his job is to be a propagandist. And so anything that he puts out cannot be analyzed or considered as a scientific production. It is not a production of anything that has to do with science. It is a production of propaganda and public relations.” Debbie Lerman Episode 445 NEVER FORGET WHAT THEY DID TO US

Doc Malik

11,609 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Lil Wayne tells the story of how he ended up signing both Drake & Nicki Minaj, saying he knew right away that they had something special: "When I heard him, it was all rap. Then, one of those hooks came in and I was like, 'Who's on the hook?' And they was like, 'That's him.' And I was like, 'That's the guy? That's him singing? Why he ain't do more of this?'" "It was instant. Like, come on, man. And, at that time, there was no one doing that sh*t." (Via Friends Keep Secrets)
1:39

Lil Wayne tells the story of how he ended up signing both Drake & Nicki Minaj, saying he knew right away that they had something special: "When I heard him, it was all rap. Then, one of those hooks came in and I was like, 'Who's on the hook?' And they was like, 'That's him.' And I was like, 'That's the guy? That's him singing? Why he ain't do more of this?'" "It was instant. Like, come on, man. And, at that time, there was no one doing that sh*t." (Via Friends Keep Secrets)

HotNewHipHop

117,831 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Sigourney Weaver on what she loved about her character in "Alien" (1979): "Interviewer: Ripley is now seen as this feminist action hero. Did you think about that or the politics of your representation at the time? Weaver: What I loved about Ripley in the first one, thanks to [producers] Walter [Hill] and David [Giler], and in the second one, thanks to Jim Cameron, was that I didn't really feel like a badass heroine ever. What I felt was like you or me in this situation, [wondering] what the f**k you were going to do. It was an everyman character that could be any of us. That was very unusual at the time that a character, a woman character, went through a whole film, doing difficult things by herself, a lot of the time, and didn't have some scene where she bursts into tears and cries in a corner for a while. Because I'm telling you, in those days, they really wanted women to be sympathetic. And that meant that either you had to be in a little skirt and run around, or you had to have these scenes where you cried and broke down because they thought if you didn't that you would seem unfeminine. So I was so lucky that I avoided all of that because I was doing science fiction, because I was in the future. And I was just playing this character who was put in this situation. And it was written like a man. It wasn't written like the way they wrote women in those days." ("At 28, Sigourney Weaver Was Thrust Into An Alien World", Zosha Millman, Bustle, 2021) P.S: On this day, 47 years ago, "Alien" (1979) had its limited release in the USA.
1:44

Sigourney Weaver on what she loved about her character in "Alien" (1979): "Interviewer: Ripley is now seen as this feminist action hero. Did you think about that or the politics of your representation at the time? Weaver: What I loved about Ripley in the first one, thanks to [producers] Walter [Hill] and David [Giler], and in the second one, thanks to Jim Cameron, was that I didn't really feel like a badass heroine ever. What I felt was like you or me in this situation, [wondering] what the f**k you were going to do. It was an everyman character that could be any of us. That was very unusual at the time that a character, a woman character, went through a whole film, doing difficult things by herself, a lot of the time, and didn't have some scene where she bursts into tears and cries in a corner for a while. Because I'm telling you, in those days, they really wanted women to be sympathetic. And that meant that either you had to be in a little skirt and run around, or you had to have these scenes where you cried and broke down because they thought if you didn't that you would seem unfeminine. So I was so lucky that I avoided all of that because I was doing science fiction, because I was in the future. And I was just playing this character who was put in this situation. And it was written like a man. It wasn't written like the way they wrote women in those days." ("At 28, Sigourney Weaver Was Thrust Into An Alien World", Zosha Millman, Bustle, 2021) P.S: On this day, 47 years ago, "Alien" (1979) had its limited release in the USA.

DepressedBergman

20,477 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

RFK Jr: "In 1989... all these autoimmune diseases suddenly appeared." "The CDC thought it may be the vaccine schedule... so they looked at one vaccine, which is the hepatitis B vaccine. They looked at kids who had gotten it in the first 30 days, and then they looked at... kids who got it later or didn't get it at all, and they compared these two groups." "Among the kids who got it in the first 30 days, there was... a relative risk of 11.35 [for a subsequent autism diagnosis]. If you have a relative risk of two, causation is presumed... The link between smoking a pack of cigarettes a day for 20 years and getting lung cancer is a relative risk of 10. This was 11.35." "So they knew what it was, and then they had an emergency meeting that they called... and they had all of the big panjandrums from the vaccine industry, from the pharmaceutical industry... from NIH, CDC, FDA, the WHO, the European Medicines Agency, and they all got together for two days to talk about this study." "Somebody made a transcript of it, and that transcript was given to me... The second day they spent talking about how to hide it from the American public, and I published these things... I took a lot of heat at that point."
3:25

RFK Jr: "In 1989... all these autoimmune diseases suddenly appeared." "The CDC thought it may be the vaccine schedule... so they looked at one vaccine, which is the hepatitis B vaccine. They looked at kids who had gotten it in the first 30 days, and then they looked at... kids who got it later or didn't get it at all, and they compared these two groups." "Among the kids who got it in the first 30 days, there was... a relative risk of 11.35 [for a subsequent autism diagnosis]. If you have a relative risk of two, causation is presumed... The link between smoking a pack of cigarettes a day for 20 years and getting lung cancer is a relative risk of 10. This was 11.35." "So they knew what it was, and then they had an emergency meeting that they called... and they had all of the big panjandrums from the vaccine industry, from the pharmaceutical industry... from NIH, CDC, FDA, the WHO, the European Medicines Agency, and they all got together for two days to talk about this study." "Somebody made a transcript of it, and that transcript was given to me... The second day they spent talking about how to hide it from the American public, and I published these things... I took a lot of heat at that point."

Wide Awake Media

755,907 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Why is the Midjourney team uniquely qualified to build medical hardware? Beff (e/acc), founder of Extropic: "David's a trained physicist. He worked at NASA. He was a founder of Leap Motion, which is completely slept on as one of the first major projects he worked on." "What I really like about that team is that a lot of the same team from Leap Motion followed David into Midjourney and now into this hardware exploration." "They were training neural nets before there was TensorFlow, before there was GPUs. They did it on CPUs, and they had some of the first neural network technology deployed in a consumer product." "So people are like, 'Why would a gen AI company pivot into medical devices?' It's really folks that came from the hardware world finding this unique blend between neural nets and hardware to achieve things people didn't think were possible." "If it's physically possible, I very much have faith that that team can pull it off."
2:18

Why is the Midjourney team uniquely qualified to build medical hardware? Beff (e/acc), founder of Extropic: "David's a trained physicist. He worked at NASA. He was a founder of Leap Motion, which is completely slept on as one of the first major projects he worked on." "What I really like about that team is that a lot of the same team from Leap Motion followed David into Midjourney and now into this hardware exploration." "They were training neural nets before there was TensorFlow, before there was GPUs. They did it on CPUs, and they had some of the first neural network technology deployed in a consumer product." "So people are like, 'Why would a gen AI company pivot into medical devices?' It's really folks that came from the hardware world finding this unique blend between neural nets and hardware to achieve things people didn't think were possible." "If it's physically possible, I very much have faith that that team can pull it off."

MTS

62,195 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Draymond Green says he created a $10,000 rule to teach himself how to budget during his NBA rookie year “I kind of went by this motto that entire year. Once I got to the point where I had $10,000 in my bank account, I said my account can never get under $10,000. Then once I got to $20,000, it can't get under $20,000. I did it in increments of $10,000” “I think every check I got at that point was like $7,600 every two weeks. By the time I paid my rent, which my rookie year was $3,000 and did all of those things, sometimes it would dip a little bit under, and that meant I couldn't spend a dollar the rest of the month” “The issue with that was, if I had $29,000, so if my one check took me to $29,000, I would spend it back down to $20,000. I just couldn't get under $20,000” “I did that because I wanted to understand how to pay bills. I wanted to understand, if I wanted to send my mom some money, how to do all of these things, know where every dollar is going, and teach myself the value of money and how money would truly work” “I made mistakes in doing that, obviously, with my theory and spending $9,000 some months, but it was great for me and gave me a better understanding” “When you come from where we come from, you don't just learn financially. You don't gain financial literacy in a year. Even after that year, I wasn't the most financially literate person, but I had a better understanding, and that was the beginning of me starting to build”
1:36

Draymond Green says he created a $10,000 rule to teach himself how to budget during his NBA rookie year “I kind of went by this motto that entire year. Once I got to the point where I had $10,000 in my bank account, I said my account can never get under $10,000. Then once I got to $20,000, it can't get under $20,000. I did it in increments of $10,000” “I think every check I got at that point was like $7,600 every two weeks. By the time I paid my rent, which my rookie year was $3,000 and did all of those things, sometimes it would dip a little bit under, and that meant I couldn't spend a dollar the rest of the month” “The issue with that was, if I had $29,000, so if my one check took me to $29,000, I would spend it back down to $20,000. I just couldn't get under $20,000” “I did that because I wanted to understand how to pay bills. I wanted to understand, if I wanted to send my mom some money, how to do all of these things, know where every dollar is going, and teach myself the value of money and how money would truly work” “I made mistakes in doing that, obviously, with my theory and spending $9,000 some months, but it was great for me and gave me a better understanding” “When you come from where we come from, you don't just learn financially. You don't gain financial literacy in a year. Even after that year, I wasn't the most financially literate person, but I had a better understanding, and that was the beginning of me starting to build”

dank

244,814 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

One of Quentin Tarantino’s biggest influences on Reservoir Dogs was actually John Carpenter’s The Thing. Not in terms of plot, but in the feeling of claustrophobia and paranoia created by trapping a group of men together who cannot trust one another. Tarantino explains: “The film that actually is a big influence on the film is John Carpenter’s remake of The Thing. It’s very similar, alright. I didn’t take anything from it, but I wanted to capture that same feeling of The Thing. In The Thing, you have all these guys trapped in this room, alright, and no one can trust anybody else. They can’t go anywhere else, and they just have to deal with each other, which is exactly the exact same situation in Reservoir Dogs. What I wanted to achieve is what I felt that film achieved when I first saw it at the theaters, the tension of those guys in that situation was so great, and there was no release of it because it was so claustrophobic, that the only place that tension could go was right into the audience. That’s how I felt when I was looking at The Thing, and that’s what I wanted to achieve in my movie.”
4:29

One of Quentin Tarantino’s biggest influences on Reservoir Dogs was actually John Carpenter’s The Thing. Not in terms of plot, but in the feeling of claustrophobia and paranoia created by trapping a group of men together who cannot trust one another. Tarantino explains: “The film that actually is a big influence on the film is John Carpenter’s remake of The Thing. It’s very similar, alright. I didn’t take anything from it, but I wanted to capture that same feeling of The Thing. In The Thing, you have all these guys trapped in this room, alright, and no one can trust anybody else. They can’t go anywhere else, and they just have to deal with each other, which is exactly the exact same situation in Reservoir Dogs. What I wanted to achieve is what I felt that film achieved when I first saw it at the theaters, the tension of those guys in that situation was so great, and there was no release of it because it was so claustrophobic, that the only place that tension could go was right into the audience. That’s how I felt when I was looking at The Thing, and that’s what I wanted to achieve in my movie.”

Gangster Cinema Central

23,960 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Chamath: Anthropic's Mythos Warning Is Theater @jason: “Chamath, is it the Boy who Cried Wolf, or is this the real deal now?” Chamath Palihapitiya: “I think it's mostly theater. In February of 2019 when Dario was still at OpenAI, they did the same thing with GPT-2. That was a 1.5 billion parameter model, which sounds like a total fart in the wind in 2026. But at that time, this model was supposed to be the end of days. And at the end of it, it was a huge nothingburger. If you actually think that Mythos is capable of doing what it says it can do, two things are true. One is, a very sophisticated hacker can probably do those things right now with Opus. And two, if these exploits are this easy to find, whether you use Opus or whether you use Mythos, the reality is you'd have to shut down the internet for about five years to patch them all. So when you see a large multi-trillion dollar GSIB bank, it's a bit of theater. Why? What do you think they can actually accomplish in two months? Do you actually think that if there's these vulnerabilities, it's all going to get fixed? Let's give them six months, let's give them nine months. So I do think that Sacks is right, that they have figured out a very clever go-to-market muscle here that activates hyper attention and hyper usage, and so I give them tremendous credit. But we've seen it before, we saw it when these folks were the principal architects at OpenAI, and we're now seeing the same playbook here. The reality is that capitalism moves forward, the funding needs moves forward, and the need for these guys to build adoption moves forward. And that's going to supersede what this is.”
1:43

Chamath: Anthropic's Mythos Warning Is Theater @jason: “Chamath, is it the Boy who Cried Wolf, or is this the real deal now?” Chamath Palihapitiya: “I think it's mostly theater. In February of 2019 when Dario was still at OpenAI, they did the same thing with GPT-2. That was a 1.5 billion parameter model, which sounds like a total fart in the wind in 2026. But at that time, this model was supposed to be the end of days. And at the end of it, it was a huge nothingburger. If you actually think that Mythos is capable of doing what it says it can do, two things are true. One is, a very sophisticated hacker can probably do those things right now with Opus. And two, if these exploits are this easy to find, whether you use Opus or whether you use Mythos, the reality is you'd have to shut down the internet for about five years to patch them all. So when you see a large multi-trillion dollar GSIB bank, it's a bit of theater. Why? What do you think they can actually accomplish in two months? Do you actually think that if there's these vulnerabilities, it's all going to get fixed? Let's give them six months, let's give them nine months. So I do think that Sacks is right, that they have figured out a very clever go-to-market muscle here that activates hyper attention and hyper usage, and so I give them tremendous credit. But we've seen it before, we saw it when these folks were the principal architects at OpenAI, and we're now seeing the same playbook here. The reality is that capitalism moves forward, the funding needs moves forward, and the need for these guys to build adoption moves forward. And that's going to supersede what this is.”

The All-In Podcast

220,049 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Imagine checking your bank account one morning and seeing $1.1 million sitting there that you know you didn’t earn. That’s exactly what happened to one man after a bank mistakenly deposited the money into his account. Instead of reporting the error, he started spending it and transferring chunks of it elsewhere. It didn’t take long for the bank to realize the mistake, and soon he was in court. The judge gave him a simple choice: return the money or spend one year in prison. Surprisingly, he chose prison. Here’s the question: If a bank accidentally dropped that kind of money into your account, what would you do? Mistakes happen in banking, but once you know the money isn’t yours, spending it can quickly turn a lucky moment into a legal nightmare. One year behind bars is a steep price for money that was never yours to begin with. 💰⚖️:
1:06

Imagine checking your bank account one morning and seeing $1.1 million sitting there that you know you didn’t earn. That’s exactly what happened to one man after a bank mistakenly deposited the money into his account. Instead of reporting the error, he started spending it and transferring chunks of it elsewhere. It didn’t take long for the bank to realize the mistake, and soon he was in court. The judge gave him a simple choice: return the money or spend one year in prison. Surprisingly, he chose prison. Here’s the question: If a bank accidentally dropped that kind of money into your account, what would you do? Mistakes happen in banking, but once you know the money isn’t yours, spending it can quickly turn a lucky moment into a legal nightmare. One year behind bars is a steep price for money that was never yours to begin with. 💰⚖️:

TheRealCherokeeOwl 🦉

33,887 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Caller: We're doing our taxes and last year we had $316,000 in capital losses. We were told that we could only deduct $3,000 a year on our taxes, but I did the math and that would take 115 years Dave Ramsey: So it sounds like the type of losses that you have is what's causing the write-off—the inability to write them off, because you don't have any income that is of similar sources to the losses. ​Caller: Right. Dave Ramsey: It sounds like you need short-term income on investments, not long-term capital gains on investments to offset this. What was this from? What's the loss from? Caller: from trading. From doing trades. ​Dave Ramsey: Jesus. What is your household income? Caller: For last year, it was only, $38,000. This year it's going up. My husband got a new job starting at $50,000 plus. Dave Ramsey: Where did you have $300,000 that you could lose? Caller: We had it in an inherited IRA. I was having problems with my pregnancy, so he started working from home trading because he was doing it and doing well. ​Dave Ramsey: Here's the problem. If we get too nitcy and nuanced and technical in order to get some benefit from this write-off, but it exposes him to the very beast that just about killed him the first time, I don't like that. So your husband being anywhere near a brokerage account sounds like suicide to me. I don't know in your household how you're going to create gains on investments to offset losses on investments to get the benefit of this that is substantial. I don't know how to do that. What I would do if I were in your shoes... but before I put your family at further risk playing with the same snakes that already bit you, I would just say, "Screw it, forget it, it's just gone."
4:22

Caller: We're doing our taxes and last year we had $316,000 in capital losses. We were told that we could only deduct $3,000 a year on our taxes, but I did the math and that would take 115 years Dave Ramsey: So it sounds like the type of losses that you have is what's causing the write-off—the inability to write them off, because you don't have any income that is of similar sources to the losses. ​Caller: Right. Dave Ramsey: It sounds like you need short-term income on investments, not long-term capital gains on investments to offset this. What was this from? What's the loss from? Caller: from trading. From doing trades. ​Dave Ramsey: Jesus. What is your household income? Caller: For last year, it was only, $38,000. This year it's going up. My husband got a new job starting at $50,000 plus. Dave Ramsey: Where did you have $300,000 that you could lose? Caller: We had it in an inherited IRA. I was having problems with my pregnancy, so he started working from home trading because he was doing it and doing well. ​Dave Ramsey: Here's the problem. If we get too nitcy and nuanced and technical in order to get some benefit from this write-off, but it exposes him to the very beast that just about killed him the first time, I don't like that. So your husband being anywhere near a brokerage account sounds like suicide to me. I don't know in your household how you're going to create gains on investments to offset losses on investments to get the benefit of this that is substantial. I don't know how to do that. What I would do if I were in your shoes... but before I put your family at further risk playing with the same snakes that already bit you, I would just say, "Screw it, forget it, it's just gone."

Traeyz ♠️

54,836 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

👽🔥 New Dylan - Biologics🔥👽 "There's things that I knew that these people were aware of, but even they would not say. One of those being biologics." ~DB "The agreement was that, if they died, that I run with it and just blow the whole thing up." ~DB Firsthand witnesses to the Legacy program, "would never come forward in a million years unless they were gonna die." ~DB "When I was still in government...I brought the people who worked on [the biological analysis of non-human bodies] to The Hill." ~Grusch ~ Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "Did you physically see photos? Did you physically see these documents?" Dylan Borland: "No, but because of how much was given to me in relay that the individuals that had relayed it, they were doing so because they were genuinely concerned for their life, because their careers were taken, their houses were broken into. I mean, computers taken, mailboxes gone through. And again, they knew what I was going through at this time. They had given me enough information, and the agreement was that, if they died, that I run with it and just blow the whole thing up." Corbell: "So he's got his firsthand experience of this tech, but then this is something George and I hear a lot. Which is, in the Legacy, when you're kind of put into the bad camp - you know, you're under scrutiny now - that there are these people that are threatening you, and you do feel afraid for your life. And we'll get to it, but there are some things that occurred to you as this gets kind of deeper and deeper with what's happening. "But just to be clear: So you're in a place where there's some sort of purgatory going on. Everybody has clearance, but they're in this sort of purgatory. You're in this sort of purgatory?" Borland: "A few of us, yep." Corbell: "And then, people directly involved in the Legacy program are afraid for their lives, so they're telling you so that at least somebody at their level can take that information if something bad happens to them?" Borland: "I think it was definitely that, but it was also, this is such an isolating, lonely experience, especially for young people to be exposed to the reality of this. If you already don't have the acknowledgement that it's a possibility, like if you're...I don't want to say closed minded. If you're an average Joe Blow going through life, and then all of a sudden this pops up on your radar, and you're seeing physical proof of it, you probably take a step back and go, 'whoa.' So you have that aspect, then these same people have that aspect of it, and they also have the aspect of their government destroying them." (In other words, people like us would be excited to see proof of what we all suspect. But someone new to the topic might freak out a bit.) George Knapp: "So they are going through the same thing you are." Borland "Exactly." Knapp: "Their clearances are in limbo, home break ins, threats..." Borland: "When I come into contact with these people, they had had to resign from their government position and take a contracting job for less money. They were, basically, blacklisted for six months. The only reason they ended up getting a job was because somebody on the Legacy program had hooked them up after six months. And they ended up where I was at, and they heard me talking all this stuff, and they're like, 'Oh, you ended up here too, buddy. So, uh, what the hell is going on here?' Knapp: "It's like the island of bad toys or something like that." Borland: "Yeah." Knapp: "You know, put them all in one basket." Borland: "After I saw what I saw, and I've experienced what I've experienced, I kind of...I think most of us have, taken the delve into all of this material (points toward a bookshelf full of what appear to be UFO books). And you're like, 'I know this is true, I know this is true, I know this is true. Who else is saying these true things? Who else is relaying information I know to be true, to try and make sense of your own life?' "Um, they were aware of what I was talking about. I don't know the capacity in which they were briefed in. There's things that I knew that these people were aware of, but even they would not say. Um, one of those being biologics." ~~~ (This is the best anecdote we have about government officials being briefed on bodies.) Joe Rogan: "When it comes to these...actual entities...do we have an understanding of how many of them we're talking about, and the variety of them?" Grusch: "There is a variety and we have a certain number of (laughs) different things... I talked to people who were familiar with the biological analysis of everything. So we have some idea, not a complete picture because it's like, you know, looking at it, it's like, well I don't even understand the physiology at all. It's like, what the heck? It's like, way different, right? So..." Rogan: "Is there a description of this physiology?" Grusch: "Yeah, no, I was in the room when uhhh... I gotta be careful, I don't wanna... I was in Washington, DC with a very number of senior people that work for members of Congress (Senate staffers seems like a safe bet ~Joe). Put it that way. When I was still in government. And I brought the people who worked on that stuff to The Hill. And this is why the members were so confident to put out the Schumer amendment and stuff. And, I was like, 'Please explain.' And they went into all those details and stuff. And I remember (laughs) some of the professional staff members were like, 'Whoa.' Like they were like, in G-Loc, right? Cause, I mean, and like, a total world bubble got burst right there for a lot of people." Source, with video... ~Back to Dylan~ Knapp: "You think there's a storehouse of that information that anybody would have put something away in case something bad happened to them? And do you know what happened to these people?" Borland: "You know the ones that I know still continue in the government. Um, I think they continue in classified-operations programs." Knapp: "They're not coming forward." Borland: "They would never come forward in a million years unless they were gonna die. And that's...it really sucks for me coming forward, because I only came forward because I sincerely believed they were going to die. Sucks."
3:47

👽🔥 New Dylan - Biologics🔥👽 "There's things that I knew that these people were aware of, but even they would not say. One of those being biologics." ~DB "The agreement was that, if they died, that I run with it and just blow the whole thing up." ~DB Firsthand witnesses to the Legacy program, "would never come forward in a million years unless they were gonna die." ~DB "When I was still in government...I brought the people who worked on [the biological analysis of non-human bodies] to The Hill." ~Grusch ~ Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "Did you physically see photos? Did you physically see these documents?" Dylan Borland: "No, but because of how much was given to me in relay that the individuals that had relayed it, they were doing so because they were genuinely concerned for their life, because their careers were taken, their houses were broken into. I mean, computers taken, mailboxes gone through. And again, they knew what I was going through at this time. They had given me enough information, and the agreement was that, if they died, that I run with it and just blow the whole thing up." Corbell: "So he's got his firsthand experience of this tech, but then this is something George and I hear a lot. Which is, in the Legacy, when you're kind of put into the bad camp - you know, you're under scrutiny now - that there are these people that are threatening you, and you do feel afraid for your life. And we'll get to it, but there are some things that occurred to you as this gets kind of deeper and deeper with what's happening. "But just to be clear: So you're in a place where there's some sort of purgatory going on. Everybody has clearance, but they're in this sort of purgatory. You're in this sort of purgatory?" Borland: "A few of us, yep." Corbell: "And then, people directly involved in the Legacy program are afraid for their lives, so they're telling you so that at least somebody at their level can take that information if something bad happens to them?" Borland: "I think it was definitely that, but it was also, this is such an isolating, lonely experience, especially for young people to be exposed to the reality of this. If you already don't have the acknowledgement that it's a possibility, like if you're...I don't want to say closed minded. If you're an average Joe Blow going through life, and then all of a sudden this pops up on your radar, and you're seeing physical proof of it, you probably take a step back and go, 'whoa.' So you have that aspect, then these same people have that aspect of it, and they also have the aspect of their government destroying them." (In other words, people like us would be excited to see proof of what we all suspect. But someone new to the topic might freak out a bit.) George Knapp: "So they are going through the same thing you are." Borland "Exactly." Knapp: "Their clearances are in limbo, home break ins, threats..." Borland: "When I come into contact with these people, they had had to resign from their government position and take a contracting job for less money. They were, basically, blacklisted for six months. The only reason they ended up getting a job was because somebody on the Legacy program had hooked them up after six months. And they ended up where I was at, and they heard me talking all this stuff, and they're like, 'Oh, you ended up here too, buddy. So, uh, what the hell is going on here?' Knapp: "It's like the island of bad toys or something like that." Borland: "Yeah." Knapp: "You know, put them all in one basket." Borland: "After I saw what I saw, and I've experienced what I've experienced, I kind of...I think most of us have, taken the delve into all of this material (points toward a bookshelf full of what appear to be UFO books). And you're like, 'I know this is true, I know this is true, I know this is true. Who else is saying these true things? Who else is relaying information I know to be true, to try and make sense of your own life?' "Um, they were aware of what I was talking about. I don't know the capacity in which they were briefed in. There's things that I knew that these people were aware of, but even they would not say. Um, one of those being biologics." ~~~ (This is the best anecdote we have about government officials being briefed on bodies.) Joe Rogan: "When it comes to these...actual entities...do we have an understanding of how many of them we're talking about, and the variety of them?" Grusch: "There is a variety and we have a certain number of (laughs) different things... I talked to people who were familiar with the biological analysis of everything. So we have some idea, not a complete picture because it's like, you know, looking at it, it's like, well I don't even understand the physiology at all. It's like, what the heck? It's like, way different, right? So..." Rogan: "Is there a description of this physiology?" Grusch: "Yeah, no, I was in the room when uhhh... I gotta be careful, I don't wanna... I was in Washington, DC with a very number of senior people that work for members of Congress (Senate staffers seems like a safe bet ~Joe). Put it that way. When I was still in government. And I brought the people who worked on that stuff to The Hill. And this is why the members were so confident to put out the Schumer amendment and stuff. And, I was like, 'Please explain.' And they went into all those details and stuff. And I remember (laughs) some of the professional staff members were like, 'Whoa.' Like they were like, in G-Loc, right? Cause, I mean, and like, a total world bubble got burst right there for a lot of people." Source, with video... ~Back to Dylan~ Knapp: "You think there's a storehouse of that information that anybody would have put something away in case something bad happened to them? And do you know what happened to these people?" Borland: "You know the ones that I know still continue in the government. Um, I think they continue in classified-operations programs." Knapp: "They're not coming forward." Borland: "They would never come forward in a million years unless they were gonna die. And that's...it really sucks for me coming forward, because I only came forward because I sincerely believed they were going to die. Sucks."

Joe Murgia

61,078 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Part 7 unequal fund sharing. I almost believe Peter on this one, the dramatic pause, the breath control, the sobbing, well packaged 😂 The account statement that was shared by Manipulator covers the period from 2013 to 2014. Part 6 video, same Peter stated clearly that Jude was building their Parkview mansion at the same time. If that's true, it means Jude was responsible for handling the construction of THREE multi-million dollar mansions in Ikoyi. So here's a simple question: If they were splitting equally three ways, which money is Jude using to build their mansion each valued well above $1m? Did Peter at any point ever send money to Jude to build a house for him or was it from their joint account? What he is deliberately missing out in the pity manipulative video is how they fund their projects and who handles it. Gaps in every story. The uneven split with Paul? This is how it ended in EFCC in the video below. No be only American artists dey go bankrupt keep that in mind. Wreck-less lifestyle spending will have you questioning if others who saved are doing scam.
4:02

Part 7 unequal fund sharing. I almost believe Peter on this one, the dramatic pause, the breath control, the sobbing, well packaged 😂 The account statement that was shared by Manipulator covers the period from 2013 to 2014. Part 6 video, same Peter stated clearly that Jude was building their Parkview mansion at the same time. If that's true, it means Jude was responsible for handling the construction of THREE multi-million dollar mansions in Ikoyi. So here's a simple question: If they were splitting equally three ways, which money is Jude using to build their mansion each valued well above $1m? Did Peter at any point ever send money to Jude to build a house for him or was it from their joint account? What he is deliberately missing out in the pity manipulative video is how they fund their projects and who handles it. Gaps in every story. The uneven split with Paul? This is how it ended in EFCC in the video below. No be only American artists dey go bankrupt keep that in mind. Wreck-less lifestyle spending will have you questioning if others who saved are doing scam.

Pericoma

127,006 görüntüleme • 16 gün önce

Zimbabweans is it not weird that these two journalists saw what we were careless to see especially after the 2030 ndendichopo ?why did they kept asking him the same question and remember this was at the beginning of Ed’s term in office.
1:10

Zimbabweans is it not weird that these two journalists saw what we were careless to see especially after the 2030 ndendichopo ?why did they kept asking him the same question and remember this was at the beginning of Ed’s term in office.

PATRIOT SON🇿🇼 🇬🇧

13,957 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

NBC’s Tom Llamas: “I wonder, Ryan, if [King Charles III] was sending a subtle message — a maybe not-so-subtle message — to our President in he said ‘America's words carry weight and meaning and they have since the independence the actions of this great nation matter even more.’” Ryan Nobles: “I don't see how you could not interpret it as such, Tom. And I have to say, being in the room and it may not have been picked up if you are watching on television, when he said those two lines, there was a hush, almost gasp you would describe from the Democratic side of the chamber in that moment. That clearly resonated with certain members of Congress in the room. And then when he drove that point home by referencing president Lincoln and the Gettysburg Address, saying the world may little know what we say but will never forget what we do, that was as powerful a moment as anything that he gave over the course of that roughly 25-minute speech. And there were multiple opportunities for him to use his subtle nature to drive home a point. Right before that section that you had brought up, Tom, he talked all about how the United Kingdom and the United States need to reinforce their alliance and that they will ‘continue to defend our shared values with partners in Europe and the Commonwealth across the world’ and that they ‘ignore the clarion calls to become ever more inward looking,’ which, of course, has been a degree of criticism for the Trump administration at different points. The other thing I think is very interesting thing to point out, which you may not realize if you were watching at home, I had the prepared remarks in front of me, that the king did not at any point stray even a syllable away from the remarks that he had prepared to deliver hear in this chamber. A very research-much different approach from Donald Trump or any other president. Bill Clinton was known to stray from his script from time to time to drive home a point. Even when he was interrupted by applause or laughter, he would go immediately back to where he was in his prepared remarks. Just kind of an indication of the type of public speaker he is and the type of public figure he is that he had a very specific plan in mind, a very specific message that he wanted to send, and he did not deviate from that goal even little bit over the course of this speech.”
2:29

NBC’s Tom Llamas: “I wonder, Ryan, if [King Charles III] was sending a subtle message — a maybe not-so-subtle message — to our President in he said ‘America's words carry weight and meaning and they have since the independence the actions of this great nation matter even more.’” Ryan Nobles: “I don't see how you could not interpret it as such, Tom. And I have to say, being in the room and it may not have been picked up if you are watching on television, when he said those two lines, there was a hush, almost gasp you would describe from the Democratic side of the chamber in that moment. That clearly resonated with certain members of Congress in the room. And then when he drove that point home by referencing president Lincoln and the Gettysburg Address, saying the world may little know what we say but will never forget what we do, that was as powerful a moment as anything that he gave over the course of that roughly 25-minute speech. And there were multiple opportunities for him to use his subtle nature to drive home a point. Right before that section that you had brought up, Tom, he talked all about how the United Kingdom and the United States need to reinforce their alliance and that they will ‘continue to defend our shared values with partners in Europe and the Commonwealth across the world’ and that they ‘ignore the clarion calls to become ever more inward looking,’ which, of course, has been a degree of criticism for the Trump administration at different points. The other thing I think is very interesting thing to point out, which you may not realize if you were watching at home, I had the prepared remarks in front of me, that the king did not at any point stray even a syllable away from the remarks that he had prepared to deliver hear in this chamber. A very research-much different approach from Donald Trump or any other president. Bill Clinton was known to stray from his script from time to time to drive home a point. Even when he was interrupted by applause or laughter, he would go immediately back to where he was in his prepared remarks. Just kind of an indication of the type of public speaker he is and the type of public figure he is that he had a very specific plan in mind, a very specific message that he wanted to send, and he did not deviate from that goal even little bit over the course of this speech.”

Curtis Houck

39,203 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

[WATCH] THE PRESIDENT WILL NOT RESIGN. When it comes to the President, there is always a distinctive role between him being the President of the party and the state. There are many factors that influence the state in terms of governance and stability. If the President is called upon by some to resign and he keeps quiet it can throw the state into a state of turmoil. I want to make it clear that the officials agreed with the President on his approach, he took us into confidence and explained the factors that led him to make that particular pronouncement. We believe that the President did the right thing in pronouncing in the best interest of South Africa that he will not be resigning. There was nothing in terms of the judgment that warranted the President to resign it was just mere calls made by individuals and political parties that wanted to throw our country into a state of turmoil, uncertainty and anxiety. So it was imperative that he focus on that. It was correct for him to tell the country that from where he is standing there is nothing in the judgement that states he has done any wrongdoing and what he is going to do with the options in front of him and he has made this public. The President will take the Section 89 Report on review based on the outcome of the judgment and the legal advice he has received. There are no daggers out for the President to resign just opportunistic elements. These elements do not know what they want, they want to impeach and want him to resign, they do know what they actually want. The veracity of the report has not been tested in any committee so they don’t have a basis for the President to resign.
6:07

[WATCH] THE PRESIDENT WILL NOT RESIGN. When it comes to the President, there is always a distinctive role between him being the President of the party and the state. There are many factors that influence the state in terms of governance and stability. If the President is called upon by some to resign and he keeps quiet it can throw the state into a state of turmoil. I want to make it clear that the officials agreed with the President on his approach, he took us into confidence and explained the factors that led him to make that particular pronouncement. We believe that the President did the right thing in pronouncing in the best interest of South Africa that he will not be resigning. There was nothing in terms of the judgment that warranted the President to resign it was just mere calls made by individuals and political parties that wanted to throw our country into a state of turmoil, uncertainty and anxiety. So it was imperative that he focus on that. It was correct for him to tell the country that from where he is standing there is nothing in the judgement that states he has done any wrongdoing and what he is going to do with the options in front of him and he has made this public. The President will take the Section 89 Report on review based on the outcome of the judgment and the legal advice he has received. There are no daggers out for the President to resign just opportunistic elements. These elements do not know what they want, they want to impeach and want him to resign, they do know what they actually want. The veracity of the report has not been tested in any committee so they don’t have a basis for the President to resign.

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

22,015 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce