Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

"It just doesn't compute. And I think when things like this don't compute, it means that there is going to be a very fast reconciliation at some point, which is the Omega Candle and a fast run to $1 million [bitcoin]." - Samson Mow, CEO of JAN3

THE Bitcoin Podcast

15,427 subscribers

37,704 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Finanzen

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

.Shaun Maguire says SpaceX's data center deal with Google may suggest there is something fundamentally different about the company's terrestrial compute. "I think a lot of people were surprised by the Anthropic and Google announcements. And I think a lot of people are getting the wrong takeaway there." "The way a lot of people are interpreting that is it's like, 'oh, we're just in this temporary compute shortage. And so anyone's willing to work with anyone, and they're willing to pay any price for compute.'" "I think that might be a reasonable way to look at the Anthropic announcement. I don't think that makes sense for looking at the Google announcement." "To me, I think an alternative hypothesis is that SpaceX's terrestrial compute is not actually a commodity. There's something that's better about it than other people's terrestrial compute."

.Shaun Maguire says SpaceX's data center deal with Google may suggest there is something fundamentally different about the company's terrestrial compute. "I think a lot of people were surprised by the Anthropic and Google announcements. And I think a lot of people are getting the wrong takeaway there." "The way a lot of people are interpreting that is it's like, 'oh, we're just in this temporary compute shortage. And so anyone's willing to work with anyone, and they're willing to pay any price for compute.'" "I think that might be a reasonable way to look at the Anthropic announcement. I don't think that makes sense for looking at the Google announcement." "To me, I think an alternative hypothesis is that SpaceX's terrestrial compute is not actually a commodity. There's something that's better about it than other people's terrestrial compute."

Jack Kuhr

44,972 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 JUST IN: Samson Mow says time is running out to buy Bitcoin at low prices "Once we get to $500k Bitcoin, the world is going to wake up and join the race. That's when Bitcoin goes to $1 million and beyond very quickly." (CoinDesk Media)

🚨 JUST IN: Samson Mow says time is running out to buy Bitcoin at low prices "Once we get to $500k Bitcoin, the world is going to wake up and join the race. That's when Bitcoin goes to $1 million and beyond very quickly." (CoinDesk Media)

Bitcoin Archive

173,202 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Today I had the pleasure of interviewing Samson Mow to discuss: 🔥What do we call a $1M candle? 🔥Where is Bitcoins Veblen Threshold? 🔥When will we see the Bitcoin Omega candle? 📺Check out my FULL interview with Samson Mow below.👇

Today I had the pleasure of interviewing Samson Mow to discuss: 🔥What do we call a $1M candle? 🔥Where is Bitcoins Veblen Threshold? 🔥When will we see the Bitcoin Omega candle? 📺Check out my FULL interview with Samson Mow below.👇

Luke Mikic🇦🇺 The 9-5 Escape Artist🇦🇺

29,616 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

What does the world look like after hyperbitcoinization? Samson Mow breaks down which assets Bitcoin will demonetize first. And why, as Bitcoin prints omega candle after omega candle, people will stop accepting fiat altogether.

What does the world look like after hyperbitcoinization? Samson Mow breaks down which assets Bitcoin will demonetize first. And why, as Bitcoin prints omega candle after omega candle, people will stop accepting fiat altogether.

Bitcoin News

23,977 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

SAMSON MOW: “it’s not gonna be a gradual slow increase to $1 million a #Bitcoin, but rather a very short and violent upheaval that sends us there in a matter of weeks to months.” 🚀

SAMSON MOW: “it’s not gonna be a gradual slow increase to $1 million a #Bitcoin, but rather a very short and violent upheaval that sends us there in a matter of weeks to months.” 🚀

Bitcoin Teddy

245,546 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

SAMSON MOW: “it’s not gonna be a gradual slow increase to $1 million a #Bitcoin, but rather a very short and violent upheaval that sends us there in a matter of weeks to months.” 🚀

SAMSON MOW: “it’s not gonna be a gradual slow increase to $1 million a #Bitcoin, but rather a very short and violent upheaval that sends us there in a matter of weeks to months.” 🚀

Simply Bitcoin

206,015 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Howard Marks: "AI will change the world, but this doesn't mean there won't be a bubble." This is why I invest exclusively in picks & shovels when it comes to AI. There'll likely be overbuilding, which means picks & shovels will make a lot of money: Compute and energy.

Howard Marks: "AI will change the world, but this doesn't mean there won't be a bubble." This is why I invest exclusively in picks & shovels when it comes to AI. There'll likely be overbuilding, which means picks & shovels will make a lot of money: Compute and energy.

Oguz Erkan

81,095 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Jacob talks about making deliberate choices with his shoots: ‘Another trick that I learned years ago is that I don't shoot very much, so nobody can cut my show the way I don't want them to cut it. There's no excess. "Is there a close up?" and I'm like, "No." And so, I do a lot of that, and it's very deliberate. I mean, the thing about the show when you talk about the money and the resources, the reason that it is stretched to a point, is that we shot, I think, 57 locations in 34 days? So to keep the scope of the show the way we wanted, we had to move fast, and we had to get things done. And so that means there's going to be some one-ers, there's going to be some things, and instead of you seeing that as a limitation, you have to view that as like, “This is a fun opportunity to do something interesting.” We shot that cottage in two days. We had two days to do it, and so it was like, “Okay, here we are doing it.” And we finished early. 🗣️ CSA Presents: Focal Point, May 31, 2026. ▶️ ✍🏼 transcription by Heated Rivalry News

Jacob talks about making deliberate choices with his shoots: ‘Another trick that I learned years ago is that I don't shoot very much, so nobody can cut my show the way I don't want them to cut it. There's no excess. "Is there a close up?" and I'm like, "No." And so, I do a lot of that, and it's very deliberate. I mean, the thing about the show when you talk about the money and the resources, the reason that it is stretched to a point, is that we shot, I think, 57 locations in 34 days? So to keep the scope of the show the way we wanted, we had to move fast, and we had to get things done. And so that means there's going to be some one-ers, there's going to be some things, and instead of you seeing that as a limitation, you have to view that as like, “This is a fun opportunity to do something interesting.” We shot that cottage in two days. We had two days to do it, and so it was like, “Okay, here we are doing it.” And we finished early. 🗣️ CSA Presents: Focal Point, May 31, 2026. ▶️ ✍🏼 transcription by Heated Rivalry News

Heated Rivalry News

33,607 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

"If they create the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, and if they launch Bitcoin Bonds... that is basically saying, ‘money is money and government is something separate.’ And it's as powerful and impactful as separation of church and state." - Samson Mow CEO of JAN3 on THE Bitcoin Podcast

"If they create the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, and if they launch Bitcoin Bonds... that is basically saying, ‘money is money and government is something separate.’ And it's as powerful and impactful as separation of church and state." - Samson Mow CEO of JAN3 on THE Bitcoin Podcast

Walker⚡️

45,823 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Chris Haynes on Giannis future with the Bucks and believes he could be moved at some point: "When the losses keep compiling, Giannis is going to have to keep fielding these questions. Thats why its getting to a point he is tired of hearing it. The Bucks have to make a decision. Do you waste a players talent when you know what that player desire is and what you promised him? I don't think this will go away anytime soon. I think he could be moved at some point. Which point? That i don't know. This team is not good. They have to make a miraculous turn around."

Chris Haynes on Giannis future with the Bucks and believes he could be moved at some point: "When the losses keep compiling, Giannis is going to have to keep fielding these questions. Thats why its getting to a point he is tired of hearing it. The Bucks have to make a decision. Do you waste a players talent when you know what that player desire is and what you promised him? I don't think this will go away anytime soon. I think he could be moved at some point. Which point? That i don't know. This team is not good. They have to make a miraculous turn around."

Heat Central

50,132 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

I'll let Noam Brown (OpenAI research) answer Yann's “told you so” again. There is nothing to add. There is no wall, there is no end in sight! "Now, we are in a world, like I said earlier, where the amount of compute that's going into pretraining for things large language models is very, very high. But the inference costs are very low. And there was a reasonable concern among various people that we were going to start seeing diminishing returns from AI progress because the costs and the amount of data that you need for pretraining would become so astronomical. And I think the really important takeaway from o1 is that that wall doesn't actually exist, that we can actually push this a lot further. Because, now, we can scale up inference compute. And there's so much room to scale up inference compute."

I'll let Noam Brown (OpenAI research) answer Yann's “told you so” again. There is nothing to add. There is no wall, there is no end in sight! "Now, we are in a world, like I said earlier, where the amount of compute that's going into pretraining for things large language models is very, very high. But the inference costs are very low. And there was a reasonable concern among various people that we were going to start seeing diminishing returns from AI progress because the costs and the amount of data that you need for pretraining would become so astronomical. And I think the really important takeaway from o1 is that that wall doesn't actually exist, that we can actually push this a lot further. Because, now, we can scale up inference compute. And there's so much room to scale up inference compute."

Chubby♨️

132,808 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

RL is a powerful mechanism for training company-specific models on their unique work and data. This is what we do at Applied Compute. A key challenge is how to make RL efficient, because we need runs to be fast (delivered in days), cheap (scalable unit economics), and predictable (not just fast, but reliably fast). Here are some takeaways: • Synchronous RL is wasteful with time and compute. • Asynchronous RL is more efficient but introduces staleness, which causes learning instabilities. • Modeling and simulations can help analytically solve for what configuration leads to optimal efficiency. This allows us to rapidly prototype training configurations, without burning expensive compute cycles on trial runs. Two of our co-founders, Rhythm Garg and Linden Li, discussed some of this research at AI Engineer recently, with a focus on the following subproblem: what is the highest throughput way to do RL given a maximum staleness and compute budget?

RL is a powerful mechanism for training company-specific models on their unique work and data. This is what we do at Applied Compute. A key challenge is how to make RL efficient, because we need runs to be fast (delivered in days), cheap (scalable unit economics), and predictable (not just fast, but reliably fast). Here are some takeaways: • Synchronous RL is wasteful with time and compute. • Asynchronous RL is more efficient but introduces staleness, which causes learning instabilities. • Modeling and simulations can help analytically solve for what configuration leads to optimal efficiency. This allows us to rapidly prototype training configurations, without burning expensive compute cycles on trial runs. Two of our co-founders, Rhythm Garg and Linden Li, discussed some of this research at AI Engineer recently, with a focus on the following subproblem: what is the highest throughput way to do RL given a maximum staleness and compute budget?

Applied Compute

45,555 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten