正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

It must come on record that despite widespread protests & repeated demand from Opposition to send #TransgenderBill to a #Parliament Committee, Govt insisted on pushing it through by making unsubstantiated claims! See video👇 First, it's rare that debate on one Bill is stopped to take up another Bill. The...

maadhyam_engage's profile picture

Maadhyam

9,428 subscribers

31,237 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治健康养生教育#TransgenderBill#Parliament
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Lessons on gaslighting by Speaker👇 Opposition MPs when #NREGA repeal Bill was introduced: Send to standing committee Govt: No, we will debate Opposition MPs during debate: send to Standing Committee Govt: silent Opposition MPs before bill being passed: send to Standing Committee Speaker: now already debated till 1.30am in night! Now, no point. [Only minutes ago, the Finance Minister had moved a motion to send the Securities Market Code to Standing Committee on Finance. Why couldn't the #NREGA repeal bill also go to the Standing Committee? Coz Finance Committee is chaired by a BJP MP and Rural Dev Committee by a INC MP!]
1:39

Lessons on gaslighting by Speaker👇 Opposition MPs when #NREGA repeal Bill was introduced: Send to standing committee Govt: No, we will debate Opposition MPs during debate: send to Standing Committee Govt: silent Opposition MPs before bill being passed: send to Standing Committee Speaker: now already debated till 1.30am in night! Now, no point. [Only minutes ago, the Finance Minister had moved a motion to send the Securities Market Code to Standing Committee on Finance. Why couldn't the #NREGA repeal bill also go to the Standing Committee? Coz Finance Committee is chaired by a BJP MP and Rural Dev Committee by a INC MP!]

Maadhyam

23,288 次观看 • 6 个月前

#Thread on crazy scenes from #RajyaSabha where #OnlineGamingBill2025 was passed WITHOUT any debate, just like in #LokSabha yesterday. See video👇just when a BJP MP starts speaking on the #OnlineGamingBill2025, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Rijiju cuts her to say that, there is disturbance, nothing can be heard (thought that MP was heard quite clearly) let's pass the Bill without any debate! Waah. This was always their plan. And just seconds before he was sermonising Opposition MPs for not cooperating and participating in debate on Bills in #MonsoonSession2025. Later, as a formality Rijiju said that let her speak because she was speaking in support of Bill 🙄 But by then the Bill was already taken up for voting. Before that, Minister Ashwini Vaishnav spoke on the Bill for about 7 minutes and MP Dr. John Brittas moved a motion to refer Bill to a Select Committee. Contd..
0:52

#Thread on crazy scenes from #RajyaSabha where #OnlineGamingBill2025 was passed WITHOUT any debate, just like in #LokSabha yesterday. See video👇just when a BJP MP starts speaking on the #OnlineGamingBill2025, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Rijiju cuts her to say that, there is disturbance, nothing can be heard (thought that MP was heard quite clearly) let's pass the Bill without any debate! Waah. This was always their plan. And just seconds before he was sermonising Opposition MPs for not cooperating and participating in debate on Bills in #MonsoonSession2025. Later, as a formality Rijiju said that let her speak because she was speaking in support of Bill 🙄 But by then the Bill was already taken up for voting. Before that, Minister Ashwini Vaishnav spoke on the Bill for about 7 minutes and MP Dr. John Brittas moved a motion to refer Bill to a Select Committee. Contd..

Maadhyam

12,081 次观看 • 10 个月前

I really think it’s unfortunate that they are not sending it to the Standing Committee. What the community feels is that this Bill is going to obliterate their identity, and therefore it was very important that they should have been consulted, and that this Bill being brought forward should have been passed after proper consultation. I think it’s very unfair that the entire community feels they have not been consulted, and that such a big decision is being taken in their context. I wish the government had listened and referred it to the Standing Committee. : Congress General Secretary & MP Smt. Priyanka Gandhi Vadra ji on the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Bill, 2026
0:43

I really think it’s unfortunate that they are not sending it to the Standing Committee. What the community feels is that this Bill is going to obliterate their identity, and therefore it was very important that they should have been consulted, and that this Bill being brought forward should have been passed after proper consultation. I think it’s very unfair that the entire community feels they have not been consulted, and that such a big decision is being taken in their context. I wish the government had listened and referred it to the Standing Committee. : Congress General Secretary & MP Smt. Priyanka Gandhi Vadra ji on the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Bill, 2026

Congress

24,647 次观看 • 3 个月前

👉 I oppose the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Bill, 2026, as this bill was introduced in Parliament without due consultation with transgender persons and other stakeholders. This itself shows the callous attitude of the Modi government. 👉 This Bill is not a reform; it is a regression. It takes away what the Constitution and the Supreme Court of India have already guaranteed. The Bill deletes the right to self-determination. 👉 Many transgender persons have already spoken about the immense barriers they face in securing a simple ID card. By adding more bureaucratic hurdles, we are not protecting them; we are exhausting them into invisibility. 👉 The Bill must be referred to the Standing Committee for detailed and inclusive consultation with the transgender community and all stakeholders. I urge the government to withdraw the Bill. : Jothimani ji in Lok Sabha
9:10

👉 I oppose the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Bill, 2026, as this bill was introduced in Parliament without due consultation with transgender persons and other stakeholders. This itself shows the callous attitude of the Modi government. 👉 This Bill is not a reform; it is a regression. It takes away what the Constitution and the Supreme Court of India have already guaranteed. The Bill deletes the right to self-determination. 👉 Many transgender persons have already spoken about the immense barriers they face in securing a simple ID card. By adding more bureaucratic hurdles, we are not protecting them; we are exhausting them into invisibility. 👉 The Bill must be referred to the Standing Committee for detailed and inclusive consultation with the transgender community and all stakeholders. I urge the government to withdraw the Bill. : Jothimani ji in Lok Sabha

Congress

33,440 次观看 • 3 个月前

Gone in SEVEN minutes! On #OnlineGamingBill2025, the process of law making in #Parliament itself was reduced to a game 👏👏 Showing amazing speed, the #OnlineGamingBill, cleared by cabinet only yesterday, introduced in #LokSabha only hours ago, was just passed by the House, WITHOUT any debate, WITHIN 7 minutes. At 5.02pm, IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnav moved motion to consider and pass the Bill. He spoke for 4 minutes. At 5.06pm, Speaker asked protesting MPs to go back to their seat, to debate Bill. Then he immediately takes up Bill for consideration. On his motion to take up the Bill, a loud 'Nooooooooo' can be heard (see video). He still went ahead and put Bill to clause by clause vote. By 5.09pm, the Bill was passed! NO wasting time on sending bill to committee, debate and deliberation. Only speed, productivity and efficiency 👏👏 #Parliament #MonsoonSession2025
1:56

Gone in SEVEN minutes! On #OnlineGamingBill2025, the process of law making in #Parliament itself was reduced to a game 👏👏 Showing amazing speed, the #OnlineGamingBill, cleared by cabinet only yesterday, introduced in #LokSabha only hours ago, was just passed by the House, WITHOUT any debate, WITHIN 7 minutes. At 5.02pm, IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnav moved motion to consider and pass the Bill. He spoke for 4 minutes. At 5.06pm, Speaker asked protesting MPs to go back to their seat, to debate Bill. Then he immediately takes up Bill for consideration. On his motion to take up the Bill, a loud 'Nooooooooo' can be heard (see video). He still went ahead and put Bill to clause by clause vote. By 5.09pm, the Bill was passed! NO wasting time on sending bill to committee, debate and deliberation. Only speed, productivity and efficiency 👏👏 #Parliament #MonsoonSession2025

Maadhyam

17,029 次观看 • 10 个月前

Constitutional Amendment Bill (N0.3) unanimously passes to committee stage The contentious Constitutional Amendment Bill (N0.3) unanimously passed to the committee stage in the National Assembly earlier in the afternoon after the opposition neglected or failed to call for a critical division of the house for MPs opposed to the legislative changes to vote against it. About 30 MPs were opposed to the bill in its entirety after a record-breaking fierce debate. The failure by the opposition to call for division of the house let the bill, which has far-reaching political implications, pass to the committee stage unanimously, without formal opposition. In terms of process, the presiding officer first judges the will of the house using a voice vote ("Ayes" vs. "Nays"). If an MP challenges the presiding officer's ruling, they then can call for a division of the house. Bells are rung to summon all lawmakers to the chamber, the doors are locked, and MPs must physically move to opposite sides of the house (or have their names recorded) to provide an exact, verified tally of votes. A minimum simple majority was required to pass the bill to the committee stage. The committee stage of the bill is the third step in the legislative process. It is a detailed, clause-by-clause examination of the proposals that takes place after the second reading and general debate. During the committee stage, the house resolves into a committee of the whole house rather than meeting as the standard legislative body, allowing for more conversational and repeated speaking opportunities. Members meticulously scrutinise each section or clause of the bill. The committee goes through the bill clause-by-clause sequentially, voting on each clause or block of clauses. MPs and ministers can propose specific alterations, additions, or removals to individual clauses. Any proposed amendment is debated, and the committee votes on whether to accept or reject the change. Once the committee finishes reviewing all clauses and finalising amendments, the bill moves to the report stage, where the committee officially reports its work back to the house for final confirmation before the third reading. Because it is where the exact wording of the proposed law or amendment is finalised, this phase is often heavily debated. For example, this bill required intense, late-night debate in the National Assembly last night before advancing to the committee stage. After the amendments have been adopted, another vote is called in the house to pass the bill by a two-thirds majority before the same process is repeated in the upper house, senate. If senate makes some changes to the bill, it then goes back to the lower house, National Assembly, for voting before being to sent to the President for assent.
0:55

Constitutional Amendment Bill (N0.3) unanimously passes to committee stage The contentious Constitutional Amendment Bill (N0.3) unanimously passed to the committee stage in the National Assembly earlier in the afternoon after the opposition neglected or failed to call for a critical division of the house for MPs opposed to the legislative changes to vote against it. About 30 MPs were opposed to the bill in its entirety after a record-breaking fierce debate. The failure by the opposition to call for division of the house let the bill, which has far-reaching political implications, pass to the committee stage unanimously, without formal opposition. In terms of process, the presiding officer first judges the will of the house using a voice vote ("Ayes" vs. "Nays"). If an MP challenges the presiding officer's ruling, they then can call for a division of the house. Bells are rung to summon all lawmakers to the chamber, the doors are locked, and MPs must physically move to opposite sides of the house (or have their names recorded) to provide an exact, verified tally of votes. A minimum simple majority was required to pass the bill to the committee stage. The committee stage of the bill is the third step in the legislative process. It is a detailed, clause-by-clause examination of the proposals that takes place after the second reading and general debate. During the committee stage, the house resolves into a committee of the whole house rather than meeting as the standard legislative body, allowing for more conversational and repeated speaking opportunities. Members meticulously scrutinise each section or clause of the bill. The committee goes through the bill clause-by-clause sequentially, voting on each clause or block of clauses. MPs and ministers can propose specific alterations, additions, or removals to individual clauses. Any proposed amendment is debated, and the committee votes on whether to accept or reject the change. Once the committee finishes reviewing all clauses and finalising amendments, the bill moves to the report stage, where the committee officially reports its work back to the house for final confirmation before the third reading. Because it is where the exact wording of the proposed law or amendment is finalised, this phase is often heavily debated. For example, this bill required intense, late-night debate in the National Assembly last night before advancing to the committee stage. After the amendments have been adopted, another vote is called in the house to pass the bill by a two-thirds majority before the same process is repeated in the upper house, senate. If senate makes some changes to the bill, it then goes back to the lower house, National Assembly, for voting before being to sent to the President for assent.

TheNewsHawks

17,671 次观看 • 7 天前

#WATCH | Delhi: Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra says, "We used to say that we are world leaders. We used to say that we are peacemakers. Whether it's the war in Ukraine or the situation today, we should think about it." On the Transgender bill, she says, "I really think that it's unfortunate that they are not sending it to the standing committee. What the community feels is that this bill is going to obliterate their identity, and therefore it was very, very important that they should have been consulted and that this bill that is being brought about should have taken place or should have been passed after proper consultation. I think it's very unfair that the entire community feels like they have not been consulted, and such a big decision is being taken in their context. I wish the government had listened and put it on the standing committee."
1:12

#WATCH | Delhi: Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra says, "We used to say that we are world leaders. We used to say that we are peacemakers. Whether it's the war in Ukraine or the situation today, we should think about it." On the Transgender bill, she says, "I really think that it's unfortunate that they are not sending it to the standing committee. What the community feels is that this bill is going to obliterate their identity, and therefore it was very, very important that they should have been consulted and that this bill that is being brought about should have taken place or should have been passed after proper consultation. I think it's very unfair that the entire community feels like they have not been consulted, and such a big decision is being taken in their context. I wish the government had listened and put it on the standing committee."

ANI

24,199 次观看 • 3 个月前

🔥🚨DEVELOPING: Rep. Nancy Mace claims Democrats and Republicans are pushing their members against her bill to publish the files on sexual misconduct by members of Congress so it will be sent to committee Mace says will never that will never see the bill. The motion to send the bill to committee passed the House today 357-65
1:03

🔥🚨DEVELOPING: Rep. Nancy Mace claims Democrats and Republicans are pushing their members against her bill to publish the files on sexual misconduct by members of Congress so it will be sent to committee Mace says will never that will never see the bill. The motion to send the bill to committee passed the House today 357-65

Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

353,736 次观看 • 3 个月前

The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Bill, 2026, which presents as a reform, is in reality a retreat from constitutional morality, judicial guidance and the hard-fought rights of one of the most marginalized communities in our country. The transgender community in India has endured centuries of exclusion, stigma and violence. Any law that claims to protect them must be expansive, inclusive and rooted in dignity. The most alarming feature of this Bill is the complete removal of the definition of a transgender person as it exists in the 2019 Act. This Amendment Bill exposes the government’s inadequate and insensitive understanding of the transgender community. This Bill is not only against human being. The decisions we make in this House will shape the lives of countless individuals. I urge the government to withdraw the Bill or at least refer it to the Parliamentary Standing Committee for detailed examination. : R.Sudha ji in Lok Sabha
5:46

The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Bill, 2026, which presents as a reform, is in reality a retreat from constitutional morality, judicial guidance and the hard-fought rights of one of the most marginalized communities in our country. The transgender community in India has endured centuries of exclusion, stigma and violence. Any law that claims to protect them must be expansive, inclusive and rooted in dignity. The most alarming feature of this Bill is the complete removal of the definition of a transgender person as it exists in the 2019 Act. This Amendment Bill exposes the government’s inadequate and insensitive understanding of the transgender community. This Bill is not only against human being. The decisions we make in this House will shape the lives of countless individuals. I urge the government to withdraw the Bill or at least refer it to the Parliamentary Standing Committee for detailed examination. : R.Sudha ji in Lok Sabha

Congress

10,659 次观看 • 3 个月前

FCPA John Mbadi: In the Finance Bill that is before the National Assembly, there is nowhere in that bill where we are putting VAT on bread, milk and unga are not even mentioned. That bill that is being talked about on social media is not my bill; it is a bill that is manufactured by the opposition and you seem to have bought it. I heard that we are going to tax newborn babies, that is a propaganda bill #CitizenMondayReport Trevor Ombija, HSC
3:05

FCPA John Mbadi: In the Finance Bill that is before the National Assembly, there is nowhere in that bill where we are putting VAT on bread, milk and unga are not even mentioned. That bill that is being talked about on social media is not my bill; it is a bill that is manufactured by the opposition and you seem to have bought it. I heard that we are going to tax newborn babies, that is a propaganda bill #CitizenMondayReport Trevor Ombija, HSC

Citizen TV Kenya

65,513 次观看 • 1 年前

#WATCH | #WaqfAmendmentBill | Speaking in the Lok Sabha, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju says, "I want to thank all the leaders for keeping their views regarding the Bill... Some leaders are saying that the bill is unconstitutional, and I want to ask them how they could say that the bill is unconstitutional. If it was unconstitutional, why didn't the court strike it down?... words like unconstitutional should not be used...the Bill is not against the Constitution, as the opposition claimed...We should not use the words ‘constitutional’ and ‘unconstitutional’ so lightly.”"
3:54

#WATCH | #WaqfAmendmentBill | Speaking in the Lok Sabha, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju says, "I want to thank all the leaders for keeping their views regarding the Bill... Some leaders are saying that the bill is unconstitutional, and I want to ask them how they could say that the bill is unconstitutional. If it was unconstitutional, why didn't the court strike it down?... words like unconstitutional should not be used...the Bill is not against the Constitution, as the opposition claimed...We should not use the words ‘constitutional’ and ‘unconstitutional’ so lightly.”"

ANI

59,539 次观看 • 1 年前

#WATCH | On 130th Amendment Bill for removal of the PM, CMs, and ministers held on serious criminal charges, Union Home Minister Amit Shah says, "...The elected government in the Parliament can bring any bill or constitutional amendment. What objection can there be in placing it before the House? I had made it clear that we will hand it over to the joint committee of both the Houses... Secondly, when it is put to vote, you can express your opinion. It is a constitutional amendment, a two-third majority is required in both Houses. Whether we have (two-third majority) or not, it will be proved at that time." "Is it right in a democracy to not allow any government bill or constitutional amendment to be presented in the House and to behave in this manner? Are both the Houses of the country's parliament for debate or for noise and uproar? We have also held protest over various issues but I do not believe the mentality of not allowing the bill to be presented is democratic. The opposition will have to answer the public..."
3:09

#WATCH | On 130th Amendment Bill for removal of the PM, CMs, and ministers held on serious criminal charges, Union Home Minister Amit Shah says, "...The elected government in the Parliament can bring any bill or constitutional amendment. What objection can there be in placing it before the House? I had made it clear that we will hand it over to the joint committee of both the Houses... Secondly, when it is put to vote, you can express your opinion. It is a constitutional amendment, a two-third majority is required in both Houses. Whether we have (two-third majority) or not, it will be proved at that time." "Is it right in a democracy to not allow any government bill or constitutional amendment to be presented in the House and to behave in this manner? Are both the Houses of the country's parliament for debate or for noise and uproar? We have also held protest over various issues but I do not believe the mentality of not allowing the bill to be presented is democratic. The opposition will have to answer the public..."

ANI

10,449 次观看 • 10 个月前

The Zimbabwean Parliament has adjourned until Tuesday, when debate on the controversial Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 will continue. Monday is not a sitting day. The Bill seeks to make significant changes to Zimbabwe’s Constitution and is expected to remain the focus of parliamentary business when proceedings resume. So far, during the debates, not a single ZANUPF Member of Parliament has opposed the Bill. Sadly, some "opposition" Members of Parliament have spoken in support of it. Parliamentarians are now speculating that the Bill could be put to a vote by Thursday or Friday. There is also concern within ZANUPF about the Senate, where speculation persists that the party’s numbers are not yet fully assured. Find the full debate from today below 👇🏿
3:42:10

The Zimbabwean Parliament has adjourned until Tuesday, when debate on the controversial Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 will continue. Monday is not a sitting day. The Bill seeks to make significant changes to Zimbabwe’s Constitution and is expected to remain the focus of parliamentary business when proceedings resume. So far, during the debates, not a single ZANUPF Member of Parliament has opposed the Bill. Sadly, some "opposition" Members of Parliament have spoken in support of it. Parliamentarians are now speculating that the Bill could be put to a vote by Thursday or Friday. There is also concern within ZANUPF about the Senate, where speculation persists that the party’s numbers are not yet fully assured. Find the full debate from today below 👇🏿

Hopewell Chin’ono

36,460 次观看 • 19 天前

This morning, I raised concerns in Parliament about the unusually rapid speed at which the Protection of Sovereignty Bill is being processed. Committee meetings to consider views of stakeholders have not commenced, but the bill has already been put on today’s order paper for passing! If the bill is good for the Country like we are told, it is prudent that adequate time is accorded for key stakeholders to share their views on this bill. #KeepingTheGovtInCheck
1:43

This morning, I raised concerns in Parliament about the unusually rapid speed at which the Protection of Sovereignty Bill is being processed. Committee meetings to consider views of stakeholders have not commenced, but the bill has already been put on today’s order paper for passing! If the bill is good for the Country like we are told, it is prudent that adequate time is accorded for key stakeholders to share their views on this bill. #KeepingTheGovtInCheck

Joel Ssenyonyi

64,924 次观看 • 2 个月前

New: Karoline Leavitt announces the passage of the ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’ in the budget committee—sends clear message to Republicans who will be voting on it. Karoline Leavitt just confirmed a major win for the MAGA agenda. “The ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’ passed the House Budget Committee last night, bringing it one step closer to final passage.” She then detailed why this matters. “The ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’ is perfectly named because it represents a once in a generation opportunity to deliver on the Make America Great Again agenda responsible for President Trump’s landslide victory on November 5th.” Leavitt made it clear: this bill is the mandate. “The America first policies in the bill are the reason why Republicans currently have the majority in Congress right now.” Then came a direct warning to the GOP: “Passing this bill is what voters sent Republicans to Washington to accomplish.” Clear, direct and hard hitting. “That’s why it is essential that EVERY Republican in the House and the Senate unites behind President Trump and passes this popular and essential legislative package.” The pressure is on. Republicans can either deliver—or answer to the voters who put them there.
0:43

New: Karoline Leavitt announces the passage of the ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’ in the budget committee—sends clear message to Republicans who will be voting on it. Karoline Leavitt just confirmed a major win for the MAGA agenda. “The ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’ passed the House Budget Committee last night, bringing it one step closer to final passage.” She then detailed why this matters. “The ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’ is perfectly named because it represents a once in a generation opportunity to deliver on the Make America Great Again agenda responsible for President Trump’s landslide victory on November 5th.” Leavitt made it clear: this bill is the mandate. “The America first policies in the bill are the reason why Republicans currently have the majority in Congress right now.” Then came a direct warning to the GOP: “Passing this bill is what voters sent Republicans to Washington to accomplish.” Clear, direct and hard hitting. “That’s why it is essential that EVERY Republican in the House and the Senate unites behind President Trump and passes this popular and essential legislative package.” The pressure is on. Republicans can either deliver—or answer to the voters who put them there.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

39,698 次观看 • 1 年前

#WATCH | Delhi: On Waqf Amendment Bill, Chairperson of Delhi State Haj Committee, Kausar Jahan, says, "It is a historic day. The Waqf Amendment Bill has been passed in the Lok Sabha and today it will be passed in the Rajya Sabha as well. It has proved to be a milestone under the leadership of PM Narendra Modi... Waqf properties will be managed and put to good use... It is a good step for the welfare of the 'qaum'..."
1:36

#WATCH | Delhi: On Waqf Amendment Bill, Chairperson of Delhi State Haj Committee, Kausar Jahan, says, "It is a historic day. The Waqf Amendment Bill has been passed in the Lok Sabha and today it will be passed in the Rajya Sabha as well. It has proved to be a milestone under the leadership of PM Narendra Modi... Waqf properties will be managed and put to good use... It is a good step for the welfare of the 'qaum'..."

ANI

12,214 次观看 • 1 年前

“E-levy is going to change and transform the lives of Ghanaians” - Throwback to the Deputy Finance Minister, Hon. Dr. Stephen Amoah’s submission on the passage of the controversial E-Levy bill. Despite massive opposition against the bill from the public, he maintained his position that the bill was going to solve Ghana’s fiscal challenges and as such must be passed by any means necessary.
0:50

“E-levy is going to change and transform the lives of Ghanaians” - Throwback to the Deputy Finance Minister, Hon. Dr. Stephen Amoah’s submission on the passage of the controversial E-Levy bill. Despite massive opposition against the bill from the public, he maintained his position that the bill was going to solve Ghana’s fiscal challenges and as such must be passed by any means necessary.

SIKAOFFICIAL🦍

63,361 次观看 • 1 年前

Desperate to hold up a bill on penalty rates Tim Wilson puts in a motion accusing govt of “sloppy drafting” which refers bill to a committee in the #HouseOfReps. Wilson ends up ravaged by Tony Burke who reveals the committee his motion refers the bill to “does not exist”🔥🤦‍♂️ffs
2:20

Desperate to hold up a bill on penalty rates Tim Wilson puts in a motion accusing govt of “sloppy drafting” which refers bill to a committee in the #HouseOfReps. Wilson ends up ravaged by Tony Burke who reveals the committee his motion refers the bill to “does not exist”🔥🤦‍♂️ffs

stranger

62,754 次观看 • 10 个月前

🚨 Five top Democrats on the Maine Legislative Council voted AGAINST a bill that would ban ai-generated child porn The vote kills the bill from reaching committee, so it will not even receive public debate House minority leader Billy Bob Faulkingham can’t believe it… “Well, that was interesting. Just got out of leg council today where I'm in Augusta. We were voting on bills — but the one that really blew my mind was a bill sponsored by a Democrat that would prohibit child pornography created by AI. And of course, even though a Democrat sponsored that bill, I voted yes for it because I think child pornography is absolutely disgusting no matter how it's created. Unfortunately, that bill failed to get entered into the second session because the majority of Democrats voted against letting that bill in, even though it was sponsored by a Democrat. I don't understand the reasoning why you would not want to go against child pornography, but that actually happened today”
1:15

🚨 Five top Democrats on the Maine Legislative Council voted AGAINST a bill that would ban ai-generated child porn The vote kills the bill from reaching committee, so it will not even receive public debate House minority leader Billy Bob Faulkingham can’t believe it… “Well, that was interesting. Just got out of leg council today where I'm in Augusta. We were voting on bills — but the one that really blew my mind was a bill sponsored by a Democrat that would prohibit child pornography created by AI. And of course, even though a Democrat sponsored that bill, I voted yes for it because I think child pornography is absolutely disgusting no matter how it's created. Unfortunately, that bill failed to get entered into the second session because the majority of Democrats voted against letting that bill in, even though it was sponsored by a Democrat. I don't understand the reasoning why you would not want to go against child pornography, but that actually happened today”

Wall Street Apes

940,907 次观看 • 7 个月前

The LOP in Parliament Of Uganda Joel Ssenyonyi has asked the committee on legal and parliamentary affairs to dismiss the Protection of Sovereignty Bill in its entirety. He argues that the bill is a threat to political pluralism, economic survival & the right for Ugandans to citizens.
3:10

The LOP in Parliament Of Uganda Joel Ssenyonyi has asked the committee on legal and parliamentary affairs to dismiss the Protection of Sovereignty Bill in its entirety. He argues that the bill is a threat to political pluralism, economic survival & the right for Ugandans to citizens.

Solomon Serwanjja

19,956 次观看 • 2 个月前