正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

It never made sense to me how pi (π) can continue forever without ending until I watched this video.

375,240 次观看 • 12 天前 •via X (Twitter)

27 条评论

Benaiah 的头像
Benaiah12 天前

π = The shape of the firmament

Paul J. Ramirez 的头像
Paul J. Ramirez12 天前

I plan to do an online math curriculum based on the presupposition that mathematics is not a "neutral" subject which is always true on its own and works unfailingly with or without GOD, but that it's a revelation of the mind of GOD. Math works and is true only because GOD made it to be true and to work and to help us interpret and understand the complexity and beauty of our natural world and to harness and apply that knowledge for His glory and for our benefit. In fact, math works so astonishingly well in the natural, physical world that Eugene Wigner called it a "miracle" in his classic 1960 essay ("The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences"). (Josh, I'm disappointed you deleted all that thoughtful commentary you originally posted with this video clip. It's what prompted me to write this!)

𝐃α𝐟𝐫Σ𝐠𝐞Ω𝐞𝐬𝐞π 的头像
𝐃α𝐟𝐫Σ𝐠𝐞Ω𝐞𝐬𝐞π12 天前

A straight line can never fully measure a circle. Thus, pi defies recurrence, its decimals stretching on without end—the very embodiment of infinity, harbored within a finite contour.

Andrew Brophy 的头像
Andrew Brophy12 天前

Like any irrational number it’s only infinite because of our decimal number system. You can draw a line of Pi with finite and definitive length

Dr.シキガミ 的头像
Dr.シキガミ12 天前

『 フラワーオブライフ 』そして『 π 』 線路はつづくよ、どこまでも・・・・

𝚝𝚊𝚞𝚎𝚙𝚜𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚗𝟼𝟿 的头像
𝚝𝚊𝚞𝚎𝚙𝚜𝚒𝚕𝚘𝚗𝟼𝟿12 天前

you have to subtract -2 from the mantissa before multiplying again.

FantasyMogul 的头像
FantasyMogul12 天前

Amazing

Paul Bogaars 的头像
Paul Bogaars12 天前

Because Pi = the Riemann !!!

Gian Marco Solas 的头像
Gian Marco Solas12 天前

Unbelievable

Edim Bukvarevic 的头像
Edim Bukvarevic12 天前

Pi doesn't continue forever. It's just as finite as any other number on the number line.

holin 的头像
holin12 天前

The actual infinity presented in one number

Jake Thayne 的头像
Jake Thayne12 天前

Cool

Embroider藤岡 的头像
Embroider藤岡12 天前

その動画、ぜひ教えてほしいです!新しい発見って素敵ですよね。

Degenerate gambler 的头像
Degenerate gambler12 天前

Bro is on to absolutely nothing

Malcolm Logan 的头像
Malcolm Logan12 天前

That is completely irrational

Zu Jian Lee 的头像
Zu Jian Lee12 天前

@grok wouldn't this apply to all irrational numbers

John Charles Hamilton Mastroligulano 的头像
John Charles Hamilton Mastroligulano12 天前

Sup lol

Laurent Curau 的头像
Laurent Curau12 天前

@grok explain this video

Shadows 的头像
Shadows12 天前

try 22/7 instead of 3.14

Тарас Говненко 的头像
Тарас Говненко12 天前

И что же становится более понятным из этого видео?😂

MΔGICK 的头像
MΔGICK12 天前

The beginning shapes the range of possibilities for what is to come, without turning any later state into an earlier one.

theantigynocentrist 的头像
theantigynocentrist12 天前

That almost looks like a program running......

david aneurin morgan 的头像
david aneurin morgan12 天前

if there is a designer God, why isn't PI three?

Charlie Greenman 的头像
Charlie Greenman12 天前

So then there should be a pragmatic end to pi then? The area in which bang for buck fades out. @grok anything like this?

nceladus 的头像
nceladus12 天前

infinity means interiority

Arsenios Efrem 的头像
Arsenios Efrem12 天前

Thats a cool way to visualize it.

Grizzly Bear 的头像
Grizzly Bear12 天前

It should be no surprise that the product of two artificial constructs (line & circle) would be irrational? 🤔

相关视频