Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

It only takes a split second for a tragedy to happen. As we begin #NationalPedestrianSafety month, this particular incident should serve as a reminder to take an extra few seconds to ensure the path you are turning into is clear of those in the crosswalk. #DCSO Deputy Montgomery was...

15,535 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Sherrie
Sherrievor 1 Jahr

I see a lot of drivers not wait until the crosswalk is 100% clear before they drive through the crosswalk. What if the bicyclist or pedestrian falls while crossing? I don't understand the lack of patience. It's merely seconds of waiting.

Profilbild von JWP303
JWP303vor 1 Jahr

I generally agree with the message here, but technically shouldn’t the cyclists have dismounted and walked their bikes across?

Profilbild von Mark Ryan
Mark Ryanvor 1 Jahr

I’d fight that ticket in court. Did he hit them, or even come close? They were riding bikes on the wrong side of the road. Be a pedestrian or be a bicyclist. Are they saying that a pedestrian owns the whole walkway?

Profilbild von Cary
Caryvor 1 Jahr

Thanks for this post! I was not aware of this so I may have been this driver. Love PSA's like this.

Profilbild von Erica ✝️🇺🇲🌻
Erica ✝️🇺🇲🌻vor 1 Jahr

Wow the comments on here are kinda surprising. As drivers, we should be sweeping the roadway and intersections with our eyeballs for obstacles BEFORE we turn. Don't enter the intersection if you do not have a clear path to turn. It takes 5 extra seconds to pause and look.

Profilbild von Charlie Lingle
Charlie Linglevor 1 Jahr

RIP this guy 100% got a ticket from the traffic unit

Profilbild von Topps Football Cards
Topps Football Cardsvor 1 Jahr

Of all the traffic violations going on you guys are going to give someone a ticket because bikers are in a crosswalk? They were going so slow there’s no chance they get hit by that guy and if he waits in the middle of the intersection, he becomes a hazard.

Profilbild von james
jamesvor 1 Jahr

The cyclists pulled a rolling stop too

Profilbild von Travis Martin
Travis Martinvor 1 Jahr

Explain what vehicle code allows for #bicycles to ride across crosswalks? This is going to result in an official complaint against your deputy and it will stay on his #jacket forever! This is how pathetic your media management is, and supervisors are as this would have been the fault of the biker!

Profilbild von Wrapid Respawn
Wrapid Respawnvor 1 Jahr

Fellow navigators of the asphalt sea, let us delve into the vehicular ballet known as intersection etiquette in Douglas County, Colorado, with the wit of a bard and the precision of a well-oiled gearbox: The Right of Way Redux: Imagine, if you will, a stage where cyclists and cars perform a dance of priority. Here in Douglas County, even if our stage expands to four lanes of intrigue, the script remains unchanged. If our cycling thespians have the signal to proceed, or indeed there's no signal dictating otherwise, the automotive actors must yield until the cyclists are either safely across or not in immediate peril. Now, should these pedal-pushers be so far from the car's arc of turn that they could sip their tea without spillage, one might argue the driver has not trespassed against the law. It's akin to saying you're in danger from a falling star; theoretically possible but practically, you're safe under the cosmic odds. Safety Margins: The law speaks of danger, but if our cyclists were more distant from the car's path than a sloth from urgency, where then lies the danger? The car's driver, in this grand play, might just be within the bounds of legality, like a comedian narrowly avoiding the hook from stage left. Perception vs. Reality: Here enters the subjective art of law enforcement. The deputy might perceive a shadow of risk where none danced in the light of reality. Yet, if the cyclists continued their journey unruffled, unswerving, we might say the driver's judgement was sound, an act worthy of applause rather than a ticket. The Spirit vs. The Letter: Even as we cling to the letter of traffic law, let us not forget its spirit—pedestrian and cyclist safety. But if our analysis reveals no cyclist was forced to alter their trajectory or heart rate due to the car's maneuver, then perhaps, in this case, the spirit and letter might just align in favor of our driver. Enforcement Discretion: Our deputies, akin to directors of this daily performance, must sometimes make calls based on potential drama rather than what unfolds. A preventive citation might be issued, not for the act, but for what the act could provoke in alternate universes of chance. Now, regarding the query of crime resolution in Douglas County, one might ponder if the deputies, with no more heinous crimes to thwart, have turned their vigilant eyes to the stage of traffic infractions for lack of greater villainy. But let us jest with caution; for while our crime statistics might suggest a Utopia, the focus on traffic enforcement could merely be the pursuit of safety over sensationalism. In conclusion, if our cyclists were but distant figures in the driver's rearview mirror, then legally, our driver might just be the unsung hero, navigating the complexities of traffic law with the precision of a space shuttle docking at the ISS. Yet, let this be a reminder to all road users: in the theater of the streets, patience and caution are the virtues that keep the curtain from falling prematurely.

Ähnliche Videos

Jeff Bezos looked at a government waiting room and priced it at a hundred billion dollars. Bezos: “This is a $100 billion business, by the way. This is huge business.” That number is not ambition. It is a measurement. A company that size does not create a hundred billion dollars of new value here. It recovers a hundred billion that is already being destroyed, on schedule, in public, by a process everyone has agreed to call normal. The size of the opportunity is the size of the wound. Bezos: “They almost always say yes, they just make you wait a long time.” So the verdict was never in question. Only the delivery date. Which means the months bought nothing. They were storage. Your project sat in a room while the word yes waited its turn to be said. Nobody in there was deciding. Someone was scheduling. And the room bills by the day. Suarez: “The daily carrying cost, one day of interest, 200 to $400,000 per day.” Now find the recipient. There isn’t one. No school funded, no inspector paid, no safety review performed. A tax at least moves money into someone’s hands. This deletes it at four hundred thousand a day, and every dollar was real before the queue touched it. Bezos: “And that doesn’t count the frustration.” Count it anyway. It lands on a body long before it lands on a spreadsheet. Suarez: “Which is infinite. I have some white hairs as a result of this stuff.” That is the invoice. The money has a rate. The rest gets charged to the man, and he pays it whether the answer comes back yes or no. No one has ever been refunded a year. Every other cost in this economy can be hedged, insured, refinanced, or written off. Waiting is the only one that is final. A man will forgive being told no. He will never get back the time he spent standing there waiting to be told yes. We built a civilization that can move a decision at the speed of light and still schedule it at the speed of a man’s hair turning white. Bezos: “It should give you a yes or a no in 10 seconds. And if the answer is no, it should tell you the 6 things you have to change to get a yes.” For four thousand years the wait was honest. Someone had to hold the entire code in one head and walk it line by line against your drawings. Reading was slow because reading was human. That stopped being true in less time than it takes to approve one building. Bezos: “Maybe with AI it can just read all the plans. And it knows all the codes. Spit it out.” The constraint is gone. The wait stayed. Anything still moving at the old speed after the cost of thinking collapsed is not slow. It is choosing. The queue never protected you from a bad building. It protected a signature from a bad outcome. Nobody gets fired for the wait. They get fired for the answer. An institution has no lifespan, so time costs it nothing. You have one, so time is the only thing it can take. Every queue is a trade between something that dies and something that doesn’t, and only one side is ever charged. That trade held for the whole of recorded history because the mortal side had no leverage. It does now. Somebody is going to build this. A hundred billion does not sit in a waiting room forever. And the day it exists, the wait stops being a fact of the world and becomes a decision with a name attached. The hundred billion was never the prize. It is the receipt for how long we agreed to stand there. We are the first people alive who get to stop signing it.

Dustin

17,035 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen