正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

It seems Humza Yousaf's Hate Hate Speech Act has completely backfired as thousands have reported his notorious hate "white" speech from the 20th Feb 2023. You can either dial 101 or fill in the form here.

David Atherton

346,357 subscribers

509,128 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 条评论

Truth Hurts 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 的头像

Truth Hurts 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿2 年前

@HumzaYousaf Let’s get him locked up under his own draconian laws 😂

Mountain States Legal Foundation 的头像

Mountain States Legal Foundation1 年前

Imagine speaking out for your kids’ safety & being smeared as a “racist,” falsely charged, & denied justice. This is Kristen Fry’s reality after questioning her school board. She’s a mom, not a politician. Help her fight back—sign the petition & protect free speech.

On The News. Free speech is the only SPEECH! 的头像

On The News. Free speech is the only SPEECH!2 年前

@11freedom1111 @HumzaYousaf 😆 🤣 😂 that's the first thing I did. Now, let's see if police Scotland actually follow their own law?

Mendy Howe 的头像

Mendy Howe2 年前

@HumzaYousaf Considering the chilling content of that Hate Speech Law, it is important that nobody is above the Law.

Not Lee Kuan Yew! 的头像

Not Lee Kuan Yew!2 年前

I mean Scotland will be white! That’s like saying Africa is full of black people!

🇦🇺 的头像

🇦🇺2 年前

@HumzaYousaf hahaha, hahaha. I love, love, love it. He better bloody well arrest himself.

Rob Boyd, Esq 的头像

Rob Boyd, Esq2 年前

@TakeThePIedge @HumzaYousaf Done.

Christina 🎗️🇬🇧🎗️🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🎗️🇮🇱🎗️🇺🇦 的头像

Christina 🎗️🇬🇧🎗️🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🎗️🇮🇱🎗️🇺🇦2 年前

@HumzaYousaf Reported online

Polish Housewife 的头像

Polish Housewife2 年前

@HumzaYousaf It's strange for a practising Muslim to protect trans and gay rights. However, if the true and ultimate goal is to make any criticism of Islam a hate crime, the gender pantomime provides a useful distraction. @HumzaYousaf #HateCrimeActScotland

Pramod Kumar Singh 的头像

Pramod Kumar Singh2 年前

@uk_rajeev @HumzaYousaf The option before the Scottish people is to elect a new First Minister. That's it.

Gingy 的头像

Gingy2 年前

@HumzaYousaf Reported.

相关视频

Is this hate speech? Or is it speech that is the truth, that they now want to create a law that defines it as hate speech? Thoughts?

Is this hate speech? Or is it speech that is the truth, that they now want to create a law that defines it as hate speech? Thoughts?

BroBro🇦🇺🏇🏻

14,641 次观看 • 8 个月前

Hate speech? If you support Canada’s Bill C-9 (Combatting Hate Act) or any ‘hate speech’ regime, you’re not compassionate — you’re an idiot & an advocate for totalitarianism. The Left can’t define it without admitting it’s “whatever we don’t like today.” The Soviets didn’t call it ‘hate speech’ either. They called any dissent ‘counter revolutionary’ and sent people to the Gulag. Jordan Peterson explains it perfectly. History’s clear. Wake the hell up Canada.

Hate speech? If you support Canada’s Bill C-9 (Combatting Hate Act) or any ‘hate speech’ regime, you’re not compassionate — you’re an idiot & an advocate for totalitarianism. The Left can’t define it without admitting it’s “whatever we don’t like today.” The Soviets didn’t call it ‘hate speech’ either. They called any dissent ‘counter revolutionary’ and sent people to the Gulag. Jordan Peterson explains it perfectly. History’s clear. Wake the hell up Canada.

Seinfeld’s Pez Dispenser 🇨🇦 🇺🇸

50,713 次观看 • 2 个月前

Evil & Hate-Filled MSNBC Contributor Matthew Dowd Has Been FIRED Over His Blatant Anti-MAGA Propaganda Targeting Charlie Kirk As The Cause Of His Own "Political Assassination" Over What Dowd Described As "Hate Speech" Completely Excusing The Sniper As Pushed To Act!

Evil & Hate-Filled MSNBC Contributor Matthew Dowd Has Been FIRED Over His Blatant Anti-MAGA Propaganda Targeting Charlie Kirk As The Cause Of His Own "Political Assassination" Over What Dowd Described As "Hate Speech" Completely Excusing The Sniper As Pushed To Act!

John Basham

108,933 次观看 • 1 年前

This entire hate speech debate in the Supreme Court is puerile and reeks of hypocrisy and cowardice. Who decides what is hate speech? Here, I dare milords to have the guts to call the public recitation of the verse claiming ‘Hindus are the worst of creatures’ as hate speech:

This entire hate speech debate in the Supreme Court is puerile and reeks of hypocrisy and cowardice. Who decides what is hate speech? Here, I dare milords to have the guts to call the public recitation of the verse claiming ‘Hindus are the worst of creatures’ as hate speech:

Anand Ranganathan

118,140 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨🇦🇺 Australian Government to introduce strictest ‘Hate Speech Laws’ ever seen “Increase penalties for hate speech” “Making hate an aggregating factor when adjudicating crimes online” “Hate based on Race or advocating racial supremacy” Listen to PM Anthony Albanese - bringing in tighter speech laws, as well as gun reform in the wake of the Bondi Beach shootings.

🚨🇦🇺 Australian Government to introduce strictest ‘Hate Speech Laws’ ever seen “Increase penalties for hate speech” “Making hate an aggregating factor when adjudicating crimes online” “Hate based on Race or advocating racial supremacy” Listen to PM Anthony Albanese - bringing in tighter speech laws, as well as gun reform in the wake of the Bondi Beach shootings.

Concerned Citizen

408,633 次观看 • 8 个月前

The genocide in Rwanda was fuelled by decades of hate speech targeting the Tutsi. Three decades later, the verbal violence of hate speech is still all around us. The global community must stand as one against this torrent of hate speech, and denounce it wherever it’s found.

The genocide in Rwanda was fuelled by decades of hate speech targeting the Tutsi. Three decades later, the verbal violence of hate speech is still all around us. The global community must stand as one against this torrent of hate speech, and denounce it wherever it’s found.

António Guterres

189,660 次观看 • 2 年前

Dana White: We have to protect free speech. Piers Morgan: Is there any limit to that for you? Dana White: No. I think probably the most important free speech to protect is hate speech. I mean, because when a government or a certain person can come out and determine, say, 'this is hate speech,' it's a very slippery slope and it's dangerous, in my opinion.

Dana White: We have to protect free speech. Piers Morgan: Is there any limit to that for you? Dana White: No. I think probably the most important free speech to protect is hate speech. I mean, because when a government or a certain person can come out and determine, say, 'this is hate speech,' it's a very slippery slope and it's dangerous, in my opinion.

Jed I. Goodman ©

990,104 次观看 • 1 年前

Aontú questioned the government on Hate Speech legislation today. This is a big breakthrough. Aontú was the only party in the Dáil to oppose hate speech fully. Now the government has said they won't pursue it.

Aontú questioned the government on Hate Speech legislation today. This is a big breakthrough. Aontú was the only party in the Dáil to oppose hate speech fully. Now the government has said they won't pursue it.

Peadar Tóibín TD

34,349 次观看 • 11 个月前

In the United States, most of what we say online – even if it’s hate-filled or toxic – is protected by the First Amendment as free speech. But in Germany, law enforcement police the internet for hate speech. 60 Minutes, Sunday.

In the United States, most of what we say online – even if it’s hate-filled or toxic – is protected by the First Amendment as free speech. But in Germany, law enforcement police the internet for hate speech. 60 Minutes, Sunday.

60 Minutes

412,894 次观看 • 1 年前

A 31 year old man has been charged to tonight from Sydney’s March for Australia event for allegedly using ‘Hate Speech’ as the language incited a ‘response from the crowd’ generating hate towards a particular group in the NSW community Is this the end of Freedom of Speech?

A 31 year old man has been charged to tonight from Sydney’s March for Australia event for allegedly using ‘Hate Speech’ as the language incited a ‘response from the crowd’ generating hate towards a particular group in the NSW community Is this the end of Freedom of Speech?

Mickamious

85,536 次观看 • 7 个月前

Free speech is not for the speech you like or for the people you like. Free speech is for the speech that you hate of the people you despise. If you're for free speech, you have to be for their free speech, or else you're not for free speech. You're for the government breaking the constitution. Full Video:

Free speech is not for the speech you like or for the people you like. Free speech is for the speech that you hate of the people you despise. If you're for free speech, you have to be for their free speech, or else you're not for free speech. You're for the government breaking the constitution. Full Video:

Jimmy Dore

69,678 次观看 • 1 年前

In the UK, Muslims were very angry and tried to have a Christian preacher arrested for ‘hate speech’ for preaching in ‘their’ area. “This is a Muslim area!” Brave policewoman: “No, it’s not. We have freedom of speech in this country.” You can see the hate on their faces.

In the UK, Muslims were very angry and tried to have a Christian preacher arrested for ‘hate speech’ for preaching in ‘their’ area. “This is a Muslim area!” Brave policewoman: “No, it’s not. We have freedom of speech in this country.” You can see the hate on their faces.

Dr. Maalouf ‏

715,762 次观看 • 29 天前

Here is Attorney General Pamela Bondi’s “hate speech” statement in full context. The broader context does not attenuate what is fundamentally wrong about what she is proposing. She confounds university *policy* with criminal prosecution of “hate speech”. She confounds “hate” *crime* with “hate *speech*”. And she actually contradicts herself by specifically acknowledging how Charlie Kirk’s political messaging was seen as “obscene” to others. Nobody wants the government prosecution of “hate speech”. If you want to know where that road goes, look at the United Kingdom or Canada. People want the application of *existing law*. More law = less justice. I cannot purport to claim what Charlie would have wanted. But for Pam to suggest Charlie would have wanted government criminalization of so-called “hate speech” is fundamentally antithetical to everything Charlie did in his life. Bondi has screwed up at every step of her stewardship of the DOJ. She is unfit for the position.

Here is Attorney General Pamela Bondi’s “hate speech” statement in full context. The broader context does not attenuate what is fundamentally wrong about what she is proposing. She confounds university policy with criminal prosecution of “hate speech”. She confounds “hate” crime with “hate speech”. And she actually contradicts herself by specifically acknowledging how Charlie Kirk’s political messaging was seen as “obscene” to others. Nobody wants the government prosecution of “hate speech”. If you want to know where that road goes, look at the United Kingdom or Canada. People want the application of existing law. More law = less justice. I cannot purport to claim what Charlie would have wanted. But for Pam to suggest Charlie would have wanted government criminalization of so-called “hate speech” is fundamentally antithetical to everything Charlie did in his life. Bondi has screwed up at every step of her stewardship of the DOJ. She is unfit for the position.

Viva Frei

62,181 次观看 • 1 年前

The Liberals just tabled Bill C-9, the so-called “Combatting Hate Act.” On the surface, it looks like a crackdown on hate crimes. In reality, it hands Ottawa sweeping new powers to police speech, symbols, and motives—all under their subjective definition of “hate.”

The Liberals just tabled Bill C-9, the so-called “Combatting Hate Act.” On the surface, it looks like a crackdown on hate crimes. In reality, it hands Ottawa sweeping new powers to police speech, symbols, and motives—all under their subjective definition of “hate.”

BlendrNews

35,979 次观看 • 11 个月前