Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

It seems that Dan Bongino can't differentiate between commentary, and evidence. (He blocked me.) Is there a good reason to disrespect former Navy SEAL Rep. Eli Crane like this? 🙄 Why would Dan ignore ballistic evidence? Why would Dan ignore the Secret Service Counter Sniper's sworn testimony? Is there... show more

John Cullen 🐓

145,190 subscribers

42,565 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von John Cullen 🐓

John Cullen 🐓vor 1 Jahr

@RepEliCrane "Why would Dan ignore the Secret Service Counter Sniper's sworn testimony?"

Profilbild von John Cullen 🐓

John Cullen 🐓vor 1 Jahr

@RepEliCrane It's not a theory.. It's ballistic evidence.

Profilbild von Dr. James Joyce

Dr. James Joycevor 1 Jahr

The most damning thing I saw regarding Bongino was during Congressional testimony when he was sitting next to Erik Prince. I did a little work with Erik a long time ago, and I know what his body language was saying when Bongino was spewing “his” opinions on a single shooter. Erik did not want to be associated with anything Dan was saying. He TOTALLY disagreed with Dan. I kind of wished he’d just smacked him in the back of the head and said “Knock it off Dan. For fvcks sake we all know there were three shooters…”, or something along those lines. Only two possibilities: 1) Dan is controlled opposition; or, 2) He’s a fvckin 1d10t… or both🤷🏽‍♂️

Profilbild von John Cullen 🐓

John Cullen 🐓vor 1 Jahr

@dbongino @RepEliCrane There is only one 488 yard scenario I can find. Washington SWAT sniper to Water Tower.

Profilbild von Carry Pliers✝️🐓🦆🦃

Carry Pliers✝️🐓🦆🦃vor 1 Jahr

@dbongino @RepEliCrane Makes zero sense He wants answers, allegedly, but blocks the man with a team that has 3-d modeled the situation in about 90 days @dbongino what gives?

Profilbild von John Cullen 🐓

John Cullen 🐓vor 1 Jahr

@dbongino @RepEliCrane 😎 I'll show you mine, Dan, if you show me yours.. I'll go first.

Profilbild von Jeff Daigneault

Jeff Daigneaultvor 1 Jahr

@dbongino @RepEliCrane I've always got controlled opposition vibes from @dbongino

Profilbild von John Cullen 🐓

John Cullen 🐓vor 1 Jahr

@dbongino @RepEliCrane Now, via his actions, he is confirming it, himself.

Profilbild von McScotchy2

McScotchy2vor 1 Jahr

@dbongino @RepEliCrane My two cents: Dan Bongino, Trump, the Secret Service, and everybody involved knows exactly what happened. They are trying to keep a lid on it until January 20 to drop the hammer. If the left gets wind of a full-fledged retribution, they are liable to act out.

Profilbild von Mayah

Mayahvor 1 Jahr

@dbongino @RepEliCrane He has a bias with the SS. I understand that. I like listening to him but discernment is necessary when he discusses anything regarding the SS.

Profilbild von John Cullen 🐓

John Cullen 🐓vor 1 Jahr

@dbongino @RepEliCrane That's why I'm referencing SWORN testimony from SECRET SERVICE employees. And he's ignoring THAT.

Ähnliche Videos

🚨WOW🚨 "THERE IS A MOLE IN THE SECRET SERVICE..." Congressman and fmr Navy SEAL Eli Crane concludes evidence suggests possible Secret Service mole after second attempt on Trump: "Watch the watchers. There is a very real possibility that there is a mole in the Secret Service."

🚨WOW🚨 "THERE IS A MOLE IN THE SECRET SERVICE..." Congressman and fmr Navy SEAL Eli Crane concludes evidence suggests possible Secret Service mole after second attempt on Trump: "Watch the watchers. There is a very real possibility that there is a mole in the Secret Service."

Benny Johnson

1,785,854 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"It’s awfully odd, in a case of such importance, that there would be a rush somehow to cremate the body.” Former Secret Service agent Dan Bongino explains why cremating Trump shooter Thomas Crooks' body is a big deal

"It’s awfully odd, in a case of such importance, that there would be a rush somehow to cremate the body.” Former Secret Service agent Dan Bongino explains why cremating Trump shooter Thomas Crooks' body is a big deal

Kyle Becker

279,858 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I HAVE EVIDENCE THAT THEY ARE LYING ABOUT CANDACE OWENS. Why is there what seems to be a coordinated effort to damage/discredit the relationship between Charlie and Candace Owens ? OR IS THERE? Idk… I’m just a conspiracy theorist. 🤷🏼‍♂️

I HAVE EVIDENCE THAT THEY ARE LYING ABOUT CANDACE OWENS. Why is there what seems to be a coordinated effort to damage/discredit the relationship between Charlie and Candace Owens ? OR IS THERE? Idk… I’m just a conspiracy theorist. 🤷🏼‍♂️

Ian

413,753 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

This footage is of Luigi Mangione being walked to the courtroom. Why don't we have similar footage of Tyler Robinson, Charlie Kirk's alleged shooter?? Because he isn't real? Is Tyler Robinson a Signature Reduction construct? Is there evidence that he isn't? Is there any evidence that Tyler Robinson is a living, breathing human being, today?

This footage is of Luigi Mangione being walked to the courtroom. Why don't we have similar footage of Tyler Robinson, Charlie Kirk's alleged shooter?? Because he isn't real? Is Tyler Robinson a Signature Reduction construct? Is there evidence that he isn't? Is there any evidence that Tyler Robinson is a living, breathing human being, today?

John Cullen 🐓

358,921 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Neuroscientist Dr Julia Mossbridge states that telepathy is real and they have gathered evidence to show it. Dr Mossbridge goes onto say that telepathy being real isn’t the most interesting thing as it can already be explained with entanglement and quantum physics. What interests her the most is that there seems to be 2 types of telepathy. Evidence for “the hill” has also been confirmed. A documentary showing the trials and evidence is expected for 2026.

Neuroscientist Dr Julia Mossbridge states that telepathy is real and they have gathered evidence to show it. Dr Mossbridge goes onto say that telepathy being real isn’t the most interesting thing as it can already be explained with entanglement and quantum physics. What interests her the most is that there seems to be 2 types of telepathy. Evidence for “the hill” has also been confirmed. A documentary showing the trials and evidence is expected for 2026.

👽 (Ruby) 👽

33,816 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Erika Kirk Got Nuked in Court. “I’ve seen it all.” That’s what Erika Kirk told Fanatical Ziónist Bari Weiss about the evidence. Her side later pushed the court to review more video evidence during the preliminary hearing. That’s when the defense attorney fired back: “The purpose of this trial is not to educate the victim’s family. ErikaKirk has been adept at holding press conferenceswhere she’s revealed evidence and claimed the state is her personal attorneys.” If Erika Kirk already has the evidence and wants transparency, release it to the public. The judge agreed: the preliminary hearing’s limited time should focus on testimony and legal proceedings — not replaying evidence already claimed to be known. So the question remains: If Erika has seen all the evidence, why not show it? And why spend valuable court time reviewing it again instead of hearing more testimony? The contradiction is impossible to ignore.

Erika Kirk Got Nuked in Court. “I’ve seen it all.” That’s what Erika Kirk told Fanatical Ziónist Bari Weiss about the evidence. Her side later pushed the court to review more video evidence during the preliminary hearing. That’s when the defense attorney fired back: “The purpose of this trial is not to educate the victim’s family. ErikaKirk has been adept at holding press conferenceswhere she’s revealed evidence and claimed the state is her personal attorneys.” If Erika Kirk already has the evidence and wants transparency, release it to the public. The judge agreed: the preliminary hearing’s limited time should focus on testimony and legal proceedings — not replaying evidence already claimed to be known. So the question remains: If Erika has seen all the evidence, why not show it? And why spend valuable court time reviewing it again instead of hearing more testimony? The contradiction is impossible to ignore.

Phantom Pain

94,391 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

"[ATF Form 4473] records should be expunged immediately. You passed the background check. There is no reason anybody should have to keep that. None! It is being used as a list." - FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino

"[ATF Form 4473] records should be expunged immediately. You passed the background check. There is no reason anybody should have to keep that. None! It is being used as a list." - FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino

Gun Owners of America

199,541 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Dr. Anthony Fauci suggests we ignore the Cochrane masks study, even though it found masks made "little to no difference" in preventing COVID-19 in a meta-analysis of 78 randomized controlled trials featuring over 600,000 participants because "there are a number of studies that show that masks work." It's worth noting that Cochrane reviews are widely regarded as the highest quality scientific evidence available. Why would Fauci suggest that we ignore the Cochrane masks study?

Dr. Anthony Fauci suggests we ignore the Cochrane masks study, even though it found masks made "little to no difference" in preventing COVID-19 in a meta-analysis of 78 randomized controlled trials featuring over 600,000 participants because "there are a number of studies that show that masks work." It's worth noting that Cochrane reviews are widely regarded as the highest quality scientific evidence available. Why would Fauci suggest that we ignore the Cochrane masks study?

KanekoaTheGreat

1,179,859 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Buttigieg: The president lost in 2020. He went to court dozens of times trying to prove otherwise. There’s a reason why he lost again and again in court which is that, unlike on Twitter, you have to present evidence and there are punishments for lying.

Buttigieg: The president lost in 2020. He went to court dozens of times trying to prove otherwise. There’s a reason why he lost again and again in court which is that, unlike on Twitter, you have to present evidence and there are punishments for lying.

chyea ok

784,528 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Schatz: "If this deal is so good, why can't the public see it? ... there is a reason they are not publishing this deal, and it's because makes plain that this is one of the biggest foreign policy blunders in many generations"

Schatz: "If this deal is so good, why can't the public see it? ... there is a reason they are not publishing this deal, and it's because makes plain that this is one of the biggest foreign policy blunders in many generations"

Aaron Rupar

96,997 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

Anna Paulina Luna on UFOs -“we're hoping to present that information and at least acknowledge it from a government perspective that we are not alone, but also let's see what the evidence is.” “The biggest information problems that we've had with UAPs is the amount of stonewalling stove piping, and also it seems that there is this push to gaslight the American people into looking at the evidence and then not fully believing it. I think for us, if we're writing the budget, for example, into the Pentagon, if we're writing the budget overall for whatever programs might be out there, why is it that members of Congress who are given a top secret security clearance are being denied access? That's not a free and true government, and so for us, especially being that we have now a Secretary of State who's actually open to Declassify Declassification and Marco Rubio, we're hoping to present that information and at least acknowledge it from a government perspective that we are not alone, but also let's see what the evidence is”

Anna Paulina Luna on UFOs -“we're hoping to present that information and at least acknowledge it from a government perspective that we are not alone, but also let's see what the evidence is.” “The biggest information problems that we've had with UAPs is the amount of stonewalling stove piping, and also it seems that there is this push to gaslight the American people into looking at the evidence and then not fully believing it. I think for us, if we're writing the budget, for example, into the Pentagon, if we're writing the budget overall for whatever programs might be out there, why is it that members of Congress who are given a top secret security clearance are being denied access? That's not a free and true government, and so for us, especially being that we have now a Secretary of State who's actually open to Declassify Declassification and Marco Rubio, we're hoping to present that information and at least acknowledge it from a government perspective that we are not alone, but also let's see what the evidence is”

neandrewthal

147,966 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"Dr. Corbett's evidence yesterday. Now, this comes to when we just explained after reading the first half of the letter that the only reason that remains logically plausible on the strength of the evidence as to why this delay, that has remained unexplained by omission by the coroner, as to why this delay occurred, the only logical reason is that the strength of the evidence yesterday of Dr. Kevin Corbett was such that it meant, and it was so strong in terms of its implications, that it meant the coroner and counsel for the Royal Trinity Hospice, barrister Wright-Kluger, needed time to digest the implications of Dr. Corbett's evidence. And Wright-Kluger may have needed extra time to prepare a proper defense for the Royal Trinity Hospice, because Dr. Corbett's evidence was damning. And we're going to come to that evidence from our notes, live notes that we published yesterday, and show you exactly what was so damning about it." Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED

"Dr. Corbett's evidence yesterday. Now, this comes to when we just explained after reading the first half of the letter that the only reason that remains logically plausible on the strength of the evidence as to why this delay, that has remained unexplained by omission by the coroner, as to why this delay occurred, the only logical reason is that the strength of the evidence yesterday of Dr. Kevin Corbett was such that it meant, and it was so strong in terms of its implications, that it meant the coroner and counsel for the Royal Trinity Hospice, barrister Wright-Kluger, needed time to digest the implications of Dr. Corbett's evidence. And Wright-Kluger may have needed extra time to prepare a proper defense for the Royal Trinity Hospice, because Dr. Corbett's evidence was damning. And we're going to come to that evidence from our notes, live notes that we published yesterday, and show you exactly what was so damning about it." Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED

أبو عمّار

32,144 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Dan Bongino Show with the Friday Comedy Clip: BONGINO: “That's why I think people are so happy we got a badass President who's the boss, like walks into the G7 and it's like, yeah, I'm the boss. Was he kidding? Was he not kidding? I don't care. He IS the BOSS. A lot of people are proud of that. And being that it's Friday, I saw this. You ever hear of this guy Trixx? He does this comedy bit…” Dan Bongino Catch The Dan Bongino Show EVERY WEEKDAY on Rumble 🏴‍☠️ at 10am ET

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Dan Bongino Show with the Friday Comedy Clip: BONGINO: “That's why I think people are so happy we got a badass President who's the boss, like walks into the G7 and it's like, yeah, I'm the boss. Was he kidding? Was he not kidding? I don't care. He IS the BOSS. A lot of people are proud of that. And being that it's Friday, I saw this. You ever hear of this guy Trixx? He does this comedy bit…” Dan Bongino Catch The Dan Bongino Show EVERY WEEKDAY on Rumble 🏴‍☠️ at 10am ET

MAGA Kitty

50,611 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

Interesting exchange just now at the DOJ press conference about the James Comey indictments for his “86-47” post last year. AG Todd Blanche was pretty tight lipped about the evidence they have on Comey, but he said that they are looking at devices and there was a communication that was sent in this case. “There’s a communication that was sent allegedly in this case, and so that means that we have to look at devices…” Is he referring to the Instagram post itself? It feels like more than that because it doesn’t seem like a grand jury would indict him for JUST the Instagram post. Plus, Blanche seems to reference that they have more evidence later in this clip: “So whether there is a defense as you just described? Maybe… but the government will have evidence. I am not gonna talk about the evidence that we have.” What do they have on Comey?

Interesting exchange just now at the DOJ press conference about the James Comey indictments for his “86-47” post last year. AG Todd Blanche was pretty tight lipped about the evidence they have on Comey, but he said that they are looking at devices and there was a communication that was sent in this case. “There’s a communication that was sent allegedly in this case, and so that means that we have to look at devices…” Is he referring to the Instagram post itself? It feels like more than that because it doesn’t seem like a grand jury would indict him for JUST the Instagram post. Plus, Blanche seems to reference that they have more evidence later in this clip: “So whether there is a defense as you just described? Maybe… but the government will have evidence. I am not gonna talk about the evidence that we have.” What do they have on Comey?

TheStormHasArrived

80,173 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The Republicans are the party of feelings over facts. Whatever they feel, is what they go with—regardless of whether or not there’s any supporting evidence. When it comes to the constitution and due process, it doesn’t work like that. We have a judicial system and legal processes for a reason, and you don’t just get to ignore it because of how you “feel”.

The Republicans are the party of feelings over facts. Whatever they feel, is what they go with—regardless of whether or not there’s any supporting evidence. When it comes to the constitution and due process, it doesn’t work like that. We have a judicial system and legal processes for a reason, and you don’t just get to ignore it because of how you “feel”.

Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett

63,125 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr