Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

it takes two to work that enormous horse bbc 🍆 still doesn't look like its enough #hugecock #monstercock #bigdick #fatcock #thick #girthypenis #girthycock #monsterdick #hung #wellhung #blacksonblondes #interracialpass #dogfart #enormousdick #enormous #enormousbbc #enormouscock

📹daddyhuge2198📼

83,306 subscribers

53,764 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

NSFW #hugecock #monstercock #bigdick #fatcock #thick #girthypenis #girthycock #monsterdick #hung #wellhung #blacksonblondes #interracialpass #dogfart #enormousdick #enormous #enormousbbc #enormouscock

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🇺🇸 I am proud to see real Americans working hard; that is the foundation of our country. A privacy fence may look like a simple backyard project, but it takes patience, skill, and attention to detail. Watching someone build one from the ground up is a reminder that quality craftsmanship often goes unnoticed. Every post, panel, and measurement matters because the finished fence is something a family may rely on for years. It's the kind of work that quietly improves everyday life. The people who build our homes and neighborhoods deserve more appreciation. What everyday job do you think doesn't get enough recognition?

🇺🇸 I am proud to see real Americans working hard; that is the foundation of our country. A privacy fence may look like a simple backyard project, but it takes patience, skill, and attention to detail. Watching someone build one from the ground up is a reminder that quality craftsmanship often goes unnoticed. Every post, panel, and measurement matters because the finished fence is something a family may rely on for years. It's the kind of work that quietly improves everyday life. The people who build our homes and neighborhoods deserve more appreciation. What everyday job do you think doesn't get enough recognition?

Dr. CZ

30,270 views • 1 month ago

#WATCH | Delhi: When asked how realistic the timeline is to conclude the India-Canada CEPA negotiations by year-end, Canadian High Commissioner to India Chris Cooter says, I think it is very realistic... Probably the most important one is that our two Prime Ministers want it to happen. They have now said this a couple of times, most recently on the margins... at the G7 meeting in France last week. And our negotiators have been actively discussing what this would look like over the last few months. So the political will is there. We want to do this. We know we need it... Canada is traditionally focused on free trade... We have got back to work on negotiating this year, and I think it will happen... the business community also wants this to happen... what it accomplishes for the two sides is... it deals with things like tariffs, which can hinder trade... We have had ups and downs in our relationship, but we have never had a clear signal... There is an enormous scope here..."

#WATCH | Delhi: When asked how realistic the timeline is to conclude the India-Canada CEPA negotiations by year-end, Canadian High Commissioner to India Chris Cooter says, I think it is very realistic... Probably the most important one is that our two Prime Ministers want it to happen. They have now said this a couple of times, most recently on the margins... at the G7 meeting in France last week. And our negotiators have been actively discussing what this would look like over the last few months. So the political will is there. We want to do this. We know we need it... Canada is traditionally focused on free trade... We have got back to work on negotiating this year, and I think it will happen... the business community also wants this to happen... what it accomplishes for the two sides is... it deals with things like tariffs, which can hinder trade... We have had ups and downs in our relationship, but we have never had a clear signal... There is an enormous scope here..."

ANI

32,736 views • 2 months ago

Putin told reporters today that he does, in fact, read bloggers and social media channels, despite the long-standing claim that he barely uses the internet. “There are bloggers whom I sometimes watch with genuine interest,” he said. “Sometimes I’m even pleased, they get it exactly right.” Putin added that online channels are “not useless,” but claimed they contain “an enormous amount of informational garbage” and can easily mislead people without enough background knowledge. He said he still relies primarily on official sources, but makes his final judgments based on “the entire volume of information” that reaches him. It's an interesting detail given how often Kremlin officials and people close to Putin have said over the years that he doesn't personally use the internet in anything like the normal sense. Unless, of course, texts are printed out for him, or videos uploaded to TV. But that would be rather strange and cumbersome?

Putin told reporters today that he does, in fact, read bloggers and social media channels, despite the long-standing claim that he barely uses the internet. “There are bloggers whom I sometimes watch with genuine interest,” he said. “Sometimes I’m even pleased, they get it exactly right.” Putin added that online channels are “not useless,” but claimed they contain “an enormous amount of informational garbage” and can easily mislead people without enough background knowledge. He said he still relies primarily on official sources, but makes his final judgments based on “the entire volume of information” that reaches him. It's an interesting detail given how often Kremlin officials and people close to Putin have said over the years that he doesn't personally use the internet in anything like the normal sense. Unless, of course, texts are printed out for him, or videos uploaded to TV. But that would be rather strange and cumbersome?

Brian McDonald

72,937 views • 28 days ago

This guy put an AI data center into a box that fits on a desk It doesn't look like a serious machine It looks like a mini PC you could hide behind a monitor But with enough unified memory it can run local models, answer over your own files, power agents and keep private work off someone else's servers That sounds like a hobby setup until you look at what people are actually renting every month Claude subscription ChatGPT subscription API credits cloud GPU time usage limits private files uploaded into third-party tools For years the deal was simple: if you wanted intelligence, you rented it Now a Mac Mini M4 Pro or a 128GB AMD mini PC can handle a big part of everyday AI work locally Ollama runs the models Open WebUI gives you the chat interface Tailscale lets you reach it from your phone or laptop without exposing it to the open internet The cloud still wins for the hardest tasks But most daily AI work is not frontier research It is reading documents, summarizing files, drafting, coding helpers, search, notes and private workflows Most people will keep paying rent because it is convenient Others are realizing the assistant they rent every month can become hardware they own save this

This guy put an AI data center into a box that fits on a desk It doesn't look like a serious machine It looks like a mini PC you could hide behind a monitor But with enough unified memory it can run local models, answer over your own files, power agents and keep private work off someone else's servers That sounds like a hobby setup until you look at what people are actually renting every month Claude subscription ChatGPT subscription API credits cloud GPU time usage limits private files uploaded into third-party tools For years the deal was simple: if you wanted intelligence, you rented it Now a Mac Mini M4 Pro or a 128GB AMD mini PC can handle a big part of everyday AI work locally Ollama runs the models Open WebUI gives you the chat interface Tailscale lets you reach it from your phone or laptop without exposing it to the open internet The cloud still wins for the hardest tasks But most daily AI work is not frontier research It is reading documents, summarizing files, drafting, coding helpers, search, notes and private workflows Most people will keep paying rent because it is convenient Others are realizing the assistant they rent every month can become hardware they own save this

Asteri

12,171 views • 1 month ago

It's not enough to just look at Iran and ask, "Why can't we just make a deal and move on?" That may have worked for other enemies like North Korea. They wanted stability and economic prosperity and feared death, just like us. So, Mutually Assured Destruction worked. But it doesn't work against a religion that commands its followers to cleanse the world with as much chaos as possible, that celebrates martyrdom as a promotion, and that calls America the "Great Satan." The Iranian Marxists learned this the hard way. In 1979, they thought they could negotiate and share power with the Twelvers to overthrow the Shah. But as soon as their revolution was successful and Khomeini took power, they were the first to be thrown off the roofs. Until the public understands that fundamental history and worldview, we will keep asking why diplomacy fails. It's because Iran isn't playing by Western rules of survival. It's playing to destroy the "Great Satan."

It's not enough to just look at Iran and ask, "Why can't we just make a deal and move on?" That may have worked for other enemies like North Korea. They wanted stability and economic prosperity and feared death, just like us. So, Mutually Assured Destruction worked. But it doesn't work against a religion that commands its followers to cleanse the world with as much chaos as possible, that celebrates martyrdom as a promotion, and that calls America the "Great Satan." The Iranian Marxists learned this the hard way. In 1979, they thought they could negotiate and share power with the Twelvers to overthrow the Shah. But as soon as their revolution was successful and Khomeini took power, they were the first to be thrown off the roofs. Until the public understands that fundamental history and worldview, we will keep asking why diplomacy fails. It's because Iran isn't playing by Western rules of survival. It's playing to destroy the "Great Satan."

Glenn Beck

96,195 views • 1 month ago

New Andrej Karpathy interview Says AI agent failures stem from user skill, not model capability. Poor instructions cause errors. He suggests delegating 20-minute macro actions like coding and research to parallel agents and reviewing their work. --- "I think everything, like so many things, even if they don't work, I think to a large extent you feel like it's a skill issue. It's not that the capability is not there; it's that you just haven't found a way to string together what's available. Like, I didn't give good enough instructions to the agents in the file, or whatever it may be. I don't have a nice enough memory tool that I put in there, or something like that. So, it all kind of feels like a skill issue when it doesn't work to some extent. You want to see how you can parallelize them, and you want to be a 'Pierce tender,' basically. Pierce famously has a funny photo where he's in front of lots of these Codex agents behind the monitor. They all take about 20 minutes if you run them correctly and use high effort. You have multiple—you know, 10 or 20—pull requests checked out. It's just like you can do much larger macro actions. It's not just, 'Here's a line of code, here's a new function.' It's like, 'Here's a new functionality, delegate it to agent one. Here's a new functionality that's not going to interfere with the other one, give it to agent two.' Then, you try to review their work as best as you can, depending on how much you care about that code. You look for these macro actions that you can manipulate your software repository by. Another agent is doing some research, another agent is writing code, another one is coming up with a plan for some new implementation. Everything just happens in these macro actions over your repository. You're just trying to become really good at it and develop a muscle memory for it. It's very rewarding when it actually works, but it's also a new thing to learn. Hence, the psychosis." --- From No Priors YT channel (link in comment)

New Andrej Karpathy interview Says AI agent failures stem from user skill, not model capability. Poor instructions cause errors. He suggests delegating 20-minute macro actions like coding and research to parallel agents and reviewing their work. --- "I think everything, like so many things, even if they don't work, I think to a large extent you feel like it's a skill issue. It's not that the capability is not there; it's that you just haven't found a way to string together what's available. Like, I didn't give good enough instructions to the agents in the file, or whatever it may be. I don't have a nice enough memory tool that I put in there, or something like that. So, it all kind of feels like a skill issue when it doesn't work to some extent. You want to see how you can parallelize them, and you want to be a 'Pierce tender,' basically. Pierce famously has a funny photo where he's in front of lots of these Codex agents behind the monitor. They all take about 20 minutes if you run them correctly and use high effort. You have multiple—you know, 10 or 20—pull requests checked out. It's just like you can do much larger macro actions. It's not just, 'Here's a line of code, here's a new function.' It's like, 'Here's a new functionality, delegate it to agent one. Here's a new functionality that's not going to interfere with the other one, give it to agent two.' Then, you try to review their work as best as you can, depending on how much you care about that code. You look for these macro actions that you can manipulate your software repository by. Another agent is doing some research, another agent is writing code, another one is coming up with a plan for some new implementation. Everything just happens in these macro actions over your repository. You're just trying to become really good at it and develop a muscle memory for it. It's very rewarding when it actually works, but it's also a new thing to learn. Hence, the psychosis." --- From No Priors YT channel (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

23,187 views • 5 months ago

🇬🇧 On a Berkshire hillside there is a chalk horse 3,000 years old. 100 generations of British people have refused to let it fade. Its name is the Uffington White Horse. It sits on the chalk of the Berkshire Downs. And it was cut around 1,000 BC by Britons of the Late Bronze Age. They cut a trench into the turf. And filled it with crushed chalk. They cut a horse 110 metres long. Visible from miles. Chalk hillside art does not last. Grass grows. Silt fills. Without care, a chalk figure disappears within a generation. 🏔️ The Uffington White Horse should have vanished by the Iron Age. It did not. Because every generation that has lived near it has scoured it. Cleared the grass. Refilled the chalk. Kept the design alive. The Iron Age tended it. Rome tended it. The Anglo-Saxons named the hill after it. A Welsh poem of 600 AD mentioned it as already ancient. Medieval villagers held a festival to scour it. Victorian villagers wrote songs about it. And every year, modern volunteers continue. 3,000 years of British people. Bronze Age carvers. Iron Age tribes. Roman Britons. Anglo-Saxon farmers. Medieval villagers. Victorian families. And the British still here today. The carvers who cut the horse became Britons. Their descendants became the British. 100 generations have tended the same horse. 100 generations have refused to let it fade. The horse is alive because the people have stayed. This is what continuity looks like. Not a memory. Not a museum. A horse kept alive by hand. 🇬🇧 If you want to know whether the British are still here, look up. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ The chalk has been re-cut by hand for 3,000 years. Most British kids have never been up the hill. Our work is made in Britain, for Britain. Take your kids up the hill. 🙏 👉 👈 Be part of us. ☝️🇬🇧 Be Proud Of Us. 🙏🇬🇧

🇬🇧 On a Berkshire hillside there is a chalk horse 3,000 years old. 100 generations of British people have refused to let it fade. Its name is the Uffington White Horse. It sits on the chalk of the Berkshire Downs. And it was cut around 1,000 BC by Britons of the Late Bronze Age. They cut a trench into the turf. And filled it with crushed chalk. They cut a horse 110 metres long. Visible from miles. Chalk hillside art does not last. Grass grows. Silt fills. Without care, a chalk figure disappears within a generation. 🏔️ The Uffington White Horse should have vanished by the Iron Age. It did not. Because every generation that has lived near it has scoured it. Cleared the grass. Refilled the chalk. Kept the design alive. The Iron Age tended it. Rome tended it. The Anglo-Saxons named the hill after it. A Welsh poem of 600 AD mentioned it as already ancient. Medieval villagers held a festival to scour it. Victorian villagers wrote songs about it. And every year, modern volunteers continue. 3,000 years of British people. Bronze Age carvers. Iron Age tribes. Roman Britons. Anglo-Saxon farmers. Medieval villagers. Victorian families. And the British still here today. The carvers who cut the horse became Britons. Their descendants became the British. 100 generations have tended the same horse. 100 generations have refused to let it fade. The horse is alive because the people have stayed. This is what continuity looks like. Not a memory. Not a museum. A horse kept alive by hand. 🇬🇧 If you want to know whether the British are still here, look up. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ The chalk has been re-cut by hand for 3,000 years. Most British kids have never been up the hill. Our work is made in Britain, for Britain. Take your kids up the hill. 🙏 👉 👈 Be part of us. ☝️🇬🇧 Be Proud Of Us. 🙏🇬🇧

Proudofus.uk

51,844 views • 2 months ago

"In 'Zodiac' (2007), I wanted the audience to feel like they went through the ringer with these guys,(...) in retrospect you look at it & say maybe audiences who are looking for entertainment on a Friday night don’t want that toll taken on them." --- David Fincher Full Excerpt: "Interviewer: It’s so rare to walk out of a movie and to feel like I know more about a subject than I did walking into it. Watching Zodiac is like the experience of reading a really absorbing non-fiction book, and I know that part of it for you was about honoring the people who were the victims of the Zodiac, but you also have so many details, so many facts, you take it to such a level where there’s so much information… why was that important to you? Fincher: I don’t respect movies that treat me like I don’t have the attention span or mental faculty to follow… it’s one thing to talk about Dave Toschi’s fall from grace in an oblique and generic way. I can answer that question in a couple of different ways. I wanted the movie to take its toll on the audience, I wanted the audience to feel like they went through it, like they went through the ringer with these guys, and I didn’t know how to do that because these guys didn’t run across rooftops and fall off fire escapes. In their quest to bring the Zodiac to justice they followed the trail of breadcrumbs as far as it would take them, and they kept pushing and kept pushing when there were crackpots coming out of the woodwork. I felt like I didn’t want to make one of those movies where you do montage/montage/montage and you get the idea that they went to the mat with this, that it took its toll – I wanted the audience to feel that. You know, in retrospect you look at it and say maybe audiences who are looking for entertainment on a Friday night don’t want that toll taken on them. I felt like anything less than that would be doing the story and people involved a disservice. You could do it as something compressed, where you get the gist of it, and we would have shots of Jake [Gyllenhaal] half asleep and you would have those obligatory shots where the boss says, ‘You look like sh!t.’ And in the end I still don’t feel like you get enough of what happens with his family, we don’t get enough with his wife and kids, but it was all we could do to get it in at under two hours and forty minutes. I feel like we took about as much time as you can really expect an audience to sit still for and we tried to make them feel what it was like to be invested in this circuitous run down the rabbit hole." (David Fincher's interview with Devin Farachi, 2008)

"In 'Zodiac' (2007), I wanted the audience to feel like they went through the ringer with these guys,(...) in retrospect you look at it & say maybe audiences who are looking for entertainment on a Friday night don’t want that toll taken on them." --- David Fincher Full Excerpt: "Interviewer: It’s so rare to walk out of a movie and to feel like I know more about a subject than I did walking into it. Watching Zodiac is like the experience of reading a really absorbing non-fiction book, and I know that part of it for you was about honoring the people who were the victims of the Zodiac, but you also have so many details, so many facts, you take it to such a level where there’s so much information… why was that important to you? Fincher: I don’t respect movies that treat me like I don’t have the attention span or mental faculty to follow… it’s one thing to talk about Dave Toschi’s fall from grace in an oblique and generic way. I can answer that question in a couple of different ways. I wanted the movie to take its toll on the audience, I wanted the audience to feel like they went through it, like they went through the ringer with these guys, and I didn’t know how to do that because these guys didn’t run across rooftops and fall off fire escapes. In their quest to bring the Zodiac to justice they followed the trail of breadcrumbs as far as it would take them, and they kept pushing and kept pushing when there were crackpots coming out of the woodwork. I felt like I didn’t want to make one of those movies where you do montage/montage/montage and you get the idea that they went to the mat with this, that it took its toll – I wanted the audience to feel that. You know, in retrospect you look at it and say maybe audiences who are looking for entertainment on a Friday night don’t want that toll taken on them. I felt like anything less than that would be doing the story and people involved a disservice. You could do it as something compressed, where you get the gist of it, and we would have shots of Jake [Gyllenhaal] half asleep and you would have those obligatory shots where the boss says, ‘You look like sh!t.’ And in the end I still don’t feel like you get enough of what happens with his family, we don’t get enough with his wife and kids, but it was all we could do to get it in at under two hours and forty minutes. I feel like we took about as much time as you can really expect an audience to sit still for and we tried to make them feel what it was like to be invested in this circuitous run down the rabbit hole." (David Fincher's interview with Devin Farachi, 2008)

DepressedBergman

19,335 views • 6 months ago

In the 1930s, Dresden was considered one of the most beautiful cities in the world. For more than two hundred years the capital of Saxony had been called the Florence on the Elbe. Its kings had imported artists from across Europe and filled the city with Baroque palaces, churches, opera houses, and wide riverfront promenades. The skyline was a crowd of domes and spires above the river. Painters had travelled there in the 18th century just to capture it, and the canvases they left behind show a city that looked less built than composed, like a single enormous work of art. By the early 1940s, Dresden had been spared the bombing that had flattened other German cities. Many of its residents believed it would stay that way. Some told themselves the city was simply too beautiful to destroy and that no one could look at it and give the order. On the night of 13 February 1945, the order came. Wave after wave of Allied bombers dropped thousands of tons of explosives and incendiaries onto the old centre. The fires merged into a firestorm, a column of heat so violent it generated its own wind and pulled people and buildings into its core. By morning, the Florence on the Elbe was gone and tens of thousands of people were dead. Eight square miles of the historic centre had been reduced to rubble and ash. What had taken three centuries to build had taken roughly fourteen hours to undo... Beauty is not permanent. It is built slowly, by many hands, across generations, and it can be taken in a single night. And yet human beings keep building it, keep rebuilding it, keep believing it is worth the risk. After the war, the people of Dresden gathered the blackened stones of their ruined cathedral and, decades later, raised it again from its own ashes. Because beauty does not stop wars, but it refuses to concede that the worst of what humans do is the whole of what humans are. Dostoevsky said beauty would save the world. He did not mean it would happen quickly. He meant it could not, ultimately, be stopped. If you'd like to sit with this a little longer, today's article is a deeper meditation on how time changes everything: And if you'd like to support my work, a paid subscription is what makes it possible:

In the 1930s, Dresden was considered one of the most beautiful cities in the world. For more than two hundred years the capital of Saxony had been called the Florence on the Elbe. Its kings had imported artists from across Europe and filled the city with Baroque palaces, churches, opera houses, and wide riverfront promenades. The skyline was a crowd of domes and spires above the river. Painters had travelled there in the 18th century just to capture it, and the canvases they left behind show a city that looked less built than composed, like a single enormous work of art. By the early 1940s, Dresden had been spared the bombing that had flattened other German cities. Many of its residents believed it would stay that way. Some told themselves the city was simply too beautiful to destroy and that no one could look at it and give the order. On the night of 13 February 1945, the order came. Wave after wave of Allied bombers dropped thousands of tons of explosives and incendiaries onto the old centre. The fires merged into a firestorm, a column of heat so violent it generated its own wind and pulled people and buildings into its core. By morning, the Florence on the Elbe was gone and tens of thousands of people were dead. Eight square miles of the historic centre had been reduced to rubble and ash. What had taken three centuries to build had taken roughly fourteen hours to undo... Beauty is not permanent. It is built slowly, by many hands, across generations, and it can be taken in a single night. And yet human beings keep building it, keep rebuilding it, keep believing it is worth the risk. After the war, the people of Dresden gathered the blackened stones of their ruined cathedral and, decades later, raised it again from its own ashes. Because beauty does not stop wars, but it refuses to concede that the worst of what humans do is the whole of what humans are. Dostoevsky said beauty would save the world. He did not mean it would happen quickly. He meant it could not, ultimately, be stopped. If you'd like to sit with this a little longer, today's article is a deeper meditation on how time changes everything: And if you'd like to support my work, a paid subscription is what makes it possible:

James Lucas

34,335 views • 2 months ago

FLEX TALK WITH FOURTH #Flex1045xFOURTH_EverySingleDay I love him so much 🥺 👩🏻: just listing everything like this its already so much. your workload is really heavy. and i think there must be times when you’re tired, discouraged or even fed up with yourself 4️⃣: no at all. i think i’m kind of strange too. i dont feel tired at all 👩🏻: maybe its a mindset thing? 4️⃣: i dont know. maybe its bc i’m still young. i’m only twenty two 4️⃣: and i feel that every morning when i go to the grammy building, do you know who gives me encouragement? from the flower garland seller over there. i feel like they probably work much harder than i do. our work tiny compared to theirs. if they were given my job, they probably wouldnt complain even once. so i feel that if i complain, there are people like them who remind me and encourage me 👩🏻: they fight harder than we do and they work without days off 4️⃣: and we dont even know whether the reward they get is enough to improve their lives. so i think to myself, there are probably people who have it harder than i do.. and my mom… my mom works harder than i do too (🥹🤍)

FLEX TALK WITH FOURTH #Flex1045xFOURTH_EverySingleDay I love him so much 🥺 👩🏻: just listing everything like this its already so much. your workload is really heavy. and i think there must be times when you’re tired, discouraged or even fed up with yourself 4️⃣: no at all. i think i’m kind of strange too. i dont feel tired at all 👩🏻: maybe its a mindset thing? 4️⃣: i dont know. maybe its bc i’m still young. i’m only twenty two 4️⃣: and i feel that every morning when i go to the grammy building, do you know who gives me encouragement? from the flower garland seller over there. i feel like they probably work much harder than i do. our work tiny compared to theirs. if they were given my job, they probably wouldnt complain even once. so i feel that if i complain, there are people like them who remind me and encourage me 👩🏻: they fight harder than we do and they work without days off 4️⃣: and we dont even know whether the reward they get is enough to improve their lives. so i think to myself, there are probably people who have it harder than i do.. and my mom… my mom works harder than i do too (🥹🤍)

𝗚𝗲𝗺 𝗙𝗼𝗿 𝗠𝘆 𝗙𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘁𝗵🌻

12,698 views • 2 months ago

+15k today trading, last year I was working $30/hour I can personally tell you, going from broke to making unfathomable amounts of money is one of the best feelings in life deep down you know, a job isn't for you you've seen your parents... you really wanna be like them? whether you're in college, have a job, or don't know what is going on in life the truth is this: you're either a person who is going to work a job your whole life or you're going to do whatever it takes to make sure that doesn't happen make a decision and do EVERYTHING you can to change your situation and do not stop until its changed IT IS NOT EASY but you wouldn't still be reading this if there wasn't a part of you that didn't think you were capable stop telling yourself you can't because of your current situation start now, take small steps less video games, netflix, social media, p*rn more time spent towards figuring out how you're going to make internet money or work a job your whole life and look back at your life in regret choice is yours

+15k today trading, last year I was working $30/hour I can personally tell you, going from broke to making unfathomable amounts of money is one of the best feelings in life deep down you know, a job isn't for you you've seen your parents... you really wanna be like them? whether you're in college, have a job, or don't know what is going on in life the truth is this: you're either a person who is going to work a job your whole life or you're going to do whatever it takes to make sure that doesn't happen make a decision and do EVERYTHING you can to change your situation and do not stop until its changed IT IS NOT EASY but you wouldn't still be reading this if there wasn't a part of you that didn't think you were capable stop telling yourself you can't because of your current situation start now, take small steps less video games, netflix, social media, p*rn more time spent towards figuring out how you're going to make internet money or work a job your whole life and look back at your life in regret choice is yours

Trey

23,972 views • 7 months ago

Justin Klahn is hard to put in a box. Twenty years inside Nike Innovation. Years embedded with JSOC units building gear that had to actually work. Time consulting with three-letter agencies, DARPA, and the Harvard Learning Innovations Laboratory. A run working directly for Kanye West. He calls himself a problem solver, and the resume backs it up. His new book is Innovator's Handbook. We open on the divorce conversation, the kind of failure neither of us wished for, and what it takes to show up for a partner the second time around. From there it gets wide. The competition mindset that separates the top of the JSOC food chain from everyone else. What it's actually like to sit in a room with Kobe, with Tinker, with Kanye. The Nike origin stories most people don't know — the real Jordan re-signing, the Pantry, the relationship between Phil Knight and Steve Jobs. We dig into the supernatural. Faith. Conspiracy and control. How a guy who advises high-stakes operators stays open enough to consider anything but grounded enough to still get the work done. And we end on the AI workflow he used to write a book in two weeks — and what that says about where the world is going.

Justin Klahn is hard to put in a box. Twenty years inside Nike Innovation. Years embedded with JSOC units building gear that had to actually work. Time consulting with three-letter agencies, DARPA, and the Harvard Learning Innovations Laboratory. A run working directly for Kanye West. He calls himself a problem solver, and the resume backs it up. His new book is Innovator's Handbook. We open on the divorce conversation, the kind of failure neither of us wished for, and what it takes to show up for a partner the second time around. From there it gets wide. The competition mindset that separates the top of the JSOC food chain from everyone else. What it's actually like to sit in a room with Kobe, with Tinker, with Kanye. The Nike origin stories most people don't know — the real Jordan re-signing, the Pantry, the relationship between Phil Knight and Steve Jobs. We dig into the supernatural. Faith. Conspiracy and control. How a guy who advises high-stakes operators stays open enough to consider anything but grounded enough to still get the work done. And we end on the AI workflow he used to write a book in two weeks — and what that says about where the world is going.

Andy Stumpf

36,297 views • 3 months ago

The yen just jumped hard after intervention and everyone is already relaxing like the problem is fixed. That’s the dangerous part. When the yen was getting crushed, everyone stayed alert. Positioning was careful. People were watching every move. Then Japan and the US stepped in, the yen jumped, and the tone flipped almost overnight. Relief showed up. People started talking like the pressure had been handled. That shift is the part that matters. Nothing about the real setup changed. The rate gap is still wide. You can still borrow yen cheap and put that money to work somewhere that pays more. That incentive did not disappear just because two governments defended the currency for a few days. The door is still open. All the intervention did was interrupt the move. It did not close it. Now we are in the quiet stretch. Headlines slow down. The yen stops making dramatic daily swings. And that is usually when people start leaning back into the same trades that created the pressure in the first place. Caution fades. Positioning rebuilds. The market starts testing whether the threat of more intervention is real or just something officials said while the cameras were on. I do not like this phase. A sharp selloff forces people to pay attention. A bounce lets them look away. And once enough people look away, the market does not need a brand new crisis. It only needs the existing pressure to reassert itself. That is why the current calm bothers me more than the original move did. Delayed pressure does not disappear. It waits. And when it stops waiting, it usually does not give much warning. You’re treating this bounce like the problem is solved… or are you watching the part that usually gets people hurt? #Gold $JPY #Kospi

₿Strategy 🟧

16,945 views • 19 days ago

Meta signed a 20 billion dollar compute deal in April and by June was quietly trying to sell the leftovers, and Dan Niles went on CNBC to explain why that flip means the AI building boom may have already peaked. That timeline should stop you. For two years, the whole AI bet ran on one idea: that nobody has enough compute, and everyone wants more, and the demand never ends. Then Meta signed a 20 billion dollar deal in April. By June they were shopping the extra capacity to their rivals. Niles explained what broke. Companies used to burn as many tokens as they could to look busy. Then they started cutting. His example is the one that sticks. Using the smartest model to summarize your emails is like driving a Ferrari to the corner store for milk. You do not need it. Coinbase cut its AI spend in half while it used the tools more. Uber burned its whole budget in four months, then slashed it. When the biggest spenders suddenly have compute to sell, the story cracks. Everyone is still pricing these stocks like demand only climbs. The people paying the bills just found the off switch.

Meta signed a 20 billion dollar compute deal in April and by June was quietly trying to sell the leftovers, and Dan Niles went on CNBC to explain why that flip means the AI building boom may have already peaked. That timeline should stop you. For two years, the whole AI bet ran on one idea: that nobody has enough compute, and everyone wants more, and the demand never ends. Then Meta signed a 20 billion dollar deal in April. By June they were shopping the extra capacity to their rivals. Niles explained what broke. Companies used to burn as many tokens as they could to look busy. Then they started cutting. His example is the one that sticks. Using the smartest model to summarize your emails is like driving a Ferrari to the corner store for milk. You do not need it. Coinbase cut its AI spend in half while it used the tools more. Uber burned its whole budget in four months, then slashed it. When the biggest spenders suddenly have compute to sell, the story cracks. Everyone is still pricing these stocks like demand only climbs. The people paying the bills just found the off switch.

Ihtesham Ali

65,575 views • 1 month ago

While I package my free Claude Code Essentials course and then proceed to pull 12 hour work days to ship my free Claude Certified Architect study course, let me you behind the scene for a moment. For the past 10 years I’ve tried to make high-quality cloud/tech courses freely available. This is a personal choice I made, because it's what I want to do for you my tech community. To make this happen I’ve structured my life around keeping costs as low possible so I could continue doing this, even when it wasn’t the most financially sensible path. But the reality is that producing these courses takes an enormous amount of time and resources. The model only works if enough people support it in small ways subscribing, sharing the content, or supporting the paid offerings that help fund the free material. If my 50 free courses have helped you in your career in the last decade. Please consider the small things like following or subscribing to my own Youtube channel. It makes a bigger difference than most people realize. For those who have been supporting us all these years, you are the real hero's because I simply would have never been able to do it without you.

While I package my free Claude Code Essentials course and then proceed to pull 12 hour work days to ship my free Claude Certified Architect study course, let me you behind the scene for a moment. For the past 10 years I’ve tried to make high-quality cloud/tech courses freely available. This is a personal choice I made, because it's what I want to do for you my tech community. To make this happen I’ve structured my life around keeping costs as low possible so I could continue doing this, even when it wasn’t the most financially sensible path. But the reality is that producing these courses takes an enormous amount of time and resources. The model only works if enough people support it in small ways subscribing, sharing the content, or supporting the paid offerings that help fund the free material. If my 50 free courses have helped you in your career in the last decade. Please consider the small things like following or subscribing to my own Youtube channel. It makes a bigger difference than most people realize. For those who have been supporting us all these years, you are the real hero's because I simply would have never been able to do it without you.

Andrew Brown

38,095 views • 5 months ago

Day 17 of tracking my formally registered footpath complaint. I didn't want to post this video. I have been sitting on it for more than two weeks. The whole point of filing the complaint formally was to go about this process via the official channels that have been built for this exact purpose. My assumption was that BBMP Sahaaya was built for the convenience of the people of Bengaluru. But the last 17 days have revealed to me that it isn't working as intended. Countless people have replied to my posts saying, "I filed a complaint on the app and it was closed without explanation and without action taken." Stuff like potholes. Broken footpaths. Encroached pedestrian infra. Burning of trash. Piles of litter. Maybe some of these get resolved. I have not seen the statistics. Maybe the city is up to its neck in grievances and simply doesn't have the manpower to tackle them all. I love India. And I know that videos like this one do not paint the country in a positive light. But I also think it's important to recognise areas that could benefit from improvement. If they aren't highlighted continuously, it signals that everyone is ok with this reality. It signals that this is fine, that it's normal. And it isn't. This is not normal, nor is it ok. This is an apocalyptic level of deterioration. This broken infrastructure is a total embarrassment, not just for Bengaluru or Karnataka, but for India. And this didn't happen yesterday. This footpath broke a long time ago. It has been sitting like this for months. This is just one example of hundreds of thousands of spots like this. India has so much potential. But it's being held back. Its growth is being stunted by inaction and sluggish responses to issues like these. India is being held back by apathy. Honestly, my hope was that I'd be able to use the footage in this video for a before/after video, showing the improvement the city made when they came in to fix the footpath after receiving my complaint. I really wanted this to be a positive story! And I still intend for it to be, it's just taking way longer than expected... As many of you know, on Day 15 the case was closed with a very unsatisfactory fix. I feel that the bare minimum was done. Just enough work to be able to close the case. But nowhere near enough work to actually make the footpath walkable for pedestrians, especially people who are differently-abled, elderly, or parents pushing strollers. I am still optimistic that this will be resolved. I will keep highlighting the status of the grievance each day until it's fixed.

Day 17 of tracking my formally registered footpath complaint. I didn't want to post this video. I have been sitting on it for more than two weeks. The whole point of filing the complaint formally was to go about this process via the official channels that have been built for this exact purpose. My assumption was that BBMP Sahaaya was built for the convenience of the people of Bengaluru. But the last 17 days have revealed to me that it isn't working as intended. Countless people have replied to my posts saying, "I filed a complaint on the app and it was closed without explanation and without action taken." Stuff like potholes. Broken footpaths. Encroached pedestrian infra. Burning of trash. Piles of litter. Maybe some of these get resolved. I have not seen the statistics. Maybe the city is up to its neck in grievances and simply doesn't have the manpower to tackle them all. I love India. And I know that videos like this one do not paint the country in a positive light. But I also think it's important to recognise areas that could benefit from improvement. If they aren't highlighted continuously, it signals that everyone is ok with this reality. It signals that this is fine, that it's normal. And it isn't. This is not normal, nor is it ok. This is an apocalyptic level of deterioration. This broken infrastructure is a total embarrassment, not just for Bengaluru or Karnataka, but for India. And this didn't happen yesterday. This footpath broke a long time ago. It has been sitting like this for months. This is just one example of hundreds of thousands of spots like this. India has so much potential. But it's being held back. Its growth is being stunted by inaction and sluggish responses to issues like these. India is being held back by apathy. Honestly, my hope was that I'd be able to use the footage in this video for a before/after video, showing the improvement the city made when they came in to fix the footpath after receiving my complaint. I really wanted this to be a positive story! And I still intend for it to be, it's just taking way longer than expected... As many of you know, on Day 15 the case was closed with a very unsatisfactory fix. I feel that the bare minimum was done. Just enough work to be able to close the case. But nowhere near enough work to actually make the footpath walkable for pedestrians, especially people who are differently-abled, elderly, or parents pushing strollers. I am still optimistic that this will be resolved. I will keep highlighting the status of the grievance each day until it's fixed.

Caleb

46,365 views • 6 months ago

How Long Will the Palace Allow Itself to Be Used by Harry and Meghan Markle? How long is this going to go on? At what point does the Royal Family actually draw a line instead of quietly absorbing the damage and hoping it fades away on its own? Because right now, what’s happening with Harry and Meghan Markle isn’t just embarrassing, it’s unsustainable. And the longer it’s allowed to drag on, the worse it makes the institution look. They walked away. That was the deal. They made it very clear they didn’t want the role, the duty, the structure. Fine. People respected that, even if they didn’t agree with it. But what no one signed up for was this half-in, half-out limbo where they continue to trade on royal proximity whenever it benefits them, while attacking the very system that gave them that platform in the first place. That’s the part that’s become impossible to ignore. Every appearance, every “tour,” every carefully staged moment still leans heavily on the royal connection. The titles, the associations, the implied status. It’s all still being used. Not for service, not for long-term work, but for optics, branding, and relevance. Strip that away, and what’s actually left? That’s the uncomfortable question no one at the Palace seems willing to confront publicly. Because make no mistake, this isn’t independence. This is dependency dressed up as freedom. They rely on the Royal Family’s name, its global recognition, its credibility. They push against it when it suits them, and then lean right back on it when they need attention, access, or legitimacy. That constant back-and-forth is what’s turning this into a circus. Not just their behaviour, but the complete lack of a firm response to it. Silence is not strategy anymore. It’s enabling. And the taxpayer angle makes it worse. If there is even the slightest suggestion that public resources are being used, directly or indirectly, to support individuals who have explicitly stepped away from duty, then that is a line that should have been shut down immediately. No grey area. No ambiguity. A clear, firm no. Instead, everything feels blurred. Undefined. Like everyone is waiting for someone else to deal with it. Meanwhile, the institution takes the hit. The credibility erodes, not because of what Harry and Meghan do, but because there’s no visible boundary separating them from it anymore. That distinction matters. Without it, the Royal Family looks weak, reactive, and unwilling to protect itself. This isn’t about punishment. It’s about clarity. You cannot have people publicly distancing themselves from the monarchy while privately benefiting from its association. You cannot allow the title, the status, the access to be used as a personal brand tool with no accountability attached to it. That’s not modernisation. That’s a breakdown of structure. And if it continues, it sets a precedent. One that others could follow. The longer this drags on, the more it sends the message that there are no real consequences. That you can walk away, criticise, undermine, and still keep the perks within reach. That’s not just unfair, it’s damaging. At some point, someone has to say enough. Define the boundaries. Make them public. Enforce them properly. Not quietly, not behind closed doors, but in a way that restores a clear distinction between those who serve the institution and those who have chosen not to. Because right now, it doesn’t look like a controlled situation. It looks like a monarchy being dragged along behind two people who refuse to let go of it, while simultaneously claiming they already have. The circus has to end. You owe it to the people who still believe in the institution. You owe it to the generations coming after you. And frankly, you owe it to yourselves to stop being the punchbag for two people who have never once shown they deserve the name they still trade on. Enough. The country is watching. The world is watching. Draw the line. Now.

Queen Esther

54,668 views • 4 months ago

Bill Gates on why AI isn't a bubble, but why many AI investments will still fail: "AI is the biggest technical thing ever in my lifetime. It is so profound and therefore its influence is hard to overstate." Gates sees the underlying value as undeniable, with intelligence on demand spanning medical advice, tutoring, and drug design. "The value is extremely high, just like creating the internet ended up being in net very very valuable." But he draws a critical distinction between two types of bubbles: The tulip kind, where people look back and realise there was nothing underneath. And the internet kind, where something transformative was happening, but most companies still got wiped out. Gates is clear about which one AI is: "If what we mean is like tulips in the Netherlands... No, that's not where we are." AI is the internet, not the tulips. But just like the internet, the frenzy around it is creating enormous risk. Overpriced electricity commitments, data centers built in the wrong locations, and hardware that becomes obsolete before it pays for itself. "Some of these companies will be glad they spent all this money. Some of them, they'll commit to data centers whose electricity is too expensive." And yet, sitting it out isn't an option either. "If you want to be a tech company, you don't get to say, 'Let's check out of this race.'" The technology is transformative. But a ton of today's investments will turn out to be dead ends. And when the dust settles, the companies that built something durable will outlast the ones that spent the most trying to keep up.

Bill Gates on why AI isn't a bubble, but why many AI investments will still fail: "AI is the biggest technical thing ever in my lifetime. It is so profound and therefore its influence is hard to overstate." Gates sees the underlying value as undeniable, with intelligence on demand spanning medical advice, tutoring, and drug design. "The value is extremely high, just like creating the internet ended up being in net very very valuable." But he draws a critical distinction between two types of bubbles: The tulip kind, where people look back and realise there was nothing underneath. And the internet kind, where something transformative was happening, but most companies still got wiped out. Gates is clear about which one AI is: "If what we mean is like tulips in the Netherlands... No, that's not where we are." AI is the internet, not the tulips. But just like the internet, the frenzy around it is creating enormous risk. Overpriced electricity commitments, data centers built in the wrong locations, and hardware that becomes obsolete before it pays for itself. "Some of these companies will be glad they spent all this money. Some of them, they'll commit to data centers whose electricity is too expensive." And yet, sitting it out isn't an option either. "If you want to be a tech company, you don't get to say, 'Let's check out of this race.'" The technology is transformative. But a ton of today's investments will turn out to be dead ends. And when the dust settles, the companies that built something durable will outlast the ones that spent the most trying to keep up.

Big Brain AI

25,681 views • 5 months ago