Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

"It was a different time". Well done Women’s Rights Network- Greater Manchester's Cath Dyson 👏 for asking the question of former Australian PM Julia Gillard. Not a hint of regret from Gillard in her answer, but a clear admission that she didn't foresee any of the consequences of her... show more

Women's Rights Network - WRN

46,069 subscribers

21,444 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Julia Gillard is a liar She is in damage control mode She is trying to diminish the role that she played in destroying women’s rights in this country in 2013 by claiming “it was a different time then” No Gillard, I’ve read the Parliamentary papers and there were plenty of submissions made to your Senate inquiry that sounded the alarm on all the problems that we are having today - male predators and male opportunists weaponising law and policy to get access to female spaces, sports and services, and to punish and censor those who object No fair minded Australian is going to believe her lies She must apologise to the people of Australia for the damage done, and in particular to the many women (and men) who have been fighting this for years, often at great cost to themselves Hold this former politician to account #Australiafirst #auspol

Julia Gillard is a liar She is in damage control mode She is trying to diminish the role that she played in destroying women’s rights in this country in 2013 by claiming “it was a different time then” No Gillard, I’ve read the Parliamentary papers and there were plenty of submissions made to your Senate inquiry that sounded the alarm on all the problems that we are having today - male predators and male opportunists weaponising law and policy to get access to female spaces, sports and services, and to punish and censor those who object No fair minded Australian is going to believe her lies She must apologise to the people of Australia for the damage done, and in particular to the many women (and men) who have been fighting this for years, often at great cost to themselves Hold this former politician to account #Australiafirst #auspol

Katherine Deves 🇦🇺

66,912 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

“As challenging as Grover’s arguments might be to sections of the community, we really see no reason why a version of her article could not have been published in the first place...Indeed her campaign to change the law is now a public conversation, and the ABC should not deny its audience the opportunity to hear from its central player.” Pleasantly surprised to see Media Watch come down on the side of Sall Grover in her saga with the ABC over its rejection of her article on the importance of women's sex-based rights. Well done Sall on getting the ABC to call out its own failings! 👏👏👏 📣 Join the campaign to #FixTheSDA: #IStandWithSallGrover #Auspol

“As challenging as Grover’s arguments might be to sections of the community, we really see no reason why a version of her article could not have been published in the first place...Indeed her campaign to change the law is now a public conversation, and the ABC should not deny its audience the opportunity to hear from its central player.” Pleasantly surprised to see Media Watch come down on the side of Sall Grover in her saga with the ABC over its rejection of her article on the importance of women's sex-based rights. Well done Sall on getting the ABC to call out its own failings! 👏👏👏 📣 Join the campaign to #FixTheSDA: #IStandWithSallGrover #Auspol

Rachael Wong

17,761 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Devastating to see Sall Grover lose her appeal in the Federal Court, with the ruling that women must share their spaces with biological men. Sall has dedicated years of her life to fighting this. Although this is a heartbreaking loss, I have no doubt she’ll continue her mission to campaign for women’s rights in Australia. This is just one of the videos I’ve made for Sall, highlighting the absurdity of it all.

Devastating to see Sall Grover lose her appeal in the Federal Court, with the ruling that women must share their spaces with biological men. Sall has dedicated years of her life to fighting this. Although this is a heartbreaking loss, I have no doubt she’ll continue her mission to campaign for women’s rights in Australia. This is just one of the videos I’ve made for Sall, highlighting the absurdity of it all.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

33,885 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Thank you to Sex Matters for asking Julia Gillard if sex matters. See, it’s Gillard’s amendments to the Sex Discrimination Act that removed the definition of “woman” & added “gender identity”, muddling the whole thing & allowing men who claim to be women to interpret the act to their advantage. The amendments took effect in 2013 but it’s not like the act has been working for the past 11 years. With the help of the Australian Human Rights Commission, many people & businesses have been intimidated into accepting men as women. I say “intimidated” because it is intimidating to receive an Australian Human Rights Commission complaint on the basis of alleged “gender identity discrimination” (under the Sex Discrimination Act… yes, none of it makes any sense) and have to either do everything the AHRC says or fight a lengthy & expensive Federal Court battle. The AHRC wanted me to pay the man who made the complaint against me $20,000, attend “sex & gender education”, allow him onto a female only platform & allow all men who claim to be women onto a female only platform. I said no. Not just because I want the platform to remain female only but because I am a woman & I reserve the right to say NO to men when they trespass my boundaries. So I said NO to the AHRC. What resulted has been an almost 3 year long battle. It started when I was 15 weeks pregnant. My daughter will be turning 3 when the appeal to the first Federal Court decision is heard in appeal to the Full Federal Court (3 judges). She will be 4 years old if/when it goes to the High Court. But I want her to grow up in a country where she has rights, including the right to say NO to a man in a dress. What mother would ever stop fighting for her daughter? In the Tickle v Giggle decision, the judge said that “indirect discrimination” occurred “on the basis of gender identity”. It didn’t. He was blocked from the app on the basis of sex - and his sex is male. A simple DNA test would prove that. My eyes clearly saw it. The judge, with the help of the AHRC’s absurd interpretation of the law & reality, said that “sex is changeable”. It isn’t. Sex is immutable. However, Gillard’s amendments along with state-based changes to birth certificate legislation that allows men to edit their BC to the opposite of their biological sex has created the concept of “legal sex”. Legal sex is gender identity aka gender ideology. It obliterates women’s rights to say NO to men if that man declares himself to be a woman. And that leads to verdicts of “indirect discrimination on the basis of gender identity”, despite not knowing or caring that he has a gender identity. Sex matters. This law has to change, and it will, in part because of Giggle v Tickle & everyone who supports the case, but also because of the hard work of every woman who is speaking up and saying NO to this absurd situation. We’re saying what Julia Gillard should have said in 2013. While she (evidently) can’t answer the question, I know that sex matters to Julia Gillard. I know this because she basked in being Australia’s first woman Prime Minister and has dined out on the fact for almost 10 years. Without the reality of sex, her achievement becomes obsolete. With what she did with her achievement, her legacy has become devastating. I have a lot of respect for people who admit they got something wrong. It happens. We’re all only human (and humans don’t change sex). I hope Julia Gillard takes the opportunity to admit it some time. In the meantime, women around Australia (and the world) will continue to do the work to ensure that we can say NO to men who claim to be women. Sex matters. Gender identity does not.

Thank you to Sex Matters for asking Julia Gillard if sex matters. See, it’s Gillard’s amendments to the Sex Discrimination Act that removed the definition of “woman” & added “gender identity”, muddling the whole thing & allowing men who claim to be women to interpret the act to their advantage. The amendments took effect in 2013 but it’s not like the act has been working for the past 11 years. With the help of the Australian Human Rights Commission, many people & businesses have been intimidated into accepting men as women. I say “intimidated” because it is intimidating to receive an Australian Human Rights Commission complaint on the basis of alleged “gender identity discrimination” (under the Sex Discrimination Act… yes, none of it makes any sense) and have to either do everything the AHRC says or fight a lengthy & expensive Federal Court battle. The AHRC wanted me to pay the man who made the complaint against me $20,000, attend “sex & gender education”, allow him onto a female only platform & allow all men who claim to be women onto a female only platform. I said no. Not just because I want the platform to remain female only but because I am a woman & I reserve the right to say NO to men when they trespass my boundaries. So I said NO to the AHRC. What resulted has been an almost 3 year long battle. It started when I was 15 weeks pregnant. My daughter will be turning 3 when the appeal to the first Federal Court decision is heard in appeal to the Full Federal Court (3 judges). She will be 4 years old if/when it goes to the High Court. But I want her to grow up in a country where she has rights, including the right to say NO to a man in a dress. What mother would ever stop fighting for her daughter? In the Tickle v Giggle decision, the judge said that “indirect discrimination” occurred “on the basis of gender identity”. It didn’t. He was blocked from the app on the basis of sex - and his sex is male. A simple DNA test would prove that. My eyes clearly saw it. The judge, with the help of the AHRC’s absurd interpretation of the law & reality, said that “sex is changeable”. It isn’t. Sex is immutable. However, Gillard’s amendments along with state-based changes to birth certificate legislation that allows men to edit their BC to the opposite of their biological sex has created the concept of “legal sex”. Legal sex is gender identity aka gender ideology. It obliterates women’s rights to say NO to men if that man declares himself to be a woman. And that leads to verdicts of “indirect discrimination on the basis of gender identity”, despite not knowing or caring that he has a gender identity. Sex matters. This law has to change, and it will, in part because of Giggle v Tickle & everyone who supports the case, but also because of the hard work of every woman who is speaking up and saying NO to this absurd situation. We’re saying what Julia Gillard should have said in 2013. While she (evidently) can’t answer the question, I know that sex matters to Julia Gillard. I know this because she basked in being Australia’s first woman Prime Minister and has dined out on the fact for almost 10 years. Without the reality of sex, her achievement becomes obsolete. With what she did with her achievement, her legacy has become devastating. I have a lot of respect for people who admit they got something wrong. It happens. We’re all only human (and humans don’t change sex). I hope Julia Gillard takes the opportunity to admit it some time. In the meantime, women around Australia (and the world) will continue to do the work to ensure that we can say NO to men who claim to be women. Sex matters. Gender identity does not.

Sall Grover

33,499 просмотров • 1 год назад

Andrea Jenkyns has a meltdown when Purkiss points out that she and Reform UK talk about women's rights, but refuse to criticise Trump At one point Jenkyns stands up and threatens to walk out Jenkyns then repeatedly refuses to respond to questions from Purkiss, repeatedly telling her she's not the host of the show Quite possibly one of the most humiliating conversations for any person

Andrea Jenkyns has a meltdown when Purkiss points out that she and Reform UK talk about women's rights, but refuse to criticise Trump At one point Jenkyns stands up and threatens to walk out Jenkyns then repeatedly refuses to respond to questions from Purkiss, repeatedly telling her she's not the host of the show Quite possibly one of the most humiliating conversations for any person

Farrukh

97,476 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Woman outgrows dysphoria and struggles now with the grief over the fact that no one was able to help her in a way that didn't require she change. She's not yet named that anger and is still in a denial mode where she does not regret the permanent changes in the absence of the reason for them. I also used to say I didn't regret it and merely outgrew it, but eventually the warm glow of reclaiming your womanhood has to be seen alongside the fact that the cure I was sold was supposed to be the only answer, when time was also a cure because some do grow out of it. They told me it was permanent when it wasn't ever proven to be so. Now we know we could have waited for it to resolve, and now one must question, did the hormones actually delay that maturation process by which we outgrew dysphoria?

Sensitive content

Woman outgrows dysphoria and struggles now with the grief over the fact that no one was able to help her in a way that didn't require she change. She's not yet named that anger and is still in a denial mode where she does not regret the permanent changes in the absence of the reason for them. I also used to say I didn't regret it and merely outgrew it, but eventually the warm glow of reclaiming your womanhood has to be seen alongside the fact that the cure I was sold was supposed to be the only answer, when time was also a cure because some do grow out of it. They told me it was permanent when it wasn't ever proven to be so. Now we know we could have waited for it to resolve, and now one must question, did the hormones actually delay that maturation process by which we outgrew dysphoria?

Exulansic

38,751 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

The two reasons she won’t answer that question is because she won’t admit she was wrong (but she was) & the only logical answer is ‘Isla Bryson is a man’ and that blows her argument to apart. Scotland is well rid of the obnoxious, narcissistic, wee boot in any position of power.

The two reasons she won’t answer that question is because she won’t admit she was wrong (but she was) & the only logical answer is ‘Isla Bryson is a man’ and that blows her argument to apart. Scotland is well rid of the obnoxious, narcissistic, wee boot in any position of power.

Huggy Bear

37,198 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

YouTube Creator LUS covers Kick Streamer Destiny's motion for summary judgment on his lawsuit with Doe Plaintiff (Pxie) It seems her deposition didn't go well, which resulted in possibly the summary judgment filing, as she stated in her deposition and confirmed that she wasn't aware that Destiny factually transmitted the video of her (that was leaked) to any third party after the effective date of CARD II statute. Destiny's lawyer is stating that, with this admission from her, the court does not have subject-matter jurisdiction over the lawsuit. And is asking the judge to dismiss the lawsuit with prejudice.

YouTube Creator LUS covers Kick Streamer Destiny's motion for summary judgment on his lawsuit with Doe Plaintiff (Pxie) It seems her deposition didn't go well, which resulted in possibly the summary judgment filing, as she stated in her deposition and confirmed that she wasn't aware that Destiny factually transmitted the video of her (that was leaked) to any third party after the effective date of CARD II statute. Destiny's lawyer is stating that, with this admission from her, the court does not have subject-matter jurisdiction over the lawsuit. And is asking the judge to dismiss the lawsuit with prejudice.

Leigha Sapienti

53,584 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Ladko se jyada Jihaad ladkiyan karti hai….. A minute of just pain due to Love Jihad A girl from Noida shares her story of how she was trapped in Love Jihad through one of her friend .A boy came in her life as common friend as a Hindu and convince her and her parents for marriage. After sometime the girl realized that the boy was Muslim. Later on she was forced to be convert but she denied, so the boy took her to Jangur Baba in Kolkata and there also she was forced to get convert. But she escape from that trap and now through her incident she awakened lot's of Hindu girls. In all this incident her parents didn't support her because they are afraid of "Log Kya Kahenge"

Ladko se jyada Jihaad ladkiyan karti hai….. A minute of just pain due to Love Jihad A girl from Noida shares her story of how she was trapped in Love Jihad through one of her friend .A boy came in her life as common friend as a Hindu and convince her and her parents for marriage. After sometime the girl realized that the boy was Muslim. Later on she was forced to be convert but she denied, so the boy took her to Jangur Baba in Kolkata and there also she was forced to get convert. But she escape from that trap and now through her incident she awakened lot's of Hindu girls. In all this incident her parents didn't support her because they are afraid of "Log Kya Kahenge"

Comman Man

54,930 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

This lady saw a heavily pregnant 🤰 woman with a baby in distress, the woman said her husband beat her and threw her out of the house, she informed the police that what could they do to help, the police told her to leave her there to d!e. She couldn't leave her, so she took her home but she is asking for human rights help.

This lady saw a heavily pregnant 🤰 woman with a baby in distress, the woman said her husband beat her and threw her out of the house, she informed the police that what could they do to help, the police told her to leave her there to d!e. She couldn't leave her, so she took her home but she is asking for human rights help.

ÓMÒÉLÉRÍNJÁRÉ

70,876 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

"No woman or maiden shall be forced to marry a man whom she dislikes." That's not a modern law. That was written in England 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 over a thousand years ago. Anglo-Saxon women had more legal rights than your great-grandmother. On the same island. A thousand years earlier. 🔑 She could own land. In her own name. Buy it. Sell it. Leave it to whoever she chose. No permission needed. Not from her husband. Not from her father. Not from anyone. She could run a business. She could stand in an open-air court, raise her hand in oath, and the law would hear her the same as any man. ⚖️ On the morning after her wedding, her husband owed her a gift. Land. Money. Property. It was called the Morgengifu, the morning gift. It wasn't symbolic. It was legally binding. And it was hers. Not jointly owned. Not held in trust. Hers. Through everything. 💍 A woman called Wynflaed owned seven estates across four counties, her will still survives. Cynethryth, wife of King Offa, struck coins bearing her own name and face. The only Anglo-Saxon queen known to have done it. The coins are still in museum collections. 🪙 Æthelflæd, Lady of the Mercians, built ten fortified towns and led armies in battle. In the tenth century. ⚔️ While most of Europe treated women as property, this island wrote their rights into law. 🇬🇧 Then the Normans came. 1066. And they took all of it away. Every. Single. Right. 🚫 A married woman's property became her husband's. She couldn't own land. Couldn't sign a contract. Couldn't keep her own wages. Under the doctrine of coverture, her legal identity was absorbed into his. Bracton wrote it plainly: "husband and wife are one person, being one flesh and one blood." In the eyes of the law, she didn't exist. For over eight hundred years. Let that satisfy. Eight. Hundred. Years. In 1882, the Married Women's Property Act gave a married woman the right to own property, keep her earnings, and exist as a separate legal person. 📜 But Britain didn't invent those rights in 1882. It restored them. Rights that Anglo-Saxon women had exercised a thousand years before. On the same island, under the same sky, in a language that became the one you're reading now. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 This island forgot once. We won't let it forget again. Happy Mother's Day ❤️ Be Proud Of Us. 🇬🇧

"No woman or maiden shall be forced to marry a man whom she dislikes." That's not a modern law. That was written in England 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 over a thousand years ago. Anglo-Saxon women had more legal rights than your great-grandmother. On the same island. A thousand years earlier. 🔑 She could own land. In her own name. Buy it. Sell it. Leave it to whoever she chose. No permission needed. Not from her husband. Not from her father. Not from anyone. She could run a business. She could stand in an open-air court, raise her hand in oath, and the law would hear her the same as any man. ⚖️ On the morning after her wedding, her husband owed her a gift. Land. Money. Property. It was called the Morgengifu, the morning gift. It wasn't symbolic. It was legally binding. And it was hers. Not jointly owned. Not held in trust. Hers. Through everything. 💍 A woman called Wynflaed owned seven estates across four counties, her will still survives. Cynethryth, wife of King Offa, struck coins bearing her own name and face. The only Anglo-Saxon queen known to have done it. The coins are still in museum collections. 🪙 Æthelflæd, Lady of the Mercians, built ten fortified towns and led armies in battle. In the tenth century. ⚔️ While most of Europe treated women as property, this island wrote their rights into law. 🇬🇧 Then the Normans came. 1066. And they took all of it away. Every. Single. Right. 🚫 A married woman's property became her husband's. She couldn't own land. Couldn't sign a contract. Couldn't keep her own wages. Under the doctrine of coverture, her legal identity was absorbed into his. Bracton wrote it plainly: "husband and wife are one person, being one flesh and one blood." In the eyes of the law, she didn't exist. For over eight hundred years. Let that satisfy. Eight. Hundred. Years. In 1882, the Married Women's Property Act gave a married woman the right to own property, keep her earnings, and exist as a separate legal person. 📜 But Britain didn't invent those rights in 1882. It restored them. Rights that Anglo-Saxon women had exercised a thousand years before. On the same island, under the same sky, in a language that became the one you're reading now. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 This island forgot once. We won't let it forget again. Happy Mother's Day ❤️ Be Proud Of Us. 🇬🇧

Proudofus.uk

424,496 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

An impassioned maiden speech by newly elected One Nation MP for Narungga, Chantelle Thomas. She spoke about how she was inspired by the example of Pauline Hanson. What’s clear is that in Chantelle there is now another very strong, straight speaking Australian woman on the frontline of politics, this time in South Australia. She is not your regular cardboard cut out uniparty politico. She’s a different sort of politician and will be offering a different sort of representation. We’re very excited to see what she will do for her constituents and for South Australia.

An impassioned maiden speech by newly elected One Nation MP for Narungga, Chantelle Thomas. She spoke about how she was inspired by the example of Pauline Hanson. What’s clear is that in Chantelle there is now another very strong, straight speaking Australian woman on the frontline of politics, this time in South Australia. She is not your regular cardboard cut out uniparty politico. She’s a different sort of politician and will be offering a different sort of representation. We’re very excited to see what she will do for her constituents and for South Australia.

One Nation Australia

44,716 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The Today Show interview got better for Karen Read as it went on, and she responded to the comment about how John was being lost in all of this perfectly: "He's not lost, he's the reason we're doing this." This needs to be emphasized more because it's the most common criticism of her detractors. Karen is John's voice. There would be no justice for John O'Keefe if she was convicted. She and her team have done more to shed light on what really happened to him than anyone who claims to be fighting for him while trying to put her in prison. She really humanized him with this answer, telling the public who John really was, and what a tremendous loss this was for everyone. We rarely heard this from her during the trial and it was powerful. The antis have tried to take ownership of John's legacy and she took it back with this answer. I know Karen cared for John because she sent me pictures of him that showed what a good father he was, and pictures of her with the kids that showed how much they liked her. She asked me not to share them publicly because she didn't want to exploit them, but she wanted me to know what a tremendous loss it was for the kids.

The Today Show interview got better for Karen Read as it went on, and she responded to the comment about how John was being lost in all of this perfectly: "He's not lost, he's the reason we're doing this." This needs to be emphasized more because it's the most common criticism of her detractors. Karen is John's voice. There would be no justice for John O'Keefe if she was convicted. She and her team have done more to shed light on what really happened to him than anyone who claims to be fighting for him while trying to put her in prison. She really humanized him with this answer, telling the public who John really was, and what a tremendous loss this was for everyone. We rarely heard this from her during the trial and it was powerful. The antis have tried to take ownership of John's legacy and she took it back with this answer. I know Karen cared for John because she sent me pictures of him that showed what a good father he was, and pictures of her with the kids that showed how much they liked her. She asked me not to share them publicly because she didn't want to exploit them, but she wanted me to know what a tremendous loss it was for the kids.

Aidan Kearney

100,964 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨BREAKING NEWS: Stunning And Brave™ Jason Tickle Declared Official Woman After Court Rules Biology Is Hate Speech SYDNEY — In a landmark victory for the mentally ill dude in a dress community, the Full Federal Court has ruled that Jason Tickle… a biological male who spent a decade in men’s hockey before discovering his inner woman… was the victim of direct discrimination when excluded from a women-only app. The judges, channelling the spirit of Julia Gillard’s 2013 Sex Discrimination Act amendment, declared that “sex is changeable” and that any woman who objects is guilty of gratuitous, disrespectful conduct. Tickle, who now boasts one-third the testosterone of an actual female and claims women’s hockey “saved my life,” celebrated by telling the radical leftist ABC and SBS that he brought the case to show other confused men they can be brave™. The progressive Marxist Australian government and the Australian Human Rights Commission have hailed the decision as a triumph of Diversity Is Our Strength™. Biological women? Irrelevant. Their spaces, their safety, their sports… all now open to any man who says the magic words. The court was clear: men are women now. Women are optional. And anyone who notices the difference is guilty of a hate crime against progress itself. Sall Grover Julia Gillard ABC News SBS Australia Australian Human Rights Commission Australian Labor

🚨BREAKING NEWS: Stunning And Brave™ Jason Tickle Declared Official Woman After Court Rules Biology Is Hate Speech SYDNEY — In a landmark victory for the mentally ill dude in a dress community, the Full Federal Court has ruled that Jason Tickle… a biological male who spent a decade in men’s hockey before discovering his inner woman… was the victim of direct discrimination when excluded from a women-only app. The judges, channelling the spirit of Julia Gillard’s 2013 Sex Discrimination Act amendment, declared that “sex is changeable” and that any woman who objects is guilty of gratuitous, disrespectful conduct. Tickle, who now boasts one-third the testosterone of an actual female and claims women’s hockey “saved my life,” celebrated by telling the radical leftist ABC and SBS that he brought the case to show other confused men they can be brave™. The progressive Marxist Australian government and the Australian Human Rights Commission have hailed the decision as a triumph of Diversity Is Our Strength™. Biological women? Irrelevant. Their spaces, their safety, their sports… all now open to any man who says the magic words. The court was clear: men are women now. Women are optional. And anyone who notices the difference is guilty of a hate crime against progress itself. Sall Grover Julia Gillard ABC News SBS Australia Australian Human Rights Commission Australian Labor

mdtlion

34,930 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Charles Kanjama on whether the DP can run for office or not: The court was not clear on it; it could have been clear by making a declaration that the outcome of the impeachment will not have any consequence. My interpretation is that because the court has found that there has been a violation of the right to a fair hearing, of necessity, the fruits of the impeachment cannot all be sustained. The finality in terms of bringing in a new DP has been sustained, but the other fruits of impeachment, which is to stop the DP from running again, cannot be sustained. The outcome is fairly confusing #CitizenMondayReport

Charles Kanjama on whether the DP can run for office or not: The court was not clear on it; it could have been clear by making a declaration that the outcome of the impeachment will not have any consequence. My interpretation is that because the court has found that there has been a violation of the right to a fair hearing, of necessity, the fruits of the impeachment cannot all be sustained. The finality in terms of bringing in a new DP has been sustained, but the other fruits of impeachment, which is to stop the DP from running again, cannot be sustained. The outcome is fairly confusing #CitizenMondayReport

Citizen TV Kenya

35,563 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад