It was timed like a setup. It was used like a setup. Was it a setup? If so, was it Teresa or Mitch behind it? You decide.

I’ve watched this several times and fail to see what’s nefarious. I’m also stoned

Joe Kent leaves administration. A couple of days later an interview is arranged that reveals "Joe Kent vetted Mitch." They somehow found Teresa's interview immediately despite the fact that she only had 2,000 followers at the time. Info is immediately picked up by Laura Loomer and Con inc to further smear Kent as a leak, "having leaked info to Candace." Instead of correcting the record, doing damage control, Teresa asks Con inc. to credit her for her video. Instead of correcting the record, doing damage control, Mitch's IRL friend reposts Con Inc's post about "Mitch just messed up big time." It's either the worst timing and most unfortunate sequence of events ever or someone or multiple people are up to no good.

Your answer is exactly how you played your video. Idk Theresa did the RT. Seems like a Mitch and Theresa issue. Also does it matter that Kent vetted Mitch or that Candace asked him to? Idk I swear I’m not trying to be difficult 😂

IDK I get immediate gut instincts about people. It wasn't good w/Teresa, yet I did check out her acct, she's close w/Lane and was going after Diligent about something too. Yet, perhaps her quote tweet of Erika Kirk telling all to go to church, and her inviting Erika to go w/her, is very icky. Lane and Teresa don't seem to know who Erika is. I haven't been a fan of Billie and Brandi's reporting either, only due lack of knowledge of political operatives and politics, similar to Teresa, yet also how they word things about TR and they aren't blunt. On Brandi's tweet about Diligent, an acct I do not like, Docmaga1, said, "WE KNOW THE TRUTH ABOUT DILIGENT. ALL OF IT." 🚩 Teresa and Artifex agreed w/Andrew Wilson, yet he wasn't fully correct either. 🚩 Not so sure about Artifex either, I liked him at first, but he seems to be about self-promotion. This case is politically based, if people don't know the tactics and why some support what they do, they can't evaluate much or maybe it's what they support too! In the end, I believe Mitch Snow, as without a doubt there was a meeting at the little fort, maybe even a few.

1 problem: Mitch Snow story was never proven to be fake.

At the time you first brought this up, I believe Kat replied to you explaining whatever you were asking? If you have the link to your original thread, you could post it here for everyone to read the thread for complete information & context. I might be able to find it. You and I communicated and sorted that out as well. Lastly, it’s not unusual for creators to want credit for their content. I know I already explained all of this to you back then. Why the reboot?

Asking Laura Loomer's ilk for credit, when your interview was being used to smear Joe Kent as he was resigning in protest of the Iran war, is wild. You wouldn't catch me doing it in a million years, but you do you.

I have no idea who is tied to whom, and frankly, I don’t spend my days tracking it. I’m not combing through the internet to see who follows whom, who knows whom, or who has done what to whom. That’s simply not how I live. You know that, and I’m not interested in playing the “six degrees of separation” game.

There is no favorable interpretation of that post, regardless of what "six degrees of separation" you may or may not be aware of. Unless the intention was to smear Joe Kent. Asking Cinema to credit your video would make sense in that context.

Here is my reply from back then, and if you can’t detect the sarcasm in my tone to cinemashogun, you missed my point. I also provided the link to my full interview so that people could watch for themselves. Again, I’m asking you, why the reboot now, and why are you framing it as though you have been sitting on it for a while when you already posted about it in March 2026?

Interesting

Very. It's never sat right with me.

Cinema Shogun, Rekeita Law, Zack Peter are all involved in this little group of narrative influencers - imo, based on what I've seen on X and YT

I don’t see an issue with Candace asking Joe to confirm if Mitch was in the military and if he would have business at Ft. H. I just don’t see a problem.

No idea what you're getting at. Setting up who? For what?

I will say I don’t trust Theresa or understand the fascination with her.

Claimed by this @cinemashogun clown?

Just so you guys know, this is what Teresa really looks like before all the plastic surgery.

You can see my comment and another clip on my page. But I’ll leave this here for you too.

I’m not trust her and her fake lips anymore

I think he sent records to Joe Kent not the other way around necessarily. I assumed Tulsi and Joe were helping Candace yes because they are all friends.

I dont see the big deal here. Candace had Kent vet that his story checked out as far as his military record etc (not what he claimed to see). Nobody "messed up". I think that shogun dumbass just did what the anti-candace crowd always does, make something out of nothing.

Let me guess, Mitch is the one that denied it. They are framing Joe Kent because WE CALL FOR JOE KENT FOR PRESIDENT. It's bullshit. Mitch has involved himself into everything since he was on Candace. He's on every Gary Meltdowns X spaces. Something's way off with Mitch

So now you’re going after Teresa? WTF Dude!

T

Multiple things can be true at once. Snow’s original account may be true. Not so tactical attacked it & inadvertently proved Snow WAS detained there. Oops! But also, Snow seems like a guy that bad people in high places might later bust kneecaps to do their bidding.

Ok

I don't see any set up. The question is legit. Mitch doesn't look like he's being sneaky. This is a much ado about nothing situation. Absolute nonsense to continue harping on all this. Teresa, Brandi, Billie and Diligent are alll 100% good faith actors with stout integrity.

100% counterterrorism at its best