Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

It works!! This is fully designed by GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.5-Pro in ForgeCAD!

ruben_kostard's profile picture

Ruben Kostandyan

3,894 subscribers

35,495 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

GPT-5.5-Pro modeled a Chandelier in ForgeCAD
1:03

GPT-5.5-Pro modeled a Chandelier in ForgeCAD

Ruben Kostandyan

63,414 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

GPT-5.5-Pro made a model of ISS in ForgeCAD
0:49

GPT-5.5-Pro made a model of ISS in ForgeCAD

Ruben Kostandyan

24,490 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Asked GPT-5.5-Pro to make a Nema 17 motor in ForgeCAD
0:24

Asked GPT-5.5-Pro to make a Nema 17 motor in ForgeCAD

Ruben Kostandyan

20,968 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

GPT-5.5 in Codex made an Electric Toothbrush in ForgeCAD. Incredible!
0:33

GPT-5.5 in Codex made an Electric Toothbrush in ForgeCAD. Incredible!

Ruben Kostandyan

180,933 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

GPT-5.5 in Codex made an electric hair clipper in ForgeCAD
0:54

GPT-5.5 in Codex made an electric hair clipper in ForgeCAD

Ruben Kostandyan

28,931 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

gpt 5.4 (5.5) pro is insane didn't expect to get this in one shot
0:36

gpt 5.4 (5.5) pro is insane didn't expect to get this in one shot

Leon Lin

41,639 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Generate an image of a product with ChatGPT Images 2.0 and convert to CAD with GPT-5.5 in Codex with ForgeCAD
0:30

Generate an image of a product with ChatGPT Images 2.0 and convert to CAD with GPT-5.5 in Codex with ForgeCAD

Ruben Kostandyan

246,018 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Looks beautiful! Asked GPT-5.5 in Codex to replicate the first one in ForgeCAD. Continuous iteration based on an image is getting better!
0:20

Looks beautiful! Asked GPT-5.5 in Codex to replicate the first one in ForgeCAD. Continuous iteration based on an image is getting better!

Ruben Kostandyan

28,961 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

GPT 5.5 is good
1:03

GPT 5.5 is good

Rasmus Andersson

17,041 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

GPT 5.5 Pro is really good at 3d low poly gen
0:23

GPT 5.5 Pro is really good at 3d low poly gen

Leon Lin

35,301 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

GPT 5.5 Pro: "make snake except its realistic"
0:21

GPT 5.5 Pro: "make snake except its realistic"

jasper

30,739 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

GPT-5.5 PRO JUST BUILT A VOXEL MINECRAFT
1:16

GPT-5.5 PRO JUST BUILT A VOXEL MINECRAFT

0xMarioNawfal

55,761 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Flagellar motor by gpt 5.5
0:24

Flagellar motor by gpt 5.5

echo.hive

20,563 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

GPT-5.5 is here. Ben and I have had access for a bit. We have a lot of thoughts. 00:00:00 - Intro 00:01:34 - Vercel hack 00:05:38 - Kimi K2.6 00:14:29 - Cursor acquired? 00:37:24 - GPT Image 2 00:49:30 - GPT-5.5 01:22:02 - GPT-5.5 Pro
1:44:10

GPT-5.5 is here. Ben and I have had access for a bit. We have a lot of thoughts. 00:00:00 - Intro 00:01:34 - Vercel hack 00:05:38 - Kimi K2.6 00:14:29 - Cursor acquired? 00:37:24 - GPT Image 2 00:49:30 - GPT-5.5 01:22:02 - GPT-5.5 Pro

Theo - t3.gg

108,928 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Claude Fable 5 on left vs GPT 5.5 on right. Both one shot. Fable 5 is truly a big jump in CAD capabilities as seen in ForgeCAD.
0:20

Claude Fable 5 on left vs GPT 5.5 on right. Both one shot. Fable 5 is truly a big jump in CAD capabilities as seen in ForgeCAD.

Ruben Kostandyan

31,787 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Guess which is Opus 4.7 and GPT 5.5 👀
0:28

Guess which is Opus 4.7 and GPT 5.5 👀

Leon Lin

174,387 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

gpt-5.5 proだとこんな感じ。
0:28

gpt-5.5 proだとこんな感じ。

Tomoki MAEDA

549,876 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Databricks is excited to partner with OpenAI on GPT-5.5, their latest frontier model. GPT-5.5 will be available in Unity AI Gateway on launch. You can use it with coding tools such as Codex, or to power your enterprise agents. GPT-5.5 is state-of-the-art on many benchmarks including OfficeQA Pro, our benchmark for evaluating grounded reasoning on enterprise tasks. We are partnering with OpenAI to co-launch on Databricks. Hear more from our co-founder Patrick Wendell and OpenAI CRO Denise Holland Dresser on GPT-5.5 in Databricks.
1:53

Databricks is excited to partner with OpenAI on GPT-5.5, their latest frontier model. GPT-5.5 will be available in Unity AI Gateway on launch. You can use it with coding tools such as Codex, or to power your enterprise agents. GPT-5.5 is state-of-the-art on many benchmarks including OfficeQA Pro, our benchmark for evaluating grounded reasoning on enterprise tasks. We are partnering with OpenAI to co-launch on Databricks. Hear more from our co-founder Patrick Wendell and OpenAI CRO Denise Holland Dresser on GPT-5.5 in Databricks.

Databricks

12,707 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

I compared Claude Fable 5 to GPT-5.5 in this Power Rangers prompt Thing is, Fable 5 is using Low thinking effort and GPT-5.5 is using xhigh Safe to say, the results are... not even close. 5.5's output is bad across the board, from the UI to the actual voxel scene itself🥲 1st video: Claude Fable 5 (Low effort) 2nd video: GPT-5.5 (xhigh)
0:34

I compared Claude Fable 5 to GPT-5.5 in this Power Rangers prompt Thing is, Fable 5 is using Low thinking effort and GPT-5.5 is using xhigh Safe to say, the results are... not even close. 5.5's output is bad across the board, from the UI to the actual voxel scene itself🥲 1st video: Claude Fable 5 (Low effort) 2nd video: GPT-5.5 (xhigh)

Lentils

207,409 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua
0:42

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

Chris

250,919 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce