Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

It’s a Blockbuster #War2 🔥🥵🏌️🏻‍♂️ Hero entries ✅ Action sequences ✅ Dance number ✅ Interval ✅ Climax ✅ Collars up, Tigers & Hrithikians… #BlockbusterWar2 🏌️🏻‍♂️🏌️🏻‍♂️ Jr NTR Hrithik Roshan #War2Review

14,721 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨🍼 PARENTS ARE WAKING UP IN THE DELIVERY ROOM! More moms & dads are quietly saying “NO THANKS” to the routine newborn protocol: Vitamin K shot, Hep B vaccine at birth, and the whole “just-in-case” bundle. Refusal rates have nearly DOUBLED in recent years — and it’s not rebellion. It’s RESEARCH + INFORMED CONSENT in action! 👏💪 Abby the Midwife When mom is Hep B negative and baby isn’t high-risk on day one, families are asking: Why inject a brand-new human with synthetic chemicals in those fragile first hours? This is a powerful shift toward trusting nature’s design over hospital scripts. 🧬✨ MUST-WATCH VIDEO by Dr. Jeffrey I. Barke, MD exposing the Vitamin K shot truth! 🔥 PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT from the video (key highlights): “There are approximately 3.6 million newborns born in the United States every year. The American Academy of Pediatrics thinks every single one of them should get an intramuscular dose of vitamin K1.” ☠️But look at the BLACK BOX WARNING right at the top:🤮 ⚠️⛔️“Severe reactions including fatalities have occurred during and immediately after intravenous and intramuscular injections of vitamin K.”⛔️⚠️ ⚠️☢️“This product contains aluminum which may be toxic… Premature neonates are particularly at risk.”☢️⚠️ Then Section 13.1: “Studies of carcinogenicity, mutagenesis or impairment of fertility have not been conducted.” 😱 Translation? They’re pushing a synthetic chemical with a fatal-reaction warning, aluminum toxicity risk, and ZERO long-term cancer/fertility studies — while recommending it for EVERY baby on day one. Nature designed thin blood for stem cell transfer from the cord… not sludge from a shot! ✅ Parents, do your homework! ✅ Demand full informed consent! ✅ Protect your littlest ones from unnecessary interventions. ✅ ✅ Say NO and watch the quiet revolution grow! 🙌🛡️ #InformedConsent #NewbornRights #VitaminKWarning #ProtectOurBabies #DoYourOwnResearch #NaturalBirth #RFKJrMAHA What are YOUR thoughts? Drop below 👇 This trend is saving lives! Are you in agreement? See here for the vitamin K package inset and more on toxic compounds! ⬇️

The Dr. Margaret Show

416,552 views • 3 months ago

Of the 661 studies often cited as proof that childhood vaccines are tested against inert placebos, a detailed breakdown reveals a shocking truth: not a single one was used to license a routine injected vaccine on the CDC schedule with a true saline placebo. Here’s the breakdown by Aaron Siri: ➡️ 567 studies were for non-routine vaccines (e.g., HIV vaccines). Irrelevant. ➡️ Of the remaining 94, 70 did not involve healthy children (e.g., HIV+ adults). Irrelevant. ➡️ Of the remaining 24, 21 did not involve a US-licensed vaccine or a control used to license one. Irrelevant. That leaves just 3 studies. But do they hold up? 1. Varicella (chickenpox) vaccine: Control group was injected with neomycin (an antibiotic), NOT an inert placebo. 2. Gardasil-4: The “inert” control group received everything in the vial except antigens and alum—including L-histidine, sodium borate, and yeast protein. NOT inert. 3. Gardasil-9: A small group received saline, BUT only after first receiving three doses of Gardasil-4. Not a true inert control. The result? ZERO trials with a true inert placebo were used to license any routine childhood vaccine. This isn’t just a statistical oversight—it’s a fundamental flaw in how we assess vaccine safety. Proper safety trials require: ✅ A true inert control (e.g., saline) ✅ Long-term safety review ✅ Sufficient power (large sample size) Not a single routine childhood vaccine on the CDC schedule meets all three criteria. When RFK Jr. highlighted this lack of placebo-controlled data, fact-checkers pointed to the same flawed list of 661 studies. After his analysis debunked them, the list was mysteriously expanded—perhaps hoping a larger number would obscure the truth. The truth remains: without proper controls, we cannot robustly quantify the risks of vaccines. Parents and physicians deserve transparent, high-quality data to make informed decisions.

Camus

59,416 views • 11 months ago

This girl gets some of her flirting advice right, but some is very OFF BASE. This is why you have to take dating advice for men that comes from women with a giant grain of salt 🧂 Some of women’s advice may be useful… but some of it will always be MISLEADING. If you are not already savvy enough to tell the difference, you’ll mix in the bad with the good and not know where you’re tripping up. Break down of what is useful vs. what is MISLEADING: ✅ USEFUL: do not open her with “You’re really pretty/beautiful, I wanted to meet you.” She doesn’t know what to say to that; she has also heard it before so many times you sound like a broken record. You can say pretty much ANYTHING other than this (e.g.: “Hey, how’s it going?” This is 10x better than a generic looks-based compliment). ✅ USEFUL: open her with something relevant to the situation. Situationally relevant openers can work great. For instance: “Think we’ll be in line forever?” if you’re waiting in line, or “The art here sure is interesting huh,” if there’s a weird piece of art. 🆇 MISLEADING: you should not expect a girl to take over on your opener, like this girl did with the “cute/sweet” coffee recommendation opener. Most girls are not outgoing enough that they are going to decide to “have a chat” with you immediately on the open. You are the man; you need to EXPECT to drive at least the first 2 minutes of conversation YOURSELF! ✅ USEFUL: “keep the conversation short, sweet, casual, fun”: all that, yes. The initial conversation needs to be light, playful, and engaging. Tease her within the first 30 seconds (that’s how she knows it’s a FLIRTATION and not a platonic chat). Make an observation about her or two (keep it positive and light). Tap her on the forearm on a joke or a high point. SMILE! You want your presence to be a warm, welcome, & flirtatious one. 🆇 MISLEADING: “worst thing you could possibly do is annoy her with your presence”; I mean, YES, BUT you do not need to be thinking about “I’d better not annoy her” when you are talking to girls. If you do, you will play it too safe, act very boring, get into your head, and become uninteresting and un-fun. Instead, just focus on bringing fun and good energy (not ‘avoiding annoyance’). ✅ USEFUL: what she is calling a ‘non-invasive call to action’ (is this chick a marketer? Because this is marketer speak!) we call a ‘soft close’. Yes, soft close her. Easy one-size-fits-all soft close you can use with any girl (say this on a high point): “We should grab a bite or a drink sometime.” As soon as she says “yes”, you have your green light 🟢 to grab her # 🆇 MISLEADING: “give her your number”… this is the WORST piece of advice in the video; even worse than the “don’t annoy her” bit (which will get you in your head doing things wrong). This girl has a wide face, deep voice, and high confidence, so she’s probably higher testosterone and extroverted. Girls like this are go-getters who will chase down guys on their own and make things happen sometimes (hence the “deciding to have a chat” with a guy when she liked his opener). Most women are NOT extroverted high testosterone women who will take charge and make things happen themselves. Most women are PASSIVE. The average girl who is into you will not text you first if you give her your number. She will just look at it, debate whether to text you, think about what she should text, feel self-conscious about it, feel like she shouldn’t be the first one to text, then you will simply never hear from her. You need to get HER number, so YOU can text, not give her YOURS. 🆇 MISLEADING: “sweet and endearing”, sorry to say it and pop anyone’s bubble, but women do not usually hook up with the “sweet and endearing” guys. They think the stuff these guys do is “cute”, like how little children and pets are “cute”, but they do not find them SEXY. You need to be in the lead, taking CHARGE, leading her through an interaction she enjoys, and setting the pace. Do not be “sweet and endearing.” Anyway, this girl seems really cool and it’s neat that she wants to help guys out. Well-meaning women advising you on dating though are some of the most dangerous because they believe what they are saying and just do not KNOW when the advice they’re giving is counterproductive for a man to actually use vs. productive! (That said, positive encouragement for men to approach & flirt is ALWAYS good! So hat tip to her!)

Girls Chase 🏃‍♀️💨

340,369 views • 8 months ago

Ok, I think we need to shift the conversation around why we join policing back to exactly that, the why? 😌 I wanted to join from a very young age.🧍‍♂️ I had an early learning centre police officer outfit that I wore till it faded and used to make my dad walk up and down my road with me writing down number plates in my first ‘note book’. 😂 I learnt the phonetic alphabet at about six or seven and then when I was little older, got addicted to ‘The Bill’. 🚔 I think that must be where I wanted to join response. 🚨 Response is the absolute definition of policing to me. 💯 The emergencies come in and we race out to help and when we get there, no matter what it is 99.9% we’re first on scene. 🤷🏼‍♂️ I know we’re burdened with roles that aren’t ours, we all agree on that, but the core role of ‘blue lighting’ to say a burglary in progress, is truly the essence of why most people join policing. ✅ But that’s not for everyone and maybe we need to embrace that in a different way. 🤔 I think we should all join as constables and complete our training period of two years and then progress into different roles like we used to. I have met countless direct entry Detectives who moved over to response because it’s not what they thought it would be. 😟 Why? 👀 The skills learnt in those two years are invaluable and also ground you in the whole organisation. 👏 I think too we need to return to a focus of scenario based training and move away from a bizarre belief that academia solves policing’s problems. 😏 Scenarios have two distinct benefits: 1) They test you in situations you’ve never been in before and give you an insight into your instincts in those challenging moments. ⚠️ 2) They give the trainer the same insight from a different perspective into your ability to deal with them and your strengths and weaknesses.❗️ They also have a bit of a hidden third benefit. I loved the scenarios I was given during training, it was finally when I knew ‘my why’ was right. I wanted to step in, in moments when most won’t, most are scared or most simply don’t want the bother of tackling a difficult situation. 😅 My favourite incidents at work are major, critical or public order based. They require a helicopter view, calm, control and critical thinking. As a Sergeant they’re what I thrive on. 🔥 New Zealand Police seem to agree with this style of learning and testing and have heavily invested in a state of the art scenario orientated training area, a power move in my opinion. 🇳🇿👏 I’d like to see Hendon or an equivalent morning back to that. ✅ Sure Hydra has its benefits, but proper scenarios like there used to be are invaluable. 🤷🏼‍♂️ But, this all requires investment. 😏 We shall see. 👀 #ThinBlueLine 🚨

Brick Cop©️

25,004 views • 2 years ago

🚨EXPOSED: Rick Cutler's Posts Erased – Proof He's the CIA Puppet in Kirk's Murder?! Y'all, the pieces are falling—Rick Cutler, the "mystery man in brown plaid" onstage with Kirk, ain't no hero. He's a 29-year cop ghost with ZERO online trail, scrubbed clean like a black ops pro. Posts ID'ing him VANISH from X's Latest tab EVERY 24 HOURS—4th time in 72! As Crentist nails it: "All mentions of him are being hidden... It’s already cemented he’s CIA and pulled the remote trigger. ✅"RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅's dropping truth bombs: Cutler's Guatemala gig? "Training first responders" in a CIA hotspot—classic cover for regime tweaks. Then Shaffer Security's elite CTG compound, pumping out tactical wizards? Screams Deep State farm for Nixon-level elite shields."Why does it seem like an intelligence agency has wiped his digital footprint?". Crentist again: "Rick Cutler and his latest documented CIA cover prior to his roll in the Charlie Kirk assassination." Ties straight to Epstein/Maxwell pardon whispers—Kirk's anti-Ukraine fire pissed off the wrong cabal. But it gets darker: It's possible the WHOLE security squad—Harpole, Dan Flood, Frank Turek, "Brian" & "Justin"—was IN ON IT. No tears, no panic—just a cold "push" off the chair, Harpole's med kit masking that point-blank wound, and poof—4K SD card from the camera behind Kirk? GONE. Videos scream it: Rushed evac like they KNEW. Motive? Kirk's leaked chats flipping off pro-Israel cash cows (shoutout Rob McCoy & Josh Hammer)—threatened the machine. Cutler? The ultimate Judas: Devout "nonprofit feeder of the homeless" turned betrayer, planted via Shaffer. Crentist: "An unbelievable deception. A real-life Judas." This ain't coincidence—it's the Deep State erasing threats. Kirk called it out; now he's silenced. Who's next? WAKE UP, BOOST THIS, DEMAND ANSWERS! —RT to break the scrub!💥🕵️ 🔥Checkout My BOMBSHELL EXPOSE' in his partner in crime and co-owner of Integrity Security Solutions Dan Flood Where i exposed his ties to Erika Kirk's "ROMANIAN ANGELS "MINISTRY" as well as his old gig as a "GAY MALE MODEL" and his ties to JINSA. Mind-blowing blackmail material. 🤯🔽

Project Constitution

103,735 views • 10 months ago

Post 🇫🇷 & 🇺🇸 🇫🇷🚨📣 Le CHAOS à #LosAngeles serait-il ORCHESTRÉ et FINANCÉ ? L’insurrection d’extrême-gauche financée par les ONG de Soros, pendant que les corrompus Gavin Newsom (gouverneur de Californie) et la maire Karen Bass laissent faire… Des magasins pillés, des voitures et des camions incendiés, des jets de béton sur les forces de l’ordre, et j’en passe. Cela n’a jamais été une question d’immigration. C’est une INVASION PLANIFIÉE ‼️ La plupart de ceux qui franchissent la frontière sont des hommes en âge de combattre, et ce n’est pas un hasard. Observez les nombreux caméramans professionnels présents. C’est une opération médiatique, une propagande. Tout a été mis en place pour déstabiliser Donald J. Trump parce qu’il est en train de gagner. Et comme il le dit lui-même : « Winning very bigly ». Gagner très grand. 👀 À noter que ce chaos sévit principalement dans les villes gouvernées par les Démocrates… 🤔 ⚠️ L’ARMÉE EST LA SEULE SOLUTION ‼️ 🎥 Regardez ce montage vidéo que j’ai traduit. 📎 Source 📌 En rappel, 2 de mes précédents posts sur ce chaos : 🔹Analyse du General Mike Flynn sur la stratégie d’ANTIFA pour l’été 2025 ➡️ 🔹 LosAngeles : 2 visions d’une ville à feu et à sang 🔥🧨 ➡️ 🇺🇸🚨📣 Is the CHAOS in LOS ANGELES ORCHESTRATED and FUNDED? The far-left insurrection funded by Soros-backed NGOs continues, while the corrupt Gavin Newsom (Governor of California) and Mayor Karen Bass look the other way. Stores looted, cars and trucks set on fire, concrete blocks thrown at law enforcement, and that’s not even all. This was never about immigration. It’s a PLANNED INVASION ‼️ Most of those crossing the border are military-aged men, and that’s no coincidence. Take a look at the number of professional cameramen on site. This is a staged media operation. Propaganda. Everything was set up to destabilize Trump — because he’s winning. And as he says himself: “Winning very bigly.” 👀 Worth noting: this chaos is happening mainly in Democrat-run cities… 🤔 ⚠️ MILITARY IS THE ONLY WAY ‼️ 🎥 Watch this video montage I translated. 📎 Source ➡️ 📌 In case you missed them, here are 2 of my previous posts on this ongoing chaos: 🔹 General Flynn’s analysis of ANTIFA’s strategy for summer 2025 ➡️ 🔹 Los Angeles: Two visions of a city on fire 🔥🧨 ➡️ 🇺🇸🦅🇫🇷 Sylvia Miami 🇫🇷🦅🇺🇸 🔴 Tous mes liens en un seul clic, suivez-moi / All my links in one click, follow me ✅ Attorney General Pamela Bondi DNI Tulsi Gabbard Roger Stone Elon Musk #sylviamiami #Trump #Soros #Émeutes #GardeNationale #Chaos #Immigration #Riots #NationalGuard #Security

Sylvia Miami

18,241 views • 1 year ago