Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
It's a gene therapy not a vaccine.
16,738 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 10
I included that clip, and several others, including Dr. Matt Shelton, in this compilation
BioNTech's form 20-F, Mid page 16. From 2019. US Government site, 'Currently, mRNA is considered a gene therapy product by the FDA' . Only got use under emergency powers.
One of the best clips of all time, IMO. What smug pricks! It drives me insane that most people I know wont even look at this, much less give it an ounce of credibility. Crime of the century, perhaps of all human history.
It is transfection.
100% agree... greatest crime against humanity I am afraid to say.
I prefer Bio Weapon.
It isn't therapy its toxic
its not even a gene therapy==its a death shot--im about to have the x6 person i know die from the death shot--good old turbo cancer--first one i know to die from it..rest where strokes and heart attacks-youngest -was-20 years young-female wellington NZ
If you can call it a "therapy".
It's a material implementation of human farming - we are worthless.
![BOOM 💥💥 It's a gene therapy. It was a gene therapy yesterday. It will still be a gene therapy tomorrow. With a plasmid, it's two gene therapies. The OGTR confirms: "Under the gene technology act an [OGTR] approval would have been required" Senator Gerard Rennick](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1718182829417480663/ext_tw_video_thumb/1718161055913025536/pu/img/1mExm-XUZPZ0bs5I.jpg)
!["There's... no definition in law of a 'vaccine' as a product. And there never has been... this is by design... [that's how they're using] gene therapy [for the COVID injections]... and no regulations apply... [RFK Jr.] knows this. I personally talked to him about it." Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art") describes for Shannon Joy (Shannon Joy) how "there's...no definition in law" for what a "vaccine" is as a "product"; rather, there is "only a definition of a vaccine as a use [or] as an application." Latypova notes this is how the government/pharmaceutical industry has gotten away with deploying "gene therapy" technology on the population without the need to obey any kind of pharmaceutical regulations whatsoever. "That's [how they're able to use] gene therapy technology. This [the COVID injections] is a gene therapy technology, and everybody knew that," Latypova says. "And it was regulated for 20 years as gene therapy. [But] all of a sudden, the FDA says, 'Oh, it's a vaccine.' But the definition of the vaccine is not based on the product [itself]." "That's how they do it," the pharma insider adds. "It's purely [by] declaration that this dangerous technology that was dangerous and regulated and... required all those things from them, [is made available]; because we put it into this lane [as a 'vaccine'], arbitrarily by declaring that it's going to be a preventative for infectious disease... [so now] no regulations apply." Latypova goes on to say: "You [also] don't have to inspect manufacturing facilities... by the way... because [former FDA commissioner] Scott Gottlieb removed those requirements and the powers of inspectors... related to biological facilities in 2019... So biologic facilities don't have to be inspected. And now you don't need to comply with good manufacturing practices. Also, you don't have to do any safety pharmacology studies. You do not have to do cancer studies. You do not have to do genotoxicity studies. "And this specific regulation comes from the WHO for vaccines. So that's how the game is played: the FDA declares that this is a vaccine now, and all of a sudden, it's not the FDA rules, it's the WHO rules, [which] say nothing is applicable because vaccines are declared safe."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1899981727310676176/ext_tw_video_thumb/1899974950846402560/pu/img/_0-Wt0WL9q-rmR97.jpg)
