正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

It’s almost laughable that they mention Turkey shooting down a Russian plane. They always forget that the subsequent retaliation against the very position where the plane was downed involved an airstrike so intense it lit up the horizon for hours - a strike the Ukrainians haven’t witnessed in three...

Zlatti_71's profile picture

Zlatti71

187,628 subscribers

58,385 次观看 • 9 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Rutte: NATO ready to shoot down Russian planes if threatened NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said the alliance did not shoot down the three Russian MiG-31s that violated Estonian airspace because “there was no need.” “This doesn’t mean we won’t shoot down a plane immediately if necessary. First, we assess the situation. But if required — we will do what’s necessary,” he emphasized.
0:35

Rutte: NATO ready to shoot down Russian planes if threatened NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said the alliance did not shoot down the three Russian MiG-31s that violated Estonian airspace because “there was no need.” “This doesn’t mean we won’t shoot down a plane immediately if necessary. First, we assess the situation. But if required — we will do what’s necessary,” he emphasized.

NEXTA

208,270 次观看 • 10 个月前

Ursula von der Leyen on NATO shooting down Russian aircraft if they invade NATO airspace: I'm not NATO, but I have a personal opinion. My opinion is we have to defend every square centimetre of the territory. And that means if there's an intrusion in the airspace, after warning, after being very clear, of course the option of shooting down a fighter jet that is intruding our airspace is on the table.
0:22

Ursula von der Leyen on NATO shooting down Russian aircraft if they invade NATO airspace: I'm not NATO, but I have a personal opinion. My opinion is we have to defend every square centimetre of the territory. And that means if there's an intrusion in the airspace, after warning, after being very clear, of course the option of shooting down a fighter jet that is intruding our airspace is on the table.

Anton Gerashchenko

113,926 次观看 • 10 个月前

🇬🇧 NIGEL FARAGE: “SHOOT DOWN RUSSIAN PLANES IF THEY ENTER NATO AIRSPACE” “I made it clear whatever the historical reasons for the mess we're in, whatever view we take on that, if Russian planes incur over NATO territory, we have to shoot them down. Putin's behavior is terrible, so I hope that finally puts this nonsense to bed.” Source: Nigel Farage MP
0:35

🇬🇧 NIGEL FARAGE: “SHOOT DOWN RUSSIAN PLANES IF THEY ENTER NATO AIRSPACE” “I made it clear whatever the historical reasons for the mess we're in, whatever view we take on that, if Russian planes incur over NATO territory, we have to shoot them down. Putin's behavior is terrible, so I hope that finally puts this nonsense to bed.” Source: Nigel Farage MP

Mario Nawfal

74,114 次观看 • 9 个月前

🇷🇺 NATO'S CHIEF RUTTE: “WE ARE SO MUCH STRONGER THAN RUSSIA” "If a plane would pose a threat, we have the authorities to do, if necessary, the ultimate. But if the plane is not posing a threat, we are not going to shoot it down. And then we will gently guide it outside the airspace. This is exactly what they should do. And I totally agree with that approach, because we are so strong. It's proportional response. We are so much stronger than the Russians. We don't have to take down Russian airplanes because they enter our airspace. If they don't pose a threat, being so much stronger than the Russians, I think it is much stronger that our reaction is as it is - proportionate, and of course making clear to the Russians that we are not too happy about these incursions." Source: Clash Report
0:56

🇷🇺 NATO'S CHIEF RUTTE: “WE ARE SO MUCH STRONGER THAN RUSSIA” "If a plane would pose a threat, we have the authorities to do, if necessary, the ultimate. But if the plane is not posing a threat, we are not going to shoot it down. And then we will gently guide it outside the airspace. This is exactly what they should do. And I totally agree with that approach, because we are so strong. It's proportional response. We are so much stronger than the Russians. We don't have to take down Russian airplanes because they enter our airspace. If they don't pose a threat, being so much stronger than the Russians, I think it is much stronger that our reaction is as it is - proportionate, and of course making clear to the Russians that we are not too happy about these incursions." Source: Clash Report

Mario Nawfal

249,513 次观看 • 9 个月前

❗️🇪🇪Estonia is ready to shoot down 🇷🇺Russian targets that cross our airspace, - Estonian Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna "We will intercept and shoot them down. And the NATO protocol on this has been in place for 20 years. NATO is ready to defend its territory from the first second, from the first push. And this time, when Russia brutally violated Estonian airspace for 12 minutes, NATO aircraft were on site, and we were ready to act if we saw an immediate threat to our sovereignty and independence."
1:16

❗️🇪🇪Estonia is ready to shoot down 🇷🇺Russian targets that cross our airspace, - Estonian Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna "We will intercept and shoot them down. And the NATO protocol on this has been in place for 20 years. NATO is ready to defend its territory from the first second, from the first push. And this time, when Russia brutally violated Estonian airspace for 12 minutes, NATO aircraft were on site, and we were ready to act if we saw an immediate threat to our sovereignty and independence."

🪖MilitaryNewsUA🇺🇦

54,114 次观看 • 9 个月前

🇷🇺 NATO CHIEF: WE WILL SHOOT DOWN RUSSIAN JETS IF THEY POSE A THREAT NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte: "Our military commanders, our fighter jet pilots, they can do what is necessary to keep our people safe. If it is no direct threat, they will escort these planes out of allied airspace; if there is a direct threat, they might shoot them down if necessary. We have the best military in the world, we are the strongest military alliance in world history. My advice here is, let's leave this military - they are trained to prepare for this." Source: Christiane Amanpour
3:08

🇷🇺 NATO CHIEF: WE WILL SHOOT DOWN RUSSIAN JETS IF THEY POSE A THREAT NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte: "Our military commanders, our fighter jet pilots, they can do what is necessary to keep our people safe. If it is no direct threat, they will escort these planes out of allied airspace; if there is a direct threat, they might shoot them down if necessary. We have the best military in the world, we are the strongest military alliance in world history. My advice here is, let's leave this military - they are trained to prepare for this." Source: Christiane Amanpour

Mario Nawfal

58,908 次观看 • 10 个月前

Bookmark this. Keep this. Remember this. Watch it often. Memorize it. Learn it. Understand it. Grasp it. Believe it. And never forget it. Ever. 🚨 The War Waged by NEOCONS Via Ukraine Was Designed to Bring Down Russia The Ukraine - Russian War Was Provoked! If you still believe that Russia started this conflict in 2022, then you are either corrupt, ignorant, or brainwashed. NATO DISBAND !!! Putin says the current crisis in Ukraine is a direct result of years of aggressive NATO policies. ▶NATO has been encircling Russia since the nineties. ▶NATO exists to solve the problems created by NATO’s existence. ▶ NATO has never defended anyone, but only attacked. ▶NATO is a military Alliance that feeds on war. ▶To justify its existence, NATO constantly needs an external enemies and conflicts. ▶The purpose of the NATO alliance is "to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down. ▶Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: The Casus Belli of the Ukraine War is NATO Enlargement, US Coup, CIA Operations All Over Ukraine. ▶Jeffrey Sachs on Trump: Until President Trump Says Publicly, "NATO Will NOT Enlarge," This War Will Continue. That's his JOB. The way to end this war is to say publicly, "NATO enlargement was a mistake, it was a provocation, it was a threat to Russia's security." ▶Jeffrey Sachs: Russia is not going to stop fighting as long as NATO enlargement is on the table. This is the basic reason why we are at war. ▶Prof. John Mearsheimer: NATO Expansion Was Really the Key. Ukraine was becoming a de facto member of NATO. ▶Larry C. Johnson A Former CIA Officer: 30 Years of Provocation by the West, 30 Years of Western Efforts to Bring Ukraine INTO NATO, 30 Years of Using, Making, Ukraine a de FACTO Member of NATO by Virtue of the FACT That, They've Conducted More NATO Military Exercises in Ukraine, Than 24 Other NATO Countries Over the Last 30 years, so That's Remarkable for a Country That's NOT 🚨Not dissolving NATO in 1990 was a big mistake, and it’s time to fix that mistake. Emmanuel Todd: “The war in Ukraine is perceived in the West as a Russian invasion of Ukraine, and of course, I admit that it was the Russian army that entered Ukraine. But the historical reality is that the true cause of the conflict is NATO's expansion into Russia, through Ukraine, and the war waged by the Ukrainians themselves, pushed by the West, against the Russians in Donbas. It is absolutely true that, for the Russians, this war is defensive. For me, it is obvious that the Americans and Europeans are the aggressors, since they have come within a thousand kilometers of Moscow. This is the objective situation. What is fascinating is that these aggressors think they are the ones being attacked and that they are forced to defend themselves. There is an element of madness in our situation in Europe.”
6:42

Bookmark this. Keep this. Remember this. Watch it often. Memorize it. Learn it. Understand it. Grasp it. Believe it. And never forget it. Ever. 🚨 The War Waged by NEOCONS Via Ukraine Was Designed to Bring Down Russia The Ukraine - Russian War Was Provoked! If you still believe that Russia started this conflict in 2022, then you are either corrupt, ignorant, or brainwashed. NATO DISBAND !!! Putin says the current crisis in Ukraine is a direct result of years of aggressive NATO policies. ▶NATO has been encircling Russia since the nineties. ▶NATO exists to solve the problems created by NATO’s existence. ▶ NATO has never defended anyone, but only attacked. ▶NATO is a military Alliance that feeds on war. ▶To justify its existence, NATO constantly needs an external enemies and conflicts. ▶The purpose of the NATO alliance is "to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down. ▶Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: The Casus Belli of the Ukraine War is NATO Enlargement, US Coup, CIA Operations All Over Ukraine. ▶Jeffrey Sachs on Trump: Until President Trump Says Publicly, "NATO Will NOT Enlarge," This War Will Continue. That's his JOB. The way to end this war is to say publicly, "NATO enlargement was a mistake, it was a provocation, it was a threat to Russia's security." ▶Jeffrey Sachs: Russia is not going to stop fighting as long as NATO enlargement is on the table. This is the basic reason why we are at war. ▶Prof. John Mearsheimer: NATO Expansion Was Really the Key. Ukraine was becoming a de facto member of NATO. ▶Larry C. Johnson A Former CIA Officer: 30 Years of Provocation by the West, 30 Years of Western Efforts to Bring Ukraine INTO NATO, 30 Years of Using, Making, Ukraine a de FACTO Member of NATO by Virtue of the FACT That, They've Conducted More NATO Military Exercises in Ukraine, Than 24 Other NATO Countries Over the Last 30 years, so That's Remarkable for a Country That's NOT 🚨Not dissolving NATO in 1990 was a big mistake, and it’s time to fix that mistake. Emmanuel Todd: “The war in Ukraine is perceived in the West as a Russian invasion of Ukraine, and of course, I admit that it was the Russian army that entered Ukraine. But the historical reality is that the true cause of the conflict is NATO's expansion into Russia, through Ukraine, and the war waged by the Ukrainians themselves, pushed by the West, against the Russians in Donbas. It is absolutely true that, for the Russians, this war is defensive. For me, it is obvious that the Americans and Europeans are the aggressors, since they have come within a thousand kilometers of Moscow. This is the objective situation. What is fascinating is that these aggressors think they are the ones being attacked and that they are forced to defend themselves. There is an element of madness in our situation in Europe.”

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

49,453 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨The BIGGEST THREAT in the WORLD is NATO. 🚨This is the MOST KILLER Video about NATO. 🚨NATO DISBAND !!! 🚨Putin says the current crisis in Ukraine is a direct result of years of aggressive NATO policies. They lied to us ten 10 (TEN TIMES) in a row about not expanding NATO. ▶NATO has been encircling Russia since the nineties. ▶NATO exists to solve the problems created by NATO’s existence. ▶ NATO has never defended anyone, but only attacked. ▶NATO is a military Alliance that feeds on war. ▶To justify its existence, NATO constantly needs an external enemies and conflicts. ▶The purpose of the NATO alliance is "to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down. ▶Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: The Casus Belli of the Ukraine War is NATO Enlargement, US Coup, CIA Operations All Over Ukraine. ▶Jeffrey Sachs on Trump: Until President Trump Says Publicly, "NATO Will NOT Enlarge," This War Will Continue. That's his JOB. The way to end this war is to say publicly, "NATO enlargement was a mistake, it was a provocation, it was a threat to Russia's security." ▶Jeffrey Sachs: Russia is not going to stop fighting as long as NATO enlargement is on the table. This is the basic reason why we are at war. ▶Prof. John Mearsheimer: NATO Expansion Was Really the Key. Ukraine was becoming a de facto member of NATO. ▶Larry C. Johnson A Former CIA Officer: 30 Years of Provocation by the West, 30 Years of Western Efforts to Bring Ukraine INTO NATO, 30 Years of Using, Making, Ukraine a de FACTO Member of NATO by Virtue of the FACT That, They've Conducted More NATO Military Exercises in Ukraine, Than 24 Other NATO Countries Over the Last 30 years, so That's Remarkable for a Country That's NOT 🚨Not dissolving NATO in 1990 was a big mistake, and it’s time to fix that mistake. Emmanuel Todd: “The war in Ukraine is perceived in the West as a Russian invasion of Ukraine, and of course, I admit that it was the Russian army that entered Ukraine. But the historical reality is that the true cause of the conflict is NATO's expansion into Russia, through Ukraine, and the war waged by the Ukrainians themselves, pushed by the West, against the Russians in Donbas. It is absolutely true that, for the Russians, this war is defensive. For me, it is obvious that the Americans and Europeans are the aggressors, since they have come within a thousand kilometers of Moscow. This is the objective situation. What is fascinating is that these aggressors think they are the ones being attacked and that they are forced to defend themselves. There is an element of madness in our situation in Europe.”
3:57

🚨The BIGGEST THREAT in the WORLD is NATO. 🚨This is the MOST KILLER Video about NATO. 🚨NATO DISBAND !!! 🚨Putin says the current crisis in Ukraine is a direct result of years of aggressive NATO policies. They lied to us ten 10 (TEN TIMES) in a row about not expanding NATO. ▶NATO has been encircling Russia since the nineties. ▶NATO exists to solve the problems created by NATO’s existence. ▶ NATO has never defended anyone, but only attacked. ▶NATO is a military Alliance that feeds on war. ▶To justify its existence, NATO constantly needs an external enemies and conflicts. ▶The purpose of the NATO alliance is "to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down. ▶Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: The Casus Belli of the Ukraine War is NATO Enlargement, US Coup, CIA Operations All Over Ukraine. ▶Jeffrey Sachs on Trump: Until President Trump Says Publicly, "NATO Will NOT Enlarge," This War Will Continue. That's his JOB. The way to end this war is to say publicly, "NATO enlargement was a mistake, it was a provocation, it was a threat to Russia's security." ▶Jeffrey Sachs: Russia is not going to stop fighting as long as NATO enlargement is on the table. This is the basic reason why we are at war. ▶Prof. John Mearsheimer: NATO Expansion Was Really the Key. Ukraine was becoming a de facto member of NATO. ▶Larry C. Johnson A Former CIA Officer: 30 Years of Provocation by the West, 30 Years of Western Efforts to Bring Ukraine INTO NATO, 30 Years of Using, Making, Ukraine a de FACTO Member of NATO by Virtue of the FACT That, They've Conducted More NATO Military Exercises in Ukraine, Than 24 Other NATO Countries Over the Last 30 years, so That's Remarkable for a Country That's NOT 🚨Not dissolving NATO in 1990 was a big mistake, and it’s time to fix that mistake. Emmanuel Todd: “The war in Ukraine is perceived in the West as a Russian invasion of Ukraine, and of course, I admit that it was the Russian army that entered Ukraine. But the historical reality is that the true cause of the conflict is NATO's expansion into Russia, through Ukraine, and the war waged by the Ukrainians themselves, pushed by the West, against the Russians in Donbas. It is absolutely true that, for the Russians, this war is defensive. For me, it is obvious that the Americans and Europeans are the aggressors, since they have come within a thousand kilometers of Moscow. This is the objective situation. What is fascinating is that these aggressors think they are the ones being attacked and that they are forced to defend themselves. There is an element of madness in our situation in Europe.”

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

47,775 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨The BIGGEST THREAT in the WORLD is NATO. 🚨This is the MOST KILLER Video about NATO. 🚨NATO DISBAND !!! ▶Larry C. Johnson A Former CIA Officer: 30 Years of Provocation by the West, 30 Years of Western Efforts to Bring Ukraine INTO NATO, 30 Years of Using, Making, Ukraine a de FACTO Member of NATO by Virtue of the FACT That, They've Conducted More NATO Military Exercises in Ukraine, Than 24 Other NATO Countries Over the Last 30 years, so That's Remarkable for a Country That's NOT 🚨Putin says the current crisis in Ukraine is a direct result of years of aggressive NATO policies. They lied to us ten 10 (TEN TIMES) in a row about not expanding NATO. ▶NATO has been encircling Russia since the nineties. ▶NATO exists to solve the problems created by NATO’s existence. ▶ NATO has never defended anyone, but only attacked. ▶NATO is a military Alliance that feeds on war. ▶To justify its existence, NATO constantly needs an external enemies and conflicts. ▶The purpose of the NATO alliance is "to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down. ▶Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: The Casus Belli of the Ukraine War is NATO Enlargement, US Coup, CIA Operations All Over Ukraine. ▶Jeffrey Sachs on Trump: Until President Trump Says Publicly, "NATO Will NOT Enlarge," This War Will Continue. That's his JOB. The way to end this war is to say publicly, "NATO enlargement was a mistake, it was a provocation, it was a threat to Russia's security." ▶Jeffrey Sachs: Russia is not going to stop fighting as long as NATO enlargement is on the table. This is the basic reason why we are at war. ▶Prof. John Mearsheimer: NATO Expansion Was Really the Key. Ukraine was becoming a de facto member of NATO. 🚨Not dissolving NATO in 1990 was a big mistake, and it’s time to fix that mistake. Emmanuel Todd: “The war in Ukraine is perceived in the West as a Russian invasion of Ukraine, and of course, I admit that it was the Russian army that entered Ukraine. But the historical reality is that the true cause of the conflict is NATO's expansion into Russia, through Ukraine, and the war waged by the Ukrainians themselves, pushed by the West, against the Russians in Donbas. It is absolutely true that, for the Russians, this war is defensive. For me, it is obvious that the Americans and Europeans are the aggressors, since they have come within a thousand kilometers of Moscow. This is the objective situation. What is fascinating is that these aggressors think they are the ones being attacked and that they are forced to defend themselves. There is an element of madness in our situation in Europe.”
0:53

🚨The BIGGEST THREAT in the WORLD is NATO. 🚨This is the MOST KILLER Video about NATO. 🚨NATO DISBAND !!! ▶Larry C. Johnson A Former CIA Officer: 30 Years of Provocation by the West, 30 Years of Western Efforts to Bring Ukraine INTO NATO, 30 Years of Using, Making, Ukraine a de FACTO Member of NATO by Virtue of the FACT That, They've Conducted More NATO Military Exercises in Ukraine, Than 24 Other NATO Countries Over the Last 30 years, so That's Remarkable for a Country That's NOT 🚨Putin says the current crisis in Ukraine is a direct result of years of aggressive NATO policies. They lied to us ten 10 (TEN TIMES) in a row about not expanding NATO. ▶NATO has been encircling Russia since the nineties. ▶NATO exists to solve the problems created by NATO’s existence. ▶ NATO has never defended anyone, but only attacked. ▶NATO is a military Alliance that feeds on war. ▶To justify its existence, NATO constantly needs an external enemies and conflicts. ▶The purpose of the NATO alliance is "to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down. ▶Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: The Casus Belli of the Ukraine War is NATO Enlargement, US Coup, CIA Operations All Over Ukraine. ▶Jeffrey Sachs on Trump: Until President Trump Says Publicly, "NATO Will NOT Enlarge," This War Will Continue. That's his JOB. The way to end this war is to say publicly, "NATO enlargement was a mistake, it was a provocation, it was a threat to Russia's security." ▶Jeffrey Sachs: Russia is not going to stop fighting as long as NATO enlargement is on the table. This is the basic reason why we are at war. ▶Prof. John Mearsheimer: NATO Expansion Was Really the Key. Ukraine was becoming a de facto member of NATO. 🚨Not dissolving NATO in 1990 was a big mistake, and it’s time to fix that mistake. Emmanuel Todd: “The war in Ukraine is perceived in the West as a Russian invasion of Ukraine, and of course, I admit that it was the Russian army that entered Ukraine. But the historical reality is that the true cause of the conflict is NATO's expansion into Russia, through Ukraine, and the war waged by the Ukrainians themselves, pushed by the West, against the Russians in Donbas. It is absolutely true that, for the Russians, this war is defensive. For me, it is obvious that the Americans and Europeans are the aggressors, since they have come within a thousand kilometers of Moscow. This is the objective situation. What is fascinating is that these aggressors think they are the ones being attacked and that they are forced to defend themselves. There is an element of madness in our situation in Europe.”

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

28,219 次观看 • 5 个月前

"What happens if a Russian fighter jet is shot down by a Western weapon in Russian airspace?" "It only means that Russia will have one less plane," - Chair of the Defense Committee of the German Bundestag Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann. 📹: DW
1:04

"What happens if a Russian fighter jet is shot down by a Western weapon in Russian airspace?" "It only means that Russia will have one less plane," - Chair of the Defense Committee of the German Bundestag Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann. 📹: DW

Anton Gerashchenko

763,775 次观看 • 2 年前

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte: And as no immediate threat was assessed here in this case, shooting down the MiGs was not necessary. And of course, what we will always do is to make sure that we react in a proportionate way. But this is how it works. So it doesn't mean that we will always immediately shoot down a plane. We will, as I said, based on clear dimensions, assess the situation in real time, based on all the available intelligence. And that's exactly what happened here.
0:35

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte: And as no immediate threat was assessed here in this case, shooting down the MiGs was not necessary. And of course, what we will always do is to make sure that we react in a proportionate way. But this is how it works. So it doesn't mean that we will always immediately shoot down a plane. We will, as I said, based on clear dimensions, assess the situation in real time, based on all the available intelligence. And that's exactly what happened here.

Anton Gerashchenko

141,906 次观看 • 10 个月前

Lukashenko threatened a “full-scale war” with Poland over its plans to shoot down Russian aerial objects. “If they hit something over Kaliningrad, we’ll have to fight, as they say in Russia, ‘with all we’ve got.’ Is that what they want? I hope they calm down,” he said, warning that Belarus would not stand aside if NATO takes action against Russian aircraft. Bla bla bla.
2:57

Lukashenko threatened a “full-scale war” with Poland over its plans to shoot down Russian aerial objects. “If they hit something over Kaliningrad, we’ll have to fight, as they say in Russia, ‘with all we’ve got.’ Is that what they want? I hope they calm down,” he said, warning that Belarus would not stand aside if NATO takes action against Russian aircraft. Bla bla bla.

NOELREPORTS 🇪🇺 🇺🇦

244,268 次观看 • 10 个月前

🚨INTERVIEW: “NO NATO COUNTRY IS GOING TO ATTACK RUSSIA - ON THE CONTRARY, RUSSIA WILL” "The first attack on Ukraine in 2022, and then Russia’s failures that same year to achieve their goals, created an opening for Finland and then Sweden to join NATO. Once Finland joined NATO, the length of the border between Russia and NATO countries doubled. NATO effectively moved to the outskirts of Putin’s native city of Saint Petersburg. So, if Russia were truly concerned about a NATO attack, it would be reasonable to expect that at least half of the army fighting in Ukraine would have been moved to Saint Petersburg to protect northern Russia from a possible NATO offensive. On the contrary, troops that were near Saint Petersburg were moved to Ukraine. And there is a conviction that no NATO country is going to attack Russia. On the contrary, it is Russia that is attacking a future NATO country." Serhii Plokhy, Harvard Professor of Ukrainian History.
2:51

🚨INTERVIEW: “NO NATO COUNTRY IS GOING TO ATTACK RUSSIA - ON THE CONTRARY, RUSSIA WILL” "The first attack on Ukraine in 2022, and then Russia’s failures that same year to achieve their goals, created an opening for Finland and then Sweden to join NATO. Once Finland joined NATO, the length of the border between Russia and NATO countries doubled. NATO effectively moved to the outskirts of Putin’s native city of Saint Petersburg. So, if Russia were truly concerned about a NATO attack, it would be reasonable to expect that at least half of the army fighting in Ukraine would have been moved to Saint Petersburg to protect northern Russia from a possible NATO offensive. On the contrary, troops that were near Saint Petersburg were moved to Ukraine. And there is a conviction that no NATO country is going to attack Russia. On the contrary, it is Russia that is attacking a future NATO country." Serhii Plokhy, Harvard Professor of Ukrainian History.

Mario Nawfal

42,126 次观看 • 8 个月前

I would like to remind you of several interesting factors about how Putin and Russia’s rhetoric about NATO has changed, as well as about Ukraine’s accession to NATO. In 2002, in Rome, when asked by a journalist about how Ukraine’s accession to NATO would affect relations between Russia and Ukraine, Putin replied that Ukraine is a sovereign state. And she herself has the right to freely choose her future, including the future of her security. And that Russia is not against if Ukraine and the Alliance decide that Ukraine will become a member of NATO. Now these liars are using NATO expansion as one of the reasons for their invasion. And this despite the fact that Ukraine has never been a member of this military bloc, and there were no plans to admit it there in the near future. And we all understand that all these reasons for the invasion are manipulation and lies in order to justify their aggression, terror and attempt to occupy Ukraine. Regarding the second part of the video, Putin says that NATO expansion is unacceptable in 2022. Some time later, when he is asked about Finland and Sweden joining NATO. He says he doesn't mind. NATO is the Defense Alliance. Even Article 5 of NATO implies collective security in the event of an attack on one of the Alliance countries. But this in no way obliges all NATO members to fight for a country that is itself an aggressor. Even if he is a member of NATO. Therefore, Putin’s manipulations that if Ukraine had joined NATO, it would have attacked Russia and started a war between NATO and Russia is a complete lie. Article 5 does not oblige one to fight for a side that itself is the aggressor. But only to protect a NATO member from attack and invasion by other countries. Against the backdrop of all this, all these fairy tales and Russian propaganda that Ukraine wanted to attack Russia is a lie. (I remind you that until 2014 Ukraine was not a member of NATO and there were no plans to admit it there, at least in the near future). And if Ukraine wanted to attack, why did it give up nuclear weapons? Why didn’t she carry out a massive militarization of the country, but, on the contrary, reduced the army? Why now, when the war is already going on, does Ukraine not enter Russian territory with its troops? After all, propaganda says that it was Ukraine that wanted to attack.
2:13

I would like to remind you of several interesting factors about how Putin and Russia’s rhetoric about NATO has changed, as well as about Ukraine’s accession to NATO. In 2002, in Rome, when asked by a journalist about how Ukraine’s accession to NATO would affect relations between Russia and Ukraine, Putin replied that Ukraine is a sovereign state. And she herself has the right to freely choose her future, including the future of her security. And that Russia is not against if Ukraine and the Alliance decide that Ukraine will become a member of NATO. Now these liars are using NATO expansion as one of the reasons for their invasion. And this despite the fact that Ukraine has never been a member of this military bloc, and there were no plans to admit it there in the near future. And we all understand that all these reasons for the invasion are manipulation and lies in order to justify their aggression, terror and attempt to occupy Ukraine. Regarding the second part of the video, Putin says that NATO expansion is unacceptable in 2022. Some time later, when he is asked about Finland and Sweden joining NATO. He says he doesn't mind. NATO is the Defense Alliance. Even Article 5 of NATO implies collective security in the event of an attack on one of the Alliance countries. But this in no way obliges all NATO members to fight for a country that is itself an aggressor. Even if he is a member of NATO. Therefore, Putin’s manipulations that if Ukraine had joined NATO, it would have attacked Russia and started a war between NATO and Russia is a complete lie. Article 5 does not oblige one to fight for a side that itself is the aggressor. But only to protect a NATO member from attack and invasion by other countries. Against the backdrop of all this, all these fairy tales and Russian propaganda that Ukraine wanted to attack Russia is a lie. (I remind you that until 2014 Ukraine was not a member of NATO and there were no plans to admit it there, at least in the near future). And if Ukraine wanted to attack, why did it give up nuclear weapons? Why didn’t she carry out a massive militarization of the country, but, on the contrary, reduced the army? Why now, when the war is already going on, does Ukraine not enter Russian territory with its troops? After all, propaganda says that it was Ukraine that wanted to attack.

Igor Kyivskyi

226,429 次观看 • 2 年前

🛑🇧🇫- Burkina Faso national TV interviewed random people on the streets to hear what they have to say about the Nigerian Air Force aircraft C-130. Here are a few reactions: First one: It (Burkina) is not a peanut farm that you can just pass through like it’s nothing. 🤣🤣🤣. Even if they used to do it in the past, now it’s the AES. It’s a new Burkina Faso 🇧🇫. Second one: It’s because of the government, if not, if it was up to us, we would tell them to shoot down the plane so that they can learn that a military aircraft cannot enter an airspace without authorization. But these days, we believe that Burkina Faso 🇧🇫 is not the same like before. Third one: It’s normal! It is a warning to others that the next time, we will not capture it, we will capture it with a missile. Eiii 🤣🤣🤣. Fourth one: an aircraft that violates an airspace, normally, we don’t ask, we shoot it down if we are not aware that it must arrive here. But they (gov’t) preferred for it to land so that they would explain to us how they got into our airspace without authorization.
1:20

🛑🇧🇫- Burkina Faso national TV interviewed random people on the streets to hear what they have to say about the Nigerian Air Force aircraft C-130. Here are a few reactions: First one: It (Burkina) is not a peanut farm that you can just pass through like it’s nothing. 🤣🤣🤣. Even if they used to do it in the past, now it’s the AES. It’s a new Burkina Faso 🇧🇫. Second one: It’s because of the government, if not, if it was up to us, we would tell them to shoot down the plane so that they can learn that a military aircraft cannot enter an airspace without authorization. But these days, we believe that Burkina Faso 🇧🇫 is not the same like before. Third one: It’s normal! It is a warning to others that the next time, we will not capture it, we will capture it with a missile. Eiii 🤣🤣🤣. Fourth one: an aircraft that violates an airspace, normally, we don’t ask, we shoot it down if we are not aware that it must arrive here. But they (gov’t) preferred for it to land so that they would explain to us how they got into our airspace without authorization.

Sy Marcus Herve Traore

171,616 次观看 • 8 个月前

☝️The use of long-range, Western-made precision weapons to strike Russian territory would mean that NATO countries, the US, and the EU are at war with Russia. “We are not talking about authorizing or prohibiting the Kiev regime from striking Russian territory—this is already being done with the help of unmanned aircraft and other means. However, when we are talking about the use of long-range, Western-made precision weapons, that is a completely different story. The fact is, and any expert from our country or the West will confirm this, the Ukrainian army is not able to operate such weapons on its own. Their effective use is only possible with targeting intelligence from satellites, which Ukraine does not have. This is data that can only come from US or EU satellites—in other words, from NATO satellites. That is the first point. The second, and perhaps the key point, is that only NATO military personnel can program the flight missions for these missile systems; Ukrainian servicemen cannot do this. Therefore, this is not about allowing the Kiev regime to strike Russia with these weapons or not. It is about deciding whether NATO countries are becoming directly involved in a military conflict or not. If such a decision is made, it would mean nothing other than the direct participation of NATO countries, the US, and the EU in the war in Ukraine. This, of course, significantly changes the very essence of the conflict. It would mean that NATO countries, the US, and the EU are at war with Russia. And if that is the case, then, bearing this in mind, we will make the appropriate decisions based on the threats that would be posed to us” - President Putin
2:31

☝️The use of long-range, Western-made precision weapons to strike Russian territory would mean that NATO countries, the US, and the EU are at war with Russia. “We are not talking about authorizing or prohibiting the Kiev regime from striking Russian territory—this is already being done with the help of unmanned aircraft and other means. However, when we are talking about the use of long-range, Western-made precision weapons, that is a completely different story. The fact is, and any expert from our country or the West will confirm this, the Ukrainian army is not able to operate such weapons on its own. Their effective use is only possible with targeting intelligence from satellites, which Ukraine does not have. This is data that can only come from US or EU satellites—in other words, from NATO satellites. That is the first point. The second, and perhaps the key point, is that only NATO military personnel can program the flight missions for these missile systems; Ukrainian servicemen cannot do this. Therefore, this is not about allowing the Kiev regime to strike Russia with these weapons or not. It is about deciding whether NATO countries are becoming directly involved in a military conflict or not. If such a decision is made, it would mean nothing other than the direct participation of NATO countries, the US, and the EU in the war in Ukraine. This, of course, significantly changes the very essence of the conflict. It would mean that NATO countries, the US, and the EU are at war with Russia. And if that is the case, then, bearing this in mind, we will make the appropriate decisions based on the threats that would be posed to us” - President Putin

🇷🇺Russia is not Enemy

291,786 次观看 • 10 个月前

‼️‼️🇩🇪🇷🇺 BREAKING – A major political party in Germany has called for shooting down Russian aircraft that violate NATO airspace, according to DPA. 💬 Ahead of a planned NATO discussion on a potential Russian invasion, CDU/CSU foreign policy expert Jürgen Hardt raised the possibility of destroying Russian fighters over NATO territory. “The Kremlin needs a clear ‘stop’ signal,” the CDU/CSU faction representative told RND. “Only a firm message to Russia that any breach of a military border will receive a military response — including shooting down Russian fighters over NATO territory — will be effective.” “Following its military logic, Russia will continue to escalate. First — airspace violations, then — strikes on specific targets, and eventually Russian troops will arrive,” warned the CDU politician. See the latest updates with us:The threat of missiles and drones
0:46

‼️‼️🇩🇪🇷🇺 BREAKING – A major political party in Germany has called for shooting down Russian aircraft that violate NATO airspace, according to DPA. 💬 Ahead of a planned NATO discussion on a potential Russian invasion, CDU/CSU foreign policy expert Jürgen Hardt raised the possibility of destroying Russian fighters over NATO territory. “The Kremlin needs a clear ‘stop’ signal,” the CDU/CSU faction representative told RND. “Only a firm message to Russia that any breach of a military border will receive a military response — including shooting down Russian fighters over NATO territory — will be effective.” “Following its military logic, Russia will continue to escalate. First — airspace violations, then — strikes on specific targets, and eventually Russian troops will arrive,” warned the CDU politician. See the latest updates with us:The threat of missiles and drones

The threat of missiles and drones

39,501 次观看 • 10 个月前

🇷🇺 FM LAVROV: "DOWNING ANY FLYING OBJECT IN OUR AIRSPACE IS A GRAVE VIOLATION" Reporter: "Trump called Russia a paper tiger and said European countries should shoot down Russian planes if they violate European airspace. Do you see that as a provocation?" Lavrov: "The next day Trump was asked if he continued to think Russia was a paper tiger and the response was negative. If Trump allowed for the bombing of the Russian Federation or for drones and planes to be shot down when a drone flies not over our territory but outside of our airspace probably everybody has a right to do what they deem necessary with that drone. If there are attempts to down any flying object over our territory in our airspace then It's an egregious violation of our territorial integrity and sovereignty." Source: Sky News
2:20

🇷🇺 FM LAVROV: "DOWNING ANY FLYING OBJECT IN OUR AIRSPACE IS A GRAVE VIOLATION" Reporter: "Trump called Russia a paper tiger and said European countries should shoot down Russian planes if they violate European airspace. Do you see that as a provocation?" Lavrov: "The next day Trump was asked if he continued to think Russia was a paper tiger and the response was negative. If Trump allowed for the bombing of the Russian Federation or for drones and planes to be shot down when a drone flies not over our territory but outside of our airspace probably everybody has a right to do what they deem necessary with that drone. If there are attempts to down any flying object over our territory in our airspace then It's an egregious violation of our territorial integrity and sovereignty." Source: Sky News

Mario Nawfal

651,597 次观看 • 10 个月前

⚡️Some notes on Russian plane shoot down: 1. New video seen below from near the area of missile launch proves that Russian defenses shot down the plane from nearby. This immediately disproves that Ukrainian missiles had anything to do with the shoot down. 2. There is zero proof an A-50 was shot down and in fact the currently best known information from the serial number on the tail indicates this was an Il-76TD, but it is not yet known for certain with any confirmation. 3. That we now know for 100% fact that Russian systems shot it down would seem to be even greater proof that it was not an A-50 because Russian S-400s in the area would absolutely have a IFF link with an A-50, but possibly not with the civilian variant Il-76TD. This weighs the likelihood heavier into Il-76 territory. 4. But there's some wrinkles to this. Sure, the missiles wouldn't initially lock onto an A-50, but there's some very remote possibility they were shooting another object and at the terminal phase, where IFF already gets iffy if not outright negated, the missile(s) may have redirected onto a potential A-50. This is a remote possibility, but the likelihood for now still weighs far heavier towards the Il-76TD explanation. 5. What other object would Russian S-400s possibly be engaging near Krasnodar where no Ukrainian missile can reach? That's simple: potentially a drone of some kind. One person had the idea that Ukrainian saboteurs in the region can even fly drones locally in the flight path of Russian military planes coming in for landing at the airport. It's possible something like this was engaged. 6. But there's an even bigger wrinkle: the plane that was shot down was firing flares. Not all Il-76s or even A-50s necessarily carry flares, they have to have a special attachment to do so. Secondly, only a plane that knows a missile is locked onto it would even fire flares. That means the plane needs to have RWR (Radar Warning Receiver), which both A-50 and Il-76 are supposed to have, though I'm not sure about the Il-76TD variant. 7. There is possibility some long range Ukrainian missile was involved indirectly, but not an AD system. I.e. something like a Storm Shadow or ATACMS could hypothetically have been fired at Krasnodar, and Russian S-400s attempted to intercept it and missed. But this is unlikely as the range from Ukrainian territory is much higher than any of their known cruise missiles. Conclusion: Now that we are almost certain from the new video that Russian S-400s performed the shoot down, particularly at close range where IFF interrogation can still easily happen (as opposed to beyond radar horizon where terminal guidance can take over and make things iffy), the A-50 is very unlikely as A-50 certainly has IFF interrogation link with S-400s. The Il-76TD IFF with S-400 is more questionable as it is technically a civilian variant, though it is in use by government agencies like emergency services. Therefore the version that it was a Il-76TD is as of now more realistic, particularly because there is zero proof of it being an A-50 other than the echochamber formed from 1 person's unsourced guess on Telegram. Lastly: since the below video proves that all Ukrainian claims of their involvement in the shootdown today were lies, it logically follows that anything they have to say about the plane being A-50 are also propaganda/lies, which makes it even likelier that it was in fact an Il-76.
0:32

⚡️Some notes on Russian plane shoot down: 1. New video seen below from near the area of missile launch proves that Russian defenses shot down the plane from nearby. This immediately disproves that Ukrainian missiles had anything to do with the shoot down. 2. There is zero proof an A-50 was shot down and in fact the currently best known information from the serial number on the tail indicates this was an Il-76TD, but it is not yet known for certain with any confirmation. 3. That we now know for 100% fact that Russian systems shot it down would seem to be even greater proof that it was not an A-50 because Russian S-400s in the area would absolutely have a IFF link with an A-50, but possibly not with the civilian variant Il-76TD. This weighs the likelihood heavier into Il-76 territory. 4. But there's some wrinkles to this. Sure, the missiles wouldn't initially lock onto an A-50, but there's some very remote possibility they were shooting another object and at the terminal phase, where IFF already gets iffy if not outright negated, the missile(s) may have redirected onto a potential A-50. This is a remote possibility, but the likelihood for now still weighs far heavier towards the Il-76TD explanation. 5. What other object would Russian S-400s possibly be engaging near Krasnodar where no Ukrainian missile can reach? That's simple: potentially a drone of some kind. One person had the idea that Ukrainian saboteurs in the region can even fly drones locally in the flight path of Russian military planes coming in for landing at the airport. It's possible something like this was engaged. 6. But there's an even bigger wrinkle: the plane that was shot down was firing flares. Not all Il-76s or even A-50s necessarily carry flares, they have to have a special attachment to do so. Secondly, only a plane that knows a missile is locked onto it would even fire flares. That means the plane needs to have RWR (Radar Warning Receiver), which both A-50 and Il-76 are supposed to have, though I'm not sure about the Il-76TD variant. 7. There is possibility some long range Ukrainian missile was involved indirectly, but not an AD system. I.e. something like a Storm Shadow or ATACMS could hypothetically have been fired at Krasnodar, and Russian S-400s attempted to intercept it and missed. But this is unlikely as the range from Ukrainian territory is much higher than any of their known cruise missiles. Conclusion: Now that we are almost certain from the new video that Russian S-400s performed the shoot down, particularly at close range where IFF interrogation can still easily happen (as opposed to beyond radar horizon where terminal guidance can take over and make things iffy), the A-50 is very unlikely as A-50 certainly has IFF interrogation link with S-400s. The Il-76TD IFF with S-400 is more questionable as it is technically a civilian variant, though it is in use by government agencies like emergency services. Therefore the version that it was a Il-76TD is as of now more realistic, particularly because there is zero proof of it being an A-50 other than the echochamber formed from 1 person's unsourced guess on Telegram. Lastly: since the below video proves that all Ukrainian claims of their involvement in the shootdown today were lies, it logically follows that anything they have to say about the plane being A-50 are also propaganda/lies, which makes it even likelier that it was in fact an Il-76.

SIMPLICIUS Ѱ

91,622 次观看 • 2 年前