正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
It's appropriate for the U.S. to discuss the security implications in Greenland, but it's unproductive to say the U.S. is going to invade Greenland. The right way to go about these discussions is for diplomats from the U.S., Denmark, and Greenland to talk behind closed doors.
10 条评论

Greenland is Denmark, Denmark is Europe. Don't touch it.

This discussion should not take place at all, because any expression of it is an encroachment on the sovereignty of Greenland and Denmark. As are the brazen cries of Greenland's annexation in the style of Putin.

How hard is it to articulate clearly that Trump needs to be removed from office, mr. Bolton ?

“Trump” and “productive” should not be used in the same sentence.

We’ve been free to have bases in Greenland. If anything, he’s making the 🇺🇸 unwelcome.

John Bolton out here sounding like a man who tried to colonize the salad bar at Denny’s and got kicked out for annexing the croutons. “My dear sirs, we must discuss the matter of Greenland with utmost discretion.” Brother, you’re on MSNBC in front of a wall of diplomas like you’re applying for custody of the Arctic. Nobody asked for a bewhiskered game of Risk live on cable. Wrap it up, Clue mustache.

Will you please raise your mustache when you have ANYTHING positive to say

Trump doesn't get the headlines he craves by talking behind closed doors.

Only Elon Musk can fix this by buying Greenland. Every man and woman over there get's 1 million dollars, a free one way flight, and a -Thank You- letter.

It also might be time for an article 4 conversation.
