Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🤫👉🔞😳 💦 It’s basically detectives chasing cases. but mostly it’s just adult scenes. 📽️watch the full episodes *3🔞 👇 #porn #hentai #nsfw #anime #rule34 #bigboobs #chudai #uncensored

Jsonxeusne690's profile picture

Json

1,318 subscribers

12,855 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

NSFW#porn#hentai#nsfw#anime#rule34#bigboobs#chudai#uncensored
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

"I would trust a Muslim with my life before any Christian..." 😳 This video starts with a claim that will make you pause, but what happens next completely flips the script. Watch how a simple historical argument gets brutally dismantled with facts you were NEVER taught in school. They don't want you to know the real history behind who actually ran the longest-running slave trade—and why it’s still happening today. Most people will swipe away because they can't handle the truth, but if you're ready to see the narrative break, you need to watch until the very end. 🤫👇 Watch the full episode on my YT channel! Link is in the comments 📷
5:09

"I would trust a Muslim with my life before any Christian..." 😳 This video starts with a claim that will make you pause, but what happens next completely flips the script. Watch how a simple historical argument gets brutally dismantled with facts you were NEVER taught in school. They don't want you to know the real history behind who actually ran the longest-running slave trade—and why it’s still happening today. Most people will swipe away because they can't handle the truth, but if you're ready to see the narrative break, you need to watch until the very end. 🤫👇 Watch the full episode on my YT channel! Link is in the comments 📷

Jillian Michaels

280,646 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

💥 Dr Sam Bailey: The REAL Story They Don’t Want You to Hear 💥 Dr Samantha Bailey’s case has been splashed all over the headlines — but the media is leaving out some crucial details. 🤫 🎙️ In this 2023 interview, Dr Sam reveals: 👉 She tried to deregister — but the Medical Council refused to let her. Why? 👉 She believes they kept her on the register just so they could drum up charges and make a public spectacle of striking her off. 👉 Meanwhile, government-endorsed non-medical influencers were free to give health advice — without consequences. 🤔 The $148K fine and license cancellation aren’t just about Sam — it’s about sending a message to every doctor who dares to question the narrative. 🚨 🔥 Don’t miss this one — it’s the side of the story you won’t hear in the media. 🎧 Listen to the full interview here: 👇 What do you think — was this about punishing Sam or scaring others into silence? 👇
3:11

💥 Dr Sam Bailey: The REAL Story They Don’t Want You to Hear 💥 Dr Samantha Bailey’s case has been splashed all over the headlines — but the media is leaving out some crucial details. 🤫 🎙️ In this 2023 interview, Dr Sam reveals: 👉 She tried to deregister — but the Medical Council refused to let her. Why? 👉 She believes they kept her on the register just so they could drum up charges and make a public spectacle of striking her off. 👉 Meanwhile, government-endorsed non-medical influencers were free to give health advice — without consequences. 🤔 The $148K fine and license cancellation aren’t just about Sam — it’s about sending a message to every doctor who dares to question the narrative. 🚨 🔥 Don’t miss this one — it’s the side of the story you won’t hear in the media. 🎧 Listen to the full interview here: 👇 What do you think — was this about punishing Sam or scaring others into silence? 👇

REALITY CHECK RADIO

12,685 просмотров • 1 год назад

Watch how they push the Hepatitis B vaccine on EVERY newborn—using fear and twisted stats. A mom asks: “My baby doesn’t have Hep B, and it’s a sexually transmitted disease—why vaccinate at birth?” The doctor’s answer? “It’s not just sexual—11-12% of cases in kids come from ‘horizontal transfer’ (caregiver exposure).” Sounds scary… until you see the REAL numbers. Of the tiny group of kids who actually get Hep B, only 11% got it that way. That’s about 400 cases per year out of 3.5 MILLION births. Before the universal birth dose? Roughly 400 acute cases annually in kids 0-9 mostly in specific high-risk immigrant households. That means 3,499,600 babies every year had ZERO risk but they’re all vaccinated to create a “safety net” for those 400. Translation from the industry: “If we can prevent it, we should.” Real translation: “If we can make billions by scaring parents about a virus their baby isn’t at risk for, we should.” And the kicker? The doctor pushing this goes to “sex raves” the one place where Hep B vaccine actually makes sense to mandate! This is how they manufacture consent and rake in profits-by vaccinating the masses for a tiny risk. 🎯 Watch the full clip below 👇
2:30

Watch how they push the Hepatitis B vaccine on EVERY newborn—using fear and twisted stats. A mom asks: “My baby doesn’t have Hep B, and it’s a sexually transmitted disease—why vaccinate at birth?” The doctor’s answer? “It’s not just sexual—11-12% of cases in kids come from ‘horizontal transfer’ (caregiver exposure).” Sounds scary… until you see the REAL numbers. Of the tiny group of kids who actually get Hep B, only 11% got it that way. That’s about 400 cases per year out of 3.5 MILLION births. Before the universal birth dose? Roughly 400 acute cases annually in kids 0-9 mostly in specific high-risk immigrant households. That means 3,499,600 babies every year had ZERO risk but they’re all vaccinated to create a “safety net” for those 400. Translation from the industry: “If we can prevent it, we should.” Real translation: “If we can make billions by scaring parents about a virus their baby isn’t at risk for, we should.” And the kicker? The doctor pushing this goes to “sex raves” the one place where Hep B vaccine actually makes sense to mandate! This is how they manufacture consent and rake in profits-by vaccinating the masses for a tiny risk. 🎯 Watch the full clip below 👇

Del Bigtree

37,446 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Loon Says Future Got Back On Drake’s Album While Young Thug & Lil Baby Got Left Out (Full Episode Out Now) Future showing up on Drake’s album looked like reconciliation. But Loon says it also creates a bigger question. If Drake can bring Future back without a public apology, without Future publicly clearing the air, and without the fans getting a full explanation… then why were Young Thug and Lil Baby left off? In today’s rap game, a feature is not just a verse. It is a public stamp. It tells the audience who is inside, who is outside, who still has access, and who is being positioned from a distance. Loon breaks down why Drake still looks powerful alone — but why this rollout made the feature politics feel louder than ever. Watch the full conversation on It’s Up There Podcast YouTube. New full episodes every Monday. Solo episodes with Loon every week. For behind-the-scenes content, tap in at #ItsUpTherePodcast #Loon #Drake #Future #YoungThug LilBaby Iceman OVO YSL Wham Slime AtlantaRap HipHopCulture RapNews MusicIndustry FeaturePolitics BlackEffect
2:55

Loon Says Future Got Back On Drake’s Album While Young Thug & Lil Baby Got Left Out (Full Episode Out Now) Future showing up on Drake’s album looked like reconciliation. But Loon says it also creates a bigger question. If Drake can bring Future back without a public apology, without Future publicly clearing the air, and without the fans getting a full explanation… then why were Young Thug and Lil Baby left off? In today’s rap game, a feature is not just a verse. It is a public stamp. It tells the audience who is inside, who is outside, who still has access, and who is being positioned from a distance. Loon breaks down why Drake still looks powerful alone — but why this rollout made the feature politics feel louder than ever. Watch the full conversation on It’s Up There Podcast YouTube. New full episodes every Monday. Solo episodes with Loon every week. For behind-the-scenes content, tap in at #ItsUpTherePodcast #Loon #Drake #Future #YoungThug LilBaby Iceman OVO YSL Wham Slime AtlantaRap HipHopCulture RapNews MusicIndustry FeaturePolitics BlackEffect

Big Loon

695,132 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

DISTURBING: The UK just approved a Soviet-style system of digital control—and they’re calling it a “15-minute city.” The Telegraph now admits what so-called ‘conspiracy theorists’ warned of all along: a technocratic surveillance state is here. Oxford is just the beginning. You’ll need a permit to leave your neighborhood. You’ll be tracked by cameras. Go over your quota? You’ll be fined automatically. This isn’t speculation. It’s already happening, and Labour wants it nationwide. Drivers will be allowed just 100 days of “free” travel a year through traffic filters. Another permit gives 25 days through congestion zones. After that, you’re penalized just for moving. But that’s phase one. The real blueprint comes from the ARUP/C40 report. Their 2030 vision includes: • Zero private vehicle ownership • Zero meat or dairy consumption • Just 3 clothing items per year • One short-haul flight every 3 years • 2,500 calories of state-approved bioengineered food All tied to digital ID and programmable money that controls what you buy, where you go, and how you live. This isn’t about traffic. It’s about turning cities into open-air prisons. See how it works—and how close we really are. Watch ZeeeMediaOfficial's full breakdown before it’s too late.👇
16:44

DISTURBING: The UK just approved a Soviet-style system of digital control—and they’re calling it a “15-minute city.” The Telegraph now admits what so-called ‘conspiracy theorists’ warned of all along: a technocratic surveillance state is here. Oxford is just the beginning. You’ll need a permit to leave your neighborhood. You’ll be tracked by cameras. Go over your quota? You’ll be fined automatically. This isn’t speculation. It’s already happening, and Labour wants it nationwide. Drivers will be allowed just 100 days of “free” travel a year through traffic filters. Another permit gives 25 days through congestion zones. After that, you’re penalized just for moving. But that’s phase one. The real blueprint comes from the ARUP/C40 report. Their 2030 vision includes: • Zero private vehicle ownership • Zero meat or dairy consumption • Just 3 clothing items per year • One short-haul flight every 3 years • 2,500 calories of state-approved bioengineered food All tied to digital ID and programmable money that controls what you buy, where you go, and how you live. This isn’t about traffic. It’s about turning cities into open-air prisons. See how it works—and how close we really are. Watch ZeeeMediaOfficial's full breakdown before it’s too late.👇

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

189,556 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: Europe WON’T stand up to Trump over war on Iran…India🇮🇳, Russia🇷🇺, China🇨🇳 MUST help Trump stop himself ‘Part of the problem here is that the Western world is completely nuts, because it’s owned and operated by the United States. And so you have an attack on Iran, and then every European reaction is, “Iran is attacking.” And you say, “excuse me, Iran was just attacked.” What I’m asking India and China and Russia to do is to speak honestly. We can’t have wars of aggression to drive countries into the Stone Age. We can’t have the President of the United States proudly talking about decapitation as if this is normal. Yeah, maybe ISIS would do that. But that’s the President of the United States talking about decapitation. When it’s so vulgar and so clear, I don’t expect most of Europe to stand up. I understand they are occupied countries by the US. But India is not. And that’s why I expect India and China and Russia to be able to be clear about these issues. And they constitute, by themselves, 3 billion people and 3 superpowers and 3 dignified countries. So that’s why I expect them to be able to help Donald Trump to stop himself. He’s an impulsive personality. The US is an impulsive country. It’s a very young, not very clever country. It’s celebrating its 250th year. It’s a baby in the world civilisations. It needs some help to stop misbehaving.’ -Prof. Jeffrey Sachs on the latest episode of New Order Watch the full interview in the quoted post, or watch it on Rumble, link below in the replies👇
3:14

🚨Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: Europe WON’T stand up to Trump over war on Iran…India🇮🇳, Russia🇷🇺, China🇨🇳 MUST help Trump stop himself ‘Part of the problem here is that the Western world is completely nuts, because it’s owned and operated by the United States. And so you have an attack on Iran, and then every European reaction is, “Iran is attacking.” And you say, “excuse me, Iran was just attacked.” What I’m asking India and China and Russia to do is to speak honestly. We can’t have wars of aggression to drive countries into the Stone Age. We can’t have the President of the United States proudly talking about decapitation as if this is normal. Yeah, maybe ISIS would do that. But that’s the President of the United States talking about decapitation. When it’s so vulgar and so clear, I don’t expect most of Europe to stand up. I understand they are occupied countries by the US. But India is not. And that’s why I expect India and China and Russia to be able to be clear about these issues. And they constitute, by themselves, 3 billion people and 3 superpowers and 3 dignified countries. So that’s why I expect them to be able to help Donald Trump to stop himself. He’s an impulsive personality. The US is an impulsive country. It’s a very young, not very clever country. It’s celebrating its 250th year. It’s a baby in the world civilisations. It needs some help to stop misbehaving.’ -Prof. Jeffrey Sachs on the latest episode of New Order Watch the full interview in the quoted post, or watch it on Rumble, link below in the replies👇

New Order with Afshin Rattansi

182,874 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Seedance 2.0 is about to change the entire internet. A “Chinese Sora 2”, but far better — and with almost no censorship. That’s why Chinese models are ahead. I’m not just talking. I’m proving it. This is a compilation of the best videos made with Seedance 2.0. It does everything: anime, gameplay, 3D animation, fight choreography, cinematic scenes — all with surreal mastery. Don’t take my word for it. Watch the full video. I guarantee you’ll be impressed. Now the question is: Between Hailuo 3.0, Veo 4, and PixVerse 6, which one actually has a chance to surpass Seedance 2.0 — which, based on what it already delivers, is the best in the world? And let’s be clear: Design is about to become obsolete. This isn’t an opinion. It’s a fact. The most challenging task humans have ever faced — video production — has truly been conquered by AI. Seedance 2.0 is about to change everything. Production models, business structures, and industry formats will be completely transformed. Leave your thoughts 👇
1:27

Seedance 2.0 is about to change the entire internet. A “Chinese Sora 2”, but far better — and with almost no censorship. That’s why Chinese models are ahead. I’m not just talking. I’m proving it. This is a compilation of the best videos made with Seedance 2.0. It does everything: anime, gameplay, 3D animation, fight choreography, cinematic scenes — all with surreal mastery. Don’t take my word for it. Watch the full video. I guarantee you’ll be impressed. Now the question is: Between Hailuo 3.0, Veo 4, and PixVerse 6, which one actually has a chance to surpass Seedance 2.0 — which, based on what it already delivers, is the best in the world? And let’s be clear: Design is about to become obsolete. This isn’t an opinion. It’s a fact. The most challenging task humans have ever faced — video production — has truly been conquered by AI. Seedance 2.0 is about to change everything. Production models, business structures, and industry formats will be completely transformed. Leave your thoughts 👇

nachos2d

69,153 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

A quiet, profound moment from Novak Djokovic on Piers Morgan Uncensored that stops you in your tracks. Piers asked the question almost no athlete ever wants to face: “When you retire one day… how would you like to be remembered?” Djokovic paused, looked away for a second, then calmly told the story of the first funeral he ever attended: his “tennis father” who passed away just over a month ago. He expected speeches about trophies and titles. Instead, every single person spoke only about the human being — how he touched hearts, how he changed lives, how he made people feel seen. In that moment, Djokovic realized what truly lasts. His answer was measured, thoughtful, and crystal clear: “I’m incredibly proud of the 24 Slams, the records, everything I’ve fought my entire life for. But when I’m gone, I don’t want the trophies on my tombstone. I want it to say: Here lies Novak Djokovic The man who touched people’s hearts.” He smiled softly at Piers and added: “You just helped me put that into words.” No drama. No tears. Just pure, powerful clarity from a man who has spent decades chasing greatness… and suddenly saw what actually matters most. No drama. No tears. Just pure, powerful clarity from a man who has spent decades chasing greatness… and suddenly saw what actually matters most. Watch the 3:37 clip. It’s calm on the surface and seismic underneath. Then ask yourself the same question Novak just answered so beautifully: When your time comes… how do YOU want to be remembered?
3:37

A quiet, profound moment from Novak Djokovic on Piers Morgan Uncensored that stops you in your tracks. Piers asked the question almost no athlete ever wants to face: “When you retire one day… how would you like to be remembered?” Djokovic paused, looked away for a second, then calmly told the story of the first funeral he ever attended: his “tennis father” who passed away just over a month ago. He expected speeches about trophies and titles. Instead, every single person spoke only about the human being — how he touched hearts, how he changed lives, how he made people feel seen. In that moment, Djokovic realized what truly lasts. His answer was measured, thoughtful, and crystal clear: “I’m incredibly proud of the 24 Slams, the records, everything I’ve fought my entire life for. But when I’m gone, I don’t want the trophies on my tombstone. I want it to say: Here lies Novak Djokovic The man who touched people’s hearts.” He smiled softly at Piers and added: “You just helped me put that into words.” No drama. No tears. Just pure, powerful clarity from a man who has spent decades chasing greatness… and suddenly saw what actually matters most. No drama. No tears. Just pure, powerful clarity from a man who has spent decades chasing greatness… and suddenly saw what actually matters most. Watch the 3:37 clip. It’s calm on the surface and seismic underneath. Then ask yourself the same question Novak just answered so beautifully: When your time comes… how do YOU want to be remembered?

Camus

1,121,463 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

🚨EPSTEIN FILES: Public support for UK🇬🇧 Royal Family CRASHES ‘Not simply with the Andrew-Epstein business, but also over the last 30 years. We look at the polling back in 1983 about the popularity of the royal family, some 83-84% were in support of the monarchy. It’s down to 50% now. And that’s a big drop over that period of time. I think the deference has gone. The respect which Elizabeth II held, basically because she’d been around for a very long time and didn’t put a foot wrong in the public’s mind, that’s gone. And the royal family should justify its existence once again. And it’s not doing very well. Let me just give you one statistic, because we’re now looking at finances very closely and the House of Commons has woken up to this. In 2011, the last year of the Civil List, the previous system for funding the royals, they got £7.9 million on that handout from government. This year, they got £132.1 million. That’s an enormous increase over 15 years. And you have to say that’s obscene. You don’t have to be a republican to think that’s obscene.’ -Rt. Hon. Norman Baker on the latest episode of Going Underground Watch the full interview in the quoted post, or watch it on Rumble, link below in the replies👇
1:45

🚨EPSTEIN FILES: Public support for UK🇬🇧 Royal Family CRASHES ‘Not simply with the Andrew-Epstein business, but also over the last 30 years. We look at the polling back in 1983 about the popularity of the royal family, some 83-84% were in support of the monarchy. It’s down to 50% now. And that’s a big drop over that period of time. I think the deference has gone. The respect which Elizabeth II held, basically because she’d been around for a very long time and didn’t put a foot wrong in the public’s mind, that’s gone. And the royal family should justify its existence once again. And it’s not doing very well. Let me just give you one statistic, because we’re now looking at finances very closely and the House of Commons has woken up to this. In 2011, the last year of the Civil List, the previous system for funding the royals, they got £7.9 million on that handout from government. This year, they got £132.1 million. That’s an enormous increase over 15 years. And you have to say that’s obscene. You don’t have to be a republican to think that’s obscene.’ -Rt. Hon. Norman Baker on the latest episode of Going Underground Watch the full interview in the quoted post, or watch it on Rumble, link below in the replies👇

Going Underground

83,333 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨 BREAKING: NEVER BEFORE SEEN LETTER + LEAKED VIDEO —Erika Kirk Named TPUSA CEO JUST 6 DAYS After Charlie’s Assassination — Then Addresses Staff Feeling “BLESSED & HONORED” 😳 Candace Owens just dropped TWO bombshells on today’s podcast: Exclusive letter from TPUSA board member Doug Degroot (dated Sept 17th, announced internally Sept 16th): “In Ecclesiastes… God has prepared us… It is our great pride to announce Erika Kirk as the new CEO and Chair of the Board.” Framed as divine will — decided in ~72 HOURS after Charlie’s death. Leaked company-wide video from THE SAME DAY (Sept 16th — 5.5 days post-assassination): Erika addresses ALL staff from the office (no full hair/makeup): “Turning Point USA will continue… bigger than ever.” “Charlie’s more alive than ever… he’s gonna guide us.” “I’ll fight like hell to make sure you all have jobs… we’re family.” “The mission has gotten deeper.” Ends: “I feel so blessed and honored…” Candace: “Within 72 hours, someone asked a grieving widow if she wanted to be CEO — and she said YES. No real family by her side in Utah… just Stacy Sheridan (head of fundraising). The vibe is spiritually disturbing — like a cult using Charlie’s wife to demand harder work.” Employees felt manipulated: “Work longer, sacrifice more — it’s what God/Charlie wants.” Where is the GRIEF? Nights “hardest,” mornings “raw”… but full mission mode and “blessed” to take the reins? This timeline changes EVERYTHING. Go watch today’s FULL episode — watch before it’s gone. Link Posted Below! FOLLOW Candace Owens Does this sit right with you? Share if it doesn’t 👇🔥
14:05

🚨 BREAKING: NEVER BEFORE SEEN LETTER + LEAKED VIDEO —Erika Kirk Named TPUSA CEO JUST 6 DAYS After Charlie’s Assassination — Then Addresses Staff Feeling “BLESSED & HONORED” 😳 Candace Owens just dropped TWO bombshells on today’s podcast: Exclusive letter from TPUSA board member Doug Degroot (dated Sept 17th, announced internally Sept 16th): “In Ecclesiastes… God has prepared us… It is our great pride to announce Erika Kirk as the new CEO and Chair of the Board.” Framed as divine will — decided in ~72 HOURS after Charlie’s death. Leaked company-wide video from THE SAME DAY (Sept 16th — 5.5 days post-assassination): Erika addresses ALL staff from the office (no full hair/makeup): “Turning Point USA will continue… bigger than ever.” “Charlie’s more alive than ever… he’s gonna guide us.” “I’ll fight like hell to make sure you all have jobs… we’re family.” “The mission has gotten deeper.” Ends: “I feel so blessed and honored…” Candace: “Within 72 hours, someone asked a grieving widow if she wanted to be CEO — and she said YES. No real family by her side in Utah… just Stacy Sheridan (head of fundraising). The vibe is spiritually disturbing — like a cult using Charlie’s wife to demand harder work.” Employees felt manipulated: “Work longer, sacrifice more — it’s what God/Charlie wants.” Where is the GRIEF? Nights “hardest,” mornings “raw”… but full mission mode and “blessed” to take the reins? This timeline changes EVERYTHING. Go watch today’s FULL episode — watch before it’s gone. Link Posted Below! FOLLOW Candace Owens Does this sit right with you? Share if it doesn’t 👇🔥

Project Constitution

25,905 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Liberal Leadership OR Labor Sworn in? - The #ABC had a choice, what did they do? 🎥 What you’re about to see is real. It’s taken directly from the ABC’s own YouTube channel — as shown in the clip below. No edits to change the story, just a spotlight on how the stories were told. From start to finish, this segment ran 3 minutes and 33 seconds. And here’s how they used that time: 88.7% was spent on the Liberal leadership circus Just 6.1% covered the Labor Government’s official swearing-in — a historic event And the rest — 5.2% — was neutral filler or transitions That’s 3 minutes and 9 seconds hyping up internal Liberal drama, vs 13 seconds acknowledging the formation of a new government. This wasn’t journalism. It was narrative. And it was bias. Pure and simple. To spare you the boredom of the full Liberal worship session, we’ve sped up their airtime, and played Labor’s 13 seconds at normal speed — to drive home the imbalance. But here's the kicker — even those calling out the lopsided timing missed this: 👉 While the ABC is talking about Liberal leadership drama, they visually overlay footage from the Labor swearing-in ceremony. They visually bury Labor’s history-making moment under a Liberal voiceover dialogue. Ask yourself: Why? This tactic — talking about the Liberals while showing Labor — is a trick straight out of the Sky News playbook. They did it before the election. They’re still doing it now. 📺 Watch closely. 📊 Look at the graphs. 🧠 Then ask: When is the ABC going to admit it’s joined at the hip with Murdoch media? This is not public broadcasting. It’s propaganda. And it’s fkng disgraceful. The full ABC clip remains live on their official YouTube channel — at the link visible in our footage. (We’re not typing it here for obvious reasons). Check it before they delete it.
2:12

Liberal Leadership OR Labor Sworn in? - The #ABC had a choice, what did they do? 🎥 What you’re about to see is real. It’s taken directly from the ABC’s own YouTube channel — as shown in the clip below. No edits to change the story, just a spotlight on how the stories were told. From start to finish, this segment ran 3 minutes and 33 seconds. And here’s how they used that time: 88.7% was spent on the Liberal leadership circus Just 6.1% covered the Labor Government’s official swearing-in — a historic event And the rest — 5.2% — was neutral filler or transitions That’s 3 minutes and 9 seconds hyping up internal Liberal drama, vs 13 seconds acknowledging the formation of a new government. This wasn’t journalism. It was narrative. And it was bias. Pure and simple. To spare you the boredom of the full Liberal worship session, we’ve sped up their airtime, and played Labor’s 13 seconds at normal speed — to drive home the imbalance. But here's the kicker — even those calling out the lopsided timing missed this: 👉 While the ABC is talking about Liberal leadership drama, they visually overlay footage from the Labor swearing-in ceremony. They visually bury Labor’s history-making moment under a Liberal voiceover dialogue. Ask yourself: Why? This tactic — talking about the Liberals while showing Labor — is a trick straight out of the Sky News playbook. They did it before the election. They’re still doing it now. 📺 Watch closely. 📊 Look at the graphs. 🧠 Then ask: When is the ABC going to admit it’s joined at the hip with Murdoch media? This is not public broadcasting. It’s propaganda. And it’s fkng disgraceful. The full ABC clip remains live on their official YouTube channel — at the link visible in our footage. (We’re not typing it here for obvious reasons). Check it before they delete it.

The Noisy Elephant

50,423 просмотров • 1 год назад

"If you watch 'Henry: Portrait of a Serial Ki!!er' (1986) often enough, you realise that in a way it’s like an extremely bizarre comedy." --- John McNaughton Full Excerpt: "Interviewer: Henry isn’t entirely unsympathetic, is he? McNaughton: I think of Henry as being a monster, but Ottis is the beast. Henry’s a bit like Frankenstein’s monster – there might just be that little bit of goodness somewhere deep inside that might come out. But once Ottis starts following Henry’s “teachings”, so to speak, he just gives way to his worst impulses and he becomes the beast. Henry is the “better” of the two, if you can make that comparison. It’s not like in most serial-ki!!er films, where what they normally do is present the ki!!er as some evil creature who will not be redeemed, so the audience doesn’t have to bother thinking any deeper thoughts. With Henry, no moral judgement is provided, so you have to think for yourself. Now that’s always been a tough sell in Hollywood. Interviewer: And there’s also a surprising amount of humour in the movie, albeit mostly very black humour. McNaughton: If you watch it often enough, you realise that in a way it’s like an extremely bizarre comedy. Tom Towles, who plays Ottis, his training was with the Second City group – improvisational comedy. He’s great at playing buffoons, and I’ve used him several times since. The relationship between Henry and Ottis is, at certain points, a little like a bickering couple – like when Ottis smashes the TV in, or when the video-camera breaks and they have their little argument in the car. The way they played those scenes makes me laugh – but of course there’s a lot about the film that’s so shocking that if somebody saw it just once they might think you were crazy to even think of laughing at it. Interviewer: Do you think the film still has the same power to shock, 18 years after you made it? McNaughton: I think it does, yes, though not quite as much as when it first came out – because this kind of thing really hadn’t been seen before. And we were trying to do something different with the presentation of the violent scenes. If you take the early scene where they ki!! the TV man – he’s this repulsive man who goads them until they attack him. It’s a quite traditional setup of introducing a distasteful character, and you’re rooting for the hero to dispatch him. And of course he gets the TV smashed over his head – it’s a kind of gratifying use of violence. Then later we have the ‘home invasion’ sequence, and that’s very different – it’s like a home movie of the massacre of a completely innocent family, chosen at random. We watch them slaughtered, and hopefully people will ask themselves – how entertaining is violence, really? Interviewer: Because in the mid-80s when the film came out, there were many violent films – the 'Rambos' and 'Terminators' and the like. McNaughton: Well, normally the hero goes and shoots a thousand people, and that’s the kind of violence that was shown in movies at the time. We didn’t exactly have those specific films in mind when we made 'Henry', but when trying to tell the story, we realised it was a lot to do with violence, so we tried to dig a little deeper." (John McNaughton's interview with Neil Young, Jigsaw Lounge)
1:45

"If you watch 'Henry: Portrait of a Serial Ki!!er' (1986) often enough, you realise that in a way it’s like an extremely bizarre comedy." --- John McNaughton Full Excerpt: "Interviewer: Henry isn’t entirely unsympathetic, is he? McNaughton: I think of Henry as being a monster, but Ottis is the beast. Henry’s a bit like Frankenstein’s monster – there might just be that little bit of goodness somewhere deep inside that might come out. But once Ottis starts following Henry’s “teachings”, so to speak, he just gives way to his worst impulses and he becomes the beast. Henry is the “better” of the two, if you can make that comparison. It’s not like in most serial-ki!!er films, where what they normally do is present the ki!!er as some evil creature who will not be redeemed, so the audience doesn’t have to bother thinking any deeper thoughts. With Henry, no moral judgement is provided, so you have to think for yourself. Now that’s always been a tough sell in Hollywood. Interviewer: And there’s also a surprising amount of humour in the movie, albeit mostly very black humour. McNaughton: If you watch it often enough, you realise that in a way it’s like an extremely bizarre comedy. Tom Towles, who plays Ottis, his training was with the Second City group – improvisational comedy. He’s great at playing buffoons, and I’ve used him several times since. The relationship between Henry and Ottis is, at certain points, a little like a bickering couple – like when Ottis smashes the TV in, or when the video-camera breaks and they have their little argument in the car. The way they played those scenes makes me laugh – but of course there’s a lot about the film that’s so shocking that if somebody saw it just once they might think you were crazy to even think of laughing at it. Interviewer: Do you think the film still has the same power to shock, 18 years after you made it? McNaughton: I think it does, yes, though not quite as much as when it first came out – because this kind of thing really hadn’t been seen before. And we were trying to do something different with the presentation of the violent scenes. If you take the early scene where they ki!! the TV man – he’s this repulsive man who goads them until they attack him. It’s a quite traditional setup of introducing a distasteful character, and you’re rooting for the hero to dispatch him. And of course he gets the TV smashed over his head – it’s a kind of gratifying use of violence. Then later we have the ‘home invasion’ sequence, and that’s very different – it’s like a home movie of the massacre of a completely innocent family, chosen at random. We watch them slaughtered, and hopefully people will ask themselves – how entertaining is violence, really? Interviewer: Because in the mid-80s when the film came out, there were many violent films – the 'Rambos' and 'Terminators' and the like. McNaughton: Well, normally the hero goes and shoots a thousand people, and that’s the kind of violence that was shown in movies at the time. We didn’t exactly have those specific films in mind when we made 'Henry', but when trying to tell the story, we realised it was a lot to do with violence, so we tried to dig a little deeper." (John McNaughton's interview with Neil Young, Jigsaw Lounge)

DepressedBergman

37,186 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Alright, this one’s worth your attention if you’re building or deploying agents. Future AGI just open-sourced their entire platform and i don’t mean a trimmed-down version. this is the full stack: UI, backend, simulation engine, evals, optimization loop, observability, guardrails, gateway, docs. all in one repo. Apache 2.0. I’ve been putting it through its paces on production agents, and what stands out isn’t just the breadth it’s the architecture. Most of the current “agent reliability” stack is fragmented. tracing lives in one tool, evals in another, guardrails somewhere else. you end up manually connecting dots, and the agent itself doesn’t really improve you just keep patching prompts and hoping for the best. This flips that model. It’s built as a closed feedback loop: simulate failures → evaluate in real time → detect production issues → learn from them → generate fixes → validate against real traffic → check regressions → redeploy → monitor again And when something new breaks, the loop just runs again. no manual glue. The simulation piece is especially strong. instead of static test cases, it generates adversarial, multi-turn conversations based on how your agent actually behaves basically hunting for the exact scenarios where your system fails confidently. ran a few thousand simulations on our side… caught things we definitely would’ve missed. Evals run fast (sub-50ms) across modalities. not LLM-as-judge trained classifiers. guardrails are built-in, not layered on top. observability gives you step-level visibility into reasoning, cost, latency, quality. But the real shift is the optimization loop. Most tools tell you *what* broke. this system actually fixes it, validates the fix, and ensures nothing else regresses. That’s the missing layer. It’s clearly built with production in mind not a research demo. and the fact that it’s self-hostable makes it even more relevant if you’re running serious workloads. If you’ve been duct-taping together infra around your agents, this is probably the closest thing to a unified system i’ve seen so far. Worth checking out. If you're serious about deploying reliable AI agents, this is worth a look: 👉 You can also try it instantly (no setup) via their cloud version:
2:20

Alright, this one’s worth your attention if you’re building or deploying agents. Future AGI just open-sourced their entire platform and i don’t mean a trimmed-down version. this is the full stack: UI, backend, simulation engine, evals, optimization loop, observability, guardrails, gateway, docs. all in one repo. Apache 2.0. I’ve been putting it through its paces on production agents, and what stands out isn’t just the breadth it’s the architecture. Most of the current “agent reliability” stack is fragmented. tracing lives in one tool, evals in another, guardrails somewhere else. you end up manually connecting dots, and the agent itself doesn’t really improve you just keep patching prompts and hoping for the best. This flips that model. It’s built as a closed feedback loop: simulate failures → evaluate in real time → detect production issues → learn from them → generate fixes → validate against real traffic → check regressions → redeploy → monitor again And when something new breaks, the loop just runs again. no manual glue. The simulation piece is especially strong. instead of static test cases, it generates adversarial, multi-turn conversations based on how your agent actually behaves basically hunting for the exact scenarios where your system fails confidently. ran a few thousand simulations on our side… caught things we definitely would’ve missed. Evals run fast (sub-50ms) across modalities. not LLM-as-judge trained classifiers. guardrails are built-in, not layered on top. observability gives you step-level visibility into reasoning, cost, latency, quality. But the real shift is the optimization loop. Most tools tell you *what* broke. this system actually fixes it, validates the fix, and ensures nothing else regresses. That’s the missing layer. It’s clearly built with production in mind not a research demo. and the fact that it’s self-hostable makes it even more relevant if you’re running serious workloads. If you’ve been duct-taping together infra around your agents, this is probably the closest thing to a unified system i’ve seen so far. Worth checking out. If you're serious about deploying reliable AI agents, this is worth a look: 👉 You can also try it instantly (no setup) via their cloud version:

Aakash Verma

22,910 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Veo 3.1 is now live on invideo. We’re one of the first official partners worldwide to launch Veo 3.1. The Google Cloud team gave us early access, and it changes everything. Veo 3.1 upgrades what creators actually care about: visual quality, motion realism, and prompt responsiveness. But the real breakthrough is in control: → You can now define a start and end frame and Veo 3.1 builds everything between them with perfect flow. → You can lock a character’s look across scenes. → You can merge multiple references into one coherent world. When that power meets invideo, it turns from generation into storytelling. Because invideo isn’t just an AI video generator, it’s a full-stack AI production house at your disposal. It makes over 300 creative decisions across editing, scripting, visuals, sound, and voiceover to craft videos like a full-scale production team would. Ad films, brand spots, social content, cinematic stories, all created with the precision of a studio team, at the speed of thought. Watch how Veo 3.1 inside invideo turns imagination into cinematic magic👇
4:27

Veo 3.1 is now live on invideo. We’re one of the first official partners worldwide to launch Veo 3.1. The Google Cloud team gave us early access, and it changes everything. Veo 3.1 upgrades what creators actually care about: visual quality, motion realism, and prompt responsiveness. But the real breakthrough is in control: → You can now define a start and end frame and Veo 3.1 builds everything between them with perfect flow. → You can lock a character’s look across scenes. → You can merge multiple references into one coherent world. When that power meets invideo, it turns from generation into storytelling. Because invideo isn’t just an AI video generator, it’s a full-stack AI production house at your disposal. It makes over 300 creative decisions across editing, scripting, visuals, sound, and voiceover to craft videos like a full-scale production team would. Ad films, brand spots, social content, cinematic stories, all created with the precision of a studio team, at the speed of thought. Watch how Veo 3.1 inside invideo turns imagination into cinematic magic👇

Sanket Shah

558,983 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

⚠️ BREAKING GRAVITY: Col. Douglas Macgregor warns — Iran WILL NOT SURRENDER! This is not just another conflict. "For Iran, this is an existential war." "They will not submit." Col. Douglas Macgregor ( Douglas Macgregor) says, "They [Iran] will not recognize Israeli” domination over Iran, nor will they become a vassal state in the Middle East, submissive to Washington or Tel Aviv, “no matter how much we threaten them." "They absolutely understand how much tonnage of bombs (the U.S. has in the region that could be used to bomb then) but “they will not capitulate." Macgregor exposes the dangerous miscalculation: Massive US/Israeli military buildup won't force Iran to give up and it’s not enough combat power (absent a large ground force) to force submission. Trying anyway risks everything. Watch the full eye-opening clip NOW before it's too late 👇 [ ] 👉#Iran #MiddleEast #Geopolitics #DouglasMacgregor #DeepDive
1:23

⚠️ BREAKING GRAVITY: Col. Douglas Macgregor warns — Iran WILL NOT SURRENDER! This is not just another conflict. "For Iran, this is an existential war." "They will not submit." Col. Douglas Macgregor ( Douglas Macgregor) says, "They [Iran] will not recognize Israeli” domination over Iran, nor will they become a vassal state in the Middle East, submissive to Washington or Tel Aviv, “no matter how much we threaten them." "They absolutely understand how much tonnage of bombs (the U.S. has in the region that could be used to bomb then) but “they will not capitulate." Macgregor exposes the dangerous miscalculation: Massive US/Israeli military buildup won't force Iran to give up and it’s not enough combat power (absent a large ground force) to force submission. Trying anyway risks everything. Watch the full eye-opening clip NOW before it's too late 👇 [ ] 👉#Iran #MiddleEast #Geopolitics #DouglasMacgregor #DeepDive

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

28,511 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад