Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

It's been 100 years since the Equal Rights Amendment was first introduced in Congress, but it still hasn’t been added to the Constitution — here's how Congresswoman Cori Bush (Archived) & Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley hope to change that

181,693 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von Old Man Coxinator 🔥🍊
Old Man Coxinator 🔥🍊vor 3 Jahren

@nowthisnews @RepPressley @RepCori When have you ever been concerned with what the Constitution says?

Profilbild von Just Me
Just Mevor 3 Jahren

@nowthisnews @RepCori @RepPressley What rights do you not have?

Profilbild von Slick Willy®
Slick Willy®vor 3 Jahren

@nowthisnews @Alyssa_Milano @RepCori @RepPressley What a gal.

Profilbild von Kingstone Comics
Kingstone Comicsvor 1 Jahr

Did you know the U.S. Constitution is a brief document? The original text was only 4,200 words with the additional amendments adding another 3,000 words. Although brief, it packs a lot of punch! Get the 100-page graphic novel from U.S. Comics.

Profilbild von Boe Jiden
Boe Jidenvor 3 Jahren

@nowthisnews @RepCori @RepPressley Sorry just out if curiosity how did they determine these and how accurate are they?

Profilbild von CoffeeTyme
CoffeeTymevor 3 Jahren

@nowthisnews @RepCori @RepPressley Constitution ⬇️ Amdt14.S1.4.3.1 Equal Protection: Overview Fourteenth Amendment, Section 1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the STATE wherein they RESIDE.

Profilbild von Stir-fry
Stir-fryvor 3 Jahren

@nowthisnews @RepCori @RepPressley Yet another embarrassing her race.

Profilbild von gerry
gerryvor 3 Jahren

@nowthisnews @AyannaPressley @RepCori @RepPressley

Profilbild von 🇺🇸 HOMESWEETMAGA🇺🇸
🇺🇸 HOMESWEETMAGA🇺🇸vor 3 Jahren

@nowthisnews @RepCori @RepPressley Why now? Democrats had super majority for 2 years. Did they do anything besides spend and spend some more, producing record high inflation? Obviously not. You aren't in control of the House anymore. We're fixing the economy you wrecked. You can do your social issues another time.

Profilbild von RideThe2ndWave
RideThe2ndWavevor 3 Jahren

@nowthisnews @Alyssa_Milano @RepCori @RepPressley Actually, no, the intention of the ERA as passed by the States was about the protection of WOMEN in law. The addition of sexual preference and gender "identity" are new rhetorical inclusions not voted by the States.

Profilbild von Aaron Smith
Aaron Smithvor 3 Jahren

@nowthisnews @Alyssa_Milano @RepCori @RepPressley I thought it was illegal to discriminate against race and sex already.

Ähnliche Videos