Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

It's been 100 years since the Equal Rights Amendment was first introduced in Congress, but it still hasn’t been added to the Constitution — here's how Congresswoman Cori Bush (Archived) & Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley hope to change that

181,693 views • 3 years ago •via X (Twitter)

11 Comments

Old Man Coxinator 🔥🍊's profile picture
Old Man Coxinator 🔥🍊3 years ago

@nowthisnews @RepPressley @RepCori When have you ever been concerned with what the Constitution says?

Just Me's profile picture
Just Me3 years ago

@nowthisnews @RepCori @RepPressley What rights do you not have?

Slick Willy®'s profile picture
Slick Willy®3 years ago

@nowthisnews @Alyssa_Milano @RepCori @RepPressley What a gal.

Kingstone Comics's profile picture
Kingstone Comics1 year ago

Did you know the U.S. Constitution is a brief document? The original text was only 4,200 words with the additional amendments adding another 3,000 words. Although brief, it packs a lot of punch! Get the 100-page graphic novel from U.S. Comics.

Boe Jiden's profile picture
Boe Jiden3 years ago

@nowthisnews @RepCori @RepPressley Sorry just out if curiosity how did they determine these and how accurate are they?

CoffeeTyme's profile picture
CoffeeTyme3 years ago

@nowthisnews @RepCori @RepPressley Constitution ⬇️ Amdt14.S1.4.3.1 Equal Protection: Overview Fourteenth Amendment, Section 1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the STATE wherein they RESIDE.

Stir-fry's profile picture
Stir-fry3 years ago

@nowthisnews @RepCori @RepPressley Yet another embarrassing her race.

gerry's profile picture
gerry3 years ago

@nowthisnews @AyannaPressley @RepCori @RepPressley

🇺🇸 HOMESWEETMAGA🇺🇸's profile picture
🇺🇸 HOMESWEETMAGA🇺🇸3 years ago

@nowthisnews @RepCori @RepPressley Why now? Democrats had super majority for 2 years. Did they do anything besides spend and spend some more, producing record high inflation? Obviously not. You aren't in control of the House anymore. We're fixing the economy you wrecked. You can do your social issues another time.

RideThe2ndWave's profile picture
RideThe2ndWave3 years ago

@nowthisnews @Alyssa_Milano @RepCori @RepPressley Actually, no, the intention of the ERA as passed by the States was about the protection of WOMEN in law. The addition of sexual preference and gender "identity" are new rhetorical inclusions not voted by the States.

Aaron Smith's profile picture
Aaron Smith3 years ago

@nowthisnews @Alyssa_Milano @RepCori @RepPressley I thought it was illegal to discriminate against race and sex already.

Related Videos