Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

“It’s espionage.” Catherine Herridge reveals a terrifying possibility: China may have the ability to build a digital dossier on MILLIONS of Americans. Herridge warns that China’s collection of data goes far beyond voter rolls...and the scariest part is what that information could be used for. HERRIDGE: “China is one...

210,700 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Investigative journalist Catherine Herridge says newly released documents appear to corroborate claims that intelligence officials purposely withheld information about China’s election influence operations. Herridge said one November 2020 email she reviewed referenced officials having “deliberately massaged” a presidential briefing to avoid direct links to the election. HERRIDGE: “Well, I think it’s a very significant announcement. Not only what he said, but the fact that they are releasing these documents so that we can really fact check the claims we heard this evening.” “I’ve been digging into the documents already and I found November 2020 email and it specifically states…it’s a conversation among intelligence officials…it specifically states that they have, ‘deliberately massaged’ one of our pending pdbs...” “That’s the president’s daily brief, to avoid any direct links to the election.” “And that is consistent with my reporting.” “I understand the whistleblower complaint alleged, I think we’re now seeing the emails, that there was an intentional effort to suppress intelligence about China’s influence operations.” “And this was, Katie, like a massive effort. What they call a multi domain operation. That means trade, it means diplomacy, it means open source information, it means social media.” “So all the levers of power, China had to influence U.S. election.” Catherine Herridge Katie Pavlich

Overton

300,499 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

I asked Garry Tan how to use meta prompting to get better at AI: "My partners at YC Jared Friedman and Pete Koomen showed me how to do this. You can take almost anything that you do all the time and just drop it into a context window. And then say, “Here’s a bunch of inputs and outputs." And maybe you also add a bunch of notes. And then you tell it, “Write me a prompt that can act as an agent that takes this input and makes this output over here.” You can do this for almost any type of knowledge work. And you can even introspect. "What are things you notice that I did to convert this from the input to the output?”. And then you can just start using the prompt. Initially, it’s going to suck. Because it’s just not that smart yet. But what’s funny is now, I also use it to Iterate my writing. You can be very direct, "I would never say that", "Don’t say it like this", or "Oh, you used the long word there, use the short word". Just speak to it conversationally. And then when you're happy with the output, you can use that new output to make a new prompt. "Based on this conversation, give me a better initial prompt that incorporates all the things we talked about." And you can do this with literally everything. And in theory, there’s so much it applies to that people do day-to-day. You could use it for tweets. You could use it for editing podcasts. You can use it for pretty much everything. I have a folder of prompts that I use all the time. My YouTube prompt is on v27 or something. I'll go through this process with all the different max models. I'll use GPT 5.2 Pro. I’ll use Grok. I'll use Claude. Then, I’ll take all the outputs from all the models and put them into Claude and say "Here’s my prompt, here’s the output from four LLMs, including yourself. Rate each response and tell me what the pros and cons of each approach are." And I usually say "give it to me in numbered form". And then you can agree with one, disagree with two, tell it three is this or that. And then after that, you say given all of this, synthesize it."

The Peel

51,632 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Must Watch! 👀💥Elections & National Security What Do The Declassified Documents Show? John Solomon explains below • Solomon says he initially received only a two-sentence intelligence assessment stating that China had obtained access to U.S. voter files. After reviewing additional declassified documents, he says he learned the scope was approximately 220 million voter records. • He contrasts that figure with the 2020 indictment of Iranian hackers involving roughly 100,000 voter records, arguing the scale is dramatically different. • Solomon also compares it to China’s alleged hack of the United Kingdom’s voter database (approximately 40 million records) and notes that U.S. officials publicly condemned that incident while, according to him, Americans were never informed about the alleged compromise of U.S. voter data. • He states that 220 million records would exceed the size of the 2017 Equifax breach, which affected approximately 148 million Americans. • Solomon addresses what he views as a contradiction in today’s public debate: some states have argued that providing voter roll data to the federal government is too risky from a privacy and security standpoint, while some media commentators argue China’s alleged access to voter data is insignificant because much of the information can be commercially purchased. • Solomon says commercially available voter databases contain only basic information. He claims the hacked databases allegedly contained additional identifiers that, according to the documents he reviewed, could be used for more extensive exploitation. • Solomon says the declassified documents outline several potential capabilities once complete voter records are obtained: Requesting ballots in another person’s name. Altering voter registration information, potentially forcing legitimate voters to cast provisional ballots. Moving a voter’s registration to another state without their knowledge. Combining voter data with other hacked information to conduct targeted influence operations. • Solomon also says the documents describe Chinese efforts to direct messaging through diplomatic consulates, use social media and journalists to amplify racial division, and gather compromising information on U.S. officials ahead of the election. Solomon’s conclusion: He argues these activities constitute election interference, regardless of whether ballots or vote totals were ultimately changed. It is my opinion that this is just the beginning. This was just to start the debate and discussion in the public forum. Elections and election data or a matter of national security. That is the important part to understand here. State Election data has been compromised by foreign adversaries. This brings the predicate for national emergency on election integrity and infrastructure.

Joshua Reid | Redpills.tv

24,758 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen