正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

48,216 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

9 条评论

issabreh 的头像
issabreh1 年前

Spoon I got a question What happens if I'm not ready

Spoon! 的头像
Spoon!1 年前

you could end up being too late

Gemini 的头像
Gemini1 年前

Gemini is the simple and secure way to buy crypto.

Ygb_3xX 的头像
Ygb_3xX1 年前

spoon you are awakening legends festival 2022 players ptsd with this

Spoon! 的头像
Spoon!1 年前

new players these days dont know the crack like subsrance UGB was on release both in game and meme wise

Niemand 的头像
Niemand1 年前

What legends players wanted for the anniversary:

Please Draw More Art of The Chrcter I’m Retweeting 的头像
Please Draw More Art of The Chrcter I’m Retweeting1 年前

I think he might hope that you’re ready And I think he might be coming at you full power But thats just what i gathered from watching this idk Regardless, he thinks its futile

SaiyanAzurah 的头像
SaiyanAzurah1 年前

Futility ball legends be like:

tom.D.autistic1 的头像
tom.D.autistic11 年前

IT'S FUTILE 🦅🔥🦅🔥🔥🔥

相关视频

🚨 NEW VIDEO Surfaces Of Erika Kirk Promoting MHC Tour With TX MEGA-CHURCH Pastor Jack Graham —Meanwhile Where Are Her KIDS?🤔 This newly surfaced video of Erika Kirk cozying up with Jack Graham from Prestonwood Baptist Church in Dallas, TX, is the epitome of inauthenticity. She's out here promoting TPUSA's "Make Heaven Crowded Tour" like some scripted saint, but it rings so HOLLOW—no real grief, no genuine emotion, her trad wife image shattered, just forced smiles and boss-bitch vibes. And the real outrage? WHERE ARE HER AND CHARLIE'S KIDS? While Erika's gallivanting on this national tour, helming a nearly BILLION-DOLLAR empire (TPUSA), and now sitting on the Department of Defense board (zero quals, mind you), who's actually raising those young children? This isn't leadership; it's straight-up NEGLECT—prioritizing her political climb over family. Charlie championed family first—Erika's ditching it for the spotlight. Heartbreaking and ABSURD! And don't think this tour is innocent evangelism—it's a MASSIVE SURVEILLANCE & PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATION! Geofencing EVERYONE'S cell phones without consent, tracking attendees to shove pro-Israel messaging down their throats. "Operation Mocking Pastor" in full swing: Manipulating clergy to control narratives, painting Candace owens as DEMONIC, and desperately trying to rehab Erika's TOXIC image post-assassination. Futile effort—she's exposed as fake, and the psyop's crumbling under scrutiny! This is deep state control at its worst—tracking, brainwashing, distracting from the truth. TPUSA ain't Charlie's anymore; it's a Zionist tool. Wake up—boycott the fraud! Video's viral—watch, question, expose. Erika's empire is falling! Tag Candace Owens and RT if Erika's neglect sickens you.

Project Constitution

146,334 次观看 • 4 个月前

Eleven years ago, Dr. Kizza Besigye warned us. He saw the creeping danger of Museveni's ambition to turn Uganda into a family fiefdom, a dynasty built on the backs of our freedoms. Today, that prophecy has become a grim reality. Besigye, a man who embodies the true will of the Ugandan people, is unjustly imprisoned, silenced by a regime that fears his voice more than any weapon. Museveni's son, Muhoozi, elevated to the head of the army through nothing more than familial privilege, carries out these orders. This is not leadership; it's the iron fist of a desperate dictatorship clinging to power. They know Besigye holds the true power – the power of the people, the power of truth, the power of a nation yearning for democracy. All they have are guns, and guns cannot silence the yearning for freedom forever. But fear and apathy are their greatest weapons. They want us to believe that resistance is futile, that our voices don't matter. They are wrong. We must refuse to be silenced. The time for complacency is over. This is not just about Besigye; it's about the soul of Uganda. It's about whether we will allow our country to be transformed into a personal possession of one family, or whether we will reclaim our sovereignty and build a future where justice and freedom prevail. We must shed the cloak of apathy and find our courage. Organize. Speak out. Demand the release of Dr. Besigye and all political prisoners. Support those who are working to build a democratic Uganda. Use your voice and your actions to reclaim your country. The will of the people is a force more powerful than any army. Let us show Museveni and his son that Uganda belongs to its people, and we will not rest until freedom reigns! #FreeKizzaBesigye #FreeEronKiiza #FreeAllPoliticalPrisoners #MuseveniMustGo #EndMilitaryRule

OGV

66,498 次观看 • 1 年前

Harish Rana's story is heartbreaking 😔. May Harish find peace in eternal sleep. Salute to Harish's parents for caring for him with unwavering love for 13 long years; sometimes letting go is the ultimate act of love. This is the first time the Supreme Court has made such a decision – and it's a commendable one. Harish Rana he was a 20-year-old engineering student at Chandigarh University when he fell from the fourth floor of his PG accommodation on Rakshabandhan in 2013, sustaining severe brain injuries. He remained in a permanent vegetative state for 13 years, relying on medical nutrition and care. In March 2026, the Supreme Court granted his parents' plea for passive euthanasia, allowing the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. The court ruled that clinically assisted nutrition and hydration constitute medical treatment, not basic care, and can be withdrawn if futile. This landmark decision marked India's first practical implementation of passive euthanasia guidelines. The plea was filed by Rana's parents, who requested the court to allow withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment after years of medical suffering. Medical boards examined his condition and confirmed that he had remained in a permanent vegetative state with extremely limited chances of improvement. His parents told the court they had been caring for him for over a decade and wanted their son to be allowed to die with dignity. Considering the medical reports and the family's plea, the Supreme Court allowed the withdrawal of life- support treatment under medical supervision. The ruling is being seen as a significant step in applying India's passive euthanasia guidelines and the right to die with dignity.

Neha Gurung

48,684 次观看 • 4 个月前

Israel is at an almost historic crossroads in Gaza, and it needs to make a decision. My take on החדשות - N12. First of all, on a personal level, it's unfortunate that while such announcements are being made, the political skirmish continues. I think that even Yair Golan doesn't really believe that Finance Minister Smotrich and National Security Minister Ben Gvir are jubilant. In my opinion, Avigdor Liberman made a serious mistake yesterday when he said soldiers are dying in vain. Even if he thinks so — and I think he’s wrong — you don't say that to bereaved families who are in mourning. Now, regarding the agonizing discussion of the continuation of the matter, the whole story that happened in the cabinet meeting, the big confrontation was not between Smotrich and the Chief of Staff, it was between the Prime Minister and the Chief of Staff. It was very convenient for everyone, for both sides, to say this is Smotrich against Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir. The army will say Smotrich is a fanatic and Smotrich will say Zamir’s a defeatist, but the truth is that there is a debate about the continuation of the war, and we are trapped in this debate in a position on which there is a consensus. All parties are convinced that it hasn’t been conducted well. The right says, “stop the humanitarian aid to the northern Gaza Strip, it's madness.” The other side says, “friends, listen, the current situation is futile procrastination.” I’m talking not just politically. The army's also unhappy with the current conduct. This isn't the path it chose. We're at an almost historic crossroads. Is Israel saying: “We've achieved our goals. let's get the hostages out, end the war, then return afterwards. We’ll avoid military rule, controlling others, and sinking into Gaza like Vietnam”? The other side says, as nir dvori described, “this is 700 meters from our border. We can't leave it now.” So what's the result? What happened in the cabinet? The cabinet decided on humanitarian aid to northern Gaza temporarily, until a humanitarian city is built south of the Morag Corridor. I wish it'd happen faster, but because everyone's waiting for a deal, and due to disagreements at the top, the decision is being delayed. And so, Israel says with one hand that we will establish a city and millions of people will come and eat Ben & Jerry's, and on the other hand, aid continues to come in and fund Hamas. We need to decide one way or another. To remain at this crossroads with ticking bombs behind us? That’s a big mistake.

Amit Segal

12,117 次观看 • 1 年前

RFK Jr. was previously asked about how it felt to be condemned by his own family. He told a story about how his father gave him a book just two weeks before he died. RFK said he read the book multiple times, trying to figure out what lesson his dad wanted to give him. Here is what he said: "Camus had written this book called The Plague. My father gave it to me and he told me, with this kind of peculiar intensity, 'I want you to read this'." "He said this with this directness that after he died, I ended up reading that book about three times, trying to figure out kind of what the message was that he was trying to give me." Breakdown of the book: - "The Plague" is set in a North African city hit by an unprecedented plague. - The city is quarantined, and the story begins with a focus on the doctor's internal conflict. - The doctor initially considers not helping because there is no treatment the unknown disease. - Despite the risks, the doctor decides to comfort and serve the people. - Camus, an existentialist, draws from Stoicism, focusing on duty and service. - The doctor's actions bring order to the chaos, reflecting Stoic philosophy. - RFK then discussed Sisyphus, a figure in Stoicism, who is happy despite his eternal, futile task. - Sisyphus's happiness comes from fulfilling his duty (protecting people from a rolling stone), regardless of the outcome. "For eternity [he] pushes a rock up a hill. He can never get it over the top. It always rolls back down and on top of him. And then he goes up and does it again," RFK said. "Sisyphus is a happy man because he put his shoulder to the stone. He was given a duty and he does his duty. And that self-sacrifice that he makes, brings order to a chaotic universe." "So for me to have kind of a concrete task that I know is right, and I'm open to criticism, I have a critical mind. If somebody shows me where I got it wrong, I'll change. I'm not dug in, I'm not hardheaded in that sense." "But until somebody shows me that I'm gonna try to help these children and, you know, and I feel like it's a gift. So, and the more people that abuse me, the bigger the gift is in some way." Video: Liam McCollum

Collin Rugg

4,341,608 次观看 • 1 年前

An Open Letter to Libertarians: As someone who has long championed individual liberty, privacy, and the minimisation of state power, I find myself grappling with a profound dilemma—one that I believe many of us share in these turbulent times. The spectre of compulsory Digital IDs (DIDs) looms large over the UK and beyond, threatening to usher in an era of unprecedented surveillance and control. I do not want this. You do not want this. No true libertarian could endorse a system that mandates government-issued digital credentials, potentially tracking our every move, transaction, and interaction. The risks are glaring: data exploitation by bloated bureaucracies, corporate profiteers, or worse, the fusion of the two in a dystopian public-private partnership that erodes our freedoms under the guise of "security" or "convenience." And yet, I must confess: outright opposition to DIDs may be a noble stand, but it is ultimately futile. History teaches us that governments rarely retreat from tools that expand their reach. From the Online Safety Bill to GDPR's unintended centralisations, once the machinery of control is proposed, it inevitably rolls forward—often rebranded as "progress" or "protection." In the UK, with talks of digital verification for everything from age checks to voting, it's not a question of if compulsory DIDs arrive, but when. Resisting them head-on risks marginalising our movement, painting us as reactionary Luddites in the eyes of a public increasingly seduced by tech's shiny promises. But here's where strategic thinking comes in: What if we don't just concede the battle—what if we turn it into a Trojan horse for winning the war against tyranny? Imagine this: Once DIDs are implemented (as they likely will be), the underlying blockchain technology—decentralised, transparent, and verifiable—could be repurposed as the foundation for a radical system of Direct Democracy. Every citizen, armed with their secure digital identity, could vote online to ratify every single Bill passed by Parliament before it receives Royal Assent. Think about it. No more backroom deals or elite cabals imposing laws that chip away at our rights—be it censorship, taxation without true representation, or encroachments on free speech and association. The Establishment would be forced to seek explicit, issue-by-issue consent from the British people. How could they ram through another Online Safety Bill or expand surveillance powers if a majority of us could veto it from our smartphones? This isn't pie-in-the-sky utopianism; blockchain's immutability ensures votes are tamper-proof, while cryptographic anonymity (if properly designed) could protect privacy far better than our current opaque parliamentary charade. Of course, this isn't a standalone fix or a magic bullet. It demands constitutional reform—a complete overhaul of how power flows in our society. And here's the opportunity: If we're already flirting with seismic changes, like exiting the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) or rethinking our post-Brexit framework, why not seize the moment to enshrine safeguards for digital liberty? We could formalise strict limits on how citizen data is collected, stored, analysed, and processed—not just by the state, but by corporations too. Imagine a constitution that mandates decentralised data ownership, where individuals control their own information via self-sovereign identities, immune to Big Tech's data-hoarding or government overreach. Technology itself is neutral; it's a tool, not a tyrant. Blockchain and DIDs promise real benefits: streamlined services, fraud reduction, and even enhanced personal sovereignty if wielded correctly. But without our input, the risks skyrocket—mass surveillance, AI-driven pattern recognition that predicts and pre-empts "undesirable" behaviour, and the slow creep toward totalitarianism. Our existing Data Protection laws, drafted in a pre-AI era, are woefully inadequate. They can't contend with algorithms that sift through vast datasets to profile, manipulate, or punish. If we don't regulate who controls the tech and how data is used, we'll wake up in a world where liberty is algorithmically allocated. This is why I urge pro-libertarian groups—think tanks, activists, and voices like those at Big Brother Watch —to reconsider our reflexive opposition. A purely reactive stance lets our opponents frame us as irrational "tin foil hat" wearers, afraid of innovation. Instead, let's lead the charge. We should be at the forefront of this conversation, educating the public on the perils of unchecked tech while proposing workable, liberty-enhancing solutions. High-profile campaigners like Silkie Carlo and others have the platform; let's amplify calls for privacy-by-design, open-source audits, and ironclad prohibitions on data misuse. Fellow libertarians, the path forward isn't blind resistance—it's intelligent redirection. Concede the inevitability of DIDs, but demand they serve us, not the state. Turn the tools of potential oppression into instruments of empowerment. In doing so, we don't just defend liberty; we expand it exponentially. What say you? Let's debate, refine, and act—before it's too late. #DigitalID #Liberty #Freedom *** Please repost and tag a politician or activist that you think should read/listen to this. ***

UK Freedom Campaign

27,772 次观看 • 1 年前