"It's literally 1-click. No Prompt. IDIOT-proof" 🤣 Comparing some Stable Diffusion outpainting methods against Adobe Firefly : "Generative Fill" in Adobe Photoshop - & all the reasons why it's so quickly become my go-to

@Photoshop Been using it in my workflow since photoshop beta released with it, sped up my process so much. Saves me so much time over whole picture inpainting. I need a sweat bead counter I must have removed thousands at this point. 😂

@Photoshop lol. Totally with you on this. Game changer. Only thing that still sucks is what it outputs when you want something more specific - so for inpainting use-case (unless it's just removing things) it's currently not great

@Photoshop All of that is true, but just in case.. I've noticed you're not using inpaint model D: With inpainting model you get much more stable results. You can create a decent inpaint checkpoint version if you do: checkpoint+(inpaint SD - original SD).

@Photoshop Made inpainting model using Counterfeit 3.0. Tried outpainting same image as firefly & controlnet vid I did. When trying to use inpaint+lama controlnet (which works okay on non-inpaint model) as well as outpainting mk2: It always produced visible seams or worse - just walls

@Photoshop adobe drives me nuts but ya... RESULTS.

As the poor man numb nut who only used the outpainting script so far I feel attacked 🤣

Hahaha oh no, jazzzo = one of the GOATS. the numbnuts are those that don't even know those scripts. They been around for forever! How do people get by without at least that?

@Photoshop Holy shit this is a game changer, I don't know why I never tried Firefly but I'm definitely trying it now. Thanks for the awesome tutorials mate!🙏😊

@Hot_AI_Angels @Photoshop I hope it's as helpful to you as it's been for me! It's also really good at painting things out of your image as well. All the unnecessary sweat beads are gone! Haha