Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

It's not that the question is impossible to answer, it's that he is so triggering and the very act of asking the question is trauma-inducing. Of course, she walked out, wouldn't you?

4,691,982 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 9

Фото профиля My Opinion
My Opinion2 лет назад

It's a buzz word she doesn't know the meaning to, and instead of being embarrassed because she has no idea what she's talking about, she acts hurt and traumatized and plays the victim. Typical feminist attitude.

Фото профиля Shannon
Shannon2 лет назад

She’s not triggered. She’s embarrassed because she didn’t know the answer to his simple question. She just knows that’s a term the left calls men. She’s such a fake.

Фото профиля Aquavious 'Fred' Dump
Aquavious 'Fred' Dump2 лет назад

My grandfather had a desk made out of misogyny.

Фото профиля Dr. Jebra Faushay
Dr. Jebra Faushay2 лет назад

It was a very popular material back in the day.

Фото профиля Laurie Gehlert
Laurie Gehlert2 лет назад

Clearly she doesn’t actually know the meaning. She’s embarrassed not triggered.

Фото профиля Jousi
Jousi2 лет назад

Leftists may have killed comedy but they still give us plenty to laugh at. 😄

Фото профиля 🏴 KᗩᔕᕼᗰIᖇ 🏴
🏴 KᗩᔕᕼᗰIᖇ 🏴2 лет назад

She is crying because she cant define, nor articulate her beliefs or big words. She's embarrassed and trapped.

Фото профиля henrypillsbury
henrypillsbury2 лет назад

Knows to use a key word for defense but doesn’t really know what she is saying/meaning. Not uncommon at all today.

Фото профиля Anti-Ghetto Advocate
Anti-Ghetto Advocate2 лет назад

The weak link. Man imagine a man acting like that to get out of answering a question lol.

Похожие видео

Great balance of showing compassion while sharing truth as Wes Huff responds to the question of why a good God would allow evil: "Well, that is arguably the hardest and most pressing apologetic question there is, because ultimately, the very tidy philosophical and theological answer isn't the right answer sometimes. You know, sometimes the right answer to the wrong question is the wrong answer, because I've encountered situations where someone has brought up a variation of the problem of evil to me, and I've just felt uneasy about maybe the tenor that they're coming at with the question...and asking them, 'You know, that's a great question. Why are you asking that question in particular?' and finding out once again (like the previous question related to it), they're personally hurting. And so, in that sense, I could give a tidy answer about if you're positing that something is good, you're positing that there's an objective good and evil, and if there's an objective good and evil, then you're positing an objective law, and objective law needs an objective lawgiver. So where do we find the groundwork for an objective lawgiver to begin with? Otherwise, you may not like certain things, but to say they ought not to happen is actually an ethical leap to an objective reality that you may or may not have groundwork for. But if that person is struggling because a family member of theirs has cancer, then that particular, maybe tidy, tied-up-in-a-nice-bow answer is not going to speak to them whatsoever. And so that's why that's the hardest question because there are actually very good answers to it, but often it doesn't speak to the person in front of you, because questions have questioners that sit behind them. And one of the pitfalls of my chosen field of ministry apologetics is that sometimes we give answers where we talk at people rather than with people. And there's a danger to that because the Christian faith isn't just an intellectual assent, right? It's a personal relationship. And that should also be played out in the answers that we give..."

Melissa the Hopeful🏠Homemaker

116,060 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

ELON'S POV ON THE MEANING OF LIFE: "IT'S ABOUT THE QUESTION, NOT THE ANSWER" Elon is literally saying the entire purpose of human existence, and everything he's building, from Neuralink and Starship to Grok and Optimus, is aimed at one goal. What's the goal, you ask? To turn humanity into a massive superintelligence that can finally figure out the right questions to ask reality itself. "Humans are 30~40 trillion cells, trillions of synapses… but the why of it is just so we can increase our understanding of the universe. I came to the conclusion, Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy style, that the answer is 42, but the real problem is we don't even know what the question is. The hard part is the question, not the answer. And for that you need a much bigger computer than Earth. So by expanding the scope and scale of consciousness, we can better understand what questions to ask about the answer that is the universe." He's literally saying the entire purpose of human existence, and everything he's building (Neuralink, Starship, Grok, Optimus), is to turn humanity into a massive superintelligence that can finally figure out the right questions to ask reality itself. Not to get the answer. To learn how to ask the question that makes the answer meaningful. This is why he doesn't give a damn about money, politics, or fame anymore. He's playing the longest game in history: Turning consciousness into a galaxy-scale instrument so we can finally understand why anything exists at all. Source: Nikhil Kamath, Elon Musk

Mario Nawfal

825,528 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад