Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

It’s official. Cabinet has confirmed that they are knowingly delaying and denying the legal rights of persons with disabilities in Kenya. And if you listened LIVE, you heard the uproar that came from all senators. During the senate Assessment & Planning Retreat, I asked the CS for Health how...

CrystalAsige's profile picture

Crystal Asige

49,608 subscribers

12,919 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Today marks a a major milestone for the rights of people with disabilities in Ireland. Government has approved ratification of the Optional Protocol of the UN Convention on Rights of Persons with Disabilities. This means that if a person with a disability believes they are being denied their rights, they can take a case directly to the United Nations.
0:58

Today marks a a major milestone for the rights of people with disabilities in Ireland. Government has approved ratification of the Optional Protocol of the UN Convention on Rights of Persons with Disabilities. This means that if a person with a disability believes they are being denied their rights, they can take a case directly to the United Nations.

Roderic O’Gorman TD

50,832 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

My attention has been brought to a video circulating online of a person with disability being forcefully arrested during peaceful demonstrations in Nakuru. As a person living with disability, I am deeply disturbed by the manner in which the individual was mishandled. Peaceful protests are a constitutional right, and no Kenyan especially one living with disability should be subjected to such indignity and excessive force. I strongly condemn this act. The police are entrusted to protect citizens, not humiliate or harm them. We must uphold the dignity and rights of all people, especially the most vulnerable in our society.a #SiMimiNiSisi #PWDsMatter
1:19

My attention has been brought to a video circulating online of a person with disability being forcefully arrested during peaceful demonstrations in Nakuru. As a person living with disability, I am deeply disturbed by the manner in which the individual was mishandled. Peaceful protests are a constitutional right, and no Kenyan especially one living with disability should be subjected to such indignity and excessive force. I strongly condemn this act. The police are entrusted to protect citizens, not humiliate or harm them. We must uphold the dignity and rights of all people, especially the most vulnerable in our society.a #SiMimiNiSisi #PWDsMatter

Hon. Tim Wanyonyi

48,865 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

AOC: We are going to have to reckon, as a country, with this time. And I hope that that reckoning includes prosecution of people who are involved with the lawbreaking and human rights violations they are knowingly engaging in right now.
0:25

AOC: We are going to have to reckon, as a country, with this time. And I hope that that reckoning includes prosecution of people who are involved with the lawbreaking and human rights violations they are knowingly engaging in right now.

Acyn

22,191 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨 BREAKING: Rep. Brandon Gill just EVISCERATED the Senate for constantly excusing inaction with "safeguarding the institution" We're still waiting on the SAVE America Act. "The people want to know when they elect a senator, THEY'LL DO SOMETHING!" 🔥 "The argument that you'll hear from the Senate, will say that 'we are protecting the institution, that the Senate is different from the House and that it ought to operate differently, that we are the deliberative body and we deliberate legislation.'" "But the reality is they're not doing ANY of that. The Senate is not deliberating legislation!" "You don't see any real Senate debates on the Senate floor anymore!" "What you see is senators threatening to debate so that they have that 60 vote, you know, cloture threshold. So the impact is that the Senate can't actually do anything." "They're basically have very little democratic accountability because they have 6 year terms and they have very little, you know, they don't listen to the people because they have this 60 vote threshold that they can hide behind." "In effect, this call to protect the Senate as an institution is destroying the Senate as an institution." Congressman Brandon Gill
2:24

🚨 BREAKING: Rep. Brandon Gill just EVISCERATED the Senate for constantly excusing inaction with "safeguarding the institution" We're still waiting on the SAVE America Act. "The people want to know when they elect a senator, THEY'LL DO SOMETHING!" 🔥 "The argument that you'll hear from the Senate, will say that 'we are protecting the institution, that the Senate is different from the House and that it ought to operate differently, that we are the deliberative body and we deliberate legislation.'" "But the reality is they're not doing ANY of that. The Senate is not deliberating legislation!" "You don't see any real Senate debates on the Senate floor anymore!" "What you see is senators threatening to debate so that they have that 60 vote, you know, cloture threshold. So the impact is that the Senate can't actually do anything." "They're basically have very little democratic accountability because they have 6 year terms and they have very little, you know, they don't listen to the people because they have this 60 vote threshold that they can hide behind." "In effect, this call to protect the Senate as an institution is destroying the Senate as an institution." Congressman Brandon Gill

Eric Daugherty

45,315 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Since the start of the war, nearly 42,000 people in Gaza have sustained life-changing injuries *according to WHO estimates*. One in four of these injuries is in children, with Gaza being home to the largest cohort of child amputees in modern history. On the International Day of Persons with Disabilities, we share the story of Ala' Taleb, a woman with a hearing disability from Gaza—a reminder that inclusion matters and matters even more when the worst unfolds. UN Human Rights Palestine works to ensure the rights of persons with disabilities are met and prioritised. #IDPD2025 #Inclusion
1:52

Since the start of the war, nearly 42,000 people in Gaza have sustained life-changing injuries *according to WHO estimates*. One in four of these injuries is in children, with Gaza being home to the largest cohort of child amputees in modern history. On the International Day of Persons with Disabilities, we share the story of Ala' Taleb, a woman with a hearing disability from Gaza—a reminder that inclusion matters and matters even more when the worst unfolds. UN Human Rights Palestine works to ensure the rights of persons with disabilities are met and prioritised. #IDPD2025 #Inclusion

UN Human Rights Palestine

188,690 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

I asked the Government how it is ensuring UK law stays aligned with our human rights obligations under the ECHR, especially when it comes to equality and protections for trans people. Legal clarity is essential and we must ensure that rights are upheld for everyone.
1:11

I asked the Government how it is ensuring UK law stays aligned with our human rights obligations under the ECHR, especially when it comes to equality and protections for trans people. Legal clarity is essential and we must ensure that rights are upheld for everyone.

Zöe Franklin MP

75,285 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

“When you reach the 5 year mark or anything beyond that, why are you still staying in that relationship if you’re not thinking about what’s next?… if you guys are not aligned with what is supposed to happen in the future or what you guys want, why are you still in the relationship?” Me thinking back to this whole TSW promo era and how they kept on emphasising that they’re aligned with each other and how they know each other’s dreams and goals. Just hits harder na wow, it seems like they really are planning their future together na no?🥺🥹
0:30

“When you reach the 5 year mark or anything beyond that, why are you still staying in that relationship if you’re not thinking about what’s next?… if you guys are not aligned with what is supposed to happen in the future or what you guys want, why are you still in the relationship?” Me thinking back to this whole TSW promo era and how they kept on emphasising that they’re aligned with each other and how they know each other’s dreams and goals. Just hits harder na wow, it seems like they really are planning their future together na no?🥺🥹

ayin

56,369 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Speech in Oslo, Norway: I would like to send my message to the people in the back who are yelling “Intifada! Intifada!” Do you know that you are supporters of terrorism? Do you know that “intifada” means the bombing of innocent children and people? How dare you scream “Intifada” in Norway? A country based on equality, peace, and tolerance? This is not the 1930s anymore. The Jewish people have a state. They protect themselves — and they will continue to protect themselves. That is why they are angry. They don’t want the Jewish people to have self-determination, rights, peace, and love. They feed off fear, antisemitism, terrorism, and “intifada.” I come from Yemen, and the Houthis who are attacking Israel — their slogan starts with “Death to America.” Because this war is not about Israel. It’s about the destruction of Western civilization as we know it. The destruction of human rights, women’s rights, gay rights, and everything that the West has built and fought for, for centuries. How DARE you scream “intifada” in Norway? You are a shame. Not only to Oslo, but to the Middle East, and the human species as a whole. And finally, I’d like to say: AM YISRAEL CHAI.
1:59

Speech in Oslo, Norway: I would like to send my message to the people in the back who are yelling “Intifada! Intifada!” Do you know that you are supporters of terrorism? Do you know that “intifada” means the bombing of innocent children and people? How dare you scream “Intifada” in Norway? A country based on equality, peace, and tolerance? This is not the 1930s anymore. The Jewish people have a state. They protect themselves — and they will continue to protect themselves. That is why they are angry. They don’t want the Jewish people to have self-determination, rights, peace, and love. They feed off fear, antisemitism, terrorism, and “intifada.” I come from Yemen, and the Houthis who are attacking Israel — their slogan starts with “Death to America.” Because this war is not about Israel. It’s about the destruction of Western civilization as we know it. The destruction of human rights, women’s rights, gay rights, and everything that the West has built and fought for, for centuries. How DARE you scream “intifada” in Norway? You are a shame. Not only to Oslo, but to the Middle East, and the human species as a whole. And finally, I’d like to say: AM YISRAEL CHAI.

Luai Ahmed

235,203 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Crockett: It is not about equity. It is about making sure that we can have the likes of the people that have been elevated into Trump's administration, who we know are not qualified and skipping over qualified black men that yes, I may disagree with but we can all say that Byron Donalds as well as Tim Scott are more qualified than every single person that has been put into this cabinet. That is the type of life that they want us to have in this country is one in which even if you are mediocre, even if you are unqualified but you are white, that will be enough.
0:50

Crockett: It is not about equity. It is about making sure that we can have the likes of the people that have been elevated into Trump's administration, who we know are not qualified and skipping over qualified black men that yes, I may disagree with but we can all say that Byron Donalds as well as Tim Scott are more qualified than every single person that has been put into this cabinet. That is the type of life that they want us to have in this country is one in which even if you are mediocre, even if you are unqualified but you are white, that will be enough.

Acyn

149,438 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

In line with JKNC's Election Manifesto, the cabinet has decided to form a sub-committee consisting of 3 ministers. They have been given time to submit a report to ensure that no one's rights are taken away and that justice is served for all.
1:32

In line with JKNC's Election Manifesto, the cabinet has decided to form a sub-committee consisting of 3 ministers. They have been given time to submit a report to ensure that no one's rights are taken away and that justice is served for all.

JKNC

79,144 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

My principle object through the PWD Bill is to repeal the 20 year old Persons with Disabilities Act of 2003, have in place a law that is consistent with Article 54 of our Constitution and place emphasis on a human rights approach towards the realization of PWD rights in Kenya
1:27

My principle object through the PWD Bill is to repeal the 20 year old Persons with Disabilities Act of 2003, have in place a law that is consistent with Article 54 of our Constitution and place emphasis on a human rights approach towards the realization of PWD rights in Kenya

Crystal Asige

17,021 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

The Constitution of Ireland begins not with government, but with the Nation—with the People themselves. That is not symbolism. That is authority. It is from the People that all power flows, and it is by our collective will that we established the Constitution as the supreme law of this State. Within it, we gave ourselves courts—not as instruments of control, but as guardians of liberty. Under Article 34, we vested those courts with a solemn duty: to protect and vindicate our personal rights. Those personal rights are not abstract ideas. They are expressly recognised and protected across the Constitution—beginning in Article 40, and extending through Articles 41, 42, 42A, 43, and 44. Together, they safeguard what it means to live freely and with dignity in Ireland: our personal liberty, our families, our children, our right to educate according to conscience, our private property, and our freedom of religion. These rights do not exist at the pleasure of the State. They do not depend on policy, preference, or administrative convenience. They are fundamental, and they are inalienable. What we are witnessing at this moment is something profoundly serious. A member of the Government—holding office as a Minister of State, an office that exists only by statute—has purported, through a statutory instrument, to prevent the People of Ireland from exercising their constitutional rights in their own courts. That cannot stand. No statutory instrument can override the Constitution. No minister, junior or otherwise, can suspend fundamental rights. No act of secondary legislation can lawfully obstruct access to the courts where those rights are vindicated. To suggest otherwise is not merely mistaken—it is constitutionally impossible. The courts do not belong to the executive. They do not belong to departments. They belong to the People, because the Constitution says so. And so, this is where the line is drawn. The Constitution is not optional. Fundamental rights are not negotiable. Access to justice is not a privilege to be rationed. Tomorrow, the law will be laid plainly before the Minister for Justice—not in defiance, but in fidelity to the Constitution; not in anger, but in duty to the People; not for personal grievance, but for the protection of all. Because if fundamental rights can be restrained today, they can be extinguished tomorrow. And if we do not stand now, we leave our children standing alone later. This is not about power. It is about principle. It is about ensuring that the Constitution lives—not on paper, but in practice. And it is about the furtherance of our fundamental rights, so that we may protect ourselves, our families, our children, the way we educate our children, our private property, and our religion—today, and for generations to come. #NoFeeOnGuarantee
1:14

The Constitution of Ireland begins not with government, but with the Nation—with the People themselves. That is not symbolism. That is authority. It is from the People that all power flows, and it is by our collective will that we established the Constitution as the supreme law of this State. Within it, we gave ourselves courts—not as instruments of control, but as guardians of liberty. Under Article 34, we vested those courts with a solemn duty: to protect and vindicate our personal rights. Those personal rights are not abstract ideas. They are expressly recognised and protected across the Constitution—beginning in Article 40, and extending through Articles 41, 42, 42A, 43, and 44. Together, they safeguard what it means to live freely and with dignity in Ireland: our personal liberty, our families, our children, our right to educate according to conscience, our private property, and our freedom of religion. These rights do not exist at the pleasure of the State. They do not depend on policy, preference, or administrative convenience. They are fundamental, and they are inalienable. What we are witnessing at this moment is something profoundly serious. A member of the Government—holding office as a Minister of State, an office that exists only by statute—has purported, through a statutory instrument, to prevent the People of Ireland from exercising their constitutional rights in their own courts. That cannot stand. No statutory instrument can override the Constitution. No minister, junior or otherwise, can suspend fundamental rights. No act of secondary legislation can lawfully obstruct access to the courts where those rights are vindicated. To suggest otherwise is not merely mistaken—it is constitutionally impossible. The courts do not belong to the executive. They do not belong to departments. They belong to the People, because the Constitution says so. And so, this is where the line is drawn. The Constitution is not optional. Fundamental rights are not negotiable. Access to justice is not a privilege to be rationed. Tomorrow, the law will be laid plainly before the Minister for Justice—not in defiance, but in fidelity to the Constitution; not in anger, but in duty to the People; not for personal grievance, but for the protection of all. Because if fundamental rights can be restrained today, they can be extinguished tomorrow. And if we do not stand now, we leave our children standing alone later. This is not about power. It is about principle. It is about ensuring that the Constitution lives—not on paper, but in practice. And it is about the furtherance of our fundamental rights, so that we may protect ourselves, our families, our children, the way we educate our children, our private property, and our religion—today, and for generations to come. #NoFeeOnGuarantee

Patrick McGreal

11,354 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa: I said: “Mazloum, if you are fighting for the rights of the Kurdish people, you don't need to shed a single drop of blood because the rights of the Kurdish people are guaranteed. They will be guaranteed by the constitution. I believe in all the rights of the Kurds in Syria, and this is not a favor from any head of state. They are given this as a right and a duty, guaranteed by the constitution, and I am pushing with all my might in this direction so that their rights are protected, because they are part of Syrian society.”
0:33

Syrian President Ahmad al-Sharaa: I said: “Mazloum, if you are fighting for the rights of the Kurdish people, you don't need to shed a single drop of blood because the rights of the Kurdish people are guaranteed. They will be guaranteed by the constitution. I believe in all the rights of the Kurds in Syria, and this is not a favor from any head of state. They are given this as a right and a duty, guaranteed by the constitution, and I am pushing with all my might in this direction so that their rights are protected, because they are part of Syrian society.”

Clash Report

242,637 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

The brutality Afghan women endure under Taliban rule is not just a national crisis—it is a stain on the conscience of the world. Girls as young as ten are being stripped of education. Women are being beaten in the streets for the simple act of trying to live. Every day, their rights are crushed under the weight of a regime that sees their existence as a threat. And yet, the world watches. Silent. Indifferent. Complicit. Where are the voices that once claimed to defend freedom and human rights? Where is the outrage that should shake global institutions to their core? Afghan women are not statistics. They are our sisters, our daughters, our future—and they are being erased in real time. We must not look away. We must not normalize this. We must speak. Share. Act.
1:00

The brutality Afghan women endure under Taliban rule is not just a national crisis—it is a stain on the conscience of the world. Girls as young as ten are being stripped of education. Women are being beaten in the streets for the simple act of trying to live. Every day, their rights are crushed under the weight of a regime that sees their existence as a threat. And yet, the world watches. Silent. Indifferent. Complicit. Where are the voices that once claimed to defend freedom and human rights? Where is the outrage that should shake global institutions to their core? Afghan women are not statistics. They are our sisters, our daughters, our future—and they are being erased in real time. We must not look away. We must not normalize this. We must speak. Share. Act.

WDI.Afghanistan

110,052 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Khanna: We are the party that got the 40-hour workweek. We are the party that got overtime pay. We are the party that got Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid. We are the party that funded public schools. We are the party that fought for and got civil rights and voting rights. We are the party that passed the Immigration Reform Act of ’65 so my parents could come here. We are the party of FDR, JFK, and Barack Obama. And if the party is letting us down, it’s time to rebuild it and understand what this party has achieved for America.
0:44

Khanna: We are the party that got the 40-hour workweek. We are the party that got overtime pay. We are the party that got Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid. We are the party that funded public schools. We are the party that fought for and got civil rights and voting rights. We are the party that passed the Immigration Reform Act of ’65 so my parents could come here. We are the party of FDR, JFK, and Barack Obama. And if the party is letting us down, it’s time to rebuild it and understand what this party has achieved for America.

Acyn

364,662 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Late-stage welfare statism is claiming disability for acne and food intolerance. But that’s the incentive of the welfare state and that’s how you end up with some 25% of the population claiming disability. Of course people are going to game the system. It’s free money, and it’s other people’s money. So the government has zero incentive to spend less or spend it wisely. And the parasites have every incentive to grab as much as they can. This is what legal plunder produces. A society that disincentivizes production and incentivizes parasitism. One where claiming disability for fucking acne becomes a rational move.
0:30

Late-stage welfare statism is claiming disability for acne and food intolerance. But that’s the incentive of the welfare state and that’s how you end up with some 25% of the population claiming disability. Of course people are going to game the system. It’s free money, and it’s other people’s money. So the government has zero incentive to spend less or spend it wisely. And the parasites have every incentive to grab as much as they can. This is what legal plunder produces. A society that disincentivizes production and incentivizes parasitism. One where claiming disability for fucking acne becomes a rational move.

Rothmus 🏴

23,584 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Today in the Australian senate, Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺 asked the sitting minister for women Katy Gallagher, “What measures is the government taking to ensure women’s health, safety, privacy & basic rights are being protected from trans activism?” Senator Gallagher responded, in part, that no stakeholders have ever contacted her about any issues. Aside from the fact that we most certainly have, and I have the receipts to prove it, consider this the latest official contact: • What is the Australian government doing to ensure that women are a protected class of people that men cannot identify themselves into? • In your determination to “treat everyone equally”, how are you dealing with the inequality of allowing men who identify into women’s spaces at the expense of women who require women only spaces? • What part of “gender identity” as a protected characteristic in the Sex Discrimination Act states that men who claim to be women have more rights than actual women, which is what happens when their demands are met at the expense of women’s needs? • What part of the SDA says that “gender identity” means that men who claim to be women *are* women? (hint: it doesn’t) • Why does “gender identity” as a protected characteristic override sex based rights, despite the fact that there is absolutely no indication in domestic or international law that this was intended let alone acceptable? • When there is a “conflict of rights”, why is it that women are supposed to accept coming in second place to men who claim to be women? • Why do private citizens have to spend millions of dollars in legal fees to clear up what is obviously a muddling of legislation while legislators such as yourself pretend that there is no issue? • If there really is no issue, why don’t you let the Sex Discrimination Commissioner know that & allow female only spaces & sport? • Are you aware that the US fixed a big part of this issue politically and the UK unmuddled the law in the courts, while Australia - who had the opportunity to lead the way - continues to look like the upside down joke we’ve always been infamous for? • Finally, what is a woman? There. A stakeholder in this issue has addressed it with you. I await your response with breath that is baited.
0:28

Today in the Australian senate, Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺 asked the sitting minister for women Katy Gallagher, “What measures is the government taking to ensure women’s health, safety, privacy & basic rights are being protected from trans activism?” Senator Gallagher responded, in part, that no stakeholders have ever contacted her about any issues. Aside from the fact that we most certainly have, and I have the receipts to prove it, consider this the latest official contact: • What is the Australian government doing to ensure that women are a protected class of people that men cannot identify themselves into? • In your determination to “treat everyone equally”, how are you dealing with the inequality of allowing men who identify into women’s spaces at the expense of women who require women only spaces? • What part of “gender identity” as a protected characteristic in the Sex Discrimination Act states that men who claim to be women have more rights than actual women, which is what happens when their demands are met at the expense of women’s needs? • What part of the SDA says that “gender identity” means that men who claim to be women *are* women? (hint: it doesn’t) • Why does “gender identity” as a protected characteristic override sex based rights, despite the fact that there is absolutely no indication in domestic or international law that this was intended let alone acceptable? • When there is a “conflict of rights”, why is it that women are supposed to accept coming in second place to men who claim to be women? • Why do private citizens have to spend millions of dollars in legal fees to clear up what is obviously a muddling of legislation while legislators such as yourself pretend that there is no issue? • If there really is no issue, why don’t you let the Sex Discrimination Commissioner know that & allow female only spaces & sport? • Are you aware that the US fixed a big part of this issue politically and the UK unmuddled the law in the courts, while Australia - who had the opportunity to lead the way - continues to look like the upside down joke we’ve always been infamous for? • Finally, what is a woman? There. A stakeholder in this issue has addressed it with you. I await your response with breath that is baited.

Sall Grover

50,450 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr