Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

It's official. Carney has completely given up on forestry management and is using "wildfires" as a net-zero climate change agenda leverage tool "they're working towards is what they're calling the Kananaskis Wildfire Charter." "That will be a joint statement focused on the need to cooperate, the acknowledgement that things...

58,009 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

9 Kommentare

Profilbild von Corrupt Saint
Corrupt Saintvor 1 Jahr

Oh, bravo, Mark Carney, you absolute eco-visionary, you! Wielding the Kananaskis Wildfire Charter like it’s the Magna Carta of climate salvation, while Canada’s forests go up in flames faster than a hipster’s artisanal campfire. Forget managing our woodlands with pesky things like controlled burns or thinning—why bother when you can jet to the G7, clutch your pearls about “cross-border smoke,” and pitch “equipment interoperability” like you’re selling NFTs to Mother Nature? Truly, a masterclass in leveraging wildfires to polish that net-zero halo without lifting a finger to actually, you know, manage a forest. And isn’t it just poetic that Carney, fresh off his Brookfield Asset Management throne, can’t seem to find a forestry division in his old firm’s portfolio? No carbon credits for clearing deadwood, I suppose—too mundane for a guy who’d rather slap a “climate crisis” sticker on every smoldering tree stump. With 3.7 million hectares burned in 2025 alone—Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba practically auditioning for the next apocalypse flick—you’d think he’d prioritize actual firefighting tools. But no, we get a feel-good charter that’s about as useful as a paper towel in a furnace. Smoke doesn’t respect borders? Wow, Mark, tell us more about this groundbreaking fluid dynamics revelation.

Profilbild von Prairie Boy 🇨🇦 🇺🇸
Prairie Boy 🇨🇦 🇺🇸vor 1 Jahr

Wow. Perhaps the Kananaskis Charter will include an acknowledgement and recognition that most of the wildfires are started by humans. Oh, wait - my bad - that would be too logical.

Profilbild von Dee A
Dee Avor 1 Jahr

How about taking some of that 500B going to Ukraine and creating a fleet of water bombers?

Profilbild von Range ETFs
Range ETFsvor 1 Jahr

Even as energy shifts, coal remains a critical player in industries from steel production to power generation. $COAL ETF targets companies globally. Capture coal’s potential lasting value with this ETF.

Profilbild von Mor Bon
Mor Bonvor 1 Jahr

Well, that Green Party May woman cites that fire in the 21st century is different from fire in the 20th century. So something has to be done 🙄🙄🙄🙄

Profilbild von Allan Tr
Allan Trvor 1 Jahr

Climate Con Carney and the Arson's, singing their #1 Hit. Burnin down the house.

Profilbild von Sunwolf
Sunwolfvor 1 Jahr

Climate Change brings out the Arsonists.

Profilbild von Jennifer
Jennifervor 1 Jahr

Remember how cute it was when QC sent water bombers to LA & how patriotic the leftie — elbows up clowns felt as they spewed off about what a great neighbour Canada is? Where are these same Liberal azholes when it comes to insisting the Carney gov’t buy a fleet of water bombers?

Profilbild von canadian in ontario.
canadian in ontario.vor 1 Jahr

Are they planning to discuss arson?

Ähnliche Videos

CBC's latest wildfire propaganda hour is peak activist capture In last night's CBC The National segment, they trot out yet another voice from the Trudeau/Carney-funded Canadian Climate Institute — for the third time in as many days — to lecture us that nothing can be done. "Some of these fires are literally thousands of kilometers away from the nearest human settlement and road" Translation: "Stop asking us to manage forests, thin fuel loads, do prescribed burns, or clear debris. Just keep writing blank cheques for 'global climate finance' while Canadian communities choke on smoke and U.S. cities get blanketed" This is the same network that treats basic forestry as heresy and forest management as "colonial." Meanwhile, Donald Trump calls it willful negligence and says he'll tariff the pollution. Republican lawmakers are fed up. Even some Indigenous firekeepers are saying governments need to get out of the way and let traditional knowledge + active stewardship back in Canada has blown through roughly $8 billion in international climate commitments since 2015 — money that could have hardened forests, funded prevention, and protected livelihoods instead of flying first-class to COP conferences and subsidizing activist NGOs But no. CBC's solution is more grants for the same "experts" who treat every fire season as Exhibit A for net-zero virtue-signaling while real prevention gets defunded and dismissed This isn't journalism. It's state-funded climate activism dressed up as news, gaslighting Canadians while their air turns orange and their tax dollars fund everything except practical forest management Enough. Redirect the climate slush fund. Manage the damn forests. Fireproof communities first. The ideology can wait Brodie Fenlon

cbcwatcher

32,524 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

CBC’s coverage of the Canadian wildfire smoke choking US cities this week has been a textbook case of omission The network ran multiple interviews with climate activists framing the fires as unquestionable proof of climate change. Yet in the only segment even touching forest management — this piece highlighting complaints from Michigan Republican lawmakers — CBC quickly pivots to Carney government talking points about “global cooperation” and “climate change being a global problem,” while giving almost no airtime to practical forestry solutions Where is the discussion of: * Proactive clearing of pine beetle-killed timber? * Scaled-up controlled burns (including Indigenous-led practices)? * Regular removal of deadwood and underbrush? Where is the historical context on Canada’s steady decline in active forestry labour and management intensity since the late 1980s? Those are measurable policy and resource choices, not weather An average Canadian cannot let their roof rot for years, then blame “climate change” when it collapses in a storm. Yet when it comes to our publicly managed forests, CBC treats neglect of basic maintenance as off-limits for debate. Instead, the network allows activist guests to declare the cause “unquestionably climate change” with zero pushback or counter-analysis. Forest management is not a partisan issue — it is land stewardship Canadians cannot lecture Americans about transboundary pollution while neglecting basic land stewardship. In the 1970s and 1980s, Canadian politicians repeatedly scolded the US over acid rain drifting from Midwest coal plants, demanding action and treaties because it was damaging Canadian lakes and forests. They didn’t simply blame “global climate patterns” and move on — they insisted on accountability for preventable emissions and management failures on the American side and Americans followed through Responsible coverage would examine both long-term climate trends ANDthe on-the-ground failures in prevention and maintenance. CBC has chosen the former while burying the latter. That’s not journalism; it’s advocacy. Canadians and our American neighbours deserve better This all merits an Ombudman complaint Brodie Fenlon Maxime Bertrand

cbcwatcher

21,352 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat