Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

It’s remarkable how every royal journalist seems determined to write the same Harry-and-Charles reconciliation story on an endless loop. Every article is about healing, forgiveness, family reunions, olive branches, and restoring ties with the Royal Family. But where are the headlines about Thomas Markle? Meghan spent years telling the...

XOQueenEsther's profile picture

Queen Esther

21,071 subscribers

87,579 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

If Reconciliation Matters, Why Doesn’t It Apply to Thomas Markle? A pointed question for the so-called royal experts, commentators and journalists: Why does the endless conversation about “reconciliation” revolve almost exclusively around Prince Harry and the Royal Family, while Meghan Markle’s estrangement from her own father and much of her family is treated as a non-issue that barely deserves mention? If reconciliation is the noble, compassionate cause so many claim it is, why has there been virtually zero sustained pressure on Meghan to address the years of public pain from Thomas Markle? Thomas Markle has repeatedly and openly expressed his desire to see his daughter and grandchildren, even while battling serious health challenges. Yet his situation is simply ignored. Harry and Meghan have made grave accusations against the Royal Family: racism, failing to support Meghan’s mental health, briefing against them, leaking stories, failing to shield them from media scrutiny, and making them feel trapped. If those claims are as serious as they insist, why is reconciliation with that same institution relentlessly pushed as the moral imperative while any reconciliation with Meghan’s own father is barely acknowledged, let alone demanded? Why has Harry never been seriously pressed on his apparent lack of effort to build or repair a relationship with his father-in-law? Why is Thomas Markle’s perspective so completely written out of the story? It raises an uncomfortable question: Reconciliation only generates relentless headlines, speculation, sympathy, relevance and attention when it involves the Crown, global prestige, wealth and institutional power. Reconciliation with Thomas Markle offers none of those things so it is treated as disposable. Every few weeks we get another round of “Will Harry reconcile with the King? Will he return? Will the family heal?” Yet the equally legitimate questions about Meghan’s side of the family meet only silence. The Sussex-aligned commentators and journalists who keep recycling this one-sided reconciliation narrative owe the public some answers. Why is one fractured family endlessly expected to forgive and forget, while the other is never expected to confront or heal anything at all? The selective silence is not accidental. It reveals exactly which relationships are considered valuable and which ones are treated as disposable. A genuine reality check is long overdue. If reconciliation is truly about accountability, forgiveness and healing, the principle must apply equally to both sides. Otherwise, it isn’t a principle. It’s just selective PR.
2:12

If Reconciliation Matters, Why Doesn’t It Apply to Thomas Markle? A pointed question for the so-called royal experts, commentators and journalists: Why does the endless conversation about “reconciliation” revolve almost exclusively around Prince Harry and the Royal Family, while Meghan Markle’s estrangement from her own father and much of her family is treated as a non-issue that barely deserves mention? If reconciliation is the noble, compassionate cause so many claim it is, why has there been virtually zero sustained pressure on Meghan to address the years of public pain from Thomas Markle? Thomas Markle has repeatedly and openly expressed his desire to see his daughter and grandchildren, even while battling serious health challenges. Yet his situation is simply ignored. Harry and Meghan have made grave accusations against the Royal Family: racism, failing to support Meghan’s mental health, briefing against them, leaking stories, failing to shield them from media scrutiny, and making them feel trapped. If those claims are as serious as they insist, why is reconciliation with that same institution relentlessly pushed as the moral imperative while any reconciliation with Meghan’s own father is barely acknowledged, let alone demanded? Why has Harry never been seriously pressed on his apparent lack of effort to build or repair a relationship with his father-in-law? Why is Thomas Markle’s perspective so completely written out of the story? It raises an uncomfortable question: Reconciliation only generates relentless headlines, speculation, sympathy, relevance and attention when it involves the Crown, global prestige, wealth and institutional power. Reconciliation with Thomas Markle offers none of those things so it is treated as disposable. Every few weeks we get another round of “Will Harry reconcile with the King? Will he return? Will the family heal?” Yet the equally legitimate questions about Meghan’s side of the family meet only silence. The Sussex-aligned commentators and journalists who keep recycling this one-sided reconciliation narrative owe the public some answers. Why is one fractured family endlessly expected to forgive and forget, while the other is never expected to confront or heal anything at all? The selective silence is not accidental. It reveals exactly which relationships are considered valuable and which ones are treated as disposable. A genuine reality check is long overdue. If reconciliation is truly about accountability, forgiveness and healing, the principle must apply equally to both sides. Otherwise, it isn’t a principle. It’s just selective PR.

Queen Esther

36,509 просмотров • 26 дней назад

The Duke and Duchess of Shameless: Expecting a Royal Welcome After Years of Public Attacks The greatest irony is watching the people who applauded every attack on the Royal Family now demand that it embrace Harry and Meghan with open arms. For years, Harry and Meghan’s supporters applauded every interview, every documentary, every podcast, every accusation and every public grievance. They insisted the Royal Family was toxic, racist, abusive, uncaring and beyond redemption. They celebrated every bridge being burned, mocked every royal engagement and insisted Harry and Meghan were “finally free.” So what changed? If the institution was truly as cruel and irredeemable as they claimed, why is there now such desperation for a royal reunion? Why is the King suddenly expected to welcome back the very people who accused his family on the world stage? The irony is impossible to ignore. These are the same supporters who insisted Harry and Meghan didn’t need the monarchy, didn’t want the monarchy and were happier without it. They mocked those who said the couple would eventually seek a way back. Yet today, many of those same voices are demanding invitations, reconciliations and royal acceptance. If they truly believed everything Harry and Meghan alleged, shouldn’t they be encouraging them to stay as far away from the Royal Family as possible? And then there’s Harry & Meghan themselves. They built an entire brand on criticizing the Royal Family, publicly accusing relatives, exposing private conversations, commercialising family disputes and publishing deeply personal claims in a self-serving memoir. But every time there is declining public interest, disappointing business news or another setback, suddenly there are whispers of olive branches, private meetings or hopes of rebuilding relationships. You cannot repeatedly profit from family conflict while expecting that same family to pretend none of it happened. Trust is not restored because the headlines change. Respect is not something you demand after spending years undermining it. The loudest outrage now seems to come from people who cannot accept one simple reality: the Royal Family is under no obligation to restore the status Harry and Meghan willingly walked away from. Leaving was their choice. The interviews were their choice. The documentaries were their choice. The memoir was their choice. The endless public criticism was their choice. Actions have consequences. The King can love his son while still recognizing that trust has been repeatedly broken. Those two things are not mutually exclusive. Families can forgive without returning to the relationship exactly as it was. Boundaries are not cruelty. They are often the natural consequence of repeated breaches of trust. Yesterday the monarchy was supposedly irrelevant, outdated and oppressive. Today, Archie and Lili meeting their grandpa.🙄 If Harry and Meghan were truly happier outside royal life, there would be no need for constant speculation about returning, no expectation of public welcomes and no outrage over being kept at arm’s length. You cannot spend years insisting you wanted out, then spend years trying to get back in. And those demanding that the Royal Family simply forget everything that has happened are asking something they would never accept in their own lives. No family is expected to erase years of public accusations, broken confidence and repeated betrayals overnight simply because the people responsible now want reconciliation. The title that fits this entire saga isn’t Duke and Duchess of Sussex. It is Duke and Duchess of Shameless. Because after everything that has been said, written, filmed and monetized, expecting a triumphant return isn’t an act of reconciliation. It’s an extraordinary display of entitlement.
2:16

The Duke and Duchess of Shameless: Expecting a Royal Welcome After Years of Public Attacks The greatest irony is watching the people who applauded every attack on the Royal Family now demand that it embrace Harry and Meghan with open arms. For years, Harry and Meghan’s supporters applauded every interview, every documentary, every podcast, every accusation and every public grievance. They insisted the Royal Family was toxic, racist, abusive, uncaring and beyond redemption. They celebrated every bridge being burned, mocked every royal engagement and insisted Harry and Meghan were “finally free.” So what changed? If the institution was truly as cruel and irredeemable as they claimed, why is there now such desperation for a royal reunion? Why is the King suddenly expected to welcome back the very people who accused his family on the world stage? The irony is impossible to ignore. These are the same supporters who insisted Harry and Meghan didn’t need the monarchy, didn’t want the monarchy and were happier without it. They mocked those who said the couple would eventually seek a way back. Yet today, many of those same voices are demanding invitations, reconciliations and royal acceptance. If they truly believed everything Harry and Meghan alleged, shouldn’t they be encouraging them to stay as far away from the Royal Family as possible? And then there’s Harry & Meghan themselves. They built an entire brand on criticizing the Royal Family, publicly accusing relatives, exposing private conversations, commercialising family disputes and publishing deeply personal claims in a self-serving memoir. But every time there is declining public interest, disappointing business news or another setback, suddenly there are whispers of olive branches, private meetings or hopes of rebuilding relationships. You cannot repeatedly profit from family conflict while expecting that same family to pretend none of it happened. Trust is not restored because the headlines change. Respect is not something you demand after spending years undermining it. The loudest outrage now seems to come from people who cannot accept one simple reality: the Royal Family is under no obligation to restore the status Harry and Meghan willingly walked away from. Leaving was their choice. The interviews were their choice. The documentaries were their choice. The memoir was their choice. The endless public criticism was their choice. Actions have consequences. The King can love his son while still recognizing that trust has been repeatedly broken. Those two things are not mutually exclusive. Families can forgive without returning to the relationship exactly as it was. Boundaries are not cruelty. They are often the natural consequence of repeated breaches of trust. Yesterday the monarchy was supposedly irrelevant, outdated and oppressive. Today, Archie and Lili meeting their grandpa.🙄 If Harry and Meghan were truly happier outside royal life, there would be no need for constant speculation about returning, no expectation of public welcomes and no outrage over being kept at arm’s length. You cannot spend years insisting you wanted out, then spend years trying to get back in. And those demanding that the Royal Family simply forget everything that has happened are asking something they would never accept in their own lives. No family is expected to erase years of public accusations, broken confidence and repeated betrayals overnight simply because the people responsible now want reconciliation. The title that fits this entire saga isn’t Duke and Duchess of Sussex. It is Duke and Duchess of Shameless. Because after everything that has been said, written, filmed and monetized, expecting a triumphant return isn’t an act of reconciliation. It’s an extraordinary display of entitlement.

Queen Esther

44,216 просмотров • 23 дней назад

When Harry was asked what he would want to do if he were a regular person, without the duties he was born into - listen to his response. THIS is why Meghan gets blamed for so much: the life they’re living now is the polar opposite of what Harry wanted if he was no longer a working royal. HARRY gave up everything to live the life that Meghan wants. So calling their departure from the royal family “Megxit” is completely justified and appropriate.
1:07

When Harry was asked what he would want to do if he were a regular person, without the duties he was born into - listen to his response. THIS is why Meghan gets blamed for so much: the life they’re living now is the polar opposite of what Harry wanted if he was no longer a working royal. HARRY gave up everything to live the life that Meghan wants. So calling their departure from the royal family “Megxit” is completely justified and appropriate.

British Royaltea

390,498 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Meghan Markle: “I wasn’t just being thrown to the wolves. I was being fed to the wolves.” Also Meghan Markle: here’s our Oprah interview, here’s our Netflix documentary, here’s Harry’s memoir, here’s our podcasts, here’s our magazine interviews, and here’s another anonymous source briefing the media. Sorry, but do people really believe everything these two say? Even listening to their story in their own words, it comes across as an incredibly self-serving narrative. We’re supposed to believe a love story that began with Harry seeing Meghan on Instagram with a dog filter and asking, “Who is that?” I swear he himself doesn’t even believe what he is saying. Then we’re told they wanted to take things slowly, yet the relationship moved at breakneck speed. And then there’s Meghan talking about how she had her life, her path, her career until she met H. A career doing what exactly, Meghan Markle? The way she tells it, you’d think she was a global superstar at the height of her profession. The reality was a lot less dramatic. The constant rewriting of history is exhausting. And the complete lack of self-awareness. They spent years accusing the Royal Family of leaking and briefing the press while making a career out of telling their very self serving side of every private family disagreement. Even now, we’re getting stories weeks before Harry’s supposed UK trip about possibly bringing Archie and Lili, visiting Diana’s grave, and all sorts of personal family details. If privacy is so important, why is any of that being briefed to the media in the first place? Nobody has revealed more private family conversations, more family grievances, or more personal details than Harry and Meghan themselves. Yet somehow we’re still expected to believe they’re the victims of leaks and briefings. Harry and Meghan demand privacy while constantly managing a public narrative. Most people who want privacy simply live their lives. They don’t announce every grievance, every family dispute, every visit, every plan and every emotion through interviews, books, documentaries and briefings.
3:16

Meghan Markle: “I wasn’t just being thrown to the wolves. I was being fed to the wolves.” Also Meghan Markle: here’s our Oprah interview, here’s our Netflix documentary, here’s Harry’s memoir, here’s our podcasts, here’s our magazine interviews, and here’s another anonymous source briefing the media. Sorry, but do people really believe everything these two say? Even listening to their story in their own words, it comes across as an incredibly self-serving narrative. We’re supposed to believe a love story that began with Harry seeing Meghan on Instagram with a dog filter and asking, “Who is that?” I swear he himself doesn’t even believe what he is saying. Then we’re told they wanted to take things slowly, yet the relationship moved at breakneck speed. And then there’s Meghan talking about how she had her life, her path, her career until she met H. A career doing what exactly, Meghan Markle? The way she tells it, you’d think she was a global superstar at the height of her profession. The reality was a lot less dramatic. The constant rewriting of history is exhausting. And the complete lack of self-awareness. They spent years accusing the Royal Family of leaking and briefing the press while making a career out of telling their very self serving side of every private family disagreement. Even now, we’re getting stories weeks before Harry’s supposed UK trip about possibly bringing Archie and Lili, visiting Diana’s grave, and all sorts of personal family details. If privacy is so important, why is any of that being briefed to the media in the first place? Nobody has revealed more private family conversations, more family grievances, or more personal details than Harry and Meghan themselves. Yet somehow we’re still expected to believe they’re the victims of leaks and briefings. Harry and Meghan demand privacy while constantly managing a public narrative. Most people who want privacy simply live their lives. They don’t announce every grievance, every family dispute, every visit, every plan and every emotion through interviews, books, documentaries and briefings.

Queen Esther

114,634 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

According to Meghan Markle, the Royal Family was so unbelievably awful that she’s still crying about it years later. Yet when you actually look at the timeline, she was a working royal for roughly 18 months. That period included a multi million pound wedding, a lavish honeymoon, maternity leave, overseas tours and official engagements. It’s not as though she spent years trapped in a room with members of the family. Most interactions would have been brief, professional and tied to work or family gatherings. Yet somehow we’re expected to believe this was such a traumatic experience that it justified publicly trashing an entire family and leaving accusations of racism hanging over them for years. The more plausible explanation is that Meghan entered an institution where she wasn’t the centre of the universe. She couldn’t boss everyone around, couldn’t bulldoze centuries of protocol and couldn’t demand that every person in the room cater to her wishes. And that, apparently, became oppression. What amazes me is that, for some, the story is still treated as beyond question when the timeline and facts are publicly available for everyone to examine. The more details that emerge, the harder it becomes to reconcile Meghan’s version of events with the publicly documented timeline. The victim narrative becomes a lot harder to sell when viewed alongside the privileges and opportunities she received.
3:01

According to Meghan Markle, the Royal Family was so unbelievably awful that she’s still crying about it years later. Yet when you actually look at the timeline, she was a working royal for roughly 18 months. That period included a multi million pound wedding, a lavish honeymoon, maternity leave, overseas tours and official engagements. It’s not as though she spent years trapped in a room with members of the family. Most interactions would have been brief, professional and tied to work or family gatherings. Yet somehow we’re expected to believe this was such a traumatic experience that it justified publicly trashing an entire family and leaving accusations of racism hanging over them for years. The more plausible explanation is that Meghan entered an institution where she wasn’t the centre of the universe. She couldn’t boss everyone around, couldn’t bulldoze centuries of protocol and couldn’t demand that every person in the room cater to her wishes. And that, apparently, became oppression. What amazes me is that, for some, the story is still treated as beyond question when the timeline and facts are publicly available for everyone to examine. The more details that emerge, the harder it becomes to reconcile Meghan’s version of events with the publicly documented timeline. The victim narrative becomes a lot harder to sell when viewed alongside the privileges and opportunities she received.

Queen Esther

139,810 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

PLEASE WATCH THIS CLIP FOR INSIGHT ON THE ROYAL FAMILY’S SOPHISTICATED DISCREET INSTITUTIONAL ABUSE & UNFAIRNESS!!!! I also encourage you to rewatch the whole Oprah interview with Prince Harry and Meghan. There’s so much that is forgotten and so much that makes so much more sense now. ♦️Although this section of the interview exposed and therefore probably scuppered the Royal Family’s plan to change the convention so as to not have the Sussex’s children be titled Prince/Princesses when Charles their grandfather ascended to the throne after all, Meghan gives a vivid picture of what she and Harry faced behind palace doors that royal reporters have tried to distract us from by pretending they lied or focusing on the racism stuff. ♦️It shows how the Royal Family uses character assassination campaigns by their media pals, threats to deny titles and therefore security in order to dehumanise the un-favoured members of the family behind the scenes whilst still using them to promote the monarchy. ♦️Of course Harry and Meghan would not want to hard launch Archie’s life as if he would be a public high profile royal by parading him to the public at birth outside the hospital if behind the scenes the discussion by the family was to delegitimise him, ensure he gets no security and possibly subject him to the character assassination H&M realised the Royal family were allowing to happen against them, meaning that if this happened to Archie he would be more vulnerable without security. They let Meghan (and Harry)be criticised to high heaven for treating & protecting Archie from a public glare that should not come without security and was reasonable if he was not to be a titled royal. ♦️It’s also highly manipulative that in laying the groundwork, royal reporters told us that Harry and Meghan did not want their children to be titled, and they silenced them from correcting that so that if they did indeed change the convention and Archie was not titled, the public would be led to believe it was H&M that wanted this and not the royal family/the firm. The institution would feign innocence. ♦️It’s only since leaving that Harry and Meghan have been able to say their truth against strong calls from royal family proxies for them to be ‘private’ =be silent =hide the institutional abuse which would eventually be directed at Archie and Lilibet.
6:24

PLEASE WATCH THIS CLIP FOR INSIGHT ON THE ROYAL FAMILY’S SOPHISTICATED DISCREET INSTITUTIONAL ABUSE & UNFAIRNESS!!!! I also encourage you to rewatch the whole Oprah interview with Prince Harry and Meghan. There’s so much that is forgotten and so much that makes so much more sense now. ♦️Although this section of the interview exposed and therefore probably scuppered the Royal Family’s plan to change the convention so as to not have the Sussex’s children be titled Prince/Princesses when Charles their grandfather ascended to the throne after all, Meghan gives a vivid picture of what she and Harry faced behind palace doors that royal reporters have tried to distract us from by pretending they lied or focusing on the racism stuff. ♦️It shows how the Royal Family uses character assassination campaigns by their media pals, threats to deny titles and therefore security in order to dehumanise the un-favoured members of the family behind the scenes whilst still using them to promote the monarchy. ♦️Of course Harry and Meghan would not want to hard launch Archie’s life as if he would be a public high profile royal by parading him to the public at birth outside the hospital if behind the scenes the discussion by the family was to delegitimise him, ensure he gets no security and possibly subject him to the character assassination H&M realised the Royal family were allowing to happen against them, meaning that if this happened to Archie he would be more vulnerable without security. They let Meghan (and Harry)be criticised to high heaven for treating & protecting Archie from a public glare that should not come without security and was reasonable if he was not to be a titled royal. ♦️It’s also highly manipulative that in laying the groundwork, royal reporters told us that Harry and Meghan did not want their children to be titled, and they silenced them from correcting that so that if they did indeed change the convention and Archie was not titled, the public would be led to believe it was H&M that wanted this and not the royal family/the firm. The institution would feign innocence. ♦️It’s only since leaving that Harry and Meghan have been able to say their truth against strong calls from royal family proxies for them to be ‘private’ =be silent =hide the institutional abuse which would eventually be directed at Archie and Lilibet.

Glow Lee

10,976 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Remember when Meghan claimed she didn’t know much about Harry in her BBC interview, then told Oprah she never looked him up online, only to later admit she’d searched his Instagram feed? She intentionally misleads, then backtracks and says everyone else misunderstood - while she was being deceiving from the start. The exact same thing is happening with the “Meghan & kids joining Harry in the UK this summer” story. Watch the pattern: “The family WILL come” to “They MIGHT come.” “Security situation has changed” to “No change.” And on and on. This is the typical Meghan playbook. Stop falling for her games.
0:42

Remember when Meghan claimed she didn’t know much about Harry in her BBC interview, then told Oprah she never looked him up online, only to later admit she’d searched his Instagram feed? She intentionally misleads, then backtracks and says everyone else misunderstood - while she was being deceiving from the start. The exact same thing is happening with the “Meghan & kids joining Harry in the UK this summer” story. Watch the pattern: “The family WILL come” to “They MIGHT come.” “Security situation has changed” to “No change.” And on and on. This is the typical Meghan playbook. Stop falling for her games.

British Royaltea

56,926 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

“The royal family needs Prince Harry, Harry doesn’t really need the royal family.” Nina Obviously the right wing twat spouts delusion that Harry misses the U.K., regrets leaving, Meghan gave him a wrist burn to do it and that he left for ‘ridiculous’ reasons. That does fascinate me. If Harry’s reasons for leaving as a working royal why do these twats get so angry about his interviews and memoir and say they were damaging to the monarchy? 🤔 Ridiculous reasons are damaging? I think it’s time to do a list of these reasons and see just how ridiculous they are.
0:42

“The royal family needs Prince Harry, Harry doesn’t really need the royal family.” Nina Obviously the right wing twat spouts delusion that Harry misses the U.K., regrets leaving, Meghan gave him a wrist burn to do it and that he left for ‘ridiculous’ reasons. That does fascinate me. If Harry’s reasons for leaving as a working royal why do these twats get so angry about his interviews and memoir and say they were damaging to the monarchy? 🤔 Ridiculous reasons are damaging? I think it’s time to do a list of these reasons and see just how ridiculous they are.

Glow Lee

24,919 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

THE INHERENT CRUELTY OF THE MONARCHY!! “They (Prince Harry and Meghan) are enormously appealing to the public….and are very good at it. What a pity it is they’ve gone….I think they (the Royal Family) needed Harry and Meghan” The same reporters that recognised that Harry and Meghan were the jewel in the crown for the Royal Family are the same ones that cyber bullied them daily for shit, giggles and clicks making it seem like they were God awful while having this green light by the family to do this. A family that also recognised Harry and Meghan were doing good things for the monarchy but targeted them out of jealousy. There is something fundamentally cruel about the monarchy that expect spares and royal wives to suffer. But its arrogance is that they don’t expect their victims to be able to escape, and when they try, just like King Charles did, they blackmail them with more cruelty - taking away security, evicting them from secure homes gifted to them- ramping up the media abuse from their reporters. The monarchy is a hierarchical system built not on service but ego, cruelty and pain. Thanks for the vid Carmella #TinaBrown #CruelMonarchy #RoyalFamilyIsACult
0:45

THE INHERENT CRUELTY OF THE MONARCHY!! “They (Prince Harry and Meghan) are enormously appealing to the public….and are very good at it. What a pity it is they’ve gone….I think they (the Royal Family) needed Harry and Meghan” The same reporters that recognised that Harry and Meghan were the jewel in the crown for the Royal Family are the same ones that cyber bullied them daily for shit, giggles and clicks making it seem like they were God awful while having this green light by the family to do this. A family that also recognised Harry and Meghan were doing good things for the monarchy but targeted them out of jealousy. There is something fundamentally cruel about the monarchy that expect spares and royal wives to suffer. But its arrogance is that they don’t expect their victims to be able to escape, and when they try, just like King Charles did, they blackmail them with more cruelty - taking away security, evicting them from secure homes gifted to them- ramping up the media abuse from their reporters. The monarchy is a hierarchical system built not on service but ego, cruelty and pain. Thanks for the vid Carmella #TinaBrown #CruelMonarchy #RoyalFamilyIsACult

Glow Lee

25,183 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

BBC NEWS speak to media Katie Razzall editor who seems a bit of a royalist as her focus at the end is how awkward it is for Prince Harry to be suing a newspaper that the Royal Family work with. Why do royalists expect a person not to pursue justice against an abuser (The Daily Fail) because their abusive family who has worked with that abuser against them is still collaborating with that abuser and it might get in the way of a reconciliation? A reconciliation with an abusive family that is still dealing with the abuser that helped break up their relationship is unlikely to be genuine or lasting anyway. At this point Harry needs to prioritise justice over his everlasting toxic family.
1:42

BBC NEWS speak to media Katie Razzall editor who seems a bit of a royalist as her focus at the end is how awkward it is for Prince Harry to be suing a newspaper that the Royal Family work with. Why do royalists expect a person not to pursue justice against an abuser (The Daily Fail) because their abusive family who has worked with that abuser against them is still collaborating with that abuser and it might get in the way of a reconciliation? A reconciliation with an abusive family that is still dealing with the abuser that helped break up their relationship is unlikely to be genuine or lasting anyway. At this point Harry needs to prioritise justice over his everlasting toxic family.

Glow Lee

20,532 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

I love this story♥️ On the latest New Heights podcast, Jason Kelce recalled meeting Prince William, Prince George and Princess Charlotte backstage at Taylor Swift’s Eras Tour. Before walking over, he froze because he was holding a beer and genuinely worried it might be disrespectful to meet the Prince of Wales with a drink in his hand. Taylor Swift even laughed about watching him debate whether he should put it down because he wanted to show proper respect and follow the etiquette. Think about that. A man meeting the Royal Family for the first time cared enough to worry about something as small as whether he should be holding a beer. Then there’s Meghan Markle.🙄 She married into the Royal Family, claimed she knew nothing about them, mocked the curtsy as if it was some ridiculous “medieval” tradition, and has spent years profiting from the very royal title that exists because of that centuries-old institution. A complete stranger showed more curiosity & respect for royal etiquette than someone who willingly became a member of the family. You don’t hate Meghan Markle enough.
0:47

I love this story♥️ On the latest New Heights podcast, Jason Kelce recalled meeting Prince William, Prince George and Princess Charlotte backstage at Taylor Swift’s Eras Tour. Before walking over, he froze because he was holding a beer and genuinely worried it might be disrespectful to meet the Prince of Wales with a drink in his hand. Taylor Swift even laughed about watching him debate whether he should put it down because he wanted to show proper respect and follow the etiquette. Think about that. A man meeting the Royal Family for the first time cared enough to worry about something as small as whether he should be holding a beer. Then there’s Meghan Markle.🙄 She married into the Royal Family, claimed she knew nothing about them, mocked the curtsy as if it was some ridiculous “medieval” tradition, and has spent years profiting from the very royal title that exists because of that centuries-old institution. A complete stranger showed more curiosity & respect for royal etiquette than someone who willingly became a member of the family. You don’t hate Meghan Markle enough.

Queen Esther

371,874 просмотров • 29 дней назад

GREAT CALL FROM TONY!!!! On Prince Harry and Meghan’s Netflix. “WE ARE BEING MANIPULATED BY THE MEDIA TO HATE (PRINCE) HARRY AND MEGHAN.” This caller said ♦️The media dangerously manipulated the public to hate Diana like they’re trying to do with the Sussexes. ♦️H&M have a bigger audience than the media and the royal want us to think. ♦️He calls out Channel 5 for its royal documentaries against Harry and Meghan and but so Pro Royal family. ♦️He suspects the Royal family have done a deal with Channel 5 for Pro royal coverage and anti Sussex coverage. Well done to Marvyn Harrison for pointing out that Prince Harry can monetise his own story. Why is Dawn Neesom okay with media and royal reporters monetising Harry’s story as their whole career and having the royal family/ palace brief private matters about Harry to them? Typical media and royalist gaslighting!
4:27

GREAT CALL FROM TONY!!!! On Prince Harry and Meghan’s Netflix. “WE ARE BEING MANIPULATED BY THE MEDIA TO HATE (PRINCE) HARRY AND MEGHAN.” This caller said ♦️The media dangerously manipulated the public to hate Diana like they’re trying to do with the Sussexes. ♦️H&M have a bigger audience than the media and the royal want us to think. ♦️He calls out Channel 5 for its royal documentaries against Harry and Meghan and but so Pro Royal family. ♦️He suspects the Royal family have done a deal with Channel 5 for Pro royal coverage and anti Sussex coverage. Well done to Marvyn Harrison for pointing out that Prince Harry can monetise his own story. Why is Dawn Neesom okay with media and royal reporters monetising Harry’s story as their whole career and having the royal family/ palace brief private matters about Harry to them? Typical media and royalist gaslighting!

Glow Lee

45,854 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

The Grifting Traitors: Prince Harry & Meghan Markle. Let that sink in. These two treacherous parasites tried their best to tear the Royal Family down and now they’re desperate to crawl back in. Meghan Markle, the woman who spent years publicly trashing and accusing them of racism and every evil under the sun, is now using her own children to slither back after all her big plans blew up and Harry’s staring down millions in legal fees. What a pathetic turnaround. What’s even funnier is the fans rushing in with, “We support whatever Meghan decides.” Of course you do. The Royal Family has been doing just fine without them, and if there’s ever a meeting, it’ll be on the King’s terms, not theirs. After everything they said and did, the sheer audacity to show their faces again is staggering. You have to be truly desperate to come begging for crumbs from the same family you spent years attacking. The desperation is pitiful. This is the woman who walked away like she was better than all of them, and now here she is on her knees again. How humiliating. Harry and Meghan are nothing but leeches and grifters, rotten to the core, spreading their poison everywhere they go even managing to stain Charles in the process. And if Charles had one message, I hope it was this: If you’re so desperate for a life away from the monarchy, stop cashing in on the titles you claim you wanted to escape.
2:47

The Grifting Traitors: Prince Harry & Meghan Markle. Let that sink in. These two treacherous parasites tried their best to tear the Royal Family down and now they’re desperate to crawl back in. Meghan Markle, the woman who spent years publicly trashing and accusing them of racism and every evil under the sun, is now using her own children to slither back after all her big plans blew up and Harry’s staring down millions in legal fees. What a pathetic turnaround. What’s even funnier is the fans rushing in with, “We support whatever Meghan decides.” Of course you do. The Royal Family has been doing just fine without them, and if there’s ever a meeting, it’ll be on the King’s terms, not theirs. After everything they said and did, the sheer audacity to show their faces again is staggering. You have to be truly desperate to come begging for crumbs from the same family you spent years attacking. The desperation is pitiful. This is the woman who walked away like she was better than all of them, and now here she is on her knees again. How humiliating. Harry and Meghan are nothing but leeches and grifters, rotten to the core, spreading their poison everywhere they go even managing to stain Charles in the process. And if Charles had one message, I hope it was this: If you’re so desperate for a life away from the monarchy, stop cashing in on the titles you claim you wanted to escape.

Queen Esther

55,852 просмотров • 21 дней назад

Prince Harry & Invictus: Before Meghan Markle vs. After Meghan Markle Watch the video clip and see the difference. Prince Harry was supposed to be in the UK for Invictus. For the veterans. For the cause. Instead, what have the headlines been? Prince Harry’s security. Meghan coming to the UK for the first time since the Queen’s funeral. The children supposedly visiting Diana’s grave. A possible meeting with King Charles. Family reconciliation. Then, a day later, it’s that Harry may have to rethink everything because he didn’t get the level of security he wanted. Then it’s that Harry is being targeted by terrorists, according to his own private security team. Now we’re back to Meghan and the children staying in California. Maybe tomorrow we’ll get another headline about how they won’t let threats deter them, how they’re bravely putting duty first, how deeply committed they are to the cause, and how, despite everything, they may come to the UK after all. The usual self-congratulatory PR praising their courage and sacrifice. Yet through all of this, where is Invictus? Where are the veterans Harry is supposed to be representing? The event has been overshadowed by an endless cycle of Sussex drama. It’s disappointing that Invictus continues to let Harry and Meghan’s endless PR narratives overshadow the very people the Games were created to support. The focus should always be on the competitors and the veterans - not on an endless cycle of Sussex drama. If I were a sponsor, I’d question whether my donation would have a greater impact with a charity that focuses on the people it’s meant to serve, rather than funding an organisation that’s repeatedly distracted by Sussex-related headlines.
0:51

Prince Harry & Invictus: Before Meghan Markle vs. After Meghan Markle Watch the video clip and see the difference. Prince Harry was supposed to be in the UK for Invictus. For the veterans. For the cause. Instead, what have the headlines been? Prince Harry’s security. Meghan coming to the UK for the first time since the Queen’s funeral. The children supposedly visiting Diana’s grave. A possible meeting with King Charles. Family reconciliation. Then, a day later, it’s that Harry may have to rethink everything because he didn’t get the level of security he wanted. Then it’s that Harry is being targeted by terrorists, according to his own private security team. Now we’re back to Meghan and the children staying in California. Maybe tomorrow we’ll get another headline about how they won’t let threats deter them, how they’re bravely putting duty first, how deeply committed they are to the cause, and how, despite everything, they may come to the UK after all. The usual self-congratulatory PR praising their courage and sacrifice. Yet through all of this, where is Invictus? Where are the veterans Harry is supposed to be representing? The event has been overshadowed by an endless cycle of Sussex drama. It’s disappointing that Invictus continues to let Harry and Meghan’s endless PR narratives overshadow the very people the Games were created to support. The focus should always be on the competitors and the veterans - not on an endless cycle of Sussex drama. If I were a sponsor, I’d question whether my donation would have a greater impact with a charity that focuses on the people it’s meant to serve, rather than funding an organisation that’s repeatedly distracted by Sussex-related headlines.

Queen Esther

69,814 просмотров • 29 дней назад

EVEN MEGHAN KNEW SECURITY WAS DECIDED BY THE FAMILY. “I even wrote letters to his family saying please….please keep my husband safe……please don’t pull his security and announce to the world when he and we are most vulnerable.” Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex Royal reporters have helped King Charles the Cruel hide behind RAVEC as being the one to deny Harry security when he influenced and had final say all along. Meghan is a smart woman. If RAVEC or the government had the power over security she would have written to them. She wrote to the family member she knew who could keep his son protected if he wanted. But he didn’t want to. Bear in mind that meant he did not want Archie protected either! #KingCharlesTheCruel
0:41

EVEN MEGHAN KNEW SECURITY WAS DECIDED BY THE FAMILY. “I even wrote letters to his family saying please….please keep my husband safe……please don’t pull his security and announce to the world when he and we are most vulnerable.” Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex Royal reporters have helped King Charles the Cruel hide behind RAVEC as being the one to deny Harry security when he influenced and had final say all along. Meghan is a smart woman. If RAVEC or the government had the power over security she would have written to them. She wrote to the family member she knew who could keep his son protected if he wanted. But he didn’t want to. Bear in mind that meant he did not want Archie protected either! #KingCharlesTheCruel

Glow Lee

35,535 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Abusive individuals/institutions always want their victims silent so their abuse is not exposed and can continue in peace. The deranger commentator in this clip 👇wants the royal family abuse covered up and suggests bad dad Charles should silence Harry with an NDA so in future he could then suffer on silence. Meanwhile the editor of The Mirror newspaper gave evidence in 2023 that stories about Harry came from the family. How about an injunction to stop the royal family briefing against the Sussexes?
1:12

Abusive individuals/institutions always want their victims silent so their abuse is not exposed and can continue in peace. The deranger commentator in this clip 👇wants the royal family abuse covered up and suggests bad dad Charles should silence Harry with an NDA so in future he could then suffer on silence. Meanwhile the editor of The Mirror newspaper gave evidence in 2023 that stories about Harry came from the family. How about an injunction to stop the royal family briefing against the Sussexes?

Glow Lee

25,320 просмотров • 1 год назад