Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

It's the little things sometimes. FDC transactions are NATIVE to this explorer. It knows you're reaching out to another chain and will put relevant information right in front of you. FDC requests have information such as minimum confirmations on a tx hash that is being proven; within the FDC...

14,280 просмотров • 12 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 7

Фото профиля Nick LoBue 🇺🇸
Nick LoBue 🇺🇸12 дней назад

this is very useful

Фото профиля Tim Rowley 🔥
Tim Rowley 🔥12 дней назад

Tryna fill in all the little gaps to make its a good experience for regular users AND devs.

Фото профиля Nick LoBue 🇺🇸
Nick LoBue 🇺🇸12 дней назад

great work, definitely moving the needle

Фото профиля Ciccio_Flr☀️🇮🇹
Ciccio_Flr☀️🇮🇹2 дней назад

🔝🔝🔝🔝

Фото профиля Kashib
Kashib2 дней назад

That’s really nice and useful! Thanks Tim! Going to add it to my todo list)))

Фото профиля ☀️ Mike ☀️
☀️ Mike ☀️2 дней назад

We need more like you! Keep up the great work👏

Фото профиля CryptoLynx.FLR☀️
CryptoLynx.FLR☀️2 дней назад

Thank you

Похожие видео

I am a physicist and I'm profoundly opposed to any idea of non-physical explanations that contradict physics. So that's a no-no and really doesn't make sense. However, there are ways in which both emergent properties such as minds and life and so on have an effect. And as you said, also abstractions. Now the fact that the theory of good explanations led to the idea that abstractions are real things was slightly surprising to me. I wasn't expecting the link, at least wasn't expecting it to be so strong as it is. But the thing is, if you think about how to explain events, physical events like a footprint on the moon, how do you explain how that happened? Well, it happened because of human ideas, of science. And human ideas, you could say in this reductionist sense that as you rightly say is the prevailing mode of explanation and the prevailing idea is to look down on other modes of explanation, that those ideas are nothing more than configurations of atoms. So some physicists, some rocket scientists put their brain into certain configurations of atoms and those atoms then acted on other atoms which then ended up making a footprint on the moon. Now what that misses is the explanation of why certain configurations of atoms put footprints on the moon while others, the overwhelming majority of configurations that human brains, even human brains have been put into in history, do not have that effect. And it's because there's a certain type of information. And this information can't in my view be reduced to statements about atoms because if you think about what that information does, it is in brains but the same information then gets transferred into, let's say, sound waves in air and then it gets transferred into ink on paper and then it gets transferred into magnetic domains inside a computer which then control a machine that instantiates those ideas in bits of steel and silicon and so on and so on. There's an immense chain of instantiations of the same information. And it's only special kinds of information that have this property that they are preserved and instantiated in successive physical modes. So what is being transmitted, what is having the causal effect is not the atoms but the fact that the atoms instantiate certain kinds of information and not other kinds. So therefore it is the information that is having the causal effect. If a particular instantiation of that information were damaged, then processes would come along to fix it, whether or not they could fix the physical instantiation. For example, if the computer goes wrong, then we don't use the corrupted information. We go back and rescue the information from a different computer and we throw away the atoms that at one point instantiated it. So the information causes itself to remain in existence. Now I think there's no way out of that mode of explanation. And if explanation is going to be the fundamental thing about our criterion, for example, about what is or isn't real, then we have to say that information and this particular kind which we call knowledge is real and really does cause things. David Deutsch

Deutsch Explains

45,735 просмотров • 2 лет назад